Assessment and Authentication of Promea Therapeutic’s Indigenous Digital Hemoglobin Analyzer (Dr. Protech H+)
Abstract
Haemoglobin estimation is an important screening test for patients. Despite many methods available, each method has some advantages and disadvantages. Hemoglobin estimation by digital Hemoglobin Meter proved to be a very reliable, sophisticated, appropriate and ideal especially for some particular setup like blood donation / premedical screening and also reliable in comparison to hematology analyzer. Materials and Methods: A study of 350 Single donor platelet donors to evaluate a Promea’s Digital Hemoglobin Analyzer (Dr. Protech H+) was done in a laboratory from November 2022 to December 2022.and data were compared to Sysmex KX 21 cell counter which is one of the most accurate methods for Haemoglobin estimation. Out of 350 donors 247 were male and 103 were female. Mean value of Promea’s Digital Hemoglobin Analyzer (Dr. Protech H+) (mean 14.0 g/dl) was slightly lower by 0.2 compared to reference (mean 14.2 g/dl) but not statistically significant. In comparison to cell counter Promea’s Digital Hemoglobin Analyzer (Dr. Protech H+) proved to be the cost effective with sensitivity and specificity more than 95%. which indicates high precision. Conclusion: Promea’s Digital Hemoglobin Analyzer (Dr. Protech H+) gives comparable results to cell counter and hence proved to be reliable, easy to operate and cost effective.
Keywords: Haemoglobin, DIGITAL Hemoglobin Meter, Promea’s Digital Hemoglobin Analyzer
Keywords:
Haemoglobin, DIGITAL Hemoglobin Meter, Promea’s Digital Hemoglobin AnalyzerDOI
https://doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v13i6.5853References
The Drugs and Cosmetics Act 1940 and the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules 1945, Amendment upto 30th September. 1999.
Gómez-Simón A, Navarro-Núñez L, Pérez-Ceballos E, et al. Evaluation of four rapid methods for hemoglobin screening of whole blood donors in mobile collection settings. Transfus Apher Science 2007; 36(3):235-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transci.2007.01.010
Rashmi Tondon, Anupam Kumar Verma,, Quality evaluation of four hemoglobin screening methods in a blood donor setting along with their comparative cost analysis in an Indian scenario, Asian Journal of transfusion science, 2009
Chaudhary R, Dubey A, Sonker A, Techniques used for the screening of hemoglobin levels in blood donors: current insights and future directions Journal of blood medicine, 2017; 8:75-88 https://doi.org/10.2147/JBM.S103788
Toppo M, Pal DK, Gour D, Melwani V, DubeyM , MishraA, Comparison of Performance of Digital Hemoglobinometer over Automated Hematology Analyzer for Hemoglobin Estimation and Its user friendliness among the Pregnant Women in Selected District Hospitals of Madhya Pradesh, .ijcm.org.in on Monday, November 25, 2019,
Sawant RB, Bharucha ZS, Rajadhyaksha SB. Evaluation of hemoglobin of blood donors deferred by the copper sulphate method for haemoglobin estimation. Transfus Apher Sci. 2007; 36(2):143-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transci.2006.11.001
Lee, S.J., Stepniewska, K., Anstey, N., The relationship between the haemoglobin concentration and haematocrit in plasmodium Falciparum malaria. Malaria Journal, 2008; 7(149):1-4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-7-149
Mabey, D., Peeling, R.W., Ustianowski, A., Perkins, M.D., Tropical infectious diseases: diagnostics for the developing world. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2004; 2:231-240. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro841
Morris, S.S., Ruel, M.T., Cohen, R.J., Dewey, K.G., dela, Briere, B., Hassan, M.N., Precision, accuracy, and reliability of hemoglobin assessment with use of capillary blood. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1999; 69(6):1243-1248. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/69.6.1243
Nkrumah, B., Nguah, S.B., Sarpong, N., Hemoglobin estimation by the Hemocue portable haemoglobin photometer in a resource poor setting. BMC Clinical Pathology, 2011; 11(5):1- 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6890-11-5
Published
Abstract Display: 403
PDF Downloads: 458
PDF Downloads: 24 How to Cite
Issue
Section
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

.