Available online on 15.12.2023 at http://jddtonline.info
Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics
Open Access to Pharmaceutical and Medical Research
Copyright © 2023 The Author(s): This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial use provided the original author and source are credited
Open Access Full Text Article Research Article
Effect of Extract (Interface) from Stem Bark of Antidiabetic Anogeissus leiocarpus (African Birch Tree) on Random Blood Glucose Levels of Adult Female Wistar Rats: Optimisation for Therapeutic Hypoglycaemic Dose
Lauretta Oghenekevwe Esievo 1,2, Dahiru Sani 3, Kingsley Oghenerukevwe Esievo 4, Edith Monica Esievo 5,6, Emmanuel Oluwadare Balogun 7,8, Ochuko Orakpoghenor 9, Peter Ibrahim Rekwot 1,10, Lushaikyaa Allam 1,11 King Akpofure Nelson Esievo 12,13,14+
|
Article Info: ____________________________________________ Article History: Received 28 Sep 2023 Reviewed 08 Nov 2023 Accepted 26 Nov 2023 Published 15 Dec 2023 ____________________________________________ Cite this article as: Esievo LO, Sani D, Esievo KO, Esievo EM, Balogun EO, Orakpoghenor O, Rekwot PI, Allam L, Esievo KAN, Effect of Extract (Interface) from Stem Bark of Antidiabetic Anogeissus leiocarpus (African Birch Tree) on Random Blood Glucose Levels of Adult Female Wistar Rats: Optimisation for Therapeutic Hypoglycaemic Dose, Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics. 2023; 13(12):125-132 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v13i12.6108 ____________________________________________ *Address for Correspondence: King Akpofure Nelson Esievo, Department of Veterinary Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Agriculture, Zuru, Nigeria. |
Abstract ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Objectives: The lethal dose (LD50) of the interface portion of ethyl acetate and n-hexane extract from antidiabetic Anogeissus leiocarpus stem bark was greater than 2000 mg/kg.bd.wt., with a wide range of safety value. In addition it caused no death 24hours and thereafter and had no effects on pregnancy, gestation, parturition, reproductive performance with no teratogenic effects on pups of Wistar rats. This led to investigation of the effects of the extract on the ovarian functions of adult female Wistar rats but strategically optimized to obtain an appropriate therapeutic hypoglycaemic dose. Design: On day 0, twenty (20) adult female Wistar rats weighing between 155 and 235 g were separated, at random, into 4 cages (A-D) of 5 rats each, unadministered A (normal control), administered B (5 mg/kg.bd.wt.), C (10 mg/kg.bd.wt.) and D (20 mg/kg.bd.wt.); to each group, an adult male Wistar rat was added. They were on feeds (superstarter chow) and water ad libitum. Groups B and C were reduced to 4 rats each due to exclusion criteria. On day 0, baseline parameters, were collected from all female rats. Thereafter, from day 0 to day 12, each female rat received the optimized dose of the interface and samples were collected for random blood glucose (RBG), vaginal cytology and assay for oestrogen and progesterone. Blood samples were collected after day 12 for clinical biochemistry analyses. Weights were taken at intervals. Results: At day 1, mean RBG values were significantly (P<0.05) higher (129.5±57.7 mg/dl) in group B than values of groups A, C and D which were 99.0±13.2, 101.8±3.2 and 102.0±11.9 mg/dl, respectively. From days 2 to 12, the mean RBG values significantly (P<0.05) decreased to 98.3±15.6 in group B. The mean bodyweights of group B decreased from day 2 to day 14. In group D, mean values of body weights equally decreased on day 14, but after an increase on day 7. Conclusion: Daily administration of 5 mg/kg/bd.wt. of the extract (interface) of A. leiocarpus stem bark is therapeutically hypoglycaemic as it reduced RBG significantly (P<0.05) up to day 12. The clinical application of the lower doses is suggested to maintain normoglycaemia for a while after “crashing” down the hyperglycaemia of DM with a much higher therapeutic dose. The shelf life/expiry date of the extract (interface) of A. leiocarpus stem bark is greater than seventeen (17) months, when stored at room temperature. Keywords: A leiocarpus; extract; Interface; Therapeutic hypoglycaemic dose; Diabetes Mellitus. |
INTRODUCTION
Worldwide increases in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) without and with microvascular and macrovascular complications of nephropathy and retinopathy implied that DM may become a leading cause of death, by WHO, come 2030 but a worse situation was projected for 20351, thus creating challenging unresolved health concerns for the 21st century2. This has impacted on the global economy and the national budgets of numerous countries worldwide; the direct consequences of the risk factors induced by DM on the progression, prognosis and mortality of COVID-19, obesity, as a predisposing factor of DM and delayed wound healing or diabetic ulcers that led to amputation of limbs with their accompanying social menace had been highlighted earlier3,4,5,6,7.
Several reports2,8,9,10,11 emphasized on the benefits of medicinal plants and their phytochemical constituents for the treatment of diabetes mellitus; this fits the situation in countries with reduced economic growth, which influenced traditional methods for the treatment of diabetes mellitus.
From numerous studies3,4,5,6,7,12,13 one medicinal plant, Anogeissus leiocarpus stand out. Crude ethanolic extracts of A. leiocarpus stem bark modulated sialic acids of plasma glycoproteins and red blood cells and revealed elevated serum sialic acids as a potent biomarker, predictive and prognostic in alloxan-induced diabetic dogs3. In addition, the crude ethanolic extracts ameliorated hyperglycaemia, hepato-renal damages, deranged electrolytes, acid-base balance and enhanced haematopoiesis in alloxan-induced diabetic dogs, further exhibiting a promise to prevent progression to type 2 diabetes mellitus since there was no reversal to hyperglycaemic state following withdrawal of administration of the extracts4.
The antioxidant activities coupled with the antidiabetic properties of the crude ethanolic extract of A. leiocarpus in alloxan-induced diabetic Wistar rats5 provided a boost to the plants efficacy in the treatment of DM. in addition, the dyslipidaemia produced in alloxan-induced diabetic dogs was attenuated by crude ethanolic extracts of A. leiocarpus stem bark6. The latter accelerated healing of surgically-induced deep skin wounds in alloxan-induced diabetic dogs7 showing landmarks of enhanced inflammatory responses of healing processes7. The guill and perr leaf of A. leiocarpus were effective on the hyperglycaemia and the associated dyslipidaemia in alloxan-induced diabetic rats12 while total extract and fractions exhibited antihyperglycaemic activity in mice13. The attenuation of dyslipidaemia on alloxan-induced diabetic dogs6 and rats12 by crude ethanolic extracts of A. leiocarpus is very important, laudable and requires more attention, since different classes of glucose lowering drugs, such as sulfonyl urea and meglitnides biguanides and thiazoliniediones14,15 controlled the hyperglycaemia but did not effectively control the hyperlipidaemia associated with the DM, apart from the toxicity and resistance some patients experienced16 and the exorbitant costs17,18 for developing countries.
Due to the above-listed endowed medicinal activities and properties of A. leiocarpus, under the context of a non-conventional treatment for DM, the ethanolic extract of its stem bark was purified to the point of crystallization and four components, an interface and three fractions were produced19 and the interface had a much higher proportion than the three other fractions19. Bioassay and toxicity studies with the interface in Wistar rats at a limit dose of 2000 mg/kg.bd.wt. caused no death within 24hours, no hepato-renal damages and pregnancy, gestation, parturition and reproductive performance were normal, with no teratogenic effects on pups19.
It became imperative to have an insight into the effect of the antidiabetic compound of extract (interface) of A. leiocarpus stem bark on the ovarian functions of adult female Wistar rats and this aspect is strategically designed to investigate an appropriate and hence the optimization for therapeutic hypoglycaemic dose.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Anogeissus leiocarpus Stem Bark Harvest and All Purification Processes:
The harvest of stem bark from A. leiocarpus; its authentication; the fertility assessment of the tree grown soils, the ethanolic extractions, along with the qualitative and quantitative phytochemical screenings; partitioning of the ethanolic extracts into fractions and the final purification processes with column chromatography and thin layer chromatography were adequately described with details19. The bioassay and toxicity studies, using the interface component of the four different purified components were performed19. The yields of the interface and the other three fractions in grams were reported earlier.
All purified extracts were stored in sample bottles, at room temperature (plate 1) and are reconstituted freshly when required. Storage of the purified A. leiocarpus stem bark extracts commenced on June, 2022.
Plate 1: Sample bottles that contained purified extracts of interface and fractions A, B and C
Constitution of purified extract
Five hundred (500) mg. of the extract, interface was dissolved in 1ml of distilled water to produce a concentration of 500 mg/ml.
Experimental Animals and experimental design
Twenty (20) adult female Wistar rats that weighed between 155 g and 235 g commenced the experiment on day 0. They were separated, at random, into 4 groups (cages) of 5 female rats each. Based on the major objective of the study, which is the effect of the antidiabetic compound of A. leiocarpus stem bark on ovarian functions, an adult male Wistar rat was placed into each of the 4 groups (cages), on day 0 and labelled groups A, B, C and D.
Group A (n=5): Served as control and received normal saline daily for 12 days.
Group B (n=5): Received oral administration of constituted extract, interface at a dose of 5 mg./kg.bd.wt. daily for 12 days.
Group C (n=5): Received oral administration of constituted extract, interface at a dose of 10 mg./kg.bd.wt. daily for 12 days.
Group D (n=5): This group received oral administration of constituted extract, interface at a dose of 20 mg/kg.bd.wt. daily for 12 days.
This design was aimed at investigating an appropriate, hence optimization for therapeutic hypoglycaemic dose for the antidiabetic A. leiocarpus and the choice of 12 days was due to the short oestrous cycle of the rats.
All the rats were fed commercial feeds (superstarter chow) and water was supplied ad. libitum.
Exclusion Criteria:
Exclusion criteria were applied to groups B (5 mg/kg.bd.wt.) and C (10 mg/kg.bd.wt.) which reduced the Wistar rats in groups B and C to 4 adult females each. (These are addressed under Results of this manuscript).
In group B, one female Wistar rat exhibited naturally acquired type 2 diabetes mellitus, noticeable on days 0 and 1. The exciting management of this naturally occurring type 2 diabetes mellitus in a female Wistar rat, as a case report, is part of another manuscript.
For group C, a female Wistar rat died from an unusual and unexpected cage related accident, three days after the commencement of the study.
Oral Administration of extract, interface of A. leiocarpus stem bark:
This was performed using 18G cannula oral gavage.
Samples Collections:
RBG:
On day 0, blood samples were collected from all female rats, through the ocular vein and baseline RBG levels were measured by placing a drop of blood directly onto an Accu chek® test strip inserted into the portable glucometer (Accu chek® Active, Roche, Roche Diabetes Care, Middle East, FZCO).
Thereafter all female rats were orally administered the extract, interface at the optimized dose corresponding with the designated group (as enumerated above) 5, 10 or 20 mg/kg.bd.wt. using 18G cannula oral gavage. Blood sample collections for RBG continued daily for the 12 days and to avoid traumatizing the ocular vein, blood samples were alternatively collected, that is, every other day, by cutting the rats tail tips.
Hormonal Assays:
Oestrogen and Progesterone:
Blood samples for the assay of oestrogen and progesterone were collected every other day post (daily) administration of the extract, by cutting the rats tail tips. Oestrogen and progesterone were measured using the human ELIZA kits.
Vaginal Cytology:
Vaginal swabs were collected every other day post (daily) administration of the extract, with the use of cotton balls.
Body Weights: The body weights of all female rats were measured in grams, at intervals, during the 12 day study.
Statistical analysis: The results obtained from this study were presented in charts and tables of means ± standard error of means (SEM). The data were subjected to ANOVA using the GraphPad Prism® statistical package with Tukey’s post-hoc tests to analyze the difference between groups. Values of P<0.05 were considered significant.
RESULTS
Random Blood Glucose (RBG)
On day 0 the mean ± SD of the RBG levels showed no significant (P>0.05) difference in all groups, but the values were nonsignificantly higher in groups B and D compared to groups A and C.
At day 1, the mean ± SD of the RBG values were significantly (P<0.05) increased in group B than in groups A, C and D.
From day 2 upto day 12, the mean ± SD values of RBG significantly (P<0.05) decreased in group B; non-significant fluctuations occurred in all other groups. (Table 1 and Fig. 1)
Random Blood Glucose (RBG) values (mg/dl.) of adult female Wistar rats of control and groups administered the optimized doses of 5, 10 and 20 mg/kg.bd.wt. of extract (Interface) of A. leiocarpus stem bark
Table 1: Mean ± SD glucose level
|
Dates (and Day) |
Group A Control |
Group B 5 mg/kg |
Group C 10 mg/kg |
Group D 20 mg/kg |
|
11/09/23 (0) |
68.8 ± 14.0 |
89.5 ± 5.21 |
77.8 ± 8.3 |
83.2 ± 7.6 |
|
12/09/23 (1) |
99.0 ± 13.2a |
129.5 ± 57.7b,2 |
101.8 ± 3.2a |
102.0 ± 11.9a |
|
13/09/23 (2) |
76.8 ± 8.7 |
81.5 ± 5.81 |
84.0 ± 5.4 |
90.4 ± 15.0 |
|
14/09/23 (3) |
87.2 ± 6.8 |
85.5 ± 6.11 |
91.8 ± 11.5 |
92.2 ± 8.3 |
|
15/09/23 (4) |
98.6 ± 12.5 |
91.0 ± 14.31 |
76.3 ± 9.8 |
90.8 ± 23.8 |
|
16/09/23 (5) |
90.4 ± 3.8 |
86.8 ± 5.11 |
90.3. ± 12.8 |
86.6 ± 11.7 |
|
17/09/23 (6) |
91.8 ± 16.1 |
83.0 ± 2.51 |
84.5 ± 7.6 |
88.8 ± 17.0 |
|
18/09/23 (7) |
93.8 ± 13.5 |
100.0 ± 5.41 |
94.0 ± 9.8 |
101.0 ± 7.7 |
|
19/09/23 (8) |
90.4 ± 14.5 |
86.3 ± 11.21 |
111.3 ± 4.8 |
106.2 ± 18.7 |
|
20/09/23 (9) |
103.6 ± 17.8 |
115.8 ± 10.81 |
107.3 ± 12.5 |
106.2 ± 13.0 |
|
21/09/23 (10) |
95.8 ± 13.9 |
107.8 ± 11.91 |
100.8 ± 11.8 |
106.2 ± 20.5 |
|
22/09/23 (11) |
93.2 ± 15.9 |
99.3 ± 8.31 |
99.0 ± 18.6 |
103.2 ± 11.3 |
|
23/09/23 (12) |
86.6 ± 10.0 |
98.3 ± 15.61 |
73.3 ± 22.2 |
87.0 ± 10.2 |
Mean ± SD values with different superscript alphabets in the same row differ significantly at P < 0.05; values with different superscript numbers in the same column differ significantly at P < 0.05
Figure 1: Line graph showing the pattern of changes in glucose levels
The variations of the RBG values of all the adult female Wistar rats under the study are presented in Table 2.
Table 2: Variations of random blood glucose levels (mg/dl) of all adult female Wistar rats under study.
Table 2a Group A: Control (n=5)
|
Dates (and Days) |
11/9/23 (0) |
12/9/23 (1) |
13/9/23 (2) |
14/9/23 (3) |
15/9/23 (4) |
16/9/23 (5) |
17/9/23 (6) |
18/9/23 (7) |
19/9/23 (8) |
20/9/23 (9) |
21/9/23 (10) |
22/9/23 (11) |
23/9/23 (12) |
|
S/No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1a |
44 |
89 |
62 |
79 |
114 |
88 |
84 |
71 |
75 |
76 |
75 |
67 |
72 |
|
2a |
76 |
119 |
78 |
86 |
95 |
88 |
80 |
92 |
85 |
105 |
93 |
93 |
86 |
|
3a |
72 |
105 |
84 |
83 |
80 |
95 |
82 |
104 |
87 |
99 |
94 |
101 |
99 |
|
4a |
78 |
95 |
78 |
96 |
103 |
87 |
119 |
101 |
91 |
121 |
110 |
96 |
92 |
|
5a |
74 |
87 |
82 |
92 |
101 |
94 |
94 |
101 |
114 |
117 |
107 |
109 |
84 |
Table 2b Group B: Administered 5mg/kg.bd.wt. (n=4)
|
Dates (and Days) |
11/9/23 (0) |
12/9/23 (1) |
13/9/23 (2) |
14/9/23 (3) |
15/9/23 (4) |
16/9/23 (5) |
17/9/23 (6) |
18/9/23 (7) |
19/9/23 (8) |
20/9/23 (9) |
21/9/23 (10) |
22/9/23 (11) |
23/9/23 (12) |
|
S/No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1b |
85 |
216 |
85 |
85 |
77 |
92 |
81 |
106 |
81 |
104 |
103 |
96 |
95 |
|
3b |
97 |
98 |
80 |
93 |
89 |
90 |
81 |
96 |
73 |
113 |
96 |
89 |
91 |
|
4b |
88 |
100 |
74 |
78 |
111 |
81 |
84 |
95 |
95 |
130 |
124 |
107 |
86 |
|
5b |
88 |
104 |
87 |
86 |
87 |
84 |
86 |
103 |
96 |
116 |
108 |
105 |
121 |
Table 2c Group C: Administered 10mg/kg.bd.wt. (n=4)
|
Dates (and Days) |
11/9/23 (0) |
12/9/23 (1) |
13/9/23 (2) |
14/9/23 (3) |
15/9/23 (4) |
16/9/23 (5) |
17/9/23 (6) |
18/9/23 (7) |
19/9/23 (8) |
20/9/23 (9) |
21/9/23 (10) |
22/9/23 (11) |
23/9/23 (12) |
|
S/No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1c |
70 |
99 |
79 |
106 |
68 |
91 |
79 |
91 |
111 |
106 |
91 |
79 |
59 |
|
3c |
81 |
105 |
90 |
95 |
79 |
101 |
77 |
98 |
109 |
116 |
93 |
95 |
104 |
|
4c |
72 |
99 |
80 |
79 |
69 |
97 |
92 |
105 |
107 |
117 |
102 |
124 |
75 |
|
5c |
88 |
104 |
87 |
87 |
89 |
72 |
90 |
82 |
118 |
90 |
117 |
98 |
55 |
Table 2d Group D: Administered 20mg/kg.bd.wt. (n=5)
|
Dates (and Days) |
11/9/23 (0) |
12/9/23 (1) |
13/9/23 (2) |
14/9/23 (3) |
15/9/23 (4) |
16/9/23 (5) |
17/9/23 (6) |
18/9/23 (7) |
19/9/23 (8) |
20/9/23 (9) |
21/9/23 (10) |
22/9/23 (11) |
23/9/23 (12) |
|
S/No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1d |
73 |
110 |
79 |
94 |
84 |
74 |
85 |
94 |
100 |
102 |
95 |
107 |
82 |
|
2d |
84 |
90 |
78 |
79 |
68 |
76 |
75 |
104 |
91 |
97 |
91 |
91 |
102 |
|
3d |
79 |
88 |
115 |
92 |
82 |
102 |
75 |
97 |
91 |
99 |
102 |
92 |
79 |
|
4d |
87 |
111 |
92 |
94 |
89 |
93 |
116 |
97 |
114 |
104 |
101 |
109 |
79 |
|
5d |
93 |
111 |
88 |
102 |
131 |
88 |
93 |
113 |
135 |
129 |
142 |
117 |
93 |
Body Weight
Body weights increased in groups A, B and C, but decreased in group D, from day 0 to day 2. Further increases in body weights occurred in groups A and C as against group B which experienced further decreases up to day 14. Group D experienced increased body weights at day 7 and then decreased at day 14. (Table 3 and Fig. 2). The variations in body weights of all adult female Wistar rats are in Table 4.
Table 3: Mean ± SD body weight in gram
|
Days |
0 |
2 |
7 |
14 |
|
Group A - Control |
209.6 ± 8.3 |
212.4 ± 15.1 |
217.2 ± 16.1 |
217.8 ± 12.9 |
|
Group B - 5 mg/kg |
215.0 ± 14.7 |
223.8 ± 14.2 |
216.0 ± 21.1 |
210.8 ± 19.2 |
|
Group C - 10 mg/kg |
178.5 ± 15.7 |
183.0 ± 12.7 |
193.0 ± 14.0 |
197.3 ± 17.2 |
|
Group D - 20 mg/kg |
174.2 ± 15.8 |
164.8 ± 21.5 |
167.8 ± 10.9 |
165.2 ± 2.6 |
Figure 2: Chart showing the changes in body weights
Table 4: Body weight changes (gm) of adult female Wistar rats of control and groups administered the optimized doses of 5, 10 and 20mg/kg.bd.wt. of extract (interface) of A. leiocarpus stem bark
Table 4a = Group A: Control (n=5)
|
Dates (and Days) |
11/9/23 (0) |
13/9/23 (2) |
18/9/23 (7) |
25/9/23 (14) |
|
S/No |
|
|
|
|
|
1a |
219 |
234 |
240 |
230 |
|
2a |
206 |
200 |
208 |
212 |
|
3a |
209 |
217 |
221 |
224 |
|
4a |
198 |
196 |
197 |
198 |
|
5a |
216 |
215 |
220 |
225 |
Table 4b = Group B: Administered 5mg./kg.bd.wt. (n=4)
|
Dates (and Days) |
11/9/23 (0) |
13/9/23 (2) |
18/9/23 (7) |
25/9/23 (14) |
|
S/No |
|
|
|
|
|
1b |
235 |
245 |
246 |
238 |
|
3b |
216 |
217 |
204 |
209 |
|
4b |
208 |
215 |
215 |
202 |
|
5b |
201 |
218 |
199 |
194 |
Table 4c = Group C: Administered 10mg/kg.bd.wt. (n=4)
|
Dates (and Days) |
11/9/23 (0) |
13/9/23 (2) |
18/9/23 (7) |
25/9/23 (14) |
|
S/No |
|
|
|
|
|
1c |
185 |
189 |
204 |
210 |
|
3c |
188 |
190 |
205 |
214 |
|
4c |
186 |
189 |
187 |
185 |
|
5c |
155 |
164 |
176 |
180 |
Table 4d = Group D: Administered 20mg/kg.bd.wt. (n=5)
|
Dates (and Days) |
11/9/23 (0) |
13/9/23 (2) |
18/9/23 (7) |
25/9/23 (14) |
|
S/No |
|
|
|
|
|
1d |
163 |
154 |
160 |
162 |
|
2d |
169 |
160 |
165 |
168 |
|
3d |
171 |
154 |
169 |
167 |
|
4d |
202 |
203 |
186 |
166 |
|
5d |
166 |
153 |
159 |
163 |
Correlation between RBG levels and body weights at days 0, 2 and 7
There was a significant strong positive correlation between RBG levels and body weights at days 0, 2 and 7 in groups A and C. while in group B, a non-significant strong negative correlation existed between the RBG levels and body weights at days 0, 2 and 7. In group D, the correlation was non-significant and moderately negative (Table 5).
Correlation between RBG and body weight mean values of group B was non-significant and strongly negative on days 0, 2 and 7.
Table 5: Correlation between glucose level and body weight at days 0, 2 and 7
|
r |
P-value |
|
|
Group A - Control |
0.999 |
0.034* |
|
Group B - 5 mg/kg |
-0.770 |
0.440 |
|
Group C - 10 mg/kg |
0.997 |
0.046* |
|
Group D - 20 mg/kg |
-0.566 |
0.617 |
* Levels of significance
DISCUSSION
This aspect of the current study has shown that 5mg/kg.bd.wt. of the extract (interface) of A. leiocarpus stem bark significantly reduced mean RBG levels in adult normal female Wistar rats (group B) by day 12 post administration. In addition, it has provided reasons to suggest that the 5 mg/kg.bd.wt. can be therapeutically hypoglycaemic in adult female Wistar rats. Further observation revealed that 10 mg.bd.wt. of the extract (interface) of A. leiocarpus stem bark non-significantly reduced the mean RBG levels in the adult female Wistar rats (group C) by day 12 post administration, when compared to the mean RBG levels of day 1. While a dose dependent glucose reduction response was expected, it is paradoxical that 20 mg/kg.bd.wt. of the extract (interface) of A. leiocarpus stem bark equally produced a non-significant reduction of the mean RBG levels in the adult female Wistar rats (group D) by day 12 post administration; for the latter, (groups C and D) further observation to exceed 12 days did not occur due to the original design of the overall study on ovarian functions.
Crude ethanolic extract at 1000 mg/kg.bd.wt. reduced blood glucose levels and enhanced haematopoiesis after a 14-day oral administration in adult Wistar rats20; the crude ethanolic extracts contained all the fractions, prior to its purification. The limit dose of 2000 mg/kg.bd.wt. of the extract (interface) produced an overwhelming and a highly significant (P<0.0001) reduction of blood glucose levels in normal adult male and female Wistar rats combined over a 24 hour period19. In a related study to investigate the molecular basis of the activities of antidiabetic A. leiocarpus, 100 mg/kg.bd.wt. of the extract (interface) reduced blood glucose levels in alloxan-induced diabetic Wistar rats, 3 days after the development of marked hyperglycaemia (part of another manuscript).
In the current study, mean RBG levels of all the groups increased on day 1 post administration of the extract (interface) with the increase in the same group B (5 mg/kg.bd.wt.) being significant when compared with groups A, C and D. The observed increase that occurred in control group A (without extract administration) an increase that is similar to those of groups C and D [administered with the extract (interface)], albeit, non-significant, strongly suggest that the extract oral administration may not be implicated for the increases of the mean RBG values on day 1. It is being suggested that the increased mean RBG values of all groups on day 1 was in part, caused by the unusual and initial handling of these Wistar rats, accompanied by excitement, fright and secretion of epinephrine with expected increases of glucose in the peripheral circulation21 of these Wistar rats, until the rats got used to the daily routines of samples collections.
From days 2 to 14, group B rats experienced decreases in mean body weights; indeed a non-significant strong negative correlation existed between the mean RBG levels and body weights.
CONCLUSION
Daily oral administration of a minimal dose, 5 mg/kg.bd.wt of extract (interface) of A. leiocarpus stem bark is therapeutically hypoglycaemic, as it significantly reduced mean RBG levels by day 12. Clinical application of these lower doses is maintenance of normoglycaema, for a while, after “crashing” down the hyperglycaemia of DM, with a much higher therapeutic dose.
The shelf life/expiry date of the extract (interface) of A. leiocarpus stem bark is greater than seventeen (17) months when stored at room temperature.
Acknowledgement
The Authors acknowledge the monumental technical assistance of Dennis Otie and the contribution of Sunusi Musa, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, ABU, Zaria
Author’s contribution
Esievo, KAN: Conceptualisation; Supervision; Investigation; Writing, Editing,
Esievo, LO: Investigation; Ethanolic Extraction and Purification; Writing.
Sani, D: Supervision; Investigation; Bioassay; Writing, Editing;
Esievo, KO: Investigation; Soil composition; Ethanolic Extraction and Purification, Writing.
Esievo, EM: Investigation; Ethanolic Extraction and Purification; Writing.
Balogun, EO: Supervision; Investigation; Writing; Editing.
Rekwot, PI: Supervision; Investigation; Writing; Editing.
Allam, L: Supervision; Investigation; Writing; Editing.
Orakpoghenor, O: Investigation; Writing; Editing.
Funding Source
The funding was partly provided by the Research and Diagnosis Unit of Kanesco Global Services Limited (RC 829505) with additional funds from supervising Authors.
Conflict of Interest
The Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All applicable international, national and institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. This article contains studies with animal subjects performed by the authors under an existing ethical approval by the committee on Animal use and care. (Ethical clearance No. ABUCAC/2019/16).
REFERENCES
1. Guariguata L, Whiting DR, Hambleton I, Beagley J, Linnenkamp U, Shaw JE. Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2013 and projections for 2035, Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 2014; 103(2):137-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2013.11.002 PMid:24630390
2. Amjad S, Jafri , Sharma AK, Serajuddin M. A novel strategy of nanotized herbal drugs and their delivery in the treatment of diabetes: Present status and future prospects, Journal of Herbal Medicin, 2019;; 17:100279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hermed.2019.100279
3. Esievo KAN, Num-Adom SM, Adamu S, Ogbuagu NE, Aluwong T, Umar IA. Elevated serum sialic acids, a potent biomarker of alloxan-induced type 1 diabetes in dogs by ethanolic extract of Anogeissus leiocarpus, Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders. 2021; 20:179-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40200-021-00726-1 PMid:34178829 PMCid:PMC8212296
4. Num-Adom SM, Adamu S, Aluwong T, Ogbuagu NE, Umar IA and Esievo KAN. Ethanolic extract of Anogeissus leiocarpus ameliorates hyperglycaemia, hepato-renal damage, deranged electrolytes and acid-base balance in alloxan-induced diabetes in dogs, Scientific African, 2022; 16:e01183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2022.e01183
5. Num-Adom SM, Adamu S, Aluwong T, Ogbuagu NE, Umar IA and Esievo KAN. Antidiabetic and antioxidant activities of ethanolic extract of Anogessus leiocarpus in alloxan induced type 1 diabetes mellitus in Wistar rats, EC Diabetes and Metabilic Research., 2022b; 6:1.
6. Num-Adom SM, Ogbuagu NE, Aluwong T, Adamu S, Umar IA and Esievo KAN. "Dyslipidaemia of alloxan-induced type 1 diabetes in dogs is attenuated by ethanolic extracts of A. leiocarpus stem bark". Diabetes & Obesity International Journal. 7.3: (2022c). https://doi.org/10.23880/doij-16000260
7. Anefu EO, Ogbuagu NE, Adamu S and Esievo KAN. Healing activities of ethanolic extract of Anogeissus leiocarpus on surgically-induced skin wounds in alloxan-induce diabetic dogs. EC Diabetes Metabolic Research. 2022; 6.3.
8. Gaikwad S, Krishna Mohan G, Sandhya Rani M. Phytochemicals for diabetes management, Pharmaceutical crops, 2014; 5(1). https://doi.org/10.2174/2210290601405010011
9. Govindappa M. A review on role of plant (s) extracts and its phytochemicals for the management of diabetes, Journal of Diabetes Metabolism, 2015; 6(7):1-38.
10. Bacanli M. effects of phytochemicals against diabetes, Advances in Food and Nutrition Research (2019): 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.afnr.2019.02.006 PMid:31351526
11. Mursiti S, Matsjeh S. The Hypoglycemia effect of Alkaloid Compound from Oil free Mahagony Seeds (Swietenia macrophylla, King), European Journal of Medicinal Plants, 2016; 16(4): 1-5. https://doi.org/10.9734/EJMP/2016/18574
12. Onoja US, Ugwu CC, Uzor PF, Nweze IE, Omeje EO, Nnamani PO, Nwachukwu E, Njoku I, Effiong EJ. Effect of Anogeissus leiocarpus guill and perr leaf on hyperglycaemia and associated dyslipidaemia in alloxan-induced diabetic rats Dhaka University Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2018; 17(1):65-72. https://doi.org/10.3329/dujps.v17i1.37120
13. Motto EA, Lawson-Evi P, Kantati Y, Eklu-Gadegbeku K, Aklikokou K, Gbeassor M. Antihyperglycemic activity of total extract and fractions of Anogeissus leiocarpus, Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics, 2020; 10(3): 107-13. https://doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v10i3.4078
14. Quresh M, Gammoh E, Shakil J, Robbins R. Update on management of type 2 diabetes for cardiologists, Methodist DeBakey Cardiovascular Jouranl, 2018; 14(4): 273-280 https://doi.org/10.14797/mdcj-14-4-273 PMid:30788013 PMCid:PMC6369620
15. Hui H, Zhao X, Perfetti R. Structure and function studies of glucagon-like peptie-1 (GLP-1): the designing of a novel pharmacological agent for the treatment of diabetes, Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews, 2005; 21(4):313-31. https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.553 PMid:15852457
16. Raj RR, Sahay SS, Tripathi JT. Medications of diabetes mellitus and antidiabetic medicinal plants: A review. International Journal of Indigenous Herbs and Drugs 2016; 31:19-28.
17. Balogh E, Toth M, Bölcsházi G, Abonyi-Toth ZS, Kocsis E, Semjen G. Oral hypoglycaemic drugs in alloxan-induced diabetes mellitus in dogs, Acta Veterinaria Brno, 2008; 77(3):363-71. https://doi.org/10.2754/avb200877030363
18. Rao MU, Sreenivasulu M, Chengaiah B, Reddy KJ, Chetty CM. Herbal medicines for diabetes mellitus: A review. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Technological Technology Research, 2010; 2(3):1883-92.
19. Esievo KAN, Esievo LO, Sani D, Esievo KO, Esievo EM, Balogun EO, Wassagwa J, Rekwot PI, Allam L, Uyovbisere EO. Acute and delayed oral toxicity studies and observations on pregnancy, gestation and reproductive performance of Wistar rats administered limit dose of purified extract from stem bark of antidiabetic Anogeissus leiocarpus (African Birch Tree). Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutic, 2023; 13(10): 11-27. https://doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v13i10.5965
20. Num SM, Oladele SB, Esievo KAN, Useh NM. Some observations in Wistar rats administered ethanol extracts of the stem bark of Anogeissus leiocarpus. Asian Journal of pharmacology and Toxicology. 2014; 2(3): 4-10.
21. Esievo KAN, "Veterinary Clinical Pathology", 1st Edit Spectrum Books, Ibadan. United Kingdom Limited, Jersey, Safari Books (Export) pp. 37: 157-158.