Comparison of the clinical implications of stellate ganglion block versus interlaminar cervical epidural deposition of steroid and local anesthetic in the treatment of unilateral cervical radicular pain

Authors

Abstract

Objective: To demonstrate through electronic chart review that the same analgesic efficacy reported in patients with unilateral cervical radicular pain undergoing ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion block versus fluoroscopy-guided epidural depot can be obtained.

Material And Methods: Observational, descriptive, cross-sectional and retrospective study, carried out from March 1, 2020 to August 31, 2024, through the medical records of patients who met the inclusion criteria.

For the descriptive analysis, frequencies and percentages were used for qualitative variables and for quantitative variables, measures of central tendency and dispersion. The inferential analysis was carried out with the Wilcoxon test.

Results: 10 patients were divided into two groups, the first group consisting of three patients undergoing stellate ganglion block and the second with 7 individuals undergoing cervical epidural steroid deposition, who met the inclusion criteria and showed improvement in pain control with lower use of daily oral morphine doses and a high satisfaction scale.

Conclusions: There was a decrease in the daily oral morphine dose and a positive satisfaction scale in the two groups of patients undergoing pain intervention, as well as a decrease in neuropathic symptoms, thus opening a new interventional option for the control of cervical radicular pain.

Keywords: Unilateral cervical radicular pain, stellate ganglion block, epidural steroid depot

Keywords:

Unilateral cervical radicular pain, stellate ganglion block, epidural steroid depot

DOI

https://doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v15i3.7052

Author Biographies

Silvia Elizabeth Medina , National Cancer Institute, Mexico City

National Cancer Institute, Mexico City

Angel Manuel Juaréz-Lemus , National Cancer Institute, Mexico City

National Cancer Institute, Mexico City

Maria del Rocío Guillén-Nunéz , National Cancer Institute, Mexico City

National Cancer Institute, Mexico City

Maria Jose Tapia, National Cancer Institute, Mexico City

National Cancer Institute, Mexico City

Citlalli Ramospliego , National Cancer Institute, Mexico City

National Cancer Institute, Mexico City

References

1. Gerken JD, Fritzsche T, Denke C, Schafer M, Tafelski S. Retrospective Study on Ganglionic and Nerve Block Series as Therapeutic Option for Chronic Pain Patients with Refractory Neuropathic Pain. Pain Res Manag. 2020;2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6042941 PMid:32774567 PMCid:PMC7399767

2. Bates D, Schultheis BC, Hanes MC, Jolly SM, Chakravarthy KV, Deer TR, et al. A Comprehensive Algorithm for Management of Neuropathic Pain. Pain Med (United States). 2019;20:S2-12. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnz075 PMid:31152178 PMCid:PMC6544553

3. Peene L, Cohen SP, Brouwer B, James R, Wolff A, Van Boxem K, et al. Cervical Radicular Pain. Pain Pract. 2023;23:800-17. John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.13252 PMid:37272250

4. Lee Y, Kim DH, Park J, Shin JW, Choi SS. Stellate Ganglion Block Versus Cervical Epidural Steroid Injection for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Comparative-Effectiveness Study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2022 Aug 1;47(8):501-503. https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2022-103532 PMid:35361695

5. Phuphanich ME, Convery QW, Nanda U, Pangarkar S. Sympathetic Blocks for Sympathetic Pain. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2022;33:455-74. W.B. Saunders. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2022.02.002 PMid:35526979

6. World Journal of Clinical Cases. Evidence Review. World J Clin Cases. 2023;11(10):2123-362. https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i10.2123 PMid:37122527 PMCid:PMC10131021

7. Luo Q, Wen S, Tan X, Yi X, Cao S. Stellate Ganglion Intervention for Chronic Pain: A Review. Ibrain. 2022;8:210-8. Wiley-VCH Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1002/ibra.12047 PMid:37786891 PMCid:PMC10529017

8. Yoo Y, Lee CS, Kim YC, Moon JY, Finlayson RJ. A Randomized Comparison Between 4, 6 and 8 mL of Local Anesthetic for Ultrasound-Guided Stellate Ganglion Block. J Clin Med. 2019 Sep 1;8(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8091314 PMid:31461935 PMCid:PMC6780673

9. Kim YH, Kim JY, Yang S, Kim D, Park Y. Retrospective Study Correlation Between the Extent of Injectate Spread and Clinical Outcomes in Cervical Interlaminar Epidural Injection. Available from: https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/index .

10. Chang A, Wang D. Complications of Fluoroscopically Guided Cervical Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injections. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2020;24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-020-00897-1 PMid:32845404

11. Goel V, Patwardhan AM, Ibrahim M, Howe CL, Schultz DM, Shankar H. Complications Associated with Stellate Ganglion Nerve Block: A Systematic Review. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019;44:669-78. BMJ Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2018-100127 PMid:30992414 PMCid:PMC9034660

Published

2025-03-15
Statistics
Abstract Display: 278
PDF Downloads: 42
PDF Downloads: 347

How to Cite

1.
Medina SE, Juaréz-Lemus AM, Guillén-Nunéz M del R, Tapia MJ, Ramospliego C. Comparison of the clinical implications of stellate ganglion block versus interlaminar cervical epidural deposition of steroid and local anesthetic in the treatment of unilateral cervical radicular pain. J. Drug Delivery Ther. [Internet]. 2025 Mar. 15 [cited 2026 Jan. 21];15(3):110-6. Available from: https://jddtonline.info/index.php/jddt/article/view/7052

How to Cite

1.
Medina SE, Juaréz-Lemus AM, Guillén-Nunéz M del R, Tapia MJ, Ramospliego C. Comparison of the clinical implications of stellate ganglion block versus interlaminar cervical epidural deposition of steroid and local anesthetic in the treatment of unilateral cervical radicular pain. J. Drug Delivery Ther. [Internet]. 2025 Mar. 15 [cited 2026 Jan. 21];15(3):110-6. Available from: https://jddtonline.info/index.php/jddt/article/view/7052

Most read articles by the same author(s)