Internet and Social Media use among Pharmacists in a state in Nigeria
Objectives: This study determined the use of internet and social media by pharmacists in Delta State as well as their experiences with the internet and patients.
Method: This was achieved through the use of a 32 item, structured questionnaire, pretested and administered to 100 pharmacists attending the quarterly meeting of Pharmaceutical Society of Nigeria in Abraka, Delta State. Use of internet and social media were evaluated by Chi square analysis, using SPSS 20. At 95% confidence interval, a 2-tailed, P- value less than 0.05 was considered significant.
Results: Of 100 questionnaires administered, 81 were returned, giving a response rate of 81%. Majorities (29.6%) were aged 30-39 years, there were more males (54.3%) than females, one third (39.5%) had been in practice for 1-10 years. Nearly half (48.1%) were in community practice, more than half (56.8%) were practicing in Asaba. Majority (61.7%) used electronic communication for professional services; a quarter (27.2%) used email to communicate with their patients. Whatsapp was 3.5%, text messaging and Face book were 1.2% each. Significant differences were found in their online activities. Reasons for not communicating online included respondents not being computer literate (9.9%), irregular power supply in location (9.9%), lack of time (2.5%).
Conclusion: Internet use among respondents in the study area was poor, with those practicing in urban capital using the internet most. There is need to encourage greater internet use among pharmacists because of the obvious benefits to patient care.
Keywords: Internet use, pharmacists, social media
2. Kim GR, Lehmann CU, The impact of the internet on pediatric medicine. Paediatr Drugs 2003; 5(7):433-4
3. Bylund CL, Guequen JA, Sabee CM, Imes RS, Li Y, Sanford AA. Provider Patient Dialogue about Internet health information: an exploration of strategies to improve the provider-patient relationship. Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Jun; 66 (3):346-52
4. McMullan M. Patients using the Internet to obtain health information: how this affects the patient-health professional relationship. Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Oct; 63 (1-2) : 24-8
5. Horvath T, Azman H, Kennedy GE, Rutherford GW. Mobile phone text messaging for promoting adherence to antiretroviral therapy in patients with HIV infections. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14; 3:CD009756
6. Allen M, Lezzoni Ll, Huang L, Leville SG. Internet –based Coaching to improve patient clinician communication in primary care. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2007 Oct:11
7. Kaufman N. Internet and information technology use in treatment of diabetes. Int J Clin Pract Supp 2010 Feb; (166): 41-6
8. Kivits J. Informed patients and the internet: a mediated context for consultations with health professionals. J. Health Psychol. 2006 Mar;11 (2): 269-82
9. Kaufman N. Information technology in the service of diabetes prevention and treatment. Int J. Clin Proct Suppl 2011 Feb; (170): 47-54
10. Vodopivec-Jamsek V, de Jongh T, Gurol-Urganci I, Atun R, Car J. Mobile phone messaging for preventive health care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012 Dec;12: CD007457
11. Allen M, Iezzoni LI, Huang A, Huang L, Leveille SG. Improving patient-clinician communication about chronic conditions: description of an internet-based nurse E-coach intervention. Nurs Res 2008 Mar-Apr; 57(2): 107-12
12. Cochrane JD. Healthcare @ the speed of thought. Integr Health Rep 1999 May; 1-14: 16-17
13. Kivits J. Everyday health and the internet: a mediated health perspective on health information seeking. Social Health llin 2009 Jul; 31(5):673-87
14. de Jongh T, Gurol-Urganci I, Vodopivec-Jamsek V, Car J, Atun R. Mobile phone messaging for facilitating self-management of long-term illnesses. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012 Dec12;12:CD007459
15. Shcherbakova N, Shepherd M. Community pharmacists, Internet and social media: An empirical investigation. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 2014, 10(6); 75-8
16. Leiberich P, Nedoschill J, Nickel M, Loew T, Tritt K. Self-help and consultation via Internet. Self-responsible users redefine the physician-patient relationship. Med Klin (Munich) 2004 May 15; 99(5): 263-8
17. Zhou YY, Kanter MH, Wang JJ, Garrido T. Improved quality at Kaiser Permanente through e-mail between physicians and patients. Health Aff. 2010; 29: 1370–1375
18. States Rheumatologists interested in using Electronic Mail in Patient Care? Concerns from a National Survey. Arthritis Rheum. 2011; 63
19. Smalls HT. Tweets, friends, and links: the use of social media by NICU Health Care Providers. Neonatal Netw. 2012; 31: 407–408
20. Fisher J, Clayton M. Who gives a Tweet: Assessing Patients' interest in the use of Social Media for Health Care. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2012; 9: 100–108
21. Greene JA, Choudhry NK, Kilabuk E, Shrank WH. Online social networking by patients with diabetes: a qualitative evaluation of communication with Facebook. J Gen Intern Med. 2011; 26: 287–292
22. Pho K, Gay S. Establishing, Managing and Protecting Your Online Reputation. Greenbranch Publishing ; 2013
23. Mayo Clinic Center for Social Media. Bringing the Social Media #Revolution to Health Care. Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research ; 2012
24. Schickedanz H D, Lopez A. et al. Access, interest, and attitudes toward electronic communication for health care among patients in the medical safety net. J Gen Intern Med. 2013; 28: 914–920
25. Bishop TF, Press MJ, Mendelsohn JL, Casalino LP. Electronic communication improves access, but barriers to its widespread adoption remain. Health Aff. 2013; 32: 1361–1367
26. McGowan BS, Wasko M, Vartabedian BS, Miller RS, Freiherr DD, Abdolrasulnia M. Understanding the factors that influence the adoption and meaningful use of social media by physicians to share medical information. J Med Internet Res. 2012; 14: e117
27. Stellefson M, Chaney B, Barry AE. et al. Web 2.0 chronic disease self-management for older adults: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2013; 15: e35
28. Zhang Y, He D, Sang Y. Facebook as a platform for health information and communication: a case study of a diabetes group. J Med Syst. 2013; 37: 9942
29. von Muhlen M, Ohno-Machado L. Reviewing social media use by clinicians. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012; 19: 777–781
30. Grindrod K, Forgione A, Tsuyuki RT, Gavura S, Giustini D. Pharmacy 2.0: a scoping review of social media use in pharmacy. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2014; 10: 256–270
31. Alkhateeb FM, Clauson KA, Latif DA. Pharmacists use of social media. Int J Pharm Pract. 2011; 19: 140–142
32. Kukreja P, Heck S A, Riggins J. Use of social media by pharmacy preceptors. Am J Pharm Educ. 2011; 75: 176
33. Hajar Z, Clauson K, Jacobs R, Melomed Y. Leveraging social media in pharmacy: analysis of pharmacists' engagement and use of Twitter. American Society Health-System Pharmacists 2012 Clinical Meeting & Exhibition. Poster 5–257. Available at: http://www.ashpmedia.org/mcm12/documents/Onsite%20Program%20Book.pdf; Accessed 12th June, 2017.
34. Lupianez-Villanueva F, Mayer M.A, Torrent J. Opportunities and challenges of Web 2.0 within the health care systems: an empirical exploration. Inform Health Soc Care. 2009; 34: 117–126
35. McCaw B, McGlade K, McElnay J. The Impact of the internet on the practice of general practitioners and community pharmacists in Northern Ireland. Inform Prim Care 2007; 15(4):231-7
36. Anderson JG, Rainey MR, Eysenbach G. The Impact of CyberHealthcare on the physician –patient relationship. J Med Syst. 2003 Feb; 27 (1): 67-84
37. De Jong CC, Ros WJ, Schrijvers G. The Effects on health behavior and health outcomes of internet based asynchronous communication between health providers and patients with a chronic condition: a Systematic Review. J. Med Internet Res 2014 Jan 16; 16 (1): e19
38. Broom A. Virtually healthy: the impact of internet use on disease experience and the doctor –patient relationship. Qual Health Res 2005 March; 15(3): 325-45
39. National Population Commission. Delta State. Available at www.population.gov.ng Accessed 15th September, 2012
40. Orhero MA. Tale of Abraka, Delta State; the Derelict University Town-Travel-Nairaland. Available at www.nairaland.com? Accessed 6th August 2014
41. Amibor KC, Onyegasi CS, Ezeudu PI, Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Pharmaceutical Care among pharmacists in a state in Nigeria. AJOPRED. 2018 10(1): 031
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).