Formulation and evaluation of chitosan containing mucoadhesive buccal patches of metoprolol succinate

  • Navneet Verma Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, IFTM University, Moradabad (UP) India
  • Anurag Verma Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, IFTM University, Moradabad (UP) India
  • Juhi Dubey Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, IFTM University, Moradabad (UP) India

Abstract

Mucoadhesive buccal patches containing metoprolol succinate were prepared using the solvent casting method. Chitosan was used as bioadhesive polymer and different ratios of chitosan to PVP K-30 were used. The patches were evaluated for their physical characteristics like mass variation, drug content uniformity, folding endurance, ex vivo mucoadhesion strength, ex vivo mucoadhesion time, surface pH, in vitro drug release, and in vitro buccal permeation study. Patches exhibited controlled release for a period of 8 h. The mechanism of drug release was found to be non-Fickian diffusion and followed the first-order kinetics. Incorporation of PVP K-30 generally enhanced the release rate. Swelling index was proportional to the concentration of PVP K-30. Optimized patches (F4) showed satisfactory bioadhesive strength of 9.6 ± 2.0 g, and ex vivo mucoadhesion time of 272 minutes. The surface pH of all patches was between 5.5 and 6.8 and hence patches should not cause irritation in the buccal cavity. Patches containing 10 mg of drug had higher bioadhesive strength with sustained drug release as compared to patches containing 20 mg of drug. Good correlation was observed between the in vitro drug release and in vitro drug permeation with a correlation coefficient of 0.9364. Stability study of optimized patches was done in human saliva and it was found that both drug and buccal patches were stable.

Keywords: Chitosan, Poly-vinyl alcohol, Mucoadhesion, Buccal patch, Metoprolol succinate.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Khairnar A, Parridhi J and Dheeraj B, Development of Mucoadhesive Buccal patch containing Aceclofenac : In vitro evaluations, Int. J. Pharm. Tech Res., 2009, 1, 978-981.
2. Randhawa MA, Malik S A and Javed M Buccal absorption of weak acidic drugs is not related to their degree of ionization as estimated from the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation, Pakistan J. Med. Res., 2003, 42, 116-119.
3. Consuelo ID and Francoise F , Ex vivo evaluation of bioadhesive films for buccal delivery of fentanyl, J. Cont. Rel, 2007, 122, 135-140.
4. Kokate AA and Xiaoling L, HPLC detection of marker compounds during Buccal permeation enhancement studies, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 2008, 47, 190-194.
5. Hao J and Heng PWS, Buccal Delivery System, Drug Develop. Indus. Pharmacy,2003, 29, 821-832.
6. Scholz O A and Wolff A, Drug delivery from the oral cavity: focus on a novel mechatronic delivery device, Drug discovery today, 2008, 13, 247-253.
7. Nafee N A and Ismail F A, Mucoadhesive delivery system. II. Formulation and In-vitro/In-vivo evaluation of buccal mucoadhesive tablets containing water soluble drugs, Develop. Indus. Pharm., 2004, 30, 995-1004.
8. Riikka L, Eera S, Kaisa T and Mikko B, Intraorally fast dissolving particles of a poorly soluble drug: Preparation and in vitro characterization, Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm., 2009, 71, 271-281.
9. Aleksandra MS and Kijenska E, Electro-osmotic flow as a result of Buccal iontophoresis- Buccal mucosa properties, Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm., 2009, 72, 595-599.
10. Perioli L and Ambrogi V, Development of mucoadhesive patches for buccal administration of Ibuprofen, J. Cont. Rel., 2004, 99, 73-82.
11. Cafaggi S and Leardi R, Preparation and evaluation of a chitosan salt-poloxamer 407 based matrix for buccal drug delivery, J. Cont. Rel., 2005, 102, 159-169.
12. Lehr CM, Bouwstra JA, In vitro evaluation of mucoadhesive properties of chitosan and some other natural polymer. Int. J. Pharmaceutics., 1992; 78, 43-8.
13. Shojaei AH and Li X, Determination of transport route of acyclovir across buccal mucosa, Cont. Rel. Bioactive Mat., 1997, 24, 427-438.
14. Ana F, Juliane H and Andreas BS, In-vitro evaluation of natural and methylated cyclodextrin as Buccal permeation enhancing system for omeprazole delivery, Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm., 2009, 71 339-345.
15. Ellen H, Marianne H and Arne S, Mucoadhesive and drug permeation of free mixed films of pectin and Chitosan : An in vivo study, Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm, 2009, 71, 325-331.
16. Albertini B, and Passerini M, Polymer-lipid Based mucoadhesive microspheres prepared by spray-congealing for the vaginal delivery of econazole nitrate, Eur. J. Pharm., 2009, 36, 591-601.
17. Henrihsen I and Green LK, Bioadhesion of hydrated chitosan : an in vitro and in vivo study, Int. J. Pharmaceutics, 1996, 145, 231-240.
18. Vishnu MP and Bhupendra GP, Design and characterization of Chitosan containing Mucoadhesive Buccal patches of propanolol HCl, AAPS Pharma. Sci. Tech, 2007, 67, 61-72.
19. Mashru RC and Sutariya MG, Development and evaluation of fast dissolving film of salbutamol sulphat, Drug develop. Ind. Pharm., 2005, 1, 25-34.
Statistics
266 Views | 344 Downloads
How to Cite
1.
Verma N, Verma A, Dubey J. Formulation and evaluation of chitosan containing mucoadhesive buccal patches of metoprolol succinate. JDDT [Internet]. 14Mar.2016 [cited 26Oct.2021];6(2):14-0. Available from: https://jddtonline.info/index.php/jddt/article/view/1223