Available online on 15.01.2024 at http://jddtonline.info

Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics

Open Access to Pharmaceutical and Medical Research

Copyright  © 2024 The  Author(s): This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial use provided the original author and source are credited

Open Access   Full Text Article                                                                                                                                          Research Article

In silico anti-Alzheimer potential of bioactive compounds in fungi from the African Natural Products Database

Cicilien Quentin Nongni Piebeng 1,3, Bruno Dupon Ambamba Akamba 1,3*, Fils Armand Ella 1,3,4, Agwe Nicoline Injoh 1, Dany Joël Ngassa Ngoumen 3,4, Damaris Enyegue Mandob 2,3 and Judith Laure Ngondi 1,3

1 Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, the University of Yaounde 1, P.O. Box 812, Yaounde, Cameroon

2 Department of Biological Sciences, Higher Teacher’s Training College, University of Yaounde 1

3 Center of Nutrition and Functional Foods, P.O. box 8024 Yaounde, Cameroon

4 Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Clinical Medicines, University of Fee State, P.O.Box 339 Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa

Article Info:

_________________________________________________

Article History:

Received 28 Oct 2023      

Reviewed 08 Dec 2023

Accepted 26 Dec 2023  

Published 15 Jan 2024  

_________________________________________________

Cite this article as: 

Piebeng CQN, Ambamba Akamba BD, Ella FA, Injoh AN, Ngoumen DJN, Mandob DE, Ngondi JL, In silico anti-Alzheimer potential of bioactive compounds in fungi from the African Natural Products Database, Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics. 2024; 14(1):103-112

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v14i1.6250  _________________________________________________

*Address for Correspondence:  

Bruno Dupon Ambamba Akamba, Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Yaounde I, Cameroon

Abstract

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Research into treatments for Alzheimer's has led to several thousand bioactive compounds being tested in clinical trials, of which over 400 have failed. Given the exponential increase in the number of cases, it makes sense to intensify the search for new anti-Alzheimer's compounds. To this end, bioactive compounds from fungi are candidates for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD). This work presents the anti-Alzheimer's potential in silico of fungi compounds contained in the African Natural Products Database (ANPDB) capable of crossing the blood-brain barrier (BBB). A virtual search for compounds of interest in ANPDB was carried out, during which 17 fungal families were identified and 91 bioactive compounds characterized. Among these molecules, those with have a log BB>0.3 in the pkCSM server were selected. Following this, a literature search using references on compelling compounds not studied in Alzheimer's disease was also selected. Conformational site analysis and docking parameters such as binding energy, and interaction profiles with AD target residues were determined. the selected compounds were: (R)-5-(1-hydroxybutyl)-4-methoxy-6-methyl-2H-pyran-2-one, Diorcinol, Elgonene B and H, Ergosta-7-en-3beta-ol and Novae-zelandin. Ergosta-7-en-3beta-ol scored better than donepezil on BuchE. This interacts with His 438 of the catalytic triad, Trp 82 of the anionic site, and Tyr 332 of the peripheral site BuchE. Ergosta-7-en-3beta-ol, Elgonene B and H have higher docking scores on β-secretase. These and diorcinol also showed better score with GSK 3β.  This study shows that ergosta-7-en-3beta-ol, Elgonene H and B and diorcinol have multi-targeted therapeutic potential for the treatment of AD.

Keywords: fungi compounds, ANPDB, in silico, AD and BBB

 


 

1. INTRODUCTION

Fungi have been appreciated for many decades for their culinary and nutritional value, but they are increasingly appreciated for their many medicinal properties, earning them the title of “superfood of the future” 1. Although their use as a food supplement, nutraceutical, and mycotherapy product has been known since antiquity in Asian regions, they remain quite recent in Western regions 2. In addition to these properties, fungi are well known for their bioactive compounds (lectins, polysaccharides (β-glucans), polysaccharide peptides, polysaccharide-protein complexes, terpenoids, alkaloids, sterols, and structured phenolic compounds), which are responsible for different biological and therapeutic activities ranging from antimicrobial, antioxidant, antidiabetic, anticancer, antiviral, anti-hypocholesterolemic, to neuroprotective properties 3 4. Due to these remarkable properties, several medicinal agents marketed today are derived from fungi including atorvastatin, aspirin, vincristine, taxol, vinblastine, cyclosporin A, lampterol, etc 5. recently, bioactive compounds derived from fungi have shown promising effects against AD 6. This makes them an ideal reservoir for research of therapeutic compounds to combat AD, one of the greatest ills of our time. AD is the most common dementia worldwide, and many urgent efforts are being made to find bioactive compounds with anti-Alzheimer properties that can reduce the incidence of the disease while improving the quality of life of patients 7. These efforts have resulted in several thousand bioactive compounds entering clinical trials, of which more than 400 have failed 8. Faced with this situation, intensifying research into new anti-Alzheimer compounds is proving to be a major asset for research. As the search processes for therapeutic agents against AD have so far demonstrated enormous complexity, the constant advances in computational approaches such as the prediction of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics represent effective tools for filtering and selecting new candidate molecules for medication. However, the empirical methods of research and drug design being tedious and AD being of multifactorial origin, these methods are also highly recommended 9 because it makes it possible to provide a multi-targeted strategy by simultaneously targeting the multiple proteins involved in the progression of the disease, the main ones being acetylcholinesterase, butyrylcholinesterase, Glycogen synthase kinase 3 β and β-secretase 10. 

Africa is rich in diverse fungi families, and the recent creation of ANPDB containing bioactive fungal compounds facilitates the screening of natural products against Alzheimer's disease 11; 12. This article presents the in silico anti-Alzheimer potential of compounds characterized from fungi contained in ANPDB capable of crossing the BBB based on their Log BB prediction values.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS 

2.1. Study design

A virtual search of ANPDB was carried out using relevant publications relayed in the database 11; 12. As a result, 91 characterized bioactive compounds from 17 fungal species were identified. Among these compounds, those likely to respond positively to BBB crossing, as described by the BBB predictive log value using the pkCSM server, were selected. Next, a literature search using recent references on these probative compounds was performed to highlight those that have not yet been studied in AD.

2.2. Molecular docking 

2.2.1. Software used

Python 2.5, Python 2.7, Molecular Graphics Lab Tools (MGL), AutoDockTools-1.5.7, Discovery Studio Visualizer 2.5.5, and ChemDraw were used. Python 2.7 was downloaded from www.python.com, Cygwin (a data store) c:\program; and Python 2.5 were downloaded simultaneously from www.cygwin.com. Molecular Graphics Lab Tools (MGL) and AutoDockTools-1.5.7 were downloaded from www.scripps.edu; Discovery Studio Visualizer 2.5.5 was downloaded from www.accelerys.com; and ChemDraw was downloaded from www.clubic.com. Online smile scoring was performed using cactus.nci.nih.gov/translate/ 13. 

2.2.2. Preparation of the target enzyme 

The crystal structures of AchE, BuchE, β-secretase, and GSK-3β proteins were downloaded from the Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics (RCSB) protein database. Preparation of the target proteins with AutoDock tools involved the addition of all hydrogen atoms to the macromolecule, a necessary step for the correct calculation of partial atomic charges. Three-dimensional affinity grids (which close the amino acids of the active site of each protein 14) sized with a spacing of 0.375 Å were centered on the geometric center of the proteins and were calculated for each of the following atom types ( HD, C, A, N, OA and SA), representing all possible atom types in a protein  15.

2.2.3. Preparation of the ligand 

The two-dimensional (2D) structures of the ligands of interest and reference drugs (donepezil, valiltamiprosate, and hydromethylthionine) were drawn using ChemDraw software (Figure 1). Three-dimensional (3D) structures were obtained using ChemDraw 3D software and energy minimization was performed using the molecular mechanics force field (MM2) and saved in PDB format using the same software.


 

 

 

Figure 1:  structure of interest ligands and reference drugs


 

2.2.4. In silico inhibition     

The molecular docking used the Lamarckian genetic algorithm method, which performed a total of 2,500,000 energy calculations for every run and 10 total generations. The algorithm method works using traditional force fields, providing empirical free energy functions and a binding energy constant (µM) with “master equation” as follows:

∆G = ∆Gvdw + ∆Ghbond + ∆Gelec + ∆Gconform + ∆Gtor + ∆Gsol

The typical molecular mechanics terms are the van der Waals interaction (ΔGvdw + desolv), electrostatic interaction (∆Gelec), torsional energy (∆Gtor), desolvation upon binding, and the hydrophobic effect (+∆Gsol). The other docking simulations were carried out with AutoDock default parameters. Finally, 10 different conformations were studied for a single compound. For each ligand, 25 best docking simulations were obtained against the target molecule 16. The results were visualized using the Discovery Studio visualizer.

3. RESULTS 

3.1. Prediction of BBB permeability and Lipinski Violations

Table 1 shows the prediction of BBB permeability and Lipinski violations.

Table 1: Prediction of BBB permeability and Lipinski violations of potential anti-Alzheimer compounds

 

BBB permeability (log BB)

Lipinski Violations

(R)-5-(1-hydroxybutyl)-4-methoxy-6-methyl-2H-pyran-2-one

0.458

0

Diorcinol

0.347

0

Elgonene B

0.598

0

Elgonene H

0.401

0

Ergosta-7-en-3beta-ol

0.77

1

Novae-zelandin A

0.369

0

 

The compounds that responded positively to the BBB cross and drug- descriptors (Lipinski violations) are represented in Table 1. Among the 91 compounds screened in the 'African Natural Product Database', only the 6 compounds having responded positively to the BBB crossing parameter and not having been subject of any recent work on AD were taken into account (Table 1). Those presenting low logBB predictive values, and have been subject of previous studies on AD were omitted. The selected compounds presented permeability scores (logBB) varying from acceptable (Diorcinol: 0.347) to very acceptable (Ergosta-7-en-3beta-ol: 0.77). Although having shown a significant capacity for its action, research and development processes of drugs are also accelerated thanks to the study of their characteristics. Thus, Lipinski violation parameters are used as criteria to locate possible drug candidates. The compounds investigated except for ergosta-7-en-3beta-ol did not present any Lipinki violation.

3.2. Molecular docking scores of interest ligands on therapeutic targets in Alzheimer's disease

3.2.1. Docking scores of interest compound on Alzheimer's disease therapeutic targets

Table 2 shows the docking scores of compounds of interest on Alzheimer's disease therapeutic targets.

The docking scores of the target compounds and various conventional compounds from the pre-clinical studies are shown in Table 2. According to the AutoDock software, the compounds most likely to establish bonds with negative energy (ΔG) represent those possessing a better existential affinity between the compound and its target. From this perspective, a value is all the more negative as its affinity score is better. 

The compounds investigated respectively presented docking scores between -5.70 and -9.38 kcal/mol for AchE, -5.15 and -10.38 kcal/mol for BuChE, -5.35 and -9.80kcal/mol for β -secretase and finally -5.43 and -8.92 for GSK3β. Likewise, the compounds used as standards presented docking scores of -10.91kcal/mol, -9.02kcal/mol, -6.80kcal/mol, and -6.79kcal/mol corresponding respectively to the affinity energies established with AChE, BuChE, β -secretase and GSK3β. Compared to the energies presented with the lead compounds, ergosta-7-en-3beta-ol presented an affinity close to that of donepezil (Table 2) for acetylcholinesterase and better than that of all the other standards for their respective targets (Table 2). Furthermore, elgonene H and B presented respective affinity energies of -7.53 and -7.68kcal/mol better than that of valiltamiprosate in β -secretase. Moreover, in the case of GSK3β, the latter as well as diorcinol also presented affinity energies better than that of hydromethylthionine used as a standard.


 

 

Table 2: Molecular docking scores (Kcal/mol) of interest compounds with pipeline drugs against four different target proteins associated with AD

 

Compounds / Standards                                                  

                                             Selected target

AChE

BuChE

BACE1

GSK3β

(R)-5-(1-hydroxy butyl)-4-methoxy-6-methyl-2H-pyran-2-one

-5.70

-5.15

-5.35

-5.43

Diorcinol

-7.45

-7.62

-6.48

-7.28

elgonene B

7.85

-7.84

-7.53

-7.42

elgonene H

-7.77

-7.79

-7.68

-7.12

ergosta-7-en-3beta-ol

-9.38

-10.38

-9.80

-8.92

novae-zelandin A

5.98

-5.81

-6.15

-5.66

Donepezil

-10.91

- 9.02

/

/

Valiltamiprosate

/

/

-6.80

/

hydromethylthionine

/

/

/

-6.79

AchE: Acetylcholinesterase, BuchE: Butyrylcholinesterase, GSK-3β: Glycogen synthetase kinase 3 beta

 


 

3.2.2. Interaction profiles for compounds of interest and reference drugs with AD therapeutic targets

Figures 2, 3, 4, and 5 present the interactions between various active site residues of the different targets and the target compounds, as well as the reference compounds. Analysis of the 2D and 3D diagrams of the interactions established with AchE showed that the compounds penetrate the active site of acetylcholinesterase by binding to residues involved in the catalytic mechanism (Table 3 and Figure 2). Concerning BuchE, the compounds investigated established convincing interactions with the amino acid residues of these same sites for butyrylcholinesterase (Table 4 and Figure 3). In addition to this, interaction with the His438 residue of the butyrylcholinesterase catalytic triad was noted on the profiles of diorcinol, elgonene B, and ergosta-7-en-3beta-ol. On the other hand, so far donepezil has not shown any favorable interaction with the amino acid residues of the catalytic triad. On the other hand, with the case of β-secretase, these target compounds showed no interaction with the amino acid residues Asp32 and Asp228 of the catalytic dyad. However, a favorable interaction was noted between an important peripheral residue (Tyr71) and the compounds elgonene H and ergosta-7-en-3beta-ol (Figure 4). Ultimately, the analysis of the interactions established between the compounds investigated and GSK 3β showed that the compounds investigated establish favorable interactions with important amino acid residues involved in the catalytic mechanism of the enzyme (Figure 5).


 

 

 

Table 3: Profiles of important amino acid residues for AchE that interact with target compounds

 

Catalytic triad

Oxyanion hole

Acyl pocket

Anionic site

Peripheral site

1

/

/

Phe295,

 

Tyr341, Tyr124, Trp286, Tyr72

2

/

Gly121

/

Trp86

/

3

/

/

Phe295,

/

Trp286, Tyr124, Tyr72

4

/

/

Phe295, Phe297

/

Tyr124, Tyr341, Trp286

5

/

/

/

/

Tyr124, Tyr341, Trp286, Tyr72

6

/

/

Phe295, Phe297, Phe338

/

Tyr124, Tyr341, Trp286, Tyr72

7

/

/

Phe295, Phe297, Phe338

Trp86

Tyr124, Tyr341, Trp286

1: (R)-5-(1-hydroxybutyl)-4-methoxy-6-methyl-2H-pyran-2-one; 2: Diorcinol; 3: elgonene B; 4: elgonene H; 5: ergosta-7-en-3beta-ol; 6:   novae-zelandin A; 7: Donepezil 

 

Table 4: Profiles of important amino acid residues for BuchE that interact with target compounds

 

Catalytic triad

Oxyanion hole

Acyl pocket

Anionic site

Peripheral site

1

/

Gly116

/

Trp82

/

2

His438

/

/

Trp82

Tyr332

3

His438

/

/

Trp82

Tyr332

4

/

/

/

Trp82

Tyr332

5

His438

/

Phe329

Trp82

Tyr332

6

/

/

Phe329

Trp82

Tyr332

7

/

Gly116

Phe329

Trp82

Tyr332, Asp70

1: (R)-5-(1-hydroxybutyl)-4-methoxy-6-methyl-2H-pyran-2-one; 2: Diorcinol; 3: elgonene B; 4: elgonene H; 5: ergosta-7-en-3beta-ol; 6:   novae-zelandin A; 7: Donepezil

 

Figure 2: 3D and 2D views of molecular interactions of interest compounds and standard in development on AchE 

Figure 3: 3D and 2D views of molecular interactions of interest compounds and standard in development on BuchE 

Figure 4: 3D and 2D views of molecular interactions of interest compounds and standard in development on β-secretase

Figure 5: 3D and 2D views of molecular interactions of interest compounds and standard in development on GSK 3β


 

 


 

4. DISCUSSION 

The progressive and debilitating nature of AD and the lack of effective treatments for it contribute to a significant economic and societal burden on the global healthcare system 17. This has led to increased efforts in the search for treatments capable of preventing AD, delaying its onset, slowing its progression, and alleviating its symptoms 8. Because of the remarkable therapeutic properties of fungi, many drugs on the market today are derived from them, including atorvastatin, aspirin, vincristine, taxol, vinblastine, cyclosporine A, lampterol, and many others. Many researchers have turned to them in their search for anti-Alzheimer's candidates 6.  This work aimed to present the anti-Alzheimer's potential in silico of compounds characterized from fungi contained in ANPDB capable of crossing the BBB based on their Log BB prediction values. A virtual search of ANPDB identified 91 characterized bioactive compounds from 17 fungal species. Of these compounds, only six responded positively to BBB crossing, as described by the BBB predictive log value using the pkCSM server and not yet explored in AD. These are (R)-5-(1-hydroxy butyl)-4-methoxy-6-methyl-2H-pyran-2-one, Diorcinol, Elgonene B, Elgonene H, Ergosta-7-en-3beta-ol and Novae-zelandin A. Except for Ergosta-7-en-3beta-ol, which has a lipinski violation score of 1, the other compounds do not violate this rule. In the drug discovery setting, the Rule of 5 predicts that poor absorption or permeation is more likely when there are more than 5 H-bond donors, 10 H-bond acceptors, the molecular weight is greater than 500, and the calculated Log P (CLog P) is greater than 5 18.  Bioactive compounds that cross the BBB can act as scaffolding to regulate several biological processes in the brain. Due to severely damaged cholinergic neurons, the amount of AChE decreases by 90% in advanced AD. Meanwhile, BChE levels and function reach 105-165% of normal, making it the main metabolic enzyme for AD 19. As a result, licensed selective AChE inhibitors, such as galantamine and donepezil, have a very limited effect on severe AD, which is linked to a significant drop in AChE levels in people with severe AD. In recent years, a growing number of researchers have focused their efforts on designing BChE inhibitors for the treatment of advanced AD 20. The compounds examined recorded relatively high docking scores compared with AchE and BuchE. However, Ergosta-7-en-3beta-ol scored better than donepezil on BuchE. This interacts with His 438 of the catalytic triad, Trp 82 of the anionic site, and Tyr 332 of the peripheral site on BuchE. It could be a good candidate against memory loss in the advanced stages of Alzheimer's disease. Accumulation of senile plaques is central to AD, occurring as a result of fibrillation of amyloid β-peptide, which is produced by the action of β-secretase on the β-amyloid precursor protein. β-secretase is a key target in AD. The results show that, in addition to ergosta-7-en-3beta-ol, elgonene H and B score higher than valiltamiprosate (a drug in phase 3 clinical trials 21) in docking β-secretase. In contrast, the interaction profile with β-secretase showed no interaction with Asp32 and Asp228 amino acid residues of the catalytic dyad, but a favorable interaction was noted between an important peripheral residue (Tyr71) (Figure 4) which controls the accessibility of the substrate to the active site of β-secretase 22. Hyperphosphorylation of the tau protein is one of the main alterations leading to AD. Tau protein is mainly phosphorylated by GSK 3β 23. The result unveils that ergosta-7-en-3beta-ol, elgonene H and B, as well as diorcinol show better affinity energies than hydromethylthionine, used as a standard 24 with regards to GSK 3β.   Analysis of the interactions established between the compounds studied and GSK 3β showed that the study compounds establish favorable interactions with important amino acid residues involved in the enzyme's catalytic mechanism (Figure 5). 

 

5. CONCLUSION 

The in-silico study of the potential of bioactive compounds from ANPDB fungi revealed that ergosta-7-en-3beta-ol, elgonene H and B, and diorcinol are promising candidates for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.  In vitro and in vivo studies are needed to confirm their anti-Alzheimer's potential.

Competing Interests

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Funding 

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript. 

Acknowledgments 

The authors address their acknowledgement to Fidele Ntie-Kang et al for setting up the African Natural Products Database (ANPDB).

Consent for Publication

All authors read and approved the manuscript for publication.

REFERENCES

1. Venturella G, Ferraro V, Cirlincione F, Gargano ML. Medicinal Mushrooms: Bioactive Compounds, Use, and Clinical Trials. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(2):634. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7826851/ https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22020634 PMid:33435246 PMCid:PMC7826851

2. Bains A, Chawla P, Kaur S, Najda A, Fogarasi M, Fogarasi S. Bioactives from Mushroom: Health Attributes and Food Industry Applications. Materials (Basel). 2021 Dec 11;14(24):7640. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14247640 PMid:34947237 PMCid:PMC8706457

3. Łysakowska P, Sobota A, Wirkijowska A. Medicinal Mushrooms: Their Bioactive Components, Nutritional Value and Application in Functional Food Production-A Review. Molecules. 2023 Jul 14;28(14):5393. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28145393 PMid:37513265 PMCid:PMC10384337

4. Dasgupta A, Acharya K. Mushrooms: an emerging resource for therapeutic terpenoids. 3 Biotech. 2019 Oct;9(10):369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-019-1906-2 PMid:31588393 PMCid:PMC6760460

5. Bhambri A, Srivastava M, Mahale VG, Mahale S, Karn SK. Mushrooms as Potential Sources of Active Metabolites and Medicines. Front Microbiol; 13:837266. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9090473/  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.837266 PMid:35558110 PMCid:PMC9090473

6. Silva AM, Preto M, Grosso C, Vieira M, Delerue-Matos C, Vasconcelos V, et al. Tracing the Path between Mushrooms and Alzheimer's Disease-A Literature Review. Molecules. 2023;28(14):5614. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/28/14/5614  https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28145614 PMid:37513486 PMCid:PMC10384108

7. Peng Y, Jin H, Xue YH, Chen Q, Yao SY, Du MQ, et al. Current and future therapeutic strategies for Alzheimer's disease: an overview of drug development bottlenecks. Front Aging Neurosci. 2023;15:1206572. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2023.1206572 PMid:37600514 PMCid:PMC10438465

8. Cummings J, Zhou Y, Lee G, Zhong K, Fonseca J, Cheng F. Alzheimer's disease drug development pipeline: 2023. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2023;9(2):e12385. https://doi.org/10.1002/trc2.12385 PMid:37251912 PMCid:PMC10210334

9. Rai SN, Mishra D, Singh P, Vamanu E, Singh MP. Therapeutic applications of mushrooms and their biomolecules along with a glimpse of in silico approach in neurodegenerative diseases. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021 May;137:111377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2021.111377 PMid:33601145

10. Cheong SL, Tiew JK, Fong YH, Leong HW, Chan YM, Chan ZL, et al. Current Pharmacotherapy and Multi-Target Approaches for Alzheimer's Disease. Pharmaceuticals. 2022;15(12):1560. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8247/15/12/1560  https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15121560 PMid:36559010 PMCid:PMC9781592

11. Ntie-Kang F, Telukunta KK, Döring K, Simoben CV, A. Moumbock AF, Malange YI, et al. NANPDB: A Resource for Natural Products from Northern African Sources. J Nat Prod. 2017;80(7):2067-76.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jnatprod.7b00283 PMid:28641017

12. Simoben CV, Qaseem A, Moumbock AFA, Telukunta KK, Günther S, Sippl W, et al. Pharmacoinformatic Investigation of Medicinal Plants from East Africa. Molecular Informatics. 2020;39(11):2000163. https://doi.org/10.1002/minf.202000163 PMid:32964659 PMCid:PMC7685152

13. Kuppusamy A, Arumugam M, George S. Combining in silico and in vitro approaches to evaluate the acetylcholinesterase inhibitory profile of some commercially available flavonoids in the management of Alzheimer's disease. Int J Biol Macromol. 2017 Feb;95:199-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.11.062 PMid:27871793

14. Akamba BDA, Pieben CQN, Kenassi MBN, Ebouel FLE, Nanhah JVK, Ella FA, et al. In silico pharmacological study of lacourtianal, a new terpenoid isolated from the stem bark of Chrysophyllum lacourtianum De Wild (Sapotaceae) against Alzheimer's disease. Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics. 2023;13(12):84-90. https://doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v13i12.6322

15. Konc J, Konc JT, Penca M, Janežič D. Binding-sites Prediction Assisting Protein-protein Docking. Acta Chim Slov. 2011 Sep;58(3):396-401.

16. Goodsell DS, Morris GM, Olson AJ. Automated docking of flexible ligands: Applications of AutoDock. Journal of molecular recognition : JMR. 1996;9(1):1-5. Available from: https://www.researchwithnj.com/en/publications/automated-docking-of-flexible-ligands-applications-of-autodock  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1352(199601)9:1<1::AID-JMR241>3.0.CO;2-6

17. Skaria AP. The economic and societal burden of Alzheimer disease: managed care considerations. Am J Manag Care. 2022 Sep;28(10 Suppl):S188-96. https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2022.89236 PMid:36197132

18. Benet LZ, Hosey CM, Ursu O, Oprea TI. BDDCS, the Rule of 5 and Drugability. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2016;101:89-98. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4910824/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2016.05.007 PMid:27182629 PMCid:PMC4910824

19. Obaid RJ, Naeem N, Mughal EU, Al-Rooqi MM, Sadiq A, Jassas RS, et al. Inhibitory potential of nitrogen, oxygen and sulfur containing heterocyclic scaffolds against acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase. RSC Adv. 2022;12(31):19764-855. Available from: https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2022/ra/d2ra03081k https://doi.org/10.1039/D2RA03081K PMid:35919585 PMCid:PMC9275557

20. Li S, Li AJ, Travers J, Xu T, Sakamuru S, Klumpp-Thomas C, et al. Identification of Compounds for Butyrylcholinesterase Inhibition. SLAS DISCOVERY: Advancing the Science of Drug Discovery. 2021;26(10):1355-64. https://doi.org/10.1177/24725552211030897 PMid:34269114 PMCid:PMC8637366

21. Huang LK, Kuan YC, Lin HW, Hu CJ. Clinical trials of new drugs for Alzheimer disease: a 2020-2023 update. Journal of Biomedical Science [Internet]. 2023 Oct 2 [cited 2023 Nov 30];30(1):83. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12929-023-00976-6 PMid:37784171 PMCid:PMC10544555

22. Spronk SA, Carlson HA. The Role of Tyrosine 71 in Modulating the Flap Conformations of BACE1. Proteins. 2011;79(7):2247-59. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3577374/  https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.23050 PMid:21590744 PMCid:PMC3577374

23. Chauhan N, Paliwal S, Jain S, Verma K, Paliwal S, Sharma S. GSK-3β and its Inhibitors in Alzheimer's Disease: A Recent Update. Mini Rev Med Chem. 2022;22(22):2881-95. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389557522666220420094317 PMid:35450523

24. Hashweh NN, Bartochowski Z, Khoury R, Grossberg GT. An evaluation of hydromethylthionine as a treatment option for Alzheimer's disease. Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy. 2020; 21(6):619-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/14656566.2020.1719066 PMid:32037892