Available online on 15.01.2024 at http://jddtonline.info

Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics

Open Access to Pharmaceutical and Medical Research

Copyright  © 2024 The   Author(s): This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial use provided the original author and source are credited

Open Access  Full Text Article                                                                                                                                                              Research Article

Antiinflammatory Lupeol and Antidiabetic Compound Coexist in Ethyl Acetate and n-Hexane Extracts from Stem Bark of Anogeissus leiocarpus (African Birch Tree): The Therapeutic Advantages

King Akpofure Nelson Esievo1,2,3,*; Emmanuel Oluwadare Balogun4,5; John Wassagwa4,#; Kingsley Oghenerukevwe Esievo6; Lauretta Oghenekevwe Esievo7,8; Edith Monica Esievo9,10; Dahiru Sani11; and Edward Oniovosa Uyovbisere12

  1. Department of Veterinary Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Agriculture, Zuru, Kebbi State, Nigeria.
  2. Lecturer/Resource Person, College of Veterinary Surgeons, Nigeria, Pathology Faculty, Samaru Zaria Study Centre, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria.
  3. Consultant; Research and Diagnosis Unit, Kanesco Global Services Limited (RC829505) Hayin Mallam, Samaru, Zaria, Nigeria.
  4. Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Life Sciences, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria.
  5. African Centre of Excellence for Neglected Tropical Diseases and Forensic Biotechnology, (ACENTDFB), Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria.
  6. Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria.
  7. Department of Theriogenology and Production, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria.
  8. Department of Theriogenology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Agriculture, Zuru, Kebbi State, Nigeria.
  9. Department of Veterinary Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Agriculture, Zuru, Kebbi State, Nigeria.
  10. Royal Veterinary College, University of London, Royal College Street, London NW1 OTU, United Kingdom.
  11. Department of Veterinary Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria.
  12. Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria.

#       UNESCO International Centre for Biotechnology, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria

Article Info:

_________________________________________________

Article History:

Received 20 Nov 2023      

Reviewed 08 Dec 2023

Accepted 26 Dec 2023  

Published 15 Jan 2024  

_________________________________________________

Cite this article as: 

Esievo KAN; Balogun EO; Wassagwa J; Esievo KO; Esievo LO; Esievo EM; Sani D; Uyovbisere EO, Antiinflammatory Lupeol and Antidiabetic Compound Coexist in Ethyl Acetate and n-Hexane Extracts from Stem Bark of Anogeissus leiocarpus (African Birch Tree): The Therapeutic Advantages, Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics. 2024; 14(1):121-126

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v14i1.6271  _________________________________________________

*Address for Correspondence:  

King Akpofure Nelson Esievo Department of Veterinary Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Agriculture, Zuru, Nigeria.

Abstract

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Objectives: Anogeissus leiocarpus stem bark is endowed with numerous antidiabetic properties, such as its prognostic value, treatment of organic damages, dyslipidaemia and enhancement of haematopoiesis. In addition to its antioxidant activity on oxidative stress, it accelerated wound healing and has a wide range of safety value. From the purification of its compounds to the points of crystallization it became necessary to analyse the structures for an insight into its mechanisms of actions.

Design: Ethanolic extracts were partitioned with ethyl acetate, onto column chromatography packed with silica gel (70-230 mesh) mixed with 95% n-hexane and 5% ethyl acetate; concentrated fractions were loaded onto silica gel-coated thin layer chromatographic plate. Different compounds were observed under UV-light fluorescence and sprayed with sulfuric acid. Similar fractions were pooled, purified to crystals for Nuclear Magnetic Resonance structural analysis.

Results: Nuclear Magnetic Resonance revealed fraction A is Lupeol, a pentacyclic triterpene anti-inflammatory compound.

Conclusion: Lupeol in the crude ethanolic extract is significant in inflammatory pain of diabetes.

Keywords: Lupeol, Anti-inflammatory, Anogeissus leiocarpus, Purified extract, inflammatory pain, Diabetes mellitus.

 


 

INTRODUCTION

Inflammation, the vascular and cellular response in a live tissue, to injury is basically, aptly and simply defined and identified by its five cardinal manifestations of (i) hyperaemia (redness); (ii) warmth (heat), both of which result from the beneficial inflow of blood to the inflamed site; (iii) swelling, emanating from the vascular endothelium as a result of hypoxia induced by stasis of blood due to cellular and platelets aggregations at the inflammatory site; (iv) pain, which invariably leads to (v) loss of function of the affected body part(s). Irrespective of the aetiology of the injury to the live tissue, a cut, torn or burnt area or infected with microorganisms (bacteria, fungi, protozoa, metazoan, viruses and their accompanying toxins), chemical poisons, mechanical or thermal and immune processes, increased vascular permeability and inflammatory oedema (exudates) develop, with production of inflammatory biomarkers, such as the significantly higher cytokine associated acute phase reaction and highly sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) variously reported in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) afflicted people1,2,3,4,5,6. Similar increases occurred in alloxan-induced type 1 diabetic (T1DM) dogs7. The increases of these inflammatory cytokine associated biomarkers were ascribed to the chronic hyperglycaemia-induced injuries, with multiple risk factors of microvascular and macrovascular damages of T2DM and their accompanying life-threatening complications, such as cardiovascular disease, nephropathy, neuropathy and retinopathy with blindness8.

Indeed, the beneficial inflow of blood into the microvascular/macrovasular damaged site could provide additional increases in inflammatory cytokines, since red blood cells were reported as dynamic reservoirs of cytokines9.

Diabetes mellitus (DM) has remained a non-communicable, devastating heterogeneous metabolic disease afflicting over 425 million people worldwide, with enormous economic costs to governments10,11,12 as a result of metabolic disorders of carbohydrate, protein and lipid, hence chronic hyperglycaemia either from lack or impairment of insulin secretion, type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), defective insulin action, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) or both13. Worldwide increases in T2DM with complications of nephropathy and retinopathy placed DM as a leading cause of death, come 2030 by WHO, with a frightening projection for 203512, and an unresolved health challenge for the 21st century14. The worrisome social menace from the risk factor induced by the chronic hyperglycaemia of diabetes on the mortality of COVID-19, obesity, which is a predisposing factor of diabetes and in particular, the delayed or non-healing wounds, diabetic ulcers, which led to amputations of limbs at some instance had been summarized7,15,16,17,18.

Sulfonyl urea and meglitinides biguanides and thiazolinediones8,19 were developed to treat DM; but were ineffective for the hyperlipidaemia associated with DM, were toxic and resistance was experienced20 and costly for the developing world21,22.

In developing countries with reduced economic resources, medicinal plants and phytoconstituents are currently being used, traditionally, to manage diabetes mellitus.

Recently, ethanolic extracts of A. leiocarpus treated DM, organic damages and restored deranged electrolytes and acid-base balance in alloxan-induced diabetic dogs, and was novel as it prevented a reversal to hyperglycaemic state15. The efficacy of A. leiocarpus received further credence with its antidiabetic and antioxidant properties in alloxan-induced diabetic Wistar rats16 and attenuation of dyslipidaemia in alloxan-induced diabetic dogs17.

Anogeissus leiocarpus, more importantly, exhibited a modulating effect on erythrocyte surface and serum free sialic acids, which very effectively demonstrated that elevated serum sialic acids served as a potent biomarker, predictive and prognostic of alloxan-induced diabetic dog7. In addition, ethanolic extract of A. leiocapus accelerated wound-healing in alloxan-induced diabetic dogs18.

These antidiabetic, antidyslipidaemic, antioxidant, sialoglycoconjugate, haemopoietic and wound-healing properties confer on A. leiocarpus a target for further technological studies, one of which is investigating the structure of its purified product, specific for an elucidation on its mechanism of action, including its environmental soil fertility requirements.

From maximum purification, to the point of crystallization of Anogeissus leiocarpus stem bark extracts, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) was applied for structural determination, for an elucidation on specific mechanisms of actions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plant collections, meteorological analysis and fertility assessment of tree grown soils on A. leiocarpus were performed and adequately described earlier23

The plant was authenticated in the herbarium of the Department of Botany, Faculty of Life Sciences, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, with a Voucher sample number ABU01756. The harvested stem bark was processed as described ealier23.

Ethanolic Extraction of A. leiocarpus stem bark

The pulverized sample was subjected to a cold maceration method using 95% v/v ethanol to obtain its ethanolic extracts as described earlier7,15,16,17,18.

Qualitative and Quantitative phytochemical screening of Ethanolic Extract of A. leiocarpus

Standard procedures and protocols were applied to detect the different phytochemical constituents in the ethanolic extract as described earlier7,15,16,17,18.

Partition of Ethanolic Extracts into Fractions.

The ethanolic extracts were partitioned with ethyl acetate24 as detailed adequately earlier23. The ethyl acetate fraction was concentrated with rotary evaporator while the aqueous fraction was concentrated on water bath before storage at 20oC.

Column Chromatography: 

The ethyl acetate fraction was subjected to column chromatography packed with silica gel (70-230 mesh), 500gm of which was mixed with 95% n-hexane and 5% ethyl acetate; bubbles were removed and poured into a glass column25. For each eluent system, the fractions were collected in vials and concentrated to dryness by evaporation at 40oC25.

Thin layer chromatography [TLC]

A spot of each concentrated fraction collected from the column chromatography was carefully applied with capillary tube on a thin layer chromatographic plate coated with silica and left to dry, thereafter, dipped into a suitable solvent as detailed earlier23.

The positions of different compounds were observed by fluorescence under UV-light and sprayed with sulfuric acid for the specific compounds and fractions with similar TLC profiles were pooled26.

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) and Determination of Structure of Purified Compound.

After column chromatography and TLC processes, to the point of crystallization, the purified compounds were presented to NMR (Bruker Avance III, Spectrometer frequency 400 MHz; solvents DMSO-do, CDCl3, Acetone-d6. Institute of Chemistry, University of Glasgow UK.) for determination of compound structures and analyses.

RESULTS:

Sample Dryness and Soil Texture

Samples drying process and soil fertility were normal23.

Qualitative and Quantitative Phytochemical Constituents

The phytochemical constituents were identical23 as previously reported15. Ethanolic extraction from the stem bark yielded 451.58gm23.

Ethyl Acetate Fractions and Yields (Weights/Percentages) from Column Chromatography and detailed TLC

An assessment of the ethyl acetate fractions and the total yields (weights and percentages), against the purified and the ethanolic extract preparatory to NMR analyses are presented in Table 1:


 

 

 

Table: Ethyl Acetate Fraction and Yields (Weights/percentages) from Column Chromatography

S/No

Or letter identity

Fractions

Weights (gm)

Percentage of Purified Extracts

Percentage of Ethanolic Extract

1

Interface 

5.10

71.83

1.13

A

28 – 37

0.70

9.86

0.16

B

38 – 58

0.60

8.45

0.13

C

59 – 80

0.70

9.86

0.16

Total

 

7.10

100.0

1.58

 

 


 

Calculations

Percentage of Purified Extracts

  

Where   is the weight (yield) of the fraction and   is the weight (total yields) of all the fractions

Percentage of Ethanolic Extracts

  

Where   is the weight (yield) of the fraction and   is the weight (yield) of ethanolic extracts from stem bark.

NMR Analysis

The compound ZSFA is Lupeol a pentacyclic triterpene (Figures 1 and 2).

image

ZSFA 1D-Proton NMR

Figure 1: Spectra of Fraction A from NMR

ZSFA = Zaria Sample, Fraction A

image

Figure 2: Structure of Lupeol.

Lupeol, a pentacyclic triterpene

DISCUSSION

The overall value of the soil fertility assessment met the recommended standards for non-deficient soils27 and the phytochemical screenings of the ethanolic extracts of A. leiocarpus stem bark23 agree with earlier reports15. Fraction A which was 0.70gm from the 451.58gm of the ethanolic extract of the stem bark, partitioned and totally purified with ethyl acetate, n-hexane through column chromatography and TLC, appears to be a small percentage, 9.86%, of the total purified fractions and in addition, a very small percentage, 0.16% of the ethanolic extract (Table 1).

The analysis of NMR spectra and the resultant structure in the present study, confirmed fraction A is lupeol, a pentacyclic pharmacologically active tripenoid29.

It is being speculated that only a “tincture” of lupeol is required to treat the inflammatory aspect of DM. This speculation is derived from the successes obtained from crude ethanolic extract of A. leiocarpus stem bark in alloxan-induced DM in dogs and rats7,15,16,17,18.

Crystallization using ethyl acetate and n-hexane from the sub-factions and interface during the process of final purifications through column chromatography and supported with thin-layer chromatography is an indication of purity of each of the four different compounds23.

The global threat of T1DM and T2DM to the human population worldwide and their companion/pet animals, as adequately described earlier10,11,12,15,28, strongly supports the research for a non-conventional drug for T1DM and T2DM, the risk factors and the unquantifiable accompanying social menace.

This is the first report that lupeol exists in A. leiocarpus and the latter joins other plant sources of lupeol29,30. The finding of lupeol in the purified extract of A. leiocarpus stem bark in the present study, is a boost to the claims of its efficacy in the treatment of the complications of diabetes mellitus, such as improvements of numerous landmarks of inflammatory response exhibited in the accelerated healing of surgically-induced diabetic wound18 and the hepato-renal damages of alloxan-induced diabetic dogs15 and rats31 since lupeol was reported as hepato-protective29,30.

Therefore, it is being suggested and indeed conceivable that A. leiocarpus with its constituent lupeol can effectively treat T2DM with its accompanying organic damages as exemplified by earlier studies with crude ethanolic extracts. This is premised from its numerous advantages, such as the anti-inflammatory activity of lupeol29,30, as inflammation accompanies diabetes mellitus, confirmed by the significantly higher cytokine associated acute phase reaction and a maker of inflammation, High sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hs-CRP) in T2DM diabetic people1,2,3,4,5,6.

The finding of lupeol, an anti-inflammatory compound coexisting with anti-diabetic compounds, in the antidiabetic A. leiocarpus, in the current study, is another advantage and very significant under the context of the inflammatory pain associated with diabetes mellitus, including such cases as diabetic neuropathic pain in rats32 and diabetic human patients33,34. In addition, N-acetyl neuraminic acid (sialic acid) attenuated high fat diet-induced inflammation and oxidative stress in rats35. Elevated serum sialic acid, as a potent biomarker of alloxan-induced diabetes mellitus in dogs adequately described and emphasized the manifestations of sialic acids in inflammatory diabetic pain7.

More advantages can be inferred from report that some triterpenes exist as glycosides, saponins36 and these saponins, along with terpenoids identified as phytochemical constituents in the ethanolic extracts of A. leiocarpus stem bark15,23 had been associated with anti-diabetic activities37,38,39,40

The total yield of lupeol (fraction A) at 9.86% of the ethanolic extracts of A. leiocarpus stem bark, in the present study was very insufficient for a bioassay investigation for its anti-diabetic activity and was equally insufficient for a study of its toxicity implication23. However, toxicity levels of lupeol were reported to be very low as oral administration of lupeol at a dose of 2gm/kg. body weight produced no adverse effects in rats and mice, with no mortality after a 96-hour observation41. In a related development, the interface fraction of the purified extracts of A. leiocarpus stem bark, at a yield of 71.83% of the ethanolic extracts, orally administered to Wistar rats at a limit dose of 2000mg/kg. body weight. produced no adverse effects and no mortality over  a 24-hour and a 14-day observation23.

It is being suggested that lupeol in the crude ethanolic extracts of A. leiocarpus stem bark, as evidenced by the latter’s maximum purification23 might have contributed appropriately and significantly in the hepato-renal and dyslipidaemic healings15,17 and the antioxidant activities16, in addition to the accelerated wound-healing in diabetic dogs18. It is highly conceivable that all these fractions with lupeol, are acting synergistically.

This suggestion is advanced and received maximum supports from the reports that lupeol scavenged peroxyl radicals by bolstering the levels of antioxidants and antioxidant enzyme system in an attempt to exhibit its hepatoprotective activity42 in addition to decreasing lipid peroxidation levels and increasing enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants, thus ameliorating the lipidemic-oxidative abnormalities in early hypercholesterolemic atherosclerosis43. Indeed, lupeol influenced the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT) and glutathione (GSH) in animals, thereby enhancing antioxidant protection44.

CONCLUSION 

In conclusion, lupeol appears to act synergistically with other fractions in A. leiocarpus stem bark in treating DM and its complications. The yield of lupeol in the present study is not enormous but appears therapeutically sufficient and advantageous in managing DM; this can be addressed during industrial production of a synthetic analogue, in combination with the antidiabetic, erythropoietic and thrombopoietic activities in the interface23 and the other fractions in the purified extracts. The double bond, hydroxyl, hydrogen and methyl groups of lupeol can be of advantage in the industrial synthesis. The co-existence of lupeol with the antidiabetic compounds can allow for economic production of a synthetic analogue for the treatment of diabetes mellitus.

Acknowledgements:

The Authors acknowledge the technical supports of Adamu Mohammed, Ibrahim Kabiru of the Department of Pharmacognosy and Drug Development; Dennis Otie of the Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology A.B.U, Zaria. The NMR structural analysis was performed by Professor J. Igoli of the Department of Chemistry, Federal University of Agriculture, Makurdi, Nigeria and is highly acknowledged.

Authors Contributions 

Esievo, KAN: Conceptualisation; Supervision; Investigation; Writing, Editing, 

Balogun, EO: Supervision; Investigation; Writing; Editing. 

Esievo, KO: Investigation; Soil composition; Ethanolic Extraction and Purification, Writing. 

Esievo, LO: Investigation; Ethanolic Extraction and Purification; Writing. 

Esievo, EM: Investigation; Ethanolic Extraction and Purification; Writing. 

Sani, D; Supervision; Investigation; Bioassay; Writing, Editing. 

Wassagwa, J: Investigation; Purification; Writing; Editing. 

Uyovbisere, EO: Supervision, Investigation; Soil componsition; Weather conditions; Writing; Editing. 

Funding Source

The funding was partly funded by the Research and Diagnosis Unit of Kanesco Global Services Limited (RC 829505) with additional funds from supervising Authors.

Conflict of Interests

Authors declare no conflict of interests

Ethical Approval 

No experimental animal involvement 

REFERENCES

1. Mahajan A, Tabassum R, Chavali S, Dwivedi OP, Bharadwij M, Tandon N. et al., High sensitivity C-reactive protein levels and type 2 diabetes in urban North Indians. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2009; 94:2123 - 2127. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2008-2754 PMid:19336513

2. Pradhan AD, Manson JE, Rifai N, Bursing JE, Ridker PM. C-reactive protein, interleukin 6 and risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus. Journal of American Medical association. 2009; 286:237. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.286.3.327 PMid:11466099

3. Shahid HD, Kurdi MI, Johair AA. Serum high sensitivity C-reactive protein and lipoprotein levels: A comparison between diabetic and non-diabetic with coronary artery disease. Medical Journal of Malaysia. 2010; 66:133-166.

4. Varki A. Essentials of Glycobiology, 2nd ed. New York; NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.

5. Sabzwari MJ, Ahmad M, Majeed MT, Riaz M, Umair M. Serum sialic acid concentration and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Professional Medical Journal 2006; 13(4):508 - 510. https://doi.org/10.29309/TPMJ/2006.13.04.4913

6. Gupta S, Maratha A, Siednienko J, Natarajan A, Gajanayake T, Hoashi A, Miggin S. Analysis of inflammatory cytokines and TLR expression levels in type 2 diabetes with complications. Scientific Report. 2017; 17:76231 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07230-8 PMid:28794498 PMCid:PMC5550417

7. Esievo KAN, Num-Adom SM, Adamu S, Ogbuagu NE, Aluwong T, Umar IA. Elevated serum sialic acids, a potent biomarker of alloxan-induced type 1 diabetes in dogs by ethanolic extract of Anogeissus leiocarpus, Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders. 2021; 20:179-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40200-021-00726-1 PMid:34178829 PMCid:PMC8212296

8. Quresh M, Gammoh E, Shakil J, Robbins R. Update on management of type 2 diabetes for cardiologists, Methodist DeBakey Cardiovascular Journal, 2018; 14(4):273-280 https://doi.org/10.14797/mdcj-14-4-273 PMid:30788013 PMCid:PMC6369620

9. Karsten E, Breen E, Haxbent BR. Red blood cells are dynamic reservoirs of cytokines. Scientific. Report 2018; 8:3101/Doi: 10:1038/s41598-021387w. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21387-w PMid:29449599 PMCid:PMC5814557

10. World Health Organization, Global report on diabetes: executive summary, World Health Organization. 2016.

11. International Diabetes Federation, IDF Diabetes Atlas.8th ed. 2017.

12. Guariguata L, Whiting DR, Hambleton I, Beagley J, Linnenkamp U, Shaw JE. Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2013 and projections for 2035. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice. 2014; 103(2):137 - 149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2013.11.002 PMid:24630390

13. Punthakee Z, Goldenberg R, Katz P. "Definition, classification and diagnosis of diabetes, pre-diabetes and metabolic syndrome diabetes". Canadian Journal of Diabetes, 2018; 42:10-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjd.2017.10.003 PMid:29650080

14. Amjad S, Jafri, Sharma AK, Serajuddin M. A novel strategy of nanotized herbal drugs and their delivery in the treatment of diabetes: Present status and future prospects, Journal of Herbal Medicine, 2019; 17:100279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hermed.2019.100279

15. Num-Adom SM, Adamu S, Aluwong T, Ogbuagu NE, Umar IA and Esievo KAN. Ethanolic extract of Anogeissus leiocarpus ameliorates hyperglycaemia, hepato-renal damage, deranged electrolytes and acid-base balance in alloxan-induced diabetes in dogs, Scientific African, 2022; 16:e01183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2022.e01183

16. Num-Adom SM, Adamu S, Aluwong T, Ogbuagu NE, Umar IA and Esievo KAN. Antidiabetic and antioxidant activities of ethanolic extract of Anogessus leiocarpus in alloxan induced type 1 diabetes mellitus in Wistar rats, EC Diabetes and Metabilic Research., 2022b; 6:1.

17. Num-Adom SM, Ogbuagu NE, Aluwong T, Adamu S, Umar IA and Esievo KAN. "Dyslipidaemia of alloxan-induced type 1 diabetes in dogs is attenuated by ethanolic extracts of A. leiocarpus stem bark". Diabetes & Obesity International Journal. 7.3: (2022c). https://doi.org/10.23880/doij-16000260

18. Anefu EO, Ogbuagu NE, Adamu S and Esievo KAN. Healing activities of ethanolic extract of Anogeissus leiocarpus on surgically-induced skin wounds in alloxan-induce diabetic dogs. EC Diabetes Metabolic Research. 2022; 6.3.

19. Hui H, Zhao X, Perfetti R. Structure and function studies of glucagon-like peptie-1 (GLP-1): the designing of a novel pharmacological agent for the treatment of diabetes, Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews, 2005; 21(4):313-31. https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.553 PMid:15852457

20. Raj RR, Sahay SS, Tripathi JT. Medications of diabetes mellitus and antidiabetic medicinal plants: A review. International Journal of Indigenous Herbs and Drugs 2016; 31:19-28.

21. Balogh E, Toth M, Bölcsházi G, Abonyi-Toth ZS, Kocsis E, Semjen G. Oral hypoglycaemic drugs in alloxan-induced diabetes mellitus in dogs, Acta Veterinaria Brno, 2008; 77(3):363-71. https://doi.org/10.2754/avb200877030363

22. Rao MU, Sreenivasulu M, Chengaiah B, Reddy KJ, Chetty CM. Herbal medicines for diabetes mellitus: A review. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Technological Technology Research, 2010; 2(3):1883-92.

23. Esievo KAN, Esievo LO, Sani D, Esievo KO, Esievo EM, Balogun EO, Wassagwa J, Rekwot PI, Allam L, Uyovbisere EO. Acute and delayed oral toxicity studies and observations on pregnancy, gestation and reproductive performance of Wistar rats administered limit dose of purified extract from stem bark of antidiabetic Anogeissus leiocarpus (African Birch Tree). Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutic, 2023; 13(10):11-27. https://doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v13i10.5965

24. Ebada SS, Edrada RA, Lin W, Proksch P. Methods for isolation, purification and structural elucidation of bioactive secondary metabolites from marine invertebrates Nature Protocol. 2008; 3(12):1820 - 1830. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2008.182

PMid:18989260

25. Harvey D. Modern analytical chemistry (1st Ed.), McGraw-Hill. 2000; Pp 547 - 589.

26. Mbaveng AT, Ngameni B, Kuete V, Simo IK, Ambassa P, Roy R, Bezabih M, Etoa FX, Ngadjui BT, Abegaz BM, Meyer JM. Antimicrobial activity of the crude extracts and five flavonoids from the twigs of Dorstenia barteri (Moraceae). Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 2008; 116(3):483 - 489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2007.12.017 PMid:18280679

27. Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Resources (FMANR). Literature review on soil fertility investigations in Nigeria: In five volumes. 1990; P. 280:20-25.

28. Ihedioha JI, Enahoro G. Prevalence of diabetes mellitus and reference values for the fasting blood glucose levels of locally available breeds of dogs in Warri, Nigeria. Comp. Clin. Pathol. 2019; 28:1107-1112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00580-019-02938-7

29. Gallo MBC, Sarachine MJ. Biological activities of lupeol. International Journal of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Science 2009; 3(1): 46 - 66.

30. Chaturvedi PK, Bhui K, Shukla Y. Lupeol: Connotations and chemoprevention. Journal of Cancer Letters. 2008; 263:1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2008.01.047 PMid:18359153

31. Aja PM, Ani OG, Offor CE, Orji UO, Alum EU. Evaluation of anti-diabetic effect and liver enzymes activity of ethanol extract of Pterocarpus santlinoides in alloxan-induced diabetic albino rats. Global Journal of Biotechnology and Biochemistry. 2015; 10(2):77 - 83.

32. Li S, Li X, Xie Z, Wei X, Yu C, Cheung CW, Xia Z, Tian G. N-Acetylcysteine attenuates hyperalgesia in rats with diabetic neuropathic pain: Role of oxidative stress and inflammatory mediators and CXCR4. Journal of Diabetes Research. 2021; Article ID 8862910. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8862910

33. Toth C, Lander J, Wiebe S. The prevalence and impact of chronic pain with neuropathic pain symptoms in the general population. Pain Medicine. 2009; 10(5):918-929. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00655.x PMid:19594844

34. Weng YC, Tsai SS, Lyu RK et al., Diabetic distal symmetrical polyneuropathy: correlation of clinical, Laboratory and electrophysiologic studies in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Journal of Diabetes Research. article 6356459, 2020; 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6356459 PMid:32695829 PMCid:PMC7362296

35. Yida Z, Imam MU, Ismail M, Ismail N, Ideris A, Abdullah M.A.. High fat diet-induced inflammation and oxidative stress are attenuated by N-acetyl neuraminic acid in rats. Journal of Biomedical Science. 2015; 22:96 (10 pages). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12929-015-0211-6 PMid:26498218 PMCid:PMC4619312

36. Jiri P. Biologically active pentacyclic triterpenes and their current medicine. Journal of Applied Biomedicine. 2003; 1:7-12. https://doi.org/10.32725/jab.2003.002

37. Gaikwad S, Krishna Mohan G, Sandhya Rani M. Phytochemicals for diabetes management, Pharmaceutical crops, 2014; 5(1). https://doi.org/10.2174/2210290601405010011 38. Govindappa M. A review on role of plant (s) extracts and its phytochemicals for the management of diabetes, Journal of Diabetes Metabolism, 2015; 6(7):1-38.

39. Bacanli M. effects of phytochemicals against diabetes, Advances in Food and Nutrition Research. 2019; 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.afnr.2019.02.006 PMid:31351526

40. Mursiti S, Matsjeh S. The Hypoglycemia effect of Alkaloid Compound from Oil free Mahagony Seeds (Swietenia macrophylla, King), European Journal of Medicinal Plants, 2016; 16(4):1-5. https://doi.org/10.9734/EJMP/2016/18574

41. Geetha T, Varalakshmi P. Anti-inflammatory activity of lupeol and lupeol-linoleate in adjuvant-induced arthritis. Fitoterapia. 1998; 69: 13-19.

42. Sunitha S, Nagaraj M, Varalakshmi P. Hepatoprotective effect of lupeol and lupeol linolenic on tissue antioxidant defence system in cadmium-induced hepatotoxicity in rats. Fitoterapia. 2001; 72:516-523. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0367-326X(01)00259-3 PMid:11429246

43. Sudhahar V, Kumar SA, Varalakshmi P. Role of lupeol and lupeol linoleate on lipemic-oxidative stress in experimental hypercholesterolemia. Life Science. 2006; 78:1329-1335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2005.07.011 PMid:16216277

44. Lee IM. Antioxidant vitamins in the prevention of cancer. Proceedings of Association of American Physicians. 1999; 111:10-15. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1381.1999.09230.x PMid:9893152