Content Validity Determination of the Suicidal Ideation Behaviour Assessment Instruments Using Content Validity Ratio (CVR) Formula
SUICIDAL IDEATION BEHAVIOUR ASSESSMENT
Abstract
Drug addiction problems have been identified as one of the high-risk factors closely linked to suicidal behaviour. Early detection of suicidal intent among addicts is important to ensure they do not take actions that could result in death. Accordingly, this study aimed to Suicidal Ideation Behaviour Assessment (SIBA) instruments specifically among 123 treated addicts in Cure and Care Rehabilitation Centre (CCRC), Besut. Based on those statements, the main objective of this study was to determine the content validity of SIBA instruments for using the content validation Ratio (CVR) method. Subjects that were involved in conducting the trial of the instruments were 8 experts from UniSZA, UPSI and UMT. The instrument validation process involved 40 items from four components. The previous study found that the instrument had high validity with the minimum level of CVR value (N=8, CVR = 0.88). Generally, all items were identified with values above 0.63 rated acceptable and no item has been rejected occur. The result showed that the instrument is appropriate, relevant, has the potential to be a good content validity and proved that SIBA has a great potential to be promoted as a good instrument. This study was conducted to detect intoxication of their suicidal ideation among drug addicts. This psychometric instrument is developed based on the situation in Malaysia. This study is expected to make a significant contribution to the government, especially the CCRC in assisting addicts with suicidal ideation behaviour by providing better attention and psychosocial support services.
Keywords: Suicide ideation, drug addict, content validity ratio, instrument
Keywords:
Suicide ideation, drug addict, content validity ratio, instrumentDOI
https://doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v11i4-S.4968References
Szanto, K., Priberson, G., & Reynolds, F. Suicide in the elderly. Clinical Neuroscience Research. 2001; 1:366–376. https://doi.org/10.7466/JKHMA. 2014.32.5.207
Van Orden, K.; Conwell, Y. Suicides in late life. Curr. Current Psychiatry Reports. 2011; 13:234–241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-011-0193-3
Conwell, Y., Thompson, C. Suicidal behavior in elders. Psychiatr. Clinics of North America. 2008; 31:333–356. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psc.2008.01.004.
Conejero, I.; Olié, E.; Courtet, P.; Calati, R. Suicide in older adults: Current perspectives. Clinical Interventions, Aging. 2018; 13:691–699. doi: https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S130670.
Lima, D. D., Azevedo, R. C. S., Gaspar, K. C.., Silva, V. F., Mauro, M. .L. .F., & Botega, N. J. Suicide attempt amongst patients with alcohol misuse admitted to a general hospital. Brazillian Journal of Psychiatry, 2010; 59(3):167-172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0047-20852010000300001
World Health Organization. (2017). Global Health Observatory. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/gho/mental_health/suicide_rates/en
National Institute of Mental Health. Suicide. Retrieved from https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/statistics/suicide.shtm. 2018.
Global Burden of Disease Collaborative Network. Global Burden of Disease Study 2017 (GBD 2017) Results. Seattle. United States: Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). 2018.
Inman, D., van Bakergem, K., LaRosa, A., & Carr, D. Evidence-based health promotion programs for school and communities. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2011; 40:207-219. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2010.10.031.
Taylor & Jacqueline. Illegal Drug Use, Suicidal Ideation, and Attempted Suicide Among New York Adolescents. Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies, 5663. 2018.
National Survey of Drug Use and Health. The NSDUH Report: Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviours Among Adults. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. 2018.
Norashida, S. R., Norshahira, O., Lukman, Z. M. Content Validity of Drug Addiction Recovery Test Instruments Using Content Validity Ratio (CVR) Method, Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics. 2021; 11(4):24-29. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v11i4.4949.
Delgado, R. E., Carretero-Dios, H., & Ruch, W. Content validity evidences in test development: An applied perspective. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 2012; 12(3):449-460. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-64551
Field, A. Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. 5th Ed., London: Sage Publications Ltd, 2018.
DeVellis, R. F., Scale Development Theory and Applications. 4th Ed. London: SAGE Publication Inc, 2017.
Furr, R. M., Scale Construction and Psychometrics for Social and Personality Psychology. London: SAGE Publications Inc. 2014.
Ghazali Darusalam & Sufean Hussin. Metodologi Penyelidikan Dalam Pendidikan: Amalan Dan Analisis Kajian. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya. 2016.
Taherdoost, H., Validity and Reliability of the Research Instrument; How to Test the Validation of a Questionnaire/Survey in a Research, International Journal of Academic Research in Management (IJARM), 2016; 5(3):28-36. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205040
Doustmohammadian, A., Omidvar, N., KeshavarzMohammadi, N., Abdollahi, M., Amini, M. and Eini Zinab, H., Developing and validating a scale to measure Food and Nutrition Literacy (FNLIT) in elementary school children in Iran., PLoS ONE 2017; 12(6):1-18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179196
Mohd Effendi Ewan, Mohd Matore, Hisyam, sani Idris, Normawati Abdul Rahman and Ahmad Zamri Khairani. Kesahan Kandungan Pakar Instrumen IKBAR Bagi Pengukuran AQ Menggunakan Nisbah Kesahan Kandungan. Proseeding of International Conference On Global Education V (ICGE V) (May), 2017; 979- 997.
P. M. Dewantara, “Stake evaluation model (countenance model) in learning process bahasa indonesia at Ganesha university of educational,” International Journal of English and Literature, 2017; 1(1):19–29. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijll.v1i1.9615
C. Ayre and A. J. Scally, “Critical values for lawshe’s content validity ratio: revisiting the original methods of calculation,” Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 2014; 47(1):79–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175613513808
Lawshe, C. H. A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 1975; 28(4):563–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
Brinkman, W. P., Design of a questionnaire instrument handbook of mobile technology research methods. Handbook of Mobile Technology Research Methods, 2009; 31-57.
Pallant. SPSS Survival Manual A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis using SPSS for Windows, 4rd Edition, Crows West: New South Wales, 2010.
Cohen, R. J. & Swerdlik, M. E. Psychological Testing and Assessment: An Introduction to Tests and Measurement. 9th ed. New York: McGraw Hill, 2013.
Haladyna, T. Developing and Validating Multiple-Choice Test Items. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2004. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203825945
Published
Abstract Display: 735
PDF Downloads: 735
PDF Downloads: 88 How to Cite
Issue
Section
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

.