Is there any difference in efficacy of oral sildenafil therapy in primary vs secondary Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension?

Authors

  • Abhishek Ghosh West Bengal University of Health Sciences
  • Asoke Kumar Das West Bengal University of Health Sciences
  • Rajat Kanti Biswas West Bengal University of Health Sciences
  • Balaram Ghosh West Bengal University of Health Sciences
  • Ananya Pal West Bengal University of Health Sciences
  • Souvik Ghosh West Bengal University of Health Sciences

Abstract

Objective: Oral sildenafil, a phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor,is now accepted mode of therapy for symptomatic Pulmonary arterial hypertension(PAH).As the pathobiologic mechanisms are different in primary and secondary PAH, we undertook this study to find out any significant difference in efficacy of oral sildenafil therapy in primary versus secondary PAH.

Methods: It was an unicentric parallel group longitudinal study. After selection and baseline investigations,all the patients of primary and secondary PAH were given sildenafil in fixed doses (50 mg thrice daily).

Study parameters: 1. Distance covered in 6 minute walk test (6MWT), 2.Pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP) by trans-thoracic Doppler echocardiography, 3.quality of life (QOL) score assessed by Minnesota living with heart disease questionnaire. At the end of 6 weeks, 6 MWT, PAP, QOL were compared to the baseline value.

Results: 42 subjects completed the study.20 subjects had primary PAH and 22 had secondary PAH. Sildenafil therapy was effective in both groups in reducing PAP, increase in distance covered in 6 minute walk and reducing QOL score. Reduction of PAP is significantly more in primary PAH than secondary PAH but no such difference was found in 6 MWT and QOL score.

Conclusion: Though lowering of pulmonary arterial pressure in primary PAH is significantly lower than secondary PAH, this is not translated in better symptomatic relief.

Key words: primary pulmonary hypertension, secondary pulmonary hypertension, sildenafil, pulmonary arterial pressure, 6 minute walk test.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v3i1.375

Author Biographies

Abhishek Ghosh, West Bengal University of Health Sciences

Senior Resident, Department of Pharmacology, R.G. Kar Medical College, Kolkata

Asoke Kumar Das, West Bengal University of Health Sciences

  1. Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacology, R G Kar Medical College, Kolkata, WB

Rajat Kanti Biswas, West Bengal University of Health Sciences

Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Maldah Medical College, WB

Balaram Ghosh, West Bengal University of Health Sciences

Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Mednapore Medical College, WB

Ananya Pal, West Bengal University of Health Sciences

Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacology, N R S Medical College, WB

Souvik Ghosh, West Bengal University of Health Sciences

Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Medinapore Medical College, WB

Published

2013-01-23
Statistics
Abstract Display: 419
PDF Downloads: 626
PDF Downloads: 0
PDF Downloads: 0
PDF Downloads: 0
PDF Downloads: 0
PDF Downloads: 0

How to Cite

1.
Ghosh A, Das AK, Biswas RK, Ghosh B, Pal A, Ghosh S. Is there any difference in efficacy of oral sildenafil therapy in primary vs secondary Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension?. J. Drug Delivery Ther. [Internet]. 2013 Jan. 23 [cited 2026 Jan. 21];3(1). Available from: https://jddtonline.info/index.php/jddt/article/view/375

How to Cite

1.
Ghosh A, Das AK, Biswas RK, Ghosh B, Pal A, Ghosh S. Is there any difference in efficacy of oral sildenafil therapy in primary vs secondary Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension?. J. Drug Delivery Ther. [Internet]. 2013 Jan. 23 [cited 2026 Jan. 21];3(1). Available from: https://jddtonline.info/index.php/jddt/article/view/375