Study to Conduct Prescription Audit as per Objective Elements of NABH in Medical and Surgical Wards of a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital
Abstract
Background: Prescriptions play a crucial role in modern healthcare, serving as a fundamental tool for physicians to communicate treatment plans and medication recommendations to patients. Writing prescriptions must comply with good practice guidelines, which can be developed through training. The aim of this study was to evaluate adherence to NABH norms on prescription writing of doctors and perform a prescription audit based on objective elements of NABH.
Methods: A prospective observational study was carried out in the Medical and Surgery Wards of a tertiary care teaching hospital for 3 months with 300 samples. A checklist aligned with NABH objective elements was used for data collection. Compliance percentages for each element were calculated using MS-Excel, and statistical analysis was performed using SPSS.
Results: For the prescription audit, 300 samples were evaluated. 22% lacked patient ID numbers, 89% missed bed numbers, and 95% omitted patient weight. 100% of prescriptions contained at least one drug not written in its generic name. Errors were found in strength (9%), route (20%), and dose frequency (4%). Allergy information was absent in 65%, while 32% lacked a diet plan. Potential drug-drug interactions were identified in 26%.
Conclusion: In relation to doctors’ prescribing patterns, several errors were identified after data analysis. These findings highlight the necessity of educating prescribing doctors to write rational prescriptions and adhering to NABH standards to improve patient care and hospital quality.
Keywords: Accreditation, Compliance, NABH, Prescription audit, Quality, Tertiary care teaching hospital.
Keywords:
Accreditation, Compliance, NABH, Prescription audit, Tertiary care teaching hospitalDOI
https://doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v15i4.7064References
1. Sarkar PK. A rational drug policy. Indian J Med Ethics 2004; 1:11 2 https://doi.org/10.20529/IJME.2004.004
2. Panayappan L, Jose JM, Joseph JG, Jayapal K, Saju S, KrishnaKumar K. Prescription audit and prescribing indicators: A review. J Bio Innov 2017; 6:542-7
3. National Accreditation Board for Hospitals and Healthcare Organisations; Guidebook to NABH Accreditation Standards for Hospitals 2020 https://nabh.co/#gsc.tab=0
4. Lesar TS, Briceland L, Stein DS. Factors related to errors in medication prescribing. JAMA. 1997; 277:312-7 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1997.03540280050033 PMid:9002494
5. Mortazavi SA, Hajebi G. An investigation on the nature and extent of occurrence of errors of commission in hospital prescriptions. Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2010:83-7
6. Whittaker CF, Miklich MA, Patel RS, Fink JC. Medication Safety Principles and Practice in CKD. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018 Nov 07;13(11):1738-1746 https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.00580118 PMid:29915131 PMCid:PMC6237057
7. Wittich CM, Burkle CM, Lanier WL. Medication errors: an overview for clinicians. Mayo Clin Proc. 2014 Aug;89(8):1116-25 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.05.007 PMid:24981217
8. Roy, V., & Rana, P. (2018). Prescribing generics: All in a name. The Indian journal of medical research, 147(5), 442-444. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1940_17 PMid:30082567 PMCid:PMC6094511
9. Lyons, R., Payne, C., McCabe, M., & Fielder, C. (1998). Legibility of doctors' handwriting: quantitative comparative study. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 317(7162), 863-864. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.317.7162.863 PMid:9748186 PMCid:PMC31098
10. Medscape https://reference.medscape.com/drug-interactionchecker
Published
Abstract Display: 362 
PDF Downloads: 330 PDF Downloads: 2 How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2025 Lalremruati Ralte, D. C. Saxena , Pankaj Kumar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
.