Available online on 15.04.2025 at http://jddtonline.info
Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics
Open Access to Pharmaceutical and Medical Research
Copyright © 2025 The Author(s): This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial use provided the original author and source are credited
Open Access Full Text Article Research Article
|
Article Info: ______________________________________________ Article History: Received 21 Jan 2025 Reviewed 06 March 2025 Accepted 03 April 2025 Published 15 April 2025 ______________________________________________ Cite this article as: Rodrigo CP, Murugan K, Bioactive compounds of Hemidesmis indices inhibit the acyl-homoserine lactone synthase, Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics. 2025; 15(4):72-79 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v15i4.7072 ______________________________________________*Address for Correspondence: Dr. Kasi Murugan, Dept. of Biotechnology, Manomaniam Sundarnar University, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu, India. |
Abstract _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ AHL (acyl homoserine lactone) is a signaling molecule responsible for communication in gram negative bacteria, which is responsible for bacterial virulence as well as biofilm formation. The speedy growing in the number of resistant pathogenic bacteria takes controlled to a decrease in the efficacy of the existing antimicrobial agents. Acyl-homoserine lactone synthase plays an important role in the key molecules responsible for the formation of antibiotic resistance of gram-negative bacteria. The molecular docking studies performed by using molecular docking server online respectively in which the oral biofilm target namely N-acyl homoserine (ESAI) (PDB id: 1kzf) have a potential interaction with vanillin and Hexadeconoic acid. In this study, the protein N-acyl homoserine (ESAI) was used from its structure perspectives. The primary and secondary structures were calculated using online tools. Its role in oral biofilm was assessed by molecular docking the compounds present in the root extract of Hemidesmis indices assayed by GC-MS analysis. This in-silico study results throw light on how these active components of Hemidesmis indices are effective in oral biofilm. Keywords: Hemidesmis indices, Docking studies. |
1. INTRODUCTION
Quorum sensing is a highly regulated and effective means of communication seen in bacterial colonies. This involves the production of certain chemical messengers called auto-inducers which signals other bacteria of the same or adjacent communities. In gram positive bacteria, the signaling molecules are called auto-inducer peptides (AIP) and in gram negative they are called acyl-homoserine lactones (AHL). The formation of biofilms is regulated by quorum sensing molecules secreted by the bacteria. 1 A biofilm is a group of microbial cells, mainly bacteria, close to the tooth surface and coated by an extracellular polymeric substance. This coating keeps cells and permits enhanced growth rates, along with new parallel gene transfer between cells within the coating, which promotes additional problems. 2 Amoxicillin from the penicillin group is often used to treat dentoalveolar abscesses and periodontitis. Amoxicillin is a broad-spectrum antibiotic that works by binding to penicillin binding proteins in Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and inhibiting the transpeptidation process in bacteria. 3 Hemidesmus indicus is one of the important medicinal plants, belongs to the family Asclepiadaceae, which is derived from the word “Asklepios” means God of medicine. It is generally named as Indian Sarsaparill, and in Sanskrit, it is termed as “Anantmool,” which means endless root. It is a slim, laticiferous semi-errect shrub. Roots of this plant contains phenolic compounds, steroids, flavonoids, saponins, terpenoids, cardiac glycosides, proteins, tannins and cardiac glycosides. 4 2-hydroxy 4-methoxy benzaldehyde (2H4MB) is an isomer of vanillin; it is one of the major compounds in the volatile oils of Decalepis hamiltonii and H. indicus 5. Nowadays, the use of complementary and alternative medicine and especially the consumption of botanicals have been increasing rapid worldwide, mostly because of the evidently less frequent side-effects when compared to modern medicine. One such plant is Hemidesmis indices is a folk medicinal plant. An attempt has been taken to investigate the oral biofilm activity of identified bioactive compounds of Hemidesmis indices root extract on quorum sensing model through molecular docking. The aim of this research is to investigate the oral biofilm constituents present in the root extract of Hemidesmis indices using molecular docking prediction. In-silico docking procedures have also been carried out to examine the interactions of the plant components with acyl-homoserine lactone synthase targets. The widespread uses of Hemidesmis indices in traditional medicine have resulted in significant qualitative analysis of the plant and its active principles.
2. EXPERIMENTAL METHODS
2.1 Molecular Docking Analysis
A computational tool offers the advantage of delivering new drug candidates more quickly and at a lower cost. The present work by computational approach used for the following software manipulation of drugs using molecular docking server online web service for calculation of drug likeness. The identified compounds from Hemidesmis indices was used to interact with acyl homoserine lactone synthase retrieved from PDB.
2.2 Protein Sequence
The acyl homoserine lactone protein was retrieved from online database of SWISSPROT. 6 It was obtained through the entry keyword of ESAI protein and searched the entire database. The sequence of acyl-homoserine lactone synthase were shown. The ESAI protein was retrieved in FASTA format and it was used for the further computational analysis.
2.3 Primary Structure Prediction
For physiochemical characterization, theoretical isoelectric point (PI), molecular weight, total number of positive and negative residues, extinction coefficient, 7 half-life, 8 11 instability index,12 aliphatic index and grand average of hydropathy (GRAVY) 13 were computed using the Expasy protparm server.
2.4 Secondary Structure Prediction
Secondary structure of the protein was determined by using the FASTA sequences of protease and predicted using SOPMA and SOPM .14
2.5 Transmembrane Region Identification
The transmembrane region of ESAI protein was examined by SOSUI server. 15 The evaluated transmembrane region was analysed and visualized by pep wheel, 16 using EMBOSS 2.7 suit.
2.6 Homology Modeling and Validation
The protein sequence was subjected for comparative homology modeling via Swiss model 17 and evaluate by Rampage online server.18 The protein was confirmed by using online server procheck 19 and WHAT IF.20 The Swiss model executes the sequence alignments and looks for the assumed template protein in the 3D model.
2.7 Protein Preparation for Docking
Docking calculations were carried out on protein models involved in acyl homoserine lactone synthase. The crystalline structure were downloaded from Protein Data Bank website (http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/home/home.do) and saved in pdb format. In the protein id the essential hydrogen atoms, Kollman united atom type charges, and salvation parameters were added with the aid of Auto Dock Tool. Affinity (grid) maps of 20x20x20 A° spacing were generated using Autogrid program. Auto dock parameter set and distance-dependent dielectric functions were used in the calculation of the van der waals and the electrostatic terms respectively.21
2.8 GC-MS Compounds
Through the GC-MS analysis of Hemidesmis indices performed by 22 identified Hemidesmis indices, vanillin and hexadeconoic acid compounds and included in this study.
2.9 Ligand Retrieved
The screened compounds were retrieved from the PubChem compound (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pccompound) and used for the further studies.
2.10 Receptor retrived
3.2. Sequence Subjected for Modeling
MLELFDVSYEELQTTRSEELYKLRKKTFSDRLGWEVICSQGMESDEFDGPGTRYILGICEGQLVCSVRFTSLDRPNMITHTFQHCFSDVTLPAYGTESSRFFVDKARARALLGEHYPISQVLFLAMVNWAQNNAYGNIYTIVSRAMLKILTRSGWQIKVIKEAFLTEKERIYLLTLPAGQDDKQQLGGDVVSRTGCPPVAVTTWPLTLPV
Amino acids |
Numbers |
Percentage |
Ala (A) |
11 |
5.2 % |
Arg (R) |
13 |
6.2 % |
Asn (N) |
5 |
2.4 % |
Asp (D) |
10 |
4.8 % |
Cys (C) |
5 |
2.4 % |
Gln (Q) |
10 |
4.8 % |
Glu (E) |
14 |
6.7 % |
Gly (G) |
14 |
6.7 % |
His (H) |
3 |
1.4 % |
Ile (I) |
11 |
5.2 % |
Leu (L) |
23 |
11.0 % |
Lys (K) |
9 |
4.3 % |
Met (M) |
5 |
2.4 % |
Phe (F) |
10 |
4.8 % |
Pro (P) |
9 |
4.3 % |
Ser (S) |
14 |
6.7 % |
Thr (T) |
17 |
8.1 % |
Trp (W) |
4 |
1.9 % |
Tyr (Y) |
8 |
3.8 % |
Val (V) |
15 |
7.1 % |
Pyl (O) |
0 |
0.0 % |
Sec (U) |
0 |
0.0 % |
Name |
Accession Number |
Sequence length |
Mol. Wt |
PI |
-R |
+R |
EC |
II |
AI |
GRAVY |
ESAI |
P54656 |
210 |
23844 |
5.96 |
24 |
22 |
33170 |
39.46 |
89.10 |
-0.129 |
Secondary structure |
SOPMA |
SOPM |
Alpha helix (Hh) |
78 is 37.14% |
59 is 28.10% |
310 helix (Gg) |
0 is 0.00% |
0 is 0.00% |
Pi helix (Ii) |
0 is 0.00% |
0 is 0.00% |
Beta bridge (Bb) |
0 is 0.00% |
0 is 0.00% |
Extended strand (Ee) |
45 is 21.43% |
52 is 24.76% |
Beta turn (Tt) |
9 is 4.29% |
17 is 8.10% |
Bend region (Ss) |
0 is 0.00% |
0 is 0.00% |
Random coil (Cc) |
78 is 37.14% |
82 is 39.05% |
Ambigous states (?) |
0 is 0.00% |
0 is 0.00% |
Other states |
0 is 0.00% |
0 is 0.00% |
Figure 4: ESAI protein (PDB id: 1kzf)
S.No |
Name |
Mol. Structure |
1 |
Amoxicillin |
|
S.No |
Name of the compound |
Mol. Formula |
Mol. Weight |
Mol. Structure |
1 |
Vanillin |
C8H8O3 |
152 |
|
2 |
Hexadecanoic acid |
C16H32O2 |
256 |
|
Docking result |
Est. free energy of binding |
Est. inhibition of constant, Ki, µM |
vdW + Hbond + desolv energy |
Electrostatic energy |
Total intermole energy |
Frequency |
Interact surface |
Amoxicillin (Drug) with 1kzf |
-4.70 kcal/mol |
357.67 |
-5.47 kcal/mol |
-0.11 kcal/mol |
-5.58 kcal/mol |
20 % |
619.632 |
Vanillin with 1kzf |
-5.15 kcal/mol |
167.39 |
-5.25 kcal/mol |
-0.03 kcal/mol |
-5.28 kcal/mol |
100% |
420.442 |
Hexadecanoic acid with 1kzf |
-4.03 kcal/mol |
1.10 |
-7.67 kcal/mol |
-0.20 kcal/mol |
-7.87 kcal/mol |
10 % |
642.461 |
Acknowledgement: The authors thank the Kamaraj Women’s College, Thoothukudi, for supporting this study.
Authors Contributions: Each author has given considerable and equal contributions to this research
Conflicts of Interest: The authors have given considerable and equal contributions to this research.
Authors Funding: Not applicable
Ethical Approval: Not applicable
1. Lopez D, Vlamakis H & Kolter R, Biofilms, Cold Spring Harbor: Perspectives in Biology, 2009; 2 (3):370-378 https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a000398 PMid:20519345 PMCid:PMC2890205
2. Archer NK, Mazaitis MJ, Costerton JW, Leid JG, Powers ME, Shirtliff ME, Staphylococcus aureus biofilms: properties, regulation, and roles in human disease, Virulence, 2011; 2:445-459 https://doi.org/10.4161/viru.2.5.17724 PMid:21921685 PMCid:PMC3322633
3. Shweta N, Prakash SK, Dental abscess: A microbiological review, Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2013; 10:585-591
4.Joshi A, Lad H, Sharma H, Bhatnagar D, Evaluation of phytochemical composition and ant oxidative, hypoglycemic and hypolipodaemic properties of methanolic extract of Hemidesmus indicus roots in streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice, Clin PhytoSci, 2018; 4:7 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40816-018-0064-0
5. Nagarajan S, Rao LJ. Determination of 2-hydroxy-4-methoxybenzaldehyde in roots of Decalepis hamiltonii (Wight and arn) and Hemidesmus indicus R. Br, J AOAC Int, 2003; 86:564-567. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoac/86.3.564 PMid:12852577
6. Arnold K, Boardoli L, Schwede T, The SWISS-MODEL workspace: A web-based environment for protein structure homology modelling, Bioinformatics, 2006; 22:195-201 https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bti770 PMid:16301204
7. Gill SC, Von Hippel PHH, Calculation of protein extinction coefficients from amino acid sequence data, Anal Biochem, 1989; 182: 319-326 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(89)90602-7 PMid:2610349
8. Bachmair A, Finley D, Varshavsky A, In-vivo-half-life of a protein is a function of its amino terminal residue, Science, 1986; 234:179-186 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3018930 PMid:3018930
9. Gonad DK, Bachmir A, Wuning I, Tobias JW, Lane WS, Varshavsky AJ, University and structure of the N-end rule, J Biol Chem, 1989; 264:16700 16712 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(19)84762-2 PMid:2506181
10. Tobias JW, Shrader TE, Rocap, Varshavsky A, The N-end rule in bacteria, Science 1991; 254:1374-1377 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1962196 PMid:1962196
11. Ciechanover A, Schwartz AL, how are substrates recognized by the ubiquitin mediated proteolytic system, Trends Biochem, Sci, 1989; 14:483-488 https://doi.org/10.1016/0968-0004(89)90180-1 PMid:2696178
12. Ikai A, Thermostability and aliphatic index of globular proteins, J Biochem, 1980; 88: 1895-1898
13. Kyte J, Doolittle RF, a simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein, J Mol Biol 1982; 157:105-132 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2836(82)90515-0 PMid:7108955
14. Comber C, Blanchet C, Geourijon C, Deleage G, NPS @ Network protein sequence Analysis, Trends Biochem Sci 2000; 25:147-150 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-0004(99)01540-6 PMid:10694887
15. Hirokawa T, Boon-chieng S, Mitaku S, SOSUI classification and secondary structure prediction system for membrane proteins, Bioinformatics, 1998; 14:378-379 https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/14.4.378 PMid:9632836
16. Ramachandran GN, Sasikharan V, Conformation of polypeptides and proteins, Adv Prot Chem, 1968; 23:283-437 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3233(08)60402-7 PMid:4882249
17. Kiefer F, Arnold K, Kunzli M, Bordoli L, Schwede T, The SWISS-MODEL repository and associated resources, Nucleic Acids Res, 2009; 37: D387-D392 https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn750 PMid:18931379 PMCid:PMC2686475
18. Lovell SC, Davis IW, Arendall B, De Bakker PIW, Word M, et al., Structure validation by Cά geometry: φ, ψ and Cβ deviation, Proteins: Struct Funct, Gen, 2002; 50:437-450 https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.10286 PMid:12557186
19. Laskowski FA, Fullmannn JA, Mac Arthur MW, Kaptein R, Thornton JM, AQUA and PROCHECK-NMR: programs for checking the quality of protein structures solved by NMR, J Biomol, NMR, 1996; 8:477-486 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00228148 PMid:9008363
20. Vriend G, WHAT IF: A molecular modelling and drug design program, J Mol Graph, 1990; 8:52-56 https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7855(90)80070-V PMid:2268628
21. Morris GM, Goodsell DS, Halliday RS, Huey R, Hart WE, et al., Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function, J Comput Chem, 1998; 19(14):1639-1662 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(19981115)19:14<1639::AID-JCC10>3.0.CO;2-B
22.Mickymaray S, AI Aboody MS, Rath PK, Annamalai P, Nooruddin T, Screening and antibacterial efficacy of selected Indian medicinal plants, Asian Pac J Trop Biomed, 2016; 6:185-191 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apjtb.2015.12.005
23. Bikadi Z, Demmko L, and Hazai E, Functional and structural characterization of a protein based on analysis of its hydrogen bonding plot, Arch. Biochem, Biophys, 2007; 461: 225-234 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2007.02.020 PMid:17391641
24. Garrett M. Morris, David S, Goodsell, Robert S. Halliday, Ruth Huey, William E. Hart, Richard K, Belew, Arthur J, Olson, Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 1998; 19(14):1639-1662 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(19981115)19:14<1639::AID-JCC10>3.0.CO;2-B
25. Solis FJ, and Wets RJB, Minimization of Random Search Techniques. Mathematics of Operations Research, 1981; 6(1): 19-30 https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.6.1.19