Available online on 15.03.2026 at http://jddtonline.info

Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics

Open Access to Pharmaceutical and Medical Research

Copyright  © 2026 The   Author(s): This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial use provided the original author and source are credited

Open Access Full Text Article   Research Article

Biochemical and antibiotic resistance profile of Salmonella isolated from stool in N'Djamena, Chad: associated risk factors

Daouda Adoumngar 1,2,3, Abdoulaye Mayangar 1, Nadlaou Bessimbaye *1,2,3

Department of Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Human Health Sciences (FSSH), University of N'Djamena, BP 1117 N'Djamena, Chad.

Ministry of Public Health and Prevention (MSPP), Chad.

Laboratory of the National Reference Hospital Center (CHURN) of N'Djamena, Chad

Article Info:

_______________________________________________ Article History:

Received 21 Dec 2025  

Reviewed 27 Jan 2026  

Accepted 15 Feb 2026  

Published 15 March 2026  

_______________________________________________

Cite this article as: 

Daouda A, Abdoulaye M, Nadlaou B, Biochemical and antibiotic resistance profile of Salmonella isolated from stool in N'Djamena, Chad: associated risk factors, Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics. 2026; 16(3):1-9  DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v16i3.7555                                              _______________________________________________

For Correspondence:  

Nadlaou Bessimbaye, Faculty of Human Health Sciences (FSSH), University of N'Djamena, Chad.

Abstract

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Salmonella is responsible for two types of infections: foodborne gastroenteritis and typhoid and paratyphoid fevers. The objective of this study was to investigate the biochemical profile and resistance to antibiotics commonly used to treat the different Salmonella serotypes circulating in the city of N'Djamena. Isolation and identification of Salmonella in stool samples were performed at the laboratory of the National University Reference Hospital (CHU-RN) using standard clinical microbiology techniques.

Of the 395 stool cultures performed, 17 (23.2%) Salmonella were isolated, among which the identified serotypes were: 5 (29.4%) Salmonella Typhi, 3 (17.6%) Salmonella Para Typhi A, 2 (11.7%) Salmonella Para Typhi B, 2 (11.7%) Salmonella Typhimurium, 2 (11.7%) Salmonella Enteritidis and 3 (17.6%) Salmonella arizonae respectively. Between the proportions of positive stool culture results in people with digestive disorders associated with symptoms (76.5%) (Group 1), and people with digestive disorders without signs of disease (23.5%) (Group 2), there is a significant difference in favor of group 1 (p = 0.001). The antibiotic efficacy test showed that 59% of Salmonella were resistant to aminopenicillins (ampicillin, amoxicillin), sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim, nalidixic acid, and tetracycline. In contrast, 82% of Salmonella were susceptible to amoxicillin + clavulanic acid, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, and imipenem.

This study not only identified the serotypes of Salmonella, but also highlighted an effective antibiotic therapy for the prevention of Salmonella involved in diarrheal diseases circulating in the city of N'Djamena in Chad.

Keywords: diarrhea, Salmonella, antibiotic, digestive troubles, N'Djamena, Chad.

 


 

INTRODUCTION

Salmonellosis is a disease caused by bacteria belonging to the Enterobacteriaceae family and the Salmonella genus. Salmonella is responsible for two main types of infections: foodborne gastroenteritis and typhoid and paratyphoid fevers. These are facultative anaerobic Gram-negative bacilli. The genus Salmonella currently comprises two species: Salmonella enterica or enteritica, subdivided into six subspecies (Salmonella enterica (I), Salmonella salamae (II), Salmonella arizonae (IIIa), Salmonella diarizonae (IIIb), Salmonella houtenae (IV), Salmonella indica (VI), and Salmonella bongori). The enterica (I) subspecies is the most common in warm-blooded animals and humans, containing pathogenic serotypes such as Typhimurium and Enteritidis. These subspecies are defined by biochemical and phenotypic criteria, then classified into more than 2600 distinct serotypes characterized by their somatic antigens “O”, their flagellar antigens “H” and in some cases, by their virulence antigens “Vi)1,2. Salmonella infection mainly affects products of animal origin (eggs, meat, raw milk, poultry) but also plant-based products (fruits, poorly washed vegetables) and is transmitted orally, often via the ingestion of food contaminated by the excrement of healthy or infected carrier animals3.

Salmonella arizonae (or Salmonella enterica subsp. arizonae) infection is a rare zoonosis in humans, affecting mainly young children and immunocompromised people, often through contact with reptiles (turtles, snakes) or their products, causing more serious infections such as meningitis or osteomyelitis; in turkey poults, it causes septicemia with high mortality. Symptoms in humans include fever, diarrhea, vomiting, and abdominal pain, but can progress to serious complications4,5. Typhoid and paratyphoid fevers are caused by strictly human Salmonella bacteria: Salmonella Typhi, Salmonella para Typhi A, and certain strains of Salmonella para Typhi B. After an incubation period of one to two weeks, a high fever of 39–40°C, headache, anorexia, abdominal pain with foul-smelling, ochre-colored diarrhea, and nausea appear. Splenomegaly, a rash, and the characteristic "typhos," a state of prostration6,7. Antibiotic resistance in Salmonella is a growing public health problem, with strains becoming multidrug-resistant to classes such as fluoroquinolones, cephalosporins, and cotrimoxazole, making treatment more difficult. The mechanisms include mutation and gene acquisition on mobile genetic elements, often transmitted by plasmids, making antibiograms essential. Furthermore, inappropriate treatment can promote chronic carriage. The most widely known methods of combating typhoid fever include effective handwashing. Cooking at temperatures above 65°C destroys the bacteria, but good hygiene and adherence to the cold chain are essential to prevent infection, which manifests as gastroenteritis. Supplying water systems with pathogen-free water should be implemented to limit the risk of exposure. Furthermore, national epidemiological surveillance is necessary: monitoring circulating serotypes and antibiotic resistance, screening individuals with fever and digestive disorders, and identifying chronic and acute carriers of Salmonella. The TAB vaccine, poorly tolerated and whose efficacy has been much debated, is currently being replaced by the Typhim Vi© vaccine, which is better tolerated and has a protective rate (against Salmonella Typhi only) of 60% in endemic areas7,8,9. In Chad, a study contributing to the knowledge of Salmonella has been documented on the prevalence of Salmonella10, but no study has been conducted on biochemical and phenotypic criteria. The objective of this study was to investigate the biochemical profile and resistance to antibiotics frequently used in our region to treat the different Salmonella serotypes (specific and non-adaptive) circulating in humans in the city of N'Djamena.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Setting, Period, and Type of Survey

This study involved prospective, cross-sectional surveys conducted from August 3 to December 21, 2025, on living conditions and the screening of chronic and acute carriers of Salmonella in the city of N'Djamena. Stool samples were analyzed at the bacteriology laboratory of the National University Reference Hospital (CHU-RN) in N'Djamena. A pre-established data collection form containing items (sociodemographic, clinical, paraclinical, and therapeutic information) was also used.

Study population, Sampling

Volunteer participants (each having signed a written informed consent form) were recruited by convenience sampling at different stages of treatment to screen for Salmonella (specific and non-adaptive) in chronic and acute carriers of Salmonella in hospital and community settings among febrile individuals with digestive troubles (n=395), aged 2 to 61 years, divided into two groups:

Group 1: Individuals with digestive troubles associated with other symptoms (n=344), aged 2 to 61 years.

Group 2: Individuals with digestive troubles without other signs of the disease (n=51), aged 11 to 61 years.

Sample Size

Sampling will be random, based on Cochran's formula11:

N = z²p (1-p)/I²

N = Sample size

Z = precision level of 1.96 for a 95% confidence level

P = 26.4% prevalence of Salmonella obtained in 2014 by Bessimbaye12, I = margin of error of 5%

N = (1.96)²×0.26 (1-0.26)̸(0.05)² = 295, but given the availability of participants, we continued to a sample size of 395 stool samples.

Antibiotic Selection

Antibiotics were selected based on their prescription for the treatment of salmonellosis in hospital and community settings.


 

 

Table 1: Antibiotics Selected for Susceptibility Testing

Category 

Family

Antibiotic

Dose/disk

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Antibiotic (Bio-Rad)

Beta-Lactams 

Amoxicillin (AMX)

25 μg

Ampicillin (AMP)

10 μg 

Amoxicillin + clavulanic acid (AMC)

20/10 μg

Ceftriaxone (CRO)

30 μg

Cefotaxime (CTX) 

30 μg

Imipenem (IMP) 

10 μg

Cyclins

Tetracycline (TET) 

30 μg

Fluroquinolone

Ciprofloxacin (CIP)

5 μg

Quinolones

Nalidixic acid (NAL)

30 μg

Sulfamides

Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (SXT)

1,25 /23,75 μg

5 famillies

10 antibiotics

 

Quality control was performed using the reference strain E. coli ATCC 25922.


 

Stool culture and antibiogram

Salmonella isolation and identification were performed after inoculation of stool samples onto Hektoen agar (Bio-Rad®). After 18 to 24 hours of incubation in a 37°C incubator, green colonies with a black center on Hektoen agar were suspected of being Salmonella. The colonies were subcultured onto Mueller-Hinton (MH) agar for Gram staining, oxidase testing, and antigenic studies. Biochemical identification was performed using the API® 20 E gallery (Bio-Mérieux 20100). The agglutination test was performed according to the instructions of Kaufmann and White (Pilet et al., 1979) using anti-Salmonella sera (OMA (agglutinating groups A, B, D, E, L), OMB (agglutinating groups C, F, G, H), OMC, and Vi) and anti-flagellar sera (Bio-Rad®) for the detection of Salmonella13,14.Culture of the inoculum on the API® 20 E gallery (Bio-Mérieux 20100) was performed for biochemical identification. The API® 20 E gallery is based on the principle of microtubule inoculum with a suspension that rehydrates the media. Incubation takes place at 37°C in an incubator for 24 hours, during which time biochemical reactions (decarboxylation, fermentation, deamination) occur, resulting in spontaneous colored products that are revealed by the addition of reagents. Salmonella identification is performed using the API® 20 E catalog. This catalog provides identification for a large number of profiles obtained using API® 20 E, thus ensuring high reliability in the interpretation of results. McFarland 0.5 inoculum was used to perform the antibiogram using conventional techniques (disc diffusion method or Kirby-Bauer technique)15. The reading of the diameters of the sensitivity of the antibiotic discs was carried out according to the recommendations of the Antibiogram Committee of the French Society of Microbiology16,17.

Bacterial strain confirmation and antibiogram testing were performed using the Vitek® 2™ Compact 60 analyzer. The system includes the Vitek® 2 Compact instrument, a computer (workstation), and a printer. The software provided with the Vitek® 2 Compact system includes data analysis and management programs. A bidirectional computer interface automatically transfers results to the user's Laboratory Information System (LIS) and to various product and patient reports. A quality control system is available to validate a Vitek® 2 Compact system test kit. An Advanced Expert System™ (AES) (for clinical use) is available to allow systematic online validation of results and interpretation of resistance phenotypes identified by the antibiograms. The inoculum for bacterial isolation was prepared according to the standard procedure and operating instructions for the Vitek® 2 Compact. Using a dispenser, 3 mL of saline solution (Reference 1204, 500 mL, 0.45% NaCl) was dispensed into 5 mL tubes arranged in a tray. Then, using a Pasteur pipette, a bacterial colony was suspended in 3 mL of saline solution, thoroughly mixed, and its optical density was checked with DensiChek McFarland (0.5-0.63) McF. For each suspension, a biochemical identification and antibiogram were performed. A Gram (-) V1 221 pipette (0.5-250 µL) was used to dispense 145 µL of identification suspension into 3 mL of saline solution for antibiotic susceptibility testing (GN = Gram (-) and AST = Corresponding Antibiotic) for each identification. The biochemical identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing cards were inserted into the suspensions arranged in the cassette, and the entire assembly was placed in the Vitek2 analyzer. Once the cassette was in the Vitek2, the loading process was initiated, and the Vitek2 read the barcodes on each card before sealing it. After sealing, the identification cassette was removed, and the Vitek2 performed the analysis. Vitek2 gave the minimum inhibitory concentration of antibiotics according to the European Antibiogram Committee17.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Data were entered and analyzed using Microsoft Word and Excel. The relationship between the proportion and sociodemographic parameters in the study population was assessed using the chi-square test (p ≤ 0.05). Odd ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals were used to determine the degree of association between infection and sociodemographic parameters.

Sociodemographic characteristics of the studied population

A total of 395 stool samples were collected in the city of N’Djamena for the detection of Salmonella by stool culture (coproculture), among them, 344 stools were collected from people suffering from digestive disorders associated with other symptoms (diarrhea, vomiting, headaches, skin rashes etc), and 51 stool samples were collected from people with digestive disorders but without other signs of the disease. Of the 395 people surveyed, there were 272 (69%) men and 123 (31%) women (p = 0.001, significant difference) in favor of the participation of men in the survey with a sex ratio of 1.84. The average age of the patients was 31.5 years with extremes ranging from 2 to 61 years.


 

 

 

 


Figure 1: Sociodemographic characteristics of the studied population

                   


 

Etiologies of Salmonella Isolated from Stool and Results of the Field Survey

Of the 395 stool cultures performed, 17 (23.2%) Salmonella were detected, including 11 (2.8%) Salmonella that specifically infect humans and 6 (1.5%) non-adaptive Salmonella that can infect both humans and animals. According to the survey, these salmonellosis infections are likely linked to poor food hygiene and are generally associated with diarrheal diseases. Furthermore, our study surveyed the most frequently prescribed antibiotics for the management of Salmonella infections in the city of N'Djamena, the capital of the Republic of Chad (Table 1). This survey revealed that Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (SXT: Cotrimoxazole, commonly known as Bactrim) was prescribed in 60% of cases, followed by aminopenicillins (ampicillin, amoxicillin, amoxicillin + clavulanic acid), ceftriaxone (a third-generation cephalosporin: beta-lactam), and ciprofloxacin (a fluoroquinolone) and tetracycline, each used in over 40% of cases for the management of Salmonella infections. In most cases, the antibiotic therapy was not tailored to the antibiogram. The investigation also revealed that expired medications were being dumped in gutters around markets and in garbage heaps around homes.

Socio-demographic and clinico-biological characteristics of the studied population according to the presence of Salmonella isolated from stool

Table 2 shows that out of a total of 395 stool samples cultured, 17/395 (23.2%) Salmonella were isolated, of which 13/344 (3.8%) Salmonella were isolated from people suffering from digestive disorders associated with other symptoms (Group 1) and 4/51 (7.8%) from people with digestive disorders without other signs of the disease (Group 2). Of the 17 (23.2%) Salmonella isolated, 13/17 (76.5%) Salmonella were isolated from Group 1 and 4/17 (23.5%) Salmonella were isolated from Group 2 with a probability of 0.001 (significant difference in favor of Group 1) (table 2).


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 2: Socio-demographic and clinico-biological characteristics of the studied population according to the presence of isolated Salmonella

Parameter

Group 1 (n1=344)

 Group (n2=51)

P-value

Average age (year)

31.5 ± 1.41

36 ± 3.32

0.10

Men (%)

272 (69)

34 (66.7)

0.01

Women (%)

123 (31.1)

17 (33.3)

0.001

Sex-ratio (H/F)

    1.84

  1.84

0.00

Vomiting/Nausea (%) 

13 (3.3)

 -

0.00

Skin rashes (%) 

16 (4.0) 

 -

0.00

Digestive troubles (%)

344 (100)

16 (29.4) 

0.001

Fever (%)

151 (38.2) 

 -

0.00

Headaches (%)

171 (43.3)

 - 

0.00

Asthenia (%)  

17 (4.3)

 -

0.00

Positive stool cultures (n1, n2) (%)

13 (3.8)

4 (7.8)

0.00

Positive stool cultures (n) positive (%)

13 (76.5)

4 (23.5)

0.001

n=(n1+n2)=395 = effective; % = percentage

 


 

Distribution of Salmonella isolates by age group

Table 3 shows the distribution of Salmonella isolates by age group. Overall, 17/395 (23.2%) cultures (stool culture) were positive for Salmonella and 378 (96%) cultures were negative (p = 0.001, significant difference). The results in Table 3 also show that children aged 2 to 11, young people aged 12 to 21 and people over 42 were the most affected by Salmonella infections, whether specific to humans or both humans and animals (non-adaptive Salmonella). Seventeen (17) Salmonella isolated, among which the identified serotypes were: 5 (29.4%) Salmonella Typhi, 3 (17.6%) Salmonella Para Typhi A, 2 (11.7%) Salmonella Para Typhi B, 2 (11.7%) Salmonella Typhimurium, 2 (11.7%) Salmonella Enteritidis and 3 (17.6%) Salmonella arizonae (table 3).


 

 

Table 3: Distribution of Salmonella associated with diarrhea 

Salmonella species

Age range (year)

2-11 

12-21

22-31

32-41

42 et plus

Human-specific Salmonella

 

 

 

 

 

Salmonella Typhi

-

 -

1

1

3

Salmonella Para Typhi A

1

2

-

-

-

Salmonella Para Typhi B

1

1

-

-

-

Total (%)

2 (18.2)

3 (27.3)

1 (9.1)

1 (9.1)

3 (27.3)

Non-adaptive Salmonella (humans, animals)

 

 

 

 

 

Salmonella Typhimurium

1

-

-

-

1

Salmonella Enteritidis

1

-

-

-

1

Salmonella arizonae

1

1

-

-

1

Total (%)

3 (50)

1 (16,6)

-

-

2 (33,3)

 


 

Biochemical profile of Salmonella isolated from stool

Table 4 shows the characteristics of Salmonella isolated from stool by culture on an API 20E strip. The isolated Salmonella had the following common biochemical characteristics: ONPG-, Urea-, TDA-, Simmons Citrate+, Indole-, H2S+, ADH+/-, LDC+/-, ODC+, GLU+, MAN+, SOR+, RHA+, ARA+, and they were all motile and oxidase-negative. We observed that H2S was weakly positive after 24 hours of culture and more pronounced between 48 and 72 hours.


 

Table 4: Biochemical profile of isolated Salmonella from stool

 

Carbohydrate

Salmonella strain

ONPG

ADH

LDC

ODC

CIT

H2S

URE

TDA

IND

VP

GEL

GLU

MAN

INO

SOR

RHA

SAC

MEL

AMY

ARA

OXY

Salmonella Typhi

-

+

+

+

+

+

-

-

-

-

-

+

+

+

+

+

-

-

-

+

-

Salmonella Para Typhi A

-

+

-

+

-

+

-

-

-

-

-

+

+

-

+

+

-

+

-

+

-

Salmonella Para Typhi B

-

-

+

+

+

+

-

-

-

-

-

+

+

-

+

+

-

+/-

-

+

-

Salmonella Typhimurium

-

+

+

-

-

+

-

-

-

-

-

+

+

-

+

+

-

+/-

-

+

-

Salmonella Enteritidis

-

+

+

+

+

+/-

-

-

-

-

-

+

+

-

+

+

-

+/-

-

+

-

Salmonella arizonae

-

-

+

+

+

+

-

-

-

-

+

+

+

-

+

+

-

-

-

+

-

+ = positive (carbohydrate utilization by the microorganism); - = negative (carbohydrate non-utilization by the microorganism); +/- = sometimes positive or negative; ONPG = Ortho-Nitro-Phenyl-Galactopyranosidase; ADH = Arginine Dihydrolase; LDC = Lysine Decarboxylase, ODC = Ornithine Decarboxylase; CIT = Simmons Citrate; H2S = Dihydrogen Sulfide; Urea; TDA = Tryptophan Deaminase; IND = Indole; VP = Vogues-Proskauer; GEL = Gelatin; GLU = Glucose; MAN = Mannitol; INO = Inositol; SOR = Sorbitol; RHA = Rhamnose; SAC = Sucrose; MEL = Melibiose; AMY = Amygdalin; ARA = Arabinose; Ox = Oxidase

 


 

Susceptibility and resistance profile of Salmonella strains isolated from stool

Antibiotic efficacy testing showed that 59% of Salmonella strains were resistant to aminopenicillins (ampicillin, amoxicillin), sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim, nalidixic acid, and tetracycline. In contrast, 82% of Salmonella strains were susceptible to amoxicillin + clavulanic acid, ciprofloxacin, ceftriaxone, and imipenem (table 5).


 

 

Table 5: Susceptibility and resistance profile of Salmonella strains isolated from stool

 

Antibiotic

Salmonella strain

NbT

AMP

AMX

AMC

CRO

IMP

CIP

NAL

TET

SXT

R

S

R

S

R

S

R

S

R

S

R

S

R

S

R

S

R

S

Salmonella Typhi

5

3

2

3

2

2

3

1

4

1

4

2

3

4

1

3

2

4

1

Salmonella Para Typhi A

3

2

1

2

1

1

2

1

2

1

1

1

2

1

2

2

1

1

2

Salmonella Para Typhi B

2

2

0

2

0

0

2

1

1

0

2

0

2

2

0

1

1

1

1

Salmonella Typhimurium

2

1

1

1

1

0

2

0

2

0

2

0

2

0

2

2

0

1

1

Salmonella Enteritidis

2

0

2

0

2

0

2

0

2

0

2

0

2

1

1

1

1

0

1

Salmonella arizonae

3

2

1

2

1

0

3

0

2

1

2

0

3

1

1

1

2

2

1

Total (%)

17

10  (59)

7 (41)

10 (59)

3 (41)

3 (18)

14 (82)

3 (18)

14 (82)

3 (18)

15 (82)

3 (18)

14 (82)

10 (59)

7 (41)

10 (59)

7 (41)

10 (59)

7N(41) 

NbT = Number tested; Resistant = intermediate + resistant (I+R); Susceptible = S

Antibiotics: Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (SXT: R < 10, 10 ≤ I ≤ 18, S ≥ 19); Ampicillin (AMP: R < 11, 11 ≤ I ≤ 14, S ≥ 14); Amoxicillin (AMX: R < 11, 11 ≤ I ≤ 16, S ≥ 17); Amoxicillin + clavulanic acid (AMC: R < 11, 11 ≤ I ≤ 16, S ≥ 17); Ceftriaxone (CRO: R<15, 15 ≤ I≤ 20, S≥ 21), Imipenem (IMP: R <22, 22≤ I≤25, S ≥25); Ciprofloxacin (CIP: R<21, S≥25); Nalidixic acid (NA: R< 21, S ≥ 25) Tetracycline (TET: R< 21, 21 ≤ I≤ 20, S ≥ 23). Quality control strains: E. coli ATCC® 25922, E. coli ATCC® 35218 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC® 27853 (CLSI®).


 

Morphological, biochemical, and antibiogram characteristics of Salmonella isolated from stool

Table 6 shows the morphological, biochemical, and antibiogram characteristics of Salmonella isolated from stool. Stool appearance (image: a) was: soft, formed, pasty, hard, and liquid. Salmonella colonies on Hektoen agar were green with a black center (image: b). The antibiogram (resistant (NAL, AMC, IMP, CRO), susceptible (AMP, SXT, CIP)) is shown in image c (Table 6). The biochemical profile of Salmonella Typhi is shown in the API20E gallery (image: d: table 6).


 

 

Table 6: Morphological, biochemical and antibiogram characteristics of Salmonella isolated from stool

1

 

a : different aspects of stools

 

 

  a

 

  
image

2

 

b : Salmonella Typhi colonies on Hectoen agar

 

c : antibiogram

image 

 

  c

 

  
image 
 

  b

 

  
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

d : Salmonella Typhi in culture on API 20E gallery

image 

 

  d

 

  

 


 

DISCUSSION

In summary, the following question should be answered: have biochemical profiles, abusive and inappropriate prescriptions of antibiotics without laboratory evidence, or more generally, poor hygiene, and inadequate health infrastructure due to diagnostic tools contributed to the distribution and resistance of Salmonella to antibiotics in Chad?

The answer to this question would certainly require comparing our results regarding biochemical profiles, risk factors and antibiotic resistance with those of other authors, which could shed light on this subject.

In our study, 17/395 (23.2%) stool cultures were positive, including 11 (2.8%) human-specific Salmonella and 6 (1.5%) non-adaptive Salmonella (human and animal). The mean age of both groups in the study population was 31.5 years, with a range from 2 to 61 years. The sex ratio was 1.84, favoring male participation in the study. The age groups most affected by Salmonella infections were 2–11 years and 42 years and older, with infection rates of 50% and 33.3%, respectively. These results show that Salmonella involved in diarrheal diseases is linked to the consumption of raw or undercooked water or food (eggs, meat, poultry), but transmission could also be direct through contact with soiled hands and feces or urine. Furthermore, Dembélé et al. in Bamako (Mali) found a female predominance in their study population, Ka et al. in Senegal found a mean age of 39.93 years with a range of 15 to 72 years, and Okomé-Kouakou et al. (Gabon) identified the same causes of diarrhea, including a predominance of Salmonella18,19,20,21

The Salmonella species isolated in our study were divided into two groups into human-specific Salmonella (5 (29.4%) Salmonella Typhi, 3 (17.6%) Salmonella Para Typhi A, 2 (11.7%) Salmonella Para Typhi B) and non-adaptive Salmonella that infect humans and animals (2 (11.7%) Salmonella Typhimurium, 2 (11.7%) Salmonella Enteritidis and 3 (17.6%) Salmonella arizonae)) (table 3). Salmonella was the second most frequently identified pathogen in the studies by de Ka et al. in Senegal and Okome et al. in Gabon. In contrast to our series, Apetse et al. and d’Okome et al. had demonstrated that Escherichia coli played a significant role in the bacterial etiologies of diarrhea22,23,24.

Next, our study conducted a field survey on the most frequently prescribed antibiotics for the management of salmonellosis in the city of N’Djamena in Chad (table 1). This survey revealed that Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (SXT: Cotrimoxazole, commonly known as Bactrim), aminopenicillins (ampicillin, amoxicillin, amoxicillin + clavulanic acid), ceftriaxone (3rd generation cephalosporin: Beta-lactams) and ciprofloxacin (Fluoroquinolones) were widely prescribed, accounting for more than 50% of salmonellosis cases. In most cases, the antibiotic therapy was not appropriate based on the antibiogram. Ciprofloxacin was the most frequently used antibiotic in cases of bacterial diarrhea (34.80%). There was no statistically significant relationship between isolated bacteria and the antibiotics used in bacterial diarrhea (p > 0.05)25.

In view of the results of the survey on antibiotic therapy, which was mostly non-probabilistic, we carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the antibiotics identified (table 1), the results of which are recorded in Table 5. The antibiotic effectiveness test showed a resistance of 59% of Salmonella to aminopenicillins (ampicillin, amoxicillin), Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim, nalidixic acid and tetracycline. In contrast, 82% of Salmonella were susceptible to amoxicillin + clavulanic acid, ciprofloxacin, ceftriaxone, and imipenem (table 5). This increased resistance is likely due to the overuse and inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics by healthcare workers, as observed during our investigation. This resistance is also attributable to expired medications being dumped in gutters around markets and in garbage around homes. Cross-resistance was also observed in this family, with 2% (100%) Salmonella Para Typhi A exhibiting resistance to ampicillin, which in turn led to 2% (100%) Salmonella Para Typhi B exhibiting cross-resistance to amoxicillin (table 5). Such resistance, when observed, is thought to be linked to the production of penicillinase-like beta-lactamases by the strain in question (Yandai et al., 2014; Africa CDC, 2020)22,23. Our results could be explained by this phenomenon. Many strains, particularly Salmonella Typhimurium, exhibit high levels of antibiotic resistance, with nearly 40% of isolates resistant to at least one antibiotic and 18% multi-resistant24,25,26. Salmonella Typhi and Salmonella Para Typhi strains exhibit increased resistance to first-line antibiotics such as second-generation quinolones. In contrast, our study showed that 82% of the isolated Salmonella strains were susceptible to amoxicillin + clavulanic acid, ciprofloxacin, ceftriaxone, and imipenem (table 5). This susceptibility was also observed by Dembélé et al. (2022), Salah et al. (2017), and Reinheimer et al. (2017)27,28

CONCLUSION

The association of digestive troubles, Salmonella, and diarrhea is a daily and alarming concern, especially in cities of resource-limited countries like N'Djamena, where there are no drainage canals for wastewater, compounded by poor hygiene at street food sales points. Although this study was located in the city of N’Djamena, it identified diet-linked Salmonella that specifically infect humans (Salmonella Typhi, Salmonella Para Typhi A, Salmonella Para Typhi B) and non-adaptive Salmonella that infect both humans and animals (Salmonella Typhimurium, Salmonella Enteritidis and Salmonella arizonae). Furthermore, the isolated Salmonella strains are much more resistant to sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim, ampicillin, amoxicillin, nalidixic acid, and tetracycline, further complicating the situation. The most susceptible antibiotics are amoxicillin + clavulanic acid, ciprofloxacin, ceftriaxone, and imipenem. Controlling these infections requires a concerted effort between the different actors (governments, the Ministry of Public Health and Prevention (MSPP) of Chad, basic humanitarian services and the population of the city of N’Djamena).

Acknowledgements: The authors wish to thank the authorities of the Ministry of Public Health and Prevention (MSPP) of Chad and the management of the National University Referral Hospital (CHU-RN) of N’Djamena for granting permission to conduct this study. The authors also express their gratitude to the laboratory technicians of the CHU-RN for their technical assistance with this study.

Author Contributions: BN participated in the study design and supervised the work, as well as critically reviewing and editing the manuscript. DA and AM contributed to data collection and laboratory analysis. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval Statement

To conduct this study, we obtained:

REFERENCES

1. Le Minor L, Popoff M Y. 1987b. Formules antigéniques des sérovars de Salmonella.

Centre collaborateur O.M.S. de référence et de recherche pour les Salmonella, Inst. Past. Paris, 1-156.

2. Le Minor L, Laurent B et Hermant D. 1986. Individualisation d'une septième

Sous-espèce de Salmonella : S.choleraesuis subsp.indica subsp.nov. Ann. Inst. Past/Microbiol. 137B : 211-217.

3. Pilet C, Bourdon J L, Toma B, Marchal N, Balbastre C. 1979, 2ème Edition. Bactériologie médicale et vétérinaire : systématique bactérienne, Paris, France. 437p.

4. Weill FX. La fièvre typhoïde n'est aussi simple à soigner, Medecine/Sciences, 2010; 26:969-975. https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/20102611969 PMid:21106179

5. WHO. Available from: https://www.who.int/health-topics/diarrhoea#tab=tab_1. Accessed April 14; 2025: 2.

6. Mai Q, Lai W, Deng W, et al. Prevalence, serotypes and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolated from children in Guangzhou, China, 2018-2023, Infect Drug Resist, 2024;17:4511-4520. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S486907 PMid:39439916 PMCid:PMC11495190

7. Helms M, Ethelberg S, Mølbak K, DT104 Study Group. International Salmonella typhimurium DT104 infections, 1992-2001, Emerg infect dis, 2005;11(6):859. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1106.041017 PMid:15963280 PMCid:PMC3367607

8. Mkangara M. Prevention and control of human Salmonella enterica infections: An implication in food safety, Int J of Food Sci, 2023; 2023(1):8899596. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8899596 PMid:37727836 PMCid:PMC10506869

9. Angulo FJ, Johnson KR, Tauxe RV, Cohen Ml. Origins and consequences of antimicrobial-resistant nontyphoidal Salmonella: implications for the use of fluoroquinolones in food animals, Microbial Drug Resistance, 2000;6(1):77-83. https://doi.org/10.1089/mdr.2000.6.77 PMid:10868811

10. Djim-Adjim Tabo. Etude de la contribution des salmonelles aviaires aux salmonelloses humaines au Tchad : Cas de la ville capitale, N'Djamena. Médecine humaine et pathologie. AgroParisTech, 2013; NNT: 2013AGPT0059.

11. Chochran WG. Sampling techniques. 1977; (3e edition), John Wiley & Sons, New.

12. Besimbaye N. Epidémiologie des maladies diarrhéiques au Burkina Faso et au Tchad. Thèse Unique, 2014 :205p.

13. Leyral G, Joffin J-N, Boineau F. Microbiologie technique : 2, Documentation technique. 2e éd. - Bordeaux : CRDP d'Aquitaine, 1998 : 304 p. (Biologie technique).

14. Pilet C, Bourdon J L, Toma B, Marchal N, Balbastre C. 1979, 2ème Edition. Bactériologie médicale et vétérinaire : systématique bactérienne, Paris, France. 437p.

15. Bauer, A.W., Kirby, W.M., Sherris, J.C. et Turck, M. Test de sensibilité aux antibiotiques par une méthode standardisée à disque unique, American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1966;45:493-496. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/45.4_ts.493 PMid:5325707

16. CDC. (2002) Méthodes de laboratoires pour le diagnostic de la dysenterie épidémique et du choléra, Atlanta Georgia. Manuel, 172p.

17. CA-SFM, EUCAST. Recommandations, 2015, 2022: 117p.

18. Dembélé M, Doucouré D, Keita BS, Dembélé JP, Soumaré M, Doucouré S, Doumbia Y, Diarra S, Magassouba O, Toloba Y, Dao S. Les Diarrhées Infectieuses chez les Personnes Infectées par le VIH au Centre Hospitalier Universitaire du « Point G » (Bamako), Health Sci. Dis, Nov 2022;23(11):62-65 Available free at www.hsd-fmsb.org.

19. Ka R, Dia NM, Dia ML, Tine D, Diagne RD, Diop SA, Dieng Y, Sow AI. Etiologies bactériennes et parasitaires de diarrhées chez les personnes vivants avec le VIH/SIDA au CHNU de Fann (Sénégal), Mali Méd, 2011;T XXVI (1):1-10

20. Okomé-Kouakou M, Békalé J, Kombila M. Etude des salmonelloses au cours de l'infection à VIH en milieu hospitalier gabonais, Méd Trop, 1999;59(1):46-50.

21. Apetse K, Assogba K, Kevi K, Balogou AAK, Pitche P, Grunitzky E et al. Infections opportunistes du VIH/sida chez les adultes en milieu hospitalier au Togo, Bull. Soc. Pathol. Exot, 2011;104:352-354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13149-011-0139-3 PMid:21359831

22. Yandaï FH, Zongo C, Moussa AM, Bessimbaye N, Tapsoba F, Savadogo A, Barro N, Ndoutamia G, Traoré AS. Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of faecal carriage of Extended-Spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producing Escherichia coli at the "Hôpital de la Mère et de l'Enfant" in N'Djamena, Chad, Sci J of Microbiol, 2014;3(2):25-31. https://doi.org/10.14196/sjm

23. Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention. African Union Framework for Antimicrobial Resistance Control 2020-2025, 2020; https:// afric acdc. org/ downl oad/ afric an- union- frame work- for- antim icrob ial- resis tance- contr ol- 2020- 2025/

24. Kashosi TM, Muhandule AB, Mwenebitu DL, Mihuhi N, Mutendela JK, Mubagwa K. Antibiotic resistance of Salmonella spp strains isolated from blood cultures in Bukavu, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Pan Afr Med J, 2018 Jan 17;29:42. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2018.29.42.13456 PMid:29875924 PMCid:PMC5987141

25. Lunguya O, Lejon V, Phoba MF, Bertrand S, Vanhoof R, Verhaegen J, Jacobs J. Salmonella typhi in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: fluoroquinolone decreased susceptibility on the rise, PLoS neglected Tropical Disease, 2012; 6 (11): e1921. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001921 PMid:23166855 PMCid:PMC3499407

26. Weill FX. Salmonella : épidémiologie, typage et résistance aux antibiotiques, Revue Francophone des Laboratoires, 2008 ;38(400) :37-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1773-035X(08)80099-8

27. Salah FD, Diagbouga S, Dabire MA, Sadji AY, Nadembega C, Moumouni A et al. Première détection de gènes de Résistance codant pour des β-lactamases à spectre étendu produisant Escherichia coli à Lomé, Togo, Archives Clinical Microbiology, 2017;7(6):1-7

28. Reinheimer C, Keppler OT, Stephan C, Wichelhaus TA, Friedrichs I, Kempf VA. Elevated prevalence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative organisms in HIV positive men, BMC Infect Dis, 2017;17(1):206. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-017-2286-z PMid:28288577 PMCid:PMC5347171


 

 


Free Email Signature Generator