Available online on 15.04.2021 at http://jddtonline.info

Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics

Open Access to Pharmaceutical and Medical Research

© 2011-21, publisher and licensee JDDT, This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted non-commercial use(CC By-NC), provided the original work is properly cited

Open Access  Full Text Article                                                                                                                                          Research Paper

The case of left loin pain and aneurysm of the splenic artery

Kamel El-Reshaid *, Shaikha Al-Bader **, Zhaneta Markova***

*   Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, Kuwait

** Department of Medicine, kidney unit, Al-Amiri Hospital, Kuwait

*** Department of radiology, Qutaina medical center, Kuwait

 

Article Info:

_______________________________________________

Article History:

Received 02 Feb 2021     

Review Completed 13 March 2021

Accepted 19 March 2021

Available online 15 April 2021 

___________________________________________________________________

Cite this article as:

El-Reshaid K, Al-Bader S, Markova Z, The case of left loin pain and aneurysm of the splenic artery, Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics. 2021; 11(2-s):24-27                                                                           DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v11i2-s.4630                 

Abstract

____________________________________________________________________________________________________

True splenic artery aneurysms (SAA) are rare, but potentially fatal, lesions. They account for 60% to 70% of patients diagnosed with visceral artery aneurysms.  They should be differentiated from pseudo ones since the etiology is different.  They risk of rupture is high if diameter is > 2 cm and in child-bearing years.  In this case report; we describe an encounter of SAA in a patient presenting with severe left loin pain and shock due to acute pyelonephritis.  The aneurysm was 1.2 cm and was partially thrombosed and calcified indicating its stability and chronicity.  The etiology, types and management of SAAs is discussed. 

Keywords: abdominal pain, aneurysm, pseudoaneurysm, rupture, splenic artery.

*Address for Correspondence: 

Dr. Kamel El-Reshaid, Professor, Dept. Of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, P O Box 24923, 13110 Safat, Kuwait       

 


INTRODUCTION

True splenic artery aneurysms (SAA) are rare, but potentially fatal, lesions. They are the third most common type of abdominal aneurysm, after aneurysms of the aorta and of the iliac artery, and account for 60% to 70% of patients diagnosed with visceral artery aneurysms (VAAs) 1.  Hepatic artery aneurysms account for 20% of VAAs and the celiac/mesenteric ones represent 10% only 2.  Since most SAAs remain asymptomatic; the true prevalence in general population is uncertain. Previous studies; have reported 0.098% in a large series to 0.78% in a study of 3600 arteriogram to 10.4% in autopsy series on patients > 60 years with special attention given to the splenic artery 3-5.  SAAs are 4 times more common in women but approximately 3 more likely to rupture in men 6.  A recent retrospective study found that 78% of SAAs occur in women, generally related to increased incidental or symptomatic findings that coincide with use of ultrasonography in pregnancy.   The mortality after rupture of SAA in non-pregnant patients ranges from 25% to 40%.  However, among pregnant patients, the maternal mortality due to SAA rupture was 75%, and fetal mortality was 95% 7.  In this case report, we present a woman with left loin pain associated with such SAA and discus its management.

THE CASE:

A 45-year-old woman presented with left flank pain for 2 weeks.  The pain was dull aching in character and was associated with low grade fever, nausea and vomiting and frequency as well as burning micturition.  She denied past medical illnesses and was a mother of 5 children, the last of whom was 8 years old.  On her initial physical examination; she was conscious, oriented X3 and in distress of pain.  She was temperature of 38 C, tachycardia and low blood pressure at 90/60 mm Hg.  She did not have lymphadenopathy, goiter, jugular venous distension or oedema.  Systemic examination did not show abnormality except for left loin and suprapubic tenderness. Laboratory investigations showed normal peripheral leucocytic and platelets counts.  Hemoglobin was 10 g/L with normal MCV.  ESR and CRP were high.  Serum sugar, urea, creatinine, electrolytes and liver functions were normal.  Urine routine and microscopy showed 1(+) protein with excess WBCs/HPF and 25 RBCs/HPF.  Chest x-ray and ECG were normal.  Abdominal and pelvic ultrasound did not show kidney abnormality yet disclosed a calcified hypoechoic cystic lesion medial to the spleen. CT angiogram of the abdominal aorta, using 128 slice MDCT scanner; confirmed a 1.2 cm aneurysm of the distal splenic artery with wall calcification and partial thrombosis (Figure 1, 2).  The patient was treated with intravenous saline to maintain her blood pressure and Meropenum 1 g IV every 12 hours after urine and blood cultures.  The latter disclosed urosepsis with significant growth of E. coli which was sensitive to Meropenum.  Her general condition had improved and her left flank pain had disappearance of after 2 weeks of IV antibiotic therapy.  Since the final diagnosis was an acute pyelonephritis; she received 2 more weeks of oral Cefuroxime 500 mg twice daily as an outpatient.  She was reassured that the calcification and partial thrombosis in the splenic aneurysm indicated its chronicity and that it was not contributing to its current illness and is unlikely to rupture with a size < 2 cm.  Hence, no intervention was done and it appeared unchanged 1 year later.


 

 


 

image

Figure 1: Axial view of CT angiogram of the abdominal aorta; shows (A) non-ruptured, saccular 1.2 cm aneurysm in the distal splenic artery


Figure 2: 3-D reconstruction, in coronal plane, of contrast-enhanced arterial phase MDCT; shows 1.2 cm aneurysm arising from distal portion


DISCUSSION

The normal diameter of the splenic artery is 0.45 cm.  Hence, SAA is considered when its diameter exceeds 1 cm 8.  SAAs develop as true or pseudo ones and each has different etiology and prognosis.  True SAAs are rarely associated with fibromascular dysplasia yet are common associate of systemic hypertension and portal one with cirrhosis as well as in liver transplantation and pregnancy 6.  Contrary to abdominal aneurysms; their etiology is not due to atherosclerosis, though in histology, 80-99% of which show medial degeneration and mural thrombi which simply reflect secondary events rather than primary ones 1.  SAAs are usually asymptomatic and rarely require more than periodic CT follow up.  However, the risk of rupture is high in; (a) those with diameter > 2 cm, (b) women in the childbearing years due to vascular dilatation and increase portal pressure during pregnancy 9, (c) cirrhotic patients and especially those planned to undergo orthotopic liver transplant or Porto venous shunting procedures 6.  Spontaneous rupture is typically associated with 2 phases.  The first bleed manifest as left upper quadrant pain with hemodynamic instability and GI bleed.  The initial bleed may be tamponade in the lesser sac to be followed shortly with massive intraperitoneal flooding 10.  Treatment of SAAs include; (a) Endovascular approach with Fusiform ones are better treated with a stent graft (covered stent), while tortuous, saccular aneurysms are treated with aneurysmal coiling techniques, (b) laparoscopic ligation of the mid-splenic artery via stapling or clipping to splenectomy alone for distal SAAs near the hilum. Splenectomy with distal pancreatectomy may be necessary when the aneurysmal wall is severely inflamed and adherent to the tail of the pancreas. The laparoscopic approach carries the advantage of the rapid recovery, shorter hospital stay, and less postoperative pain compared with the open approach. The laparoscopic approach is also suitable and safe in pregnant SAA patients.  Finally; open surgical approach with/without splenectomy may be indicated in large SAAs, those with impending rupture and hilar ones 11.  Pseudoaneurysms of splenic artery are different.  They develop subsequent to necrotizing pancreatitis, perforated peptic ulcer or postoperative injury 12.  Because of the high risk of rupture and the high mortality rate if splenic artery pseudoaneurysm ruptures, the earliest possible intervention is deemed necessary. Transarterial embolization of pseudoaneurysm using coils, thrombin injections, or gelfoam if the patient is hemodynamically stable and diagnosis certain 13. Ligation of pseudoaneurysm with or without pancreatectomy (distal, partial, or total) and splenectomy is the standard treatment when the patient is hemodynamically unstable or embolization has failed 14.  Good surgical judgment and early consultation with a vascular surgeon should be undertaken because surgical intervention has been reported to carry mortality and morbidity risks of 1.3% and 9%, respectively 15.  In conclusion; SAAs once detected, should be differentiated from pseudo ones since the etiology and management is different.  In the case of SAAs; the size, exact location in the splenic artery, and associated co-morbid states especially with pregnancy should be defined to assess risks of its rupture and hence its subsequent management. 

REFERENCES:

  1. Trastek VF, Pairolero PC, Joyce JW, Hollier LH, Benatz PE. Splenic artery aneurysms.  1982; 91:694-699.
  2. Therakathu J, Panwala HK, Bhargava S, Eapen A, Keshava SN, David D. Contrast-enhanced Computed Tomography Imaging of Splenic Artery Aneurysms and Pseudoaneurysms: A Single-center Experience. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2018; 8:37.
  3. Stanley JC, Thomas NW, Fry WJ. Splanchnic artery aneurysms.  Arch Surg. 1970; 1010:689-697.
  4. Bedford PD, Lodge B. Aneurysm of the splenic artery.  Gut 1960; 1: 312-320.
  5. Moore SW, Guida PM, Schumacher HW. Splenic artery aneurysm.  Bull Soc Int Chir. 1970; 29:210-218.
  6. Abass MA, Stone WM, Fowl RJ, et al. Splenic artery aneurysms: two decades experience at Mayo clinic.  Ann Vasc Surg. 2002; 16:442-449. 
  7. Veluppillai C, Perreve S, de Kerviler B, Ducarme G. Splenic arterial aneurysm and pregnancy: A review. Presse Med. 2015 Oct; 44(10):991-994.
  8. Hogendoorn W, Lavida A, Hunink MG, et al. Open repair, endovascular repair, and conservative management of true splenic artery aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2014; 60:1667-76.e1.
  9. Al-Habbal Y, Christophi C, Muralidharan V. Aneurysms of the splenic artery—a review. Surgeon. 2010; 8:223-31.
  10. Remy D, Linder JL. Splenic aneurysm rupture: case report and review of the literature.  Acta Chir Belg. 1993; 93:54-57. 
  11. Kassem MM, Gonzalez L. Splenic Artery Aneurysm. [Updated 2020 Aug 24]. In: Stat Pearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK430849/.
  12. Tessier DJ, Stone WM, Fowl RJ, et al. Clinical features and amangement of splenic artery pseudoaneurysm: case report and cumulative review of the literature.  J Vasc Surg 2003; 38:969-974.
  13. Loffroy R, Guiu B, Cercueil JP, Lepage C, Cheynel N, Steinmetz E, Ricolfi F, Krausé D. Transcatheter arterial embolization of splenic artery aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms: short- and long-term results.  Ann Vasc Surg. 2008; 22:618-26.
  14. Batagini NC, El-Arousy H, Clair DG, Kirksey L. Open versus Endovascular Treatment of Visceral Artery Aneurysms and Pseudoaneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg. 2016; 35:1-8.
  15. Guillon R, Garcier JM, Abergel A, Mofid R, Garcia V, Chahid T, Ravel A, Pezet D, Boyer L. Management of splenic artery aneurysms and false aneurysms with endovascular treatment in 12 patients.  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2003; 26:256-260.