Comparison of the Use of Kinetic Model Plots and DD Solver Software to Evaluate the Drug Release from Griseofulvin Tablets

Authors

  • Ifeoma Cynthia Ekenna Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1553-8797
  • Sunday Okorie Abali Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria

Abstract

Awareness of the release kinetics of active drugs is important in formulating drugs that have the desired delivery and in predicting the behaviour of the formulated drug in vivo. The study aims to determine the mechanism of drug release from griseofulvin tablets formulated with different surfactants using mathematical models and to compare the use of graphs and DD solver software in fitting dissolution profiles to kinetic models. The batches P1 -P3 were composed of the surfactant - PEG 4000 in different concentrations. A control batch without surfactant and a commercial brand (Mycoxyl 500) were used for comparison. Granule and tablet quality tests indicated quality formulations. Dissolution profiles showed that the surfactant improved drug release of griseofulvin and batches (batches P1 -P3) formulated with PEG 4000 had the best release profiles comparable with the commercial brand. The Excel Add-in DD solver and kinetic plots were used to determine the kinetic model of best fit. The Higuchi model was the best fit for batches P1 -P3. The first order and Hixon -Crowell also fit batches P2 and P3. The Korsmeyer’s model showed that batches P1 -P3 exhibited anomalous diffusion. The tablets formulated with PEG were as good as the commercial brand and they had an anomalous diffusion of the drug from the tablet; meaning that drug diffused following Fickian law and also diffused through a swollen and porous matrix. Kinetic plots and the DD solver can be used for fitting dissolution profiles to kinetic models.

Keywords: Griseofulvin, Kinetics, Models, Surfactants, Polyethylene glycol (PEG) 4000, DD solver, Dissolution profile, mathematical models

Keywords:

Griseofulvin, Kinetics, Models, Surfactants, Polyethylene glycol (PEG) 4000, DD solver, Dissolution profile, mathematical models

DOI

https://doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v12i2-S.5402

Author Biographies

Ifeoma Cynthia Ekenna, Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria

Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria

Sunday Okorie Abali, Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria

Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria

References

Beers MH, Fletcher AJ, Jones T, Porter R, Berkwitz M, Kaplan J. The Merck manual of medical information. 2nd ed. New York: Pocket Books; 2003.

Schlossberg DL, Samuel R. Antibiotics Manual: A Guide to Commonly Used Antimicrobials: Wiley; 2017. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119220787

Aguiar J, Carpena P, Molina-Bolívar JA, Carnero Ruiz C. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2003; 258(null):116. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9797(02)00082-6

Shaikh HK, Kshirsagar R, Patil S. Mathematical models for drug release characterization: a review. World J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2015; 4(4):324-38.

Razvi N, Siddiqui SA, Khan LG. The effect of surfactant on the dissolution rate of ibuprofen tablets. IntI Chern Pharm Med J. 2005; 2(1):213-6.

Shoaib MH, Tazeen J, Merchant HA, Yousuf RI. Evaluation of drug release kinetics from ibuprofen matrix tablets using HPMC. Pakistan journal of pharmaceutical sciences. 2006; 19(2):119-24.

Chime S, Onunkwo G, Onyishi I. Kinetics and mechanisms of drug release from swellable and non swellable matrices: a review. Res J Pharm Biol Chem Sci. 2013; 4(2):97-103.

Jaimini M, Ranga S, Kumar A, Sharma S, Chauhan BS. A review on immediate release drug delivery system by using design of experiment. J Drug Discov Therap. 2013; 1(12):21-7.

Huang W, Shi Y, Wang C, Yu K, Sun F, Li Y. Using spray-dried lactose monohydrate in wet granulation method for a low-dose oral formulation of a paliperidone derivative. Powder technology. 2013; 246:379-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2013.05.042

Gouda R, Baishya H, Qing Z. Application of mathematical models in drug release kinetics of carbidopa and levodopa ER tablets. J Dev Drugs. 2017; 6(02). https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-6631.1000171

Costa P, Lobo JMS. Modeling and comparison of dissolution profiles. European journal of pharmaceutical sciences. 2001; 13(2):123-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0928-0987(01)00095-1

Quevedo R, Díaz O, Valencia E, Pedreschi F, Bastias JM, Siche R. Differences between the order model and the Weibull model in the modeling of the enzymatic browning. Food and Bioprocess Technology. 2016; 9(11):1961-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-016-1775-1

Langenbucher F. Letters to the Editor: Linearization of dissolution rate curves by the Weibull distribution. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 1972; 24(12):979-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-7158.1972.tb08930.x

Papadopoulou V, Kosmidis K, Vlachou M, Macheras P. On the use of the Weibull function for the discernment of drug release mechanisms. International journal of pharmaceutics. 2006; 309(1-2):44-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2005.10.044

Pharmacopoeia B. British Pharmacopoeia Volume III2009.

Adelakun T, Okhamafe A, Ohwoavworhua F. Processing pharmaceutical grade microcrystalline cellulose from groundnut husk: Extraction methods and characterization. International Journal of Green Pharmacy. 2009; 3(2):97. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-8258.54895

Blake GR. Bulk density. Methods of soil analysis Part 1 Physical and mineralogical properties, including statistics of measurement and sampling. 1965(methodsofsoilana):374-90. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.1.c30

Carr RL. Evaluating flow properties of solids. Chem Eng. 1965; 72:163-8.

Hausner H. Friction conditions in a mass of metal powder. Polytechnic Inst. of Brooklyn. Univ. of California, Los Angeles, 1967.

Staniforth J. Powder flow. In: Aulton ME, editor. Pharmaceutics: The science of dosage form design. 2nd edition ed. London: UK: Churchill Livingstone; 2002. p. 198-210.

Loyd V. Allen J, Nicholas G. Popovich, Ansel HC. Powders and Granules. Ansel's Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms and Drug Delivery Systems. Solid dosage forms & solid modified release drug delivery system. 9th edition ed. Philadelphia, USA: Wolters Kluwer/ Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011. p. 185-202.

Carstensen J, Chan PC. Flow rates and repose angles of wet‐processed granulations. Journal of pharmaceutical sciences. 1977; 66(9):1235-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.2600660907

British-Pharmacopoeia. British Pharmacopoeia Volume III. Tablets of the British Pharmacopoeia. 2009.

Okorie O, Ekenna I, Uruemu A. Screening of A Variety of Nigerian Maize for The Production of Pharmaceutical Grade Tablet Excipient. Paripex - Indian Journal of Research. 2015; 4(6):241 - 8.

Gao Y, Zuo J, Bou-Chacra N, Pinto TdJA, Clas S-D, Walker RB, et al. In vitro release kinetics of antituberculosis drugs from nanoparticles assessed using a modified dissolution apparatus. BioMed research international. 2013; 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/136590

Zhang Y, Huo M, Zhou J, Zou A, Li W, Yao C, et al. DDSolver: an add-in program for modeling and comparison of drug dissolution profiles. The AAPS journal. 2010; 12(3):263-71. https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-010-9185-1

Patel N, Chotai N, Patel J, Soni T, Desai J, Patel R. Comparison of in vitro dissolution profiles of oxcarbazepine-HP b-CD tablet formulations with marketed oxcarbazepine tablets. Dissolution Technologies. 2008; 15(4):28-34. https://doi.org/10.14227/DT150408P28

Sahoo NG, Kakran M, Li L, Judeh Z, Müller RH. Dissolution enhancement of a poorly water-soluble antimalarial drug by means of a modified multi-fluid nozzle pilot spray drier. Materials Science and Engineering: C. 2011; 31(2):391-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2010.10.018

Aulton ME, Taylor K. Aulton's pharmaceutics: The design and manufacture of medicines. . 4th ed. New York: Churchill livingstone/ Elsevier; 2013.

Bhandari A. The Interrelationship of Bulk Density, Granule Density, Tablet Weight, and Weight Variation. 1967.

Santomaso A, Lazzaro P, Canu P. Powder flowability and density ratios: the impact of granules packing. Chemical Engineering Science. 2003; 58(13):2857-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(03)00137-4

Danish F, Parrott E. Effect of concentration and size of lubricant on flow rate of granules. Journal of pharmaceutical sciences. 1971; 60(5):752-4. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.2600600519

Kurup T, Pilpel N. The tensile strength and disintegration of griseofulvin tablets. Powder Technology. 1977; 16(2):179-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-5910(77)87004-6

Khan K, Rhodes C. Disintegration properties of calcium phosphate dibasic dihydrate tablets. Journal of pharmaceutical sciences. 1975; 64(1):166-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.2600640141

Elworthy P, Lipscomb F. Solubilization of griseofulvin by nonionic surfactants. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 1968; 20(11):817-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-7158.1968.tb09654.x

Bruschi ML. Mathematical models of drug release. Strategies to modify the drug release from pharmaceutical systems: Woodhead Publishing; 2015. p. 63 -86. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100092-2.00005-9

Pascoal A, da Silva P, Pinheiro MC. Drug dissolution profiles from polymeric matrices: Data versus numerical solution of the diffusion problem and kinetic models. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer. 2015; 61:118-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2014.12.011

Cojocaru V, Ranetti AE, Hinescu LG, Ionescu M, Cosmescu C, Poștoarcă AG, et al. Formulation and evaluation of in vitro release kinetics of Na3CaDTPA decorporation agent embedded in microemulsion-based gel formulation for topical delivery. Farmacia. 2015; 63(5):656-64.

Paarakh MP, Jose PA, Setty C, Peter G. Release kinetics-concepts and applications. Int J Pharm Res Technol. 2018; 8:12-20.

Efentakis M, Al-Hmoud H, Buckton G, Rajan Z. The influence of surfactants on drug release from a hydrophobic matrix. International journal of pharmaceutics. 1991; 70(1-2):153-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-5173(91)90175-N

Published

2022-04-15
Statistics
Abstract Display: 2276
PDF Downloads: 3894
PDF Downloads: 493

How to Cite

1.
Ekenna IC, Abali SO. Comparison of the Use of Kinetic Model Plots and DD Solver Software to Evaluate the Drug Release from Griseofulvin Tablets. J. Drug Delivery Ther. [Internet]. 2022 Apr. 15 [cited 2026 Jan. 21];12(2-S):5-13. Available from: https://jddtonline.info/index.php/jddt/article/view/5402

How to Cite

1.
Ekenna IC, Abali SO. Comparison of the Use of Kinetic Model Plots and DD Solver Software to Evaluate the Drug Release from Griseofulvin Tablets. J. Drug Delivery Ther. [Internet]. 2022 Apr. 15 [cited 2026 Jan. 21];12(2-S):5-13. Available from: https://jddtonline.info/index.php/jddt/article/view/5402