Available online on 18.01.2021 at http://jddtonline.info

Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics

Open Access to Pharmaceutical and Medical Research

© 2011-21, publisher and licensee JDDT, This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted non-commercial use(CC By-NC), provided the original work is properly cited

Open Access Full Text Article                                                                                                           Research Article

Molecular Characterization of Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacterales in Children with Diarrhea in Rural Burkina Faso

René Dembélé1,2*, Issiaka Soulama3, Wendpoulomdé Aimé Désiré Kaboré1, Ali Konaté1ˆ, Assèta Kagambèga1,4, David Coulibaly N'Golo5Oumar Traoré1,2, Abdoulaye Seck6,7, Alfred Sababenedyo Traoré1, Nathalie Guessennd8,9, Amy Gassama-Sow10ˆ and Nicolas Barro1

Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Epidemiology and Surveillance of Bacteria and Viruses Transmitted by Food/Center for Research in Biological, Food and Nutritional Sciences/Graduate School of Science and Technology/University Joseph KI-ZERBO, 03 BP 7021 Ouagadougou 03, Burkina Faso.

Training and Research Unit in Applied Sciences and Technologies/University of Dedougou, BP 176 Dedougou, Burkina Faso.

National Centre for Research and Training on Malaria, 01 BP 2208 Ouagadougou 01, Burkina Faso.

4 Institute of Sciences, 01 BP 1757 Ouagadougou 01, Burkina Faso.

Molecular Biology Platform, Pasteur Institute of Abidjan, Ivory Coast, 01 BP 490 Abidjan 01.

6 Laboratory of Biological and Medical Analyzes, Pasteur Institute of Dakar, Dakar, Senegal.

7 Faculty of Medicine, Pharmacy and Odontology, University of Cheikh Anta DIOP of Dakar, Senegal.

8 Laboratory of Bacteriology-Virology, Unit of Antibiotics, Natural Substances and Surveillance of Resistance of Microorganisms to Antimicrobials/ Pasteur Institute of Abidjan, Ivory Coast, 01 BP 490 Abidjan 01.

9 Laboratory of Bacteriology-Virology/Unit of Training and Research of Medical Sciences/University Felix Houphouet BOIGNY, 01 BP V34 Abidjan 01, Ivory Coast.

10 Unit of Experimental Bacteriology, Pasteur Institute of Dakar, 36 avenue Pasteur, BP 220, Dakar, Senegal.

ˆAli Konaté and Amy Gassama-Sow are deceased

Article Info:

________________________________________________

Article History:

Received  04 Nov 2020;     

Review Completed 28 Dec 2020

Accepted 06 Jan 2021;  

Available online 18 Jan 2021 

______________________________

Cite this article as:

Dembélé R, Soulama I, Kaboré WAD, Konaté A, Kagambèga A, N'Golo DCTraoré O, Seck A, Traoré AS, Guessennd N, Gassama-Sow A, Barro N, Molecular Characterization of Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacterales in Children with Diarrhea in Rural Burkina Faso, Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics. 2021; 11(1):84-92                                                                DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v11i1.4513     

_____________________________________________________________

*Address for Correspondence: 

René Dembélé, Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Epidemiology and Surveillance of Bacteria and Viruses Transmitted by Food/Center for Research in Biological, Food and Nutritional Sciences/Graduate School of Science and Technology/University Joseph KI-ZERBO, 03 BP 7021 Ouagadougou 03, Burkina Faso.   ORCID ID: 0000-0002-9282-8555            

Abstract

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

Keywords: Antibiotics, Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacterales, children, Burkina Faso.

Conflict of Interest: The authors stipulate that they have no conflict of interest in regard to this study.


INTRODUCTION

New antimicrobial resistance mechanisms are emerging and spreading globally, hampering our ability to effectively treat common infectious diseases. This has extended illness, disability and increased death rates 1. As a result, antimicrobial resistance represents a major challenge for public health worldwide. One of the most worrying threat is the emergence and rapid dissemination of carbapenem resistant Gram-negative bacteria, following the spread of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) 2, 3. In bacteria of animal and human origins, beta-lactam resistance, which includes resistance to extended-spectrum beta-lactams, has now been increasingly observed 4. In Enterobacteriaceae, the carbapenemases have been previously classified into the three following classes : class A [ie K. pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) enzymes], Class B [ie metallo-beta-lactamases (MBL)] including New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM), Verona integrin-encoded metallo-β-lactamase (VIM), Imipenemase (IMP), and Class D [ie oxacillinase (OXA)-48 and related variants] 5-7. Enterobacteriaceae can be resistant to carbapenems through intrinsic or acquired mechanisms. The chromosomally-encoded mechanisms can occur by (a) production of chromosomal carbapenemases from the group of class A serine carbapenemases 8 or (b) efflux pumps or (c) reduction in outer membrane permeability through porin loss 9. The acquired resistance is a plasmid-mediated mechanism through which the mobile carbapenemases are easily transmitted between bacteria 10.

The recent spread of CPE is one of the major public health threats worldwide 11 because carbapenems are among the main stay of therapy for treating severe infections directly related to multidrug-resistant bacteria producing extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) 12. Carbapenemases are defined as β-lactamases that hydrolyze almost all beta-lactam antibiotics. According to some recent studies, the most prevalent carbapenemases in Enterobacteriaceae are blaKPC (Ambler class A), blaVIM, blaIMP, blaNDM (class B) and blaOXA-48 like (class D) 11, 13. Although several studies reported the occurrence of carbapenemases producing bacteria in Africa 12, to our best knowledge, no study focusing on the molecular characterization of Carbapenemase-producing E. coli and Salmonella has been undertaken in Burkina Faso. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to carry out a molecular characterization of carbapenemase-Producing Escherichia coli and Salmonella isolates recovered from children in two rural hospitals in Burkina Faso.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Study design and population

A prospective cross sectional study was conducted to determine the serotypes and antimicrobial susceptibility of diarrheagenic E. coli and Salmonella among children visiting hospitals in rural settings of Burkina Faso.

Settings

This study was conducted in north (Gourcy, distance 140 km) and western (Boromo, distance 185 km) of the capital Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso (Fig. 1). The main sources of income in these rural settings are subsistence farming, animal husbandry and small scale trade.

Specimen collection

Two hundred and seventy five (275) faecal samples were taken in 2009-2010 by trained health staff personnel using a swab transport system (M40 transystemAmies agar gel without charcoal; Copan Italia Spa, Brescia, Italy) and transported to laboratory within 24h of their collection for analysis. A questionnaire was used to collect demographic information (e.g., age and sex) of each patient).

Salmonella isolation and serotyping

Selenite broth (Emapol, Pologne) was used for the enrichment of specimens followed by an incubation at 37°C for 18h. Subsequently, samples were cultured on Hecktoen Enteric agar (Liofilchem, Italy) and incubated at 37°C for 24h. The identity of typical-looking Salmonella colonies on Hektoen was examined by using orthonitrophenyl-ß-D-galactopyranoside (ONPG), citrate, mannitol, lysine decarboxylase tests and the Kliger Hajna medium (Liofilchem, Italy). Finally the isolates were confirmed by API 20E (BioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France). All Salmonella isolates were serotyped by the Salmonella Reference Laboratory. Isolates were serotyped with the somatic O and flagellar H anti-sera according to the Kauffman White scheme 14.

  1. coli isolation and identification

Stool samples were plated on eosin methylene blue agar (Liofilchem, Italy), and the plates were incubated at +37°C for 18–24 h. After incubation, the suspected colonies were selected and streaked onto Mueller Hinton agar plate (Liofilchem, Italy). Confirmation was carried out by a biochemical microbiology method based on negative urease (Bio-Rad, France), negative citrate (Liofilchem, Italy), positive indole (Bio-Rad, France), positive lactose (Liofi lchem, Italy), and positive orthonitrophenyl-β-D-galactopyranoside (ONPG) (bioMerieux, France). E. coli strains isolated were confirmed by API 20E (bioMérieux, France).

The 16-plex PCR was used to detect simultaneously 16 genes from the five main pathogroups of E. coli (enterohemoragic E. coli: EHEC, enteropathogenic E. coli: EPEC, enteroaggregative E. coli: EAEC, enteroinvasive E. coli: EIEC and enterotoxigenic E. coli: ETEC) as described by Antikainen et al. 15. The genes investigated and primers used are listed in Table 1 15-17.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Antibiotic susceptibility was determined on Mueller–Hinton agar (Liofilchem, Italy) using the standard disc diffusion procedure as described by the European Committee of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) 18. Nineteen antibiotics belonging to 7 different families (Table 2) were tested : amoxicillin (25 µg), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (20/10 µg), ceftriaxone (30 µg), cefotaxime (30 µg), cefepime (30 µg), cefixime (10 µg), piperacillin (75 µg), piperacillin-tazobactam (100 +10 µg), imipenem (10 µg), tetracycline (30 µg), chloramphenicol (30 µg), trimethoprim-sulfametoxazole (1.25 ± 23.75 µg), aztreonam (30 µg), colistin sulfate (50 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), nalidixic acid (30 µg), gentamicin (15 µg), netilmicin (10 µg) and tobramycin (10 µg) (Bio-Rad, France). The diameters of the antibiotic susceptibility halos were recorded according to the recommendations of EUCAST. Intermediate (I) susceptibility of pathovars was classified as resistant (R).

Detection of antibiotic resistance genes

The strains that were resistant to imipenem and amoxicillin/clavulanate were PCR screened. DNA for PCR analysis was extracted from the isolates using the heat lysis method 19. A loopful of bacterial growth from Mueller Hinton agar (Liofilchem, Italy) plate was suspended in 1 ml of sterile water, and the mixture was boiled for 10 min at +100 °C and centrifuged for 10 min at 12000 rpm at +4°C. The obtained supernatant was collected and used for PCR reactions. Multiplex PCR assays were carried out using oligonucleotides (Table 3) to detect the presence of genes of the blaKPC, blaVIM, blaIMP, blaTEM, blaSHV, blaOXA and blaCTX-M types in all E. coli and Salmonella strains of the study.

About 2.5 μl of supernatant were added to 22.5 μl reaction mixture containing 5U of Taq DNA polymerase (Accu Power, Korea), deoxyribonucleic triphosphate (10 mM), buffer GC (10X), MgCl2 (25 mM), and PCR primers (10 μM). We performed PCR conditions as followed: 5min at +94°C, followed by 35 amplification cycles of +94°C for 30s, 59±4 °C for 60s and +72°C for 60s with a final extension of +72°C for 10min on a thermal cycler (Gene Amp 9700, Applied Biosystems). Our reaction products were separated by electrophoresis in (1.5% weight/volume) agarose gel, stained with a Redsafe solution (Prolabo, France) and visualized under ultraviolet (UV) light (Gel Logic 200).

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Permission to conduct the study was obtained from the hospital authorities of Burkina Faso, and informed verbal consent was obtained from the parents/guardians of every child before sample collection. The National Ethical Committee (s) of Burkina Faso (N ° 2009-39) approved the study protocol.

RESULTS

Bacterial isolates

Of the 275 stool samples, five isolates were confirmed as E. coli strains: 3 EAEC, and 2 atypical EPEC. Nine Salmonella isolates were detected belonging to the following serotypes: Salmonella Poona, S. Typhimurium, S. Ouakam, S. Virchow, S. Duisburg and S. Hvittingfoss.

Antimicrobial resistance

The five E. coli strains were resistant to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, amoxicillin and tetracycline (5/5); four strains were resistant to trimetoprim-sulfametoxazol, colistin-sulfate and piperacillin (4/5); three strains showed resistance to cefotaxim, ceftriaxone, aztreonam, cefixime and cefepime (3/5). Whereas, resistance to chloramphenicol and also to imipenem was shown in two of isolates (2/5).

All the nine Salmonella strains were resistant to amoxicillin (9/9), eight were resistant to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (8/9), six were resistant to tetracycline, cefixime and cefepime (6/9); five were resistant to ceftriaxone, cefotaxim and colistin-sulfate (5/9). Less than five strains were resistant to aztreonam, trimetoprim-sulfametoxazol and piperacillin while no resistance was shown to imipenem (Fig. 2).

Carbapenemase genes

The results of PCR amplification of blaKPC, blaVIM, blaIMP, blaTEM, blaSHV, blaOXA and blaCTX-M genes in E. coli and Salmonella isolates are given in table 4. blaKPC gene (Fig. 4), blaVIM gene and blaIMP-2 gene were carried by two E. coli isolates which were resistant to imipenem. blaOXA gene (Fig. 3) was found in all the five E. coli strains (5/5) and in three of the Salmonella strains (3/9). blaCTX-M gene (Fig. 4) was shown in one E. coli strain and in none of the Salmonella. blaTEM and blaSHV were reported in none of the E. coli and Salmonella strains.

All E. coli strains were isolated in children of one year old while the sex distribution was 4/5 for male and 1/5 for female. The Salmonella were reported in children of one year old (4/9), two years old (2/9) and three years old (3/9) with a sex distribution of 5/9 for male and 4/9 for female (table 3).


 

 

Figure 1: Map of Burkina Faso. In red = Gourcy and Boromo where the study was conducted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Burkina_Faso,_administrative_divisions_-_de_-_monochrome.svg

 

Figure 2: Resistance to individual antimicrobial among E. coli and Salmonella strains.

Figure legend: AMC = Amoxicillin- clavulanic acid, AMX = Amoxicillin, CTX = Cefotaxime, ATM = Aztreoname, IPM = Imipenem, CRO = Ceftriaxone, FEP = Cefepime, CFM = Cefixime, TET = Tetracycline, CHL = Chloramphenicol, SXT = Trimethoprim-sulfametoxazole CIP = Ciprofloxacine, NAL = nalidixic acid, CST = Colistin sulfate, GMI = Gentamicin, TZP = Piperacillin-tazobactam, PIP = Piperacillin, NTM = Netilmicin, TMN = Tobramycin, I = Intermediate, R = Resistant.

 

 

 

Figure 3: blaOXA gene detected in E. coli.

Figure legend : Lane M : hyperlader (100 bp), Lane 1 : blaOXA positive control (813 pb), Lane 2-8 : positive samples for blaOXA gene (813 pb), Lane T : negative sample.

 

 

Figure 4. blaCTX-M and  blaKPC genes detected in E. coli.

Figure legend: Lane M = hyperlader 100 bp; Lane A = blaCTX-M positive control (544 pb), Lane B, D et E = positive samples for blaCTX-M  gene (544 pb), Lane B, C, D et E = positive samples for blaKPC  gene (300 pb), T: negative sample.

 

Table 1 : Oligonucleotides primers used for multiplex PCR reaction

Pathotype

Target gene

Primer sequence (5' to 3')

Size (bp)

[C] (μM)

Reference

Typical EPEC

bfpB

MP3-bfpB-F: GACACCTCATTGCTGAAGTCG

910

0.1

[16]

MP3-bfpB-R:CCAGAACACCTCCGTTATGC

0.1

EHEC and EPEC

eaeA

eae-F:TCAATGCAGTTCCGTTATCAGTT

482

0.1

[16]

eae-R:GTAAAGTCCGTTACCCCAACCTG

0.1

escV

MP3-escV-F:ATTCTGGCTCTCTTCTTCTTTATGGCTG

544

0.4

[16]

MP3-escV-R:CGTCCCCTTTTACAAACTTCATCGC

0.4

Ent

ent-F:TGGGCTAAAAGAAGACACACTG

629

0.4

[16]

ent-R:CAAGCATCCTGATTATCTCACC

0.4

EHEC

EHEC-hly

hlyEHEC-F: TTCTGGGAAACAGTGACGCACATA

688

0.1

[15]

hlyEHEC-R: TCACCGATCTTCTCATCCCAATG

0.1

Stx1

MP4-stx1A-F:CGATGTTACGGTTTGTTACTGTGACAGC

244

0.2

[16]

MP4-stx1A-R:AATGCCACGCTTCCCAGAATTG

0.2

Stx2

MP3-stx2AF:GTTTTGACCATCTTCGTCTGATTATTGAG

324

0.4

[16]

MP3-stx2A-R:AGCGTAAGGCTTCTGCTGTGAC

0.4

EAEC

 

astA

MP-astA-F TGCCATCAACACAGTATATCCG

102

0.4

[16]

MP2-astA-R ACGGCTTTGTAGTCCTTCCAT

0.4

aggR

MP2-aggR-F:ACGCAGAGTTGCCTGATAAAG

400

0.2

[16]

MP2-aggR-R:AATACAGAATCGTCAGCATCAGC

0.2

Pic

MP2-pic-F:AGCCGTTTCCGCAGAAGCC

1111

0.2

[16]

MP2-pic-R:AAATGTCAGTGAACCGACGATTGG

0.2

 

EIEC

invE

MP2-invE-F:CGATAGATGGCGAGAAATTATATCCCG

766

0.2

[16]

MP2-invE-R:CGATCAAGAATCCCTAACAGAAGAATCAC

0.2

ipaH

ipaH-F: GAAAACCCTCCTGGTCCATCAGG

437

0.1

[17]

ipaH-R:GCCGGTCAGCCACCCTCTGAGAGTAC

0.1

ETEC

elt

MP2-LT-F: GAACAGGAGGTTTCTGCGTTAGGTG

655

0.1

[16]

MP2-LT-R: CTTTCAATGGCTTTTTTTTGGGAGTC

0.1

estA

MP4-STIa-F: CCTCTTTTAGYCAGACARCTGAATCASTTG

157

0.4

[16]

MP4-STIa-R : CAGGCAGGATTACAACAAAGTTCACAG

0.4

estB

MP2-STI-F : TGTCTTTTTCACCTTTCGCTC

171

0.2

[16]

MP2-STI-R CGGTACAAGCAGGATTACAACAC

0.2

E. coli

uidA

MP2-uidA-F:ATGCCAGTCCAGCGTTTTTGC

1487

0.2

[17]

MP2-uidA-R:AAAGTGTGGGTCAATAATCAGGAAGTG

0.2

 

 

 

 

Table 2 : Zones of inhibition of the tested antibiotics

Families

Antibiotics

[C]a (µg)

Ǿ b(mm)

R (Ǿ˂)

S (Ǿ≥)

 

 

 

 

 

 

β-lactams

Aminopenicillins

Amoxicillin- clavulanic acid (AMC)

30

19

19

Amoxicillin (AMX)

25

19

19

Piperacillin (PIP)

75

17

20

Piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP)

100/10

17

20

Cephalosporins C3G

Ceftriaxone (CRO)

30

20

23

Cefixime (CFM)

10

17

17

Cefotaxime (CTX)

30

17

20

Cephalosporines C4G

Cefepime (FEP)

30

21

24

Monobactam

Aztreonam (ATM)

30

21

24

Carbapenemes

Imipenem (IPM)

10

16

22

Quinolones

Nalidixic acid (NAL)

30

14

19

Fluoroquinolones

Ciprofloxacin (CIP)

5

19

22

Cyclines

Tetracycline (TET)

30

15

18

Phenicols

Chloramphenicol (CHL)

30

17

17

Sulfamides

Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT)

1.25/23.75

13

16

Polymyxines

Colistin sulfate (CST)

50

15

15

Aminoglycosides

Gentamycin (GMI)

15 (10 IU)

14

17

Netilmicin (NTM)

10

12

15

Tobramycin (TMN)

10

14

17

 

 

Table 3: Oligonucleotides used to amplify carbapenemases genes

Primer name

Target genes

Primers sequence (5'to3')

Size (bp)

KPC- F

KPC-R

blaKPC2

GCT CAG GCG CAA CTG TAA G

300

AGC ACA GCG GCA GCA AGA AAG

VIM- F

VIM-R

blaVIM

CAG ATT GCC GAT GGT GTT TGG

390

AGG TGG GCC ATT CAG CCA GA

IMP- F

IMP-R

blaIMP

GGA ATA GAG TGG CTT AAT TCTC

232

GTG ATG CGT CYC CAA YTT CAC T

TEM- F

TEM-R

blaTEM

ATG AGT ATT CAA CAT TTC CG

 

1080

CCA ATG CTT ATT CAG TGA GG

SHV- F

SHV-R

blaSHV

TTA TCT CCC TGT TAG CCA CC

 

768

GAT TTG CTG ATT TCG CTC GG

OXA- F

OXA-R

blaOXA

ATG AAA AAC ACA ATA CAT ATC

 

813

AAT TTA GTG TGT TTA GAA TGG

CTX-M- F

CTX-M-R

blaCTX-M

ATG TGC AGY ACC AGT AAR GT

 

544

TGG GTR AAR TAR GTS ACC AGA

 

 

 

 

Table 4: Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae

 

Strains

Sex

Age (year)

Carbapenemase genes

 

Total N

blaKPC2

blaVIM

blaIMP

blaTEM

blaSHV

blaOXA

blaCTX-M

Escherichia coli pathotyps

025 B (EAEC)

M

1

-

-

-

-

-

+

-

1

039B (EAEC)

F

1

-

-

-

-

-

+

-

1

043B (Atypical EPEC)

M

1

+

+

+

-

-

+

-

4

044B (EAEC)

M

1

+

+

+

-

-

+

+

5

046B (Atypical EPEC)

M

1

-

-

-

-

-

+

-

1

Salmonella serovars

084B (S. Duisburg)

M

3

-

-

-

-

-

+

-

1

057B (S. Poona)

M

2

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

0

066B (S. Typhimurium)

M

1

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

0

068B (S. Typhimurium)

M

2

-

-

-

-

-

+

-

1

078B (S. Ouakam)

M

1

-

-

-

-

-

+

-

1

063G (S. Hvittingfoss)

F

1

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

0

087G (S. Poona)

F

1

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

0

112G1 (S. Virchow)

F

3

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

0

112G2 (S. Virchow)

F

3

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

0

 

 


DISCUSSION

Increasing numbers of antibiotic-resistant Enterobacteriaceae are responsible of serious problems in infection control. This phenomenon also contributes to the global spread of Carbapenemase- producing bacteria becoming therefore especially worrisome 20. It has been shown that Enterobacterales spp., such as Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae, are common human pathogens and asymptomatic colonizers of the human gastrointestinal tract and environmental niches 21. Our study reported for the first time the occurrence of Carbapenemase-producing E. coli and Salmonella in children with diarrhea in rural settings of Burkina Faso.

The isolated strains were mainly resistant to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, amoxicillin, tetracycline, trimetoprim-sulfametoxazol, colistin-sulfate, piperacillin, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, aztreonam, cefixime and cefepime (between 60% and 100%). Particularly, two E. coli harbored resistance patterns to imipenem. In contrast, no resistance to imipenem was observed in Salmonella strains. Similar results concerning E. coli resistance to imipenem were reported in India 12. All isolated E. coli and Salmonella were 100% sensitive to netilmicin in agreement with data reported in Bangladesh 22.

In the present study, the most detected carbapenemase was blaOXA which was encoded by eight of the isolates (57.14%). In agreement to our result, a recent review showed that OXA-48-like enzymes associated with Enterobacteriaceae are one of the most concerning developments in carbapenem resistance in the last decade and are still globally ascending 23. blaCTX-M gene was shown in one E. coli strain while blaTEM and blaSHV were reported in none of the strains. Unlike our results, studies conducted in India reported a high prevalence of CTX‑M‑type ESBL among ESBL‑E. coli isolated from clinical specimens 24, 25. Interestingly, the strain encoding blaCTX-M gene in our study also harbored blaOXA gene. Indeed, enteric Gram-negative bacteria with the blaOXA-48-like genes could co-harbor genes encoding ESBL (blaCTX-M, blaSHV, blaTEM) 26. blaKPC2, blaVIM and blaIMP-2 were carried by two E. coli isolates while no Salmonella strains harboured these genes. Similarly, a recent study reported no blaKPC, blaVIM and blaIMP genes on carbapenemase producing Salmonella enterica isolates in the United Kingdom but reported 2 blaOXA48 strains and one blaNDM on the same isolates 27. This is expected because carbapenemase-producing Salmonella strains are rarely isolated. In contrast, resistance to carbapenems was observed in CIP-R Salmonella KentuckyX1-ST198-SGI1 isolates in which carbapenemases blaVIM−2 and blaOXA−48 have been detected 28.

Our results show that carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) remain one of the most urgent healthcare threats. Indeed, carbapenemase-encoding genes are already widespread in many parts of the world 23. A recent study on wastewater used for urban agriculture in Ouagadougou (Burkina Faso) concluded that raw sewage used as fertilizer could be contributing to the spread of resistance bacteria among humans and animals 29. Furthermore, a study has shown that bacteria producing carbapenemase are currently spreading among pets 3 and because of the proximity between humans and animals, these bacteria can contaminate humans. For example, it has been shown that poultry flocks contribute to the global dissemination of Salmonella Kentucky ST198-X1-SGI1CIP-R strain in developing countries 28. Since subsistence, farming and animal husbandry are the primary economic activities for the local populations in Boromo and Gourcy, the spread of these bacteria poses serious health concerns.

Three specific genes were detected in two E. coli strains: Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC), Verona integrin-encoded metallo-β-lactamase (VIM) and Imipenemase (IMP-2). To our best of knowledge, this is the first report of blaKPC gene in E. coli in Burkina Faso. However, KPC producers have been described, mostly from nosocomial K. pneumoniae isolates, and E. coli strains in Israel but also from other enterobacterial species 30. Indeed, since their identification the first time in the USA in 1996, Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemases (KPCs) have spread internationally among Gram-negative bacteria, especially K. pneumoniae, although their precise epidemiology is diverse across countries and regions worldwide 31. Furthermore, because of its extensively identification worldwide, K. pneumoniae may have contributed to the spread of the blaKPC genes 32.

As far as the class B metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) is concerned, our results corroborate the existing reports. Endemicity of VIM- and IMP-type enzymes has been reported in Greece, Taiwan and Japan 33, 8, although outbreaks and single reports of VIM and IMP producers have been shown in many other countries 33.

It has been shown that carbapenemases can hydrolyze almost all β-lactams, and are easily transferable among enterobacterial species 34. These genes are found in multidrug-resistant isolates consistent with the result found in the present study 34. Therefore, its spread in Enterobacteriaceae is a public health issue. For example, invasive infections by carbapenem-resistant strains have been found to be associated with high morbidity and mortality rates 35.

Otherwise, several risk factors of colonization and infection with carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) including severe underlying illness, prolonged hospital stay, the presence of invasive medical devices, and antibiotic use have been shown 36-39. According to previous studies, CPE have been associated with adverse clinical and economic outcomes such as increased mortality, increased length of stay, setting up an effective therapy scheme, decreased functional status on discharge, and increased cost of health care 40-43. Young children (those under one year old) were severely infected with carbapenem-resistant E. coli. This is a matter of public health issues because the emergence of MBL-producing bacteria greatly limits treatment options 44. The most frequent MBLs reported to date belong to the VIM and IMP types and have been described extensively worldwide 45.

The main limitation of the present study consists of the low number of isolates which makes generalizability difficult. Morever, the use of phenotypic approach limited to imipenem MIC is not adapted for the detection of all carbapenemase type. For instance, enterobacteria strains carrying blaOXA48 carbapenemase could present low imipenem MIC (0.5 mg/L) suggesting the use of temocillin for phenotypic detection of blaOXA48 46.

CONCLUSIONS

Infections by carbapenem-resistant bacteria are difficult to treat successfully. This study highlights the need for rapid identification of MBL-producing Gram-negative species both for appropriate treatment and for timely implementation of infection control measures. In developing countries like Burkina Faso, phenotypic methods may be useful for routine detection of Carbapenemase production, particularly when PCR is not available.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

We thank the "Réseau de Recherche sur les Maladies Entériques à Potentiel Épidémique en Afrique de l’Ouest (REMENTA)" for assistance with PCR reagentsthe "Centre National de Recherche et de Formation sur le Paludisme (CNRFP)/Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso" and the "Centre National de Référence pour les Antibiotiques (CNR-Antibiotiques)/Institut Pasteur de Côte d'Ivoire" for technical support.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors stipulate that they have no conflict of interest in regard to this study.

REFERENCES

  1. World Health Organization (WHO). Antimicrobial resistance; 2018. https://www.who.int/medicines/areas/rational_use/who-amr-amc-report-20181109.pdf
  2. Gauthier L, Dortet L, Cotellon G, Creton E, Cuzon G, et al. Diversity of carbapenemase-producing Escherichia coli isolates, France 2012-2013. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018; 62: pii: e00266-18.
  3. Yousfi M, Touati A, Mairi A, Creton E, Cuzon G, Ponties V, et al. Emergence of Carbapenemase-Producing Escherichia coli Isolated from Companion Animals in Algeria. 2016; Microbial Drug Resist. 22:342-346.
  4. Li XZ, Mehrotra M, Ghimire S, Adewoye L. Beta-Lactam resistance and beta-lactamases in bacteria of animal origin. Vet Mic 2007; 121:197-214.
  5. Tzouvelekis LS, Markogiannakis A, Psichogiou M, Tassios PT, Daikos GL. Carbapenemases in Klebsiella pneumoniae and other Enterobacteriaceae: an evolving crisis of global dimensions. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2012; 25:682-707.
  6. Nordmann P, Dortet L, Poirel L. Carbapenem resistance in Enterobacteriaceae: Here is the storm! Trends Mol Med. 2012; 18:263-272.
  7. Nordmann P, Cornaglia G. Carbapenemase‑producing Enterobacteriaceae: A call for action! Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012; 18:411-412.
  8. Queenan AM, Bush K. Carbapenemases: the versatile β-lactamases. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007; 20:440–458.
  9. Ruppé É, Woerther P-L, Barbier F. Mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative bacilli. Ann Intensive Care 2015; 5 (21) Article 61.
  10. Lowman W, Bamford C, Govind C, Swe Swe Han K, Kularatne R, Senekal M, et al. The SASCM CRE-WG: consensus statement and working guidelines for the screening and laboratory detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. South Afr J Infect Dis. 2014; 29:5–11.
  11. Sherchan JB, Hayakawa K, Miyoshi-Akiyama T, Ohmagari N, Kirikae T, Nagamatsu M, et al. Clinical Epidemiology and Molecular Analysis of Extended-Spectrum B-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli in Nepal: Characteristics of Sequence Types 131 and 648. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015; 59:3424-32.
  12. Mariappan S, Sekar U, Kamalanathan A. Carbapenemase‑producing Enterobacteriaceae: Risk factors for infection and impact of resistance on outcomes. Int J App Basic Med Res. 2018; 7:32-39.
  13. Ortega A, Saez D, Bautista V, Fernandez-Romero S, Lara N, Aracil B, et al. Carbapenemase-producing Escherichia coli is becoming more prevalent in Spain mainly because of the polyclonal dissemination of OXA-48. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016; 71: 2131-38.
  14. Popoff MY, Bockemuhl J, Gheesling LL. Supplement 2002 (no. 46) to the Kauffmann-White scheme. Res Microbiol. 2004; 155:568-70.
  15. Antikainen J, Tarkka E, Haukka K, Siitonen A, Vaara M, Kirveskari J. New 16 plex PCR method for rapid detection of Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli directly from stool samples. Europ J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009; 28: 899–908.
  16. Müller D, Greune L, Heusipp G, Karch H, Fruth A, Tschäpe H, et al. Identification of unconventional intestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli isolates expressing intermediate virulence factor profiles by using a novel single-step multiplex PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007; 73: 3380–90.
  17. Vidal M, Kruger E, Durán C, Lagos R, Levine M, Prado V, et al. Single Multiplex PCR Assay To Identify Simultaneously the Six Categories of Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli Associated with Enteric Infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2005; 43: 5362–65.
  18. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). Recommandation 2017. Éd. V.1.0 Mars. pp 1-127. https://www.eucast.org/
  19. Moyo SJ, Maselle SY, Matee MI, Langeland N, Mylvaganam H. Identification of Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli isolated from infants and children in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. BMC Infect Dis. 2007; 7: 92.
  20. Nordmann P, Naas T, Poirel L. Global spread of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011; 17:1791-1798.
  21. Mathers AJ, Vegesana K, German-Mesner I, Ainsworth J, Pannone A, Crook DW, et al. Risk factors for Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) gene acquisition and clinical outcomes across multiple bacterial species. J Hospit Infect. 2020; 104: 456-468.
  22. Hossain MZ, Naher A, Hasan P, Mozazfia KT, Tasnim H, Ferdush Z, et al. Prevalent bacteria and their sensitivity and resistance pattern to antibiotics: a study in Dhaka medical college hospital. J Dhaka Med Coll. 2017; 26: 52-64.
  23. Halat DH, Moubareck CA. The Current Burden of Carbapenemases: Review of Significant Properties and Dissemination among Gram-Negative Bacteria. Antibiotics 2020; 9, 186.
  24. Nisha KV, Veena SA, Rathika SD, Vijaya SM, Avinash SK. Antimicrobial susceptibility, risk factors and prevalence of bla cefotaximase, temoneira, and sulfhydryl variable genes among Escherichia coli in community-acquired pediatric urinary tract infection. J Lab Physic. 2017; 9:156-62.
  25. Devi LS, Broor S, Rautela RS, Grover SS, Chakravarti A, Chattopadhya D. Increasing Prevalence of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae Producing CTX-M-Type Extended‑Spectrum Beta‑Lactamase, Carbapenemase, and NDM-1 in Patients from a Rural Community with Community Acquired Infections: A 3‑Year Study. Int J App Basic Med Res. 2020; 10:156-163.
  26. Jean S-S, Lee W-S, Lam C, Hsu C-W, Chen R-J, Hsueh P-R. Carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacteria: Current epidemics, antimicrobial susceptibility and treatment options. Future Microbiol. 2015; 10: 407–425.
  27. Day MR, Meunier D, Doumith M, de Pinna E, Woodford N, Hopkins KL. Carbapenemase-producing Salmonella enterica isolates in the UK. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015; 2165-2167.
  28. Le Hello S, Bekhit A, Granier SA, Barua H, Beutlich J, Zajac M, et al. The global establishment of a highly-fluoroquinolone resistant Salmonella enterica serotype Kentucky ST198 strain. Front Microbiol. 2013; 4: 395.
  29. Bougnom BP, Zongo C, McNally A, Ricci V, Etoa FX, Thiele-Bruhn S, et al. Wastewater used for urban agriculture in West Africa as a reservoir for antibacterial resistance dissemination. Environ Res. 2019; 168:14-24.
  30. Nordmann P, Cuzon G, Naas T. The real threat of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing bacteria. Lancet Infect D 2009; 9:228–236.
  31. Munoz-Price LS, Poirel L, Bonomo RA, Schwaber MJ, Daikos GL, Cormican M, et al. Clinical epidemiology of the global expansion of Klebsiella pneumoniae Lancet Infect Dis. 2013; 13: 785–796.
  32. Cuzon G, Naas T, Truong H, Villegas MV, Wisell KT, Carmeli Y, et al. Worldwide diversity of Klebsiella pneumoniae that produce β-lactamase blaKPC-2 gene. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010; 16:1349–56.
  33. Walsh TR, Toleman MA, Poirel L, Nordmannn P. Metallo-β-lactamases: the quiet before the storm? Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005; 18:306–325.
  34. Nordmann P, Poirel L. Strategies for identification of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013; 68: 487–9.
  35. Struelens MJ, Monnet DL, Magiorakos AP, Santos O'Connor F, Giesecke J, European NDM-1 Survey Participants. New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase 1-producing Enterobacteriaceae: emergence and response in Europe. Euro Surveill. 2010; 15:pii https://www.eurosurveillance.org/images/dynamic/EE/V15N46/art19716.pdf
  1. Gupta N, Limbago BM, Patel JB, Kallen AJ. Carbapenem‑resistant Enterobacteriaceae: Epidemiology and prevention. Clin Infect Dis. 2011; 53:60‑67.
  2. Patel N, Harrington S, Dihmess A, Woo B, Masoud R, Martis P, et al. Clinical epidemiology of carbapenem‑intermediate or ‑resistant Enterobacteriaceae. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011; 66:1600‑08.
  3. Swaminathan M, Sharma S, Poliansky Blash S, Patel G, Banach DB, Phillips M, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for acquisition of carbapenem‑resistant Enterobacteriaceae in the setting of endemicity. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013; 34:809‑817.
  4. Ling ML, Tee YM, Tan SG, Amin IM, How KB, Tan KY, et al. Risk factors for acquisition of carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriaceae in an acute tertiary care hospital in Singapore. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2015; 4:26.
  5. Borer A, Saidel‑Odes L, Riesenberg K, Eskira S, Peled N, Nativ R, et al. Attributable mortality rate for carbapenem‑resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009; 30:972‑6.
  6. Gasink LB, Edelstein PH, Lautenbach E, Synnestvedt M, Fishman NO. Risk factors and clinical impact of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase‑producing pneumoniae. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009; 30:1180‑85.
  7. Teo J, Cai Y, Tang S, Lee W, Tan TY, Tan TT, et al. Risk factors, molecular epidemiology and outcomes of ertapenem‑resistant, carbapenem‑susceptible Enterobacteriaceae: A case‑case‑control study. PLoS One 2012; 7:e34254.
  8. Bleumin D, Cohen MJ, Moranne O, Esnault VL, Benenson S, Paltiel O, et al. Carbapenem‑resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae is associated with poor outcome in hemodialysis patients. J Infect. 2012; 65:318‑25.
  9. Birgy A, Doit C, Mariani-Kurkdjian P, Gene N, Faye A, Arlet G, et al. Early Detection of Colonization by VIM-1-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and NDM-1-Producing Escherichia coli in Two Children Returning to France. J Clin Microbiol. 2011; 49: 3085–87.
  10. Overturf GD. Carbapenemases: a brief review for pediatric infectious disease specialists. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2010; 29:68–70.
  11. Cavaco LM, Hansen F, Mushtaq S, Hill RLR, Woodford N, Le Hello S, et al. Evaluation of temocillin for phenotypic carbapenemase screening of Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica isolates in relation to the presence of genes encoding ESBLs and carbapenemase production. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019; 74:639-644.