Available online on 15.12.2024 at http://jddtonline.info

Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics

Open Access to Pharmaceutical and Medical Research

Copyright  © 2024 The  Author(s): This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial use provided the original author and source are credited

Open Access Full Text Article  Review Article

The Invisible Threat: Microplastics in Human Blood and Placenta 

Anjali Mishra *¹, Sudipta Modak ², Shubhrojit Bhattacharjee ³, Rupam Vishwanaath ³, Anand Mohan ³, Bipin Kumar ³

¹ Department of Pharmacy, Sarala Birla University, Mahilong, Ranchi, Jharkhand 835009

² BCDA College of Pharmacy and Technology Campus-2, Madhyamgram, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700129

³ Department of Pharmacy, Jharkhand Rai University, Namkum, Ranchi, Jharkhand 835009

 

 

Introduction

In the hidden places of our daily lives, an unnoticed invader has quietly crept into our oceans, soil and even the air we breathe, and this overlooked invader is simply the infamous "MICROPLASTIC". Invisible, ignored, and shunned tiny creatures contain the history of a modern world trapped in their creation¹. Although these particles are few, they usually have a big impact on our planet. When it comes to plastic, the main thing that separates macroplastic from microplastics is its morphology. A smaller size indicates a low presence of plastic particles². While large particles are easier to collect, smaller particles are often very difficult to clean. Great efforts and awareness have been made to stop the dangerous use of microplastics, but the presence of microplastics has been ignored somewhere. The use and availability of microplastics are often so wide and widespread because it is formed in a different way, lighter, and cheaper than other modern materials. While we have replaced everything we need with plastic without even accepting its strange consequences, the irrational use of plastic everywhere, and the omnipresence of microplastics can never be ignored^3,4 .

Environmental science has long focused on large plastic waste, i.e. macroplastics, and quotes that it can affect the marine ecosystem. In sync with these vital concerns, the occurrence of microplastics in the aquamarine environment is a major problem to tackle, leading to the death of a huge number of marine entities. Aquamarine pollution not only attacks aquatic lives but also hampers industries like shipping, fishing, power accumulation, and aquaculture. The presence of plastics in these industries leads to equipment wear and tear⁵. Damage and death from ingesting plastics and the ingestion of seabirds, whales, fish, and insects are just some of the environmental impacts of microplastics. Another setback from the presence of microplastics is the growth and flourishment of unwelcomed species which often hamper the growth of residential flora and fauna^6,7.

The results of large-scale plastic squander, or "macroplastics," on oceanic environments have long provoked the interest of natural science. As the ocean occupies the largest area on the earth, the presence of microplastics, within the water column isn't as it were a stylish issue but also a major natural stress that jeopardizes a few sea businesses, such as aquaculture, angling, shipping, and vitality era. Furthermore, the utilization of plastic in these sectors can tangle and hurt apparatus. Many of the negative natural impacts of plastics that are large scale incorporate hurt and mortality to marine fowls, creatures, angels, and reptiles due to trap and ingestion⁸.

Foremost and secondary microplastics

Foremost microplastics are those microplastics that were called to be of minuscule morphology. Even though there is developing proof of these plastics being utilized as medicate vectors in medication, they are essentially found in discussions impacting media, facial cleansers, and makeup. The incorporation of virgin plastic pellets, which are ordinarily 3-5 mm in breadth, as essential microplastics fall beneath the broader definitions of the microplastic estimate, despite a few pundits challenging this classification. Exfoliating hand wipes and confront cleans that once contained common fixings like pumice, oats, and powdered almonds have been supplanted by microplastic "scrubbers." Exfoliating cleansers utilizing plastics have been much better known since the 1980s when modest plastic scrubbers utilized in makeup were licensed. The basic difference in micro beads or microplastics is their emergence in sizes, external morphology, or configuration setup. More as of late, found that another restorative item had a colossal sum of circular microplastics, ordinarily with a distance across of less than 0.5 mm and a mode estimate of less than 0.1 mm^8,9. Auxiliary microplastics are little pieces of plastic that break down from bigger plastic squanders, which might happen on arrival or in the ocean. Persistent presentation to daylight can cause plastics to photodegrade; bright (UV) radiation oxidizes the polymer lattice and breaks bonds, as uncovered by recommended that the corruption of plastics may lead to the filtering of added substances aiming to move forward solidness and erosion resistance. The ocean environment's extreme saltiness, wave-action, and turbulence fractures the big plastics coming about from scraped areas. This preparation proceeds and the parts end up little over time until they become microplastics. Microplastics are thought to proceed to corrupt into nanoplastics, even though the littlest microparticle right now identified within the seas is 1.6 μm in breadth. The presence of nanoplastics within the marine environment is going to surpass its current number, owing to the non-stoppable use of plastics worldwide^10,11.

Microplastics in Marine environment

The increasing presence of microplastics in the marine environment is becoming more significant in the upcoming years¹². Researchers are already speculating on the potential impact of this pollution on the marine food web, as these particles can accumulate in organisms, leading to physical harm such as internal friction and blockages¹³. Apart from the risks associated with ingested microplastics, toxicity can also result from the leaching of contaminated impurities like monomers and plastic additives, contributing to issues such as carcinogenesis and hormone disruption¹⁴. The accumulation of low-density microplastic debris in ocean gyres poses a threat to pelagic invertebrates, potentially causing harm through ingestion. Additionally, benthic organisms act as sinks for high densities of microplastics, with some microbes capable of absorbing these particles and incorporating them into marine aggregates. Consequently, benthic suspensions and sediment feeders are likely to ingest sinking and immobilized microplastics^15,16.

Microplastics in Human plate

Microplastics have become a growing concern in the human diet as these tiny plastic particles infiltrate various food sources. These particles often measuring less than 5 millimeters, find their way into the food chain through contamination of water and soil. Seafood, salt, and even the air we breathe can carry microplastics. Distinct human indulges in activities like, packaging and multiple processing continuously release toxic microplastics into the human milieu. Due to the omnipresence of plastics, we humans as well as animals unknowingly consume microplastics and potential health hazards occur. These occurrences have paved the way for extensive research in microplastics and their effects on humans and aquatic life^16,17.

Because fish have a filter-feeding mechanism, they exhibit a high incidence of microplastics. This is especially true of shellfish.   Because these particles are common in the water column, they build up in the connective tissues of these organisms and can be consumed by people. Plastic consumption has been documented in marine mammals, fish, invertebrates, and the birds that eat them at different trophic levels in the food chain. Because of their small size, microplastics are readily ingested by a variety of organisms, including those that feed on organic debris, animals that feed on silt, and filter feeders. Studies involving a wide range of marine organisms, including zooplankton fish, seabirds, shellfish, and bivalves, in both natural and controlled environments have reported cases of microplastic ingestion. Some of these studies are intended^17,18.

Popular brands of bottles have been found to display the prevalence of microplastics in them¹⁹. It is vital to understand that in the water treatment plant, the equipment and storage units too are made up of microplastics, which may also leach microplastics into the water, even though this aqua treatment plant is designed to evacuate water borne plastics and well as other nuisances of water²⁰. In addition to water bottles, sometimes caps and closures are also constituted with plastics which may react with aqua and leach out its toxic elements in water and render it useless²¹.

Ubiquitously plastic emerges from toothbrushes, plastic water bottles, dining plates, and many personal care items. Nowadays, toilet preparations like eye shadow, nail polishes, and shower gels have microbeads in them which are microplastics. Eventually, these products are washed off and reach the water bodies²². It is obvious that the accumulation of small plastics in aquatic life is due to fragmentations of larger ones. It is vital to not let this untreated water reach the marine ecosystem unless treated. In a shocking result, in Macao, Hong Kong, waste water was released without filtration and treatment which led to deposition of 49-880 billion per year²³. 

Microplastics in Human placenta

The presence of microplastic in the human placenta has raised concerns about potential health, impacts during pregnancy. Recent studies have detected microplastic in placental tissues, indicating that these tiny plastic fragments can cross the placental barrier. The exact consequences of microplastic exposure on fetal development are not fully understood, and research in this area is ongoing. Nevertheless, the presence of microplastics in the placenta underscores the need for investigation into the potential risks and implications for maternal and fetal health. Efforts to reduce overall plastic pollution remain crucial to mitigate potential harm to both the environment and human well-being²⁴.

To detect the presence of microplastic in the human placenta, various clinical studies have been done. However extensive studies are still left to occur, and there is huge room for research in this area²⁵. The following method has been absorbed to study the occurrence of microplastics in the human placenta. The study was done on 6 females who were pregnant, and around 6 placentas were collected. The observation emerged as a big shock when 5 to 10 micron spherical, and irregularly shaped microplastics were seen, to be precise 4 spherical structures were present on the fetal side, 5 on the maternal end, and 3 irregular shape entities in the choriamniotic end²⁵. Nine of these were identified as thermoplastic polymers, while three were identified as recolored PP. A chance is presented to the growing embryo by the measuring run of microplastics found, which is consistent with conveyance through the bloodstream, section over layers, and conveyance in cells. Microplastics in this organ could alter the baby's recognition as a non-foreign corpse and be linked to the safe framework. More recently, Zhu et al. (2023) evaluated the proximity and features of MPs in 17 placentas, noting that MPs were present in all placenta testing, with a range of 0.28–9.55 particles/g and a plenitude of 2.70 ± 2.65 particles/g. PVC (43.27%), PP (14.55%), and polybutylene succinate (PBS) (10.90%) made up most of the MPs, with a measure ranging from 20 to 34 micrometer^26,27.

Microplastics in Breast milk

In addition to the human placenta, MPs have also been discovered in meconium and the stool of newborn children in 2019, yet it is difficult to determine where these plastics originate from. Early life exposures can occur from plastic toys, supplementing bottles, nursing, and other means, as well as from the placenta²⁸. For example, it has been suggested that a newborn's formula placed in polypropylene (PP) bottles has the potential to release millions of MPs. That being said, these presentation courses' relative importance hasn't yet been established. Recently, a study collected three meconium and six newborn children from Modern York State and evaluated the concentrations of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polycarbonate (PC) MPs. The results showed that the concentration of PET was significantly higher in newborn baby feces than it was in adult feces. Selecting the primary MP sources is essential to reducing the presentation because of the tall appearance and to foresee any negative effects. Breast milk is considered the gold standard of nutrition for infants, valued for its ability to optimize the immune system and arrange nutrients. As a result, assessing its quality in terms of potential pollution is necessary ²⁹. Mothers encounter a remarkable variety of synthetics daily from the environment, such as in food, beverages, and personal care products. As a result, breast milk may become contaminated by these mixes, potentially harming children's health. Thus far, human milk has been found to contain metals, phenols, per-and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFASs), phthalates and phthalate metabolites, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), organ chlorine insecticides, polybrominated diphenyl esters (PBDEs), phthalates, and phthalate metabolites. In actuality, these pollutants may be drained during lactation since the majority of them are lipophilic and prefer to accumulate in fat tissue³⁰. Early developmental stages are known to be the most vulnerable to the negative effects of PCBs, which primarily include a severe influence on the endocrine and mental systems, leading to altered behavior and a lowered IQ. Furthermore, PBDEs are thought to be neurotoxic, especially in children, having negative effects on behavior, the brain, and the engine. Phthalates have been explained in the text as hurting the usefulness of male regeneration. Furthermore, youth exposure to phthalates was shown to increase the risk of adversely susceptible illnesses and modify improvements in physical and neurocognitive functions^31,32.

Conclusion

The plastic parts move like slippery apparitions in this minuscule world, so they recount the tale of humankind's utilization and ecological effect. The universality of minuscule plastic particles challenges our impression of the air we are breathing, from glimmering ocean surfaces to remote corners of uncontaminated scenes. It is clear, with regards to unwinding this secret emergency, that understanding the impacts of these little trespassers is significantly more than basically logical endeavors; they call upon activity in a world at a crossing point of plastic multiplication and planetary conservation. Subsequently, this article has endeavored to investigate the multi-layered nature of microplastics trying to do so, and in the end, it is accepted we should focus on a tranquil orchestra of small particles that keeps on reverberating all through our biological systems.

Acknowledgements: All the authors are thankful to the entire team for constant support and encouragement in completion of this article.

Conflict of Interest: None.

Funding Source: None.

Author Contributions: All    authors   have   equal contribution in the preparation of manuscript and compilation.

Source of Support: Nil.

Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement: Not applicable. 

Data Availability Statement: The data supporting in this paper are available in the cited references.

References

1. Andrady AL. The plastic in microplastics: A review. Marine pollution bulletin. 2017., 15;119(1):12-22. DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.01.082
2. Hale RC, Seeley ME, La Guardia MJ, Mai L, Zeng EY. A global perspective on microplastics. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans. 2020;125(1):e2018JC014719. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JC014719
3. Andrady AL. Microplastics in the marine environment. Marine pollution bulletin. 2011;62(8):1596-605. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.05.030
4. Cox KD, Covernton GA, Davies HL, Dower JF, Juanes F, Dudas SE. Human consumption of microplastics. Environmental science & technology. 2019, 53(12):7068-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b01517
5. Li J, Liu H, Chen JP. Microplastics in freshwater systems: A review on occurrence, environmental effects, and methods for microplastics detection. Water research. 2018., 15;137:362-74.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.12.056
6. Cole M, Lindeque P, Halsband C, Galloway TS. Microplastics as contaminants in the marine environment: a review. Marine pollution bulletin. 2011.,1;62(12):2588-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.09.025
7. Silva AB, Bastos AS, Justino CI, da Costa JP, Duarte AC, Rocha-Santos TA. Microplastics in the environment: Challenges in analytical chemistry-A review. Analytica chimica acta. 2018.,9;1017:1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2018.02.043
8. Shahnawaz M, Sangale MK, Ade AB. Bioremediation technology for plastic waste. (2019) pg. 11-9. 
9. Zitko V, Hanlon MJ. Another source of pollution by plastics: skin cleaners with plastic scrubbers. Marine pollution bulletin. 1991;22(1):41-2. DOI: 10.1016/0025-326X(91)90444-W
10. Fendall LS, Sewell MA. Contributing to marine pollution by washing your face: microplastics in facial cleansers. Marine pollution bulletin. 2009. 1;58(8):1225-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2009.04.025
11. Roy PK, Hakkarainen M, Varma IK, Albertsson AC. Degradable polyethylene: fantasy or reality. Environmental science & technology. 2011.15;45(10):4217-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/es104042f
12. Kaiser J. The dirt on ocean garbage patches. (2010) Pg: 1506. DOI: DOI: 10.1126/science.328.5985.1506
13. Turner A. Paint particles in the marine environment: an overlooked component of microplastics. Water rEsearch x. 2021. 1;12:100110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wroa.2021.100110
14. Moore CJ. Synthetic polymers in the marine environment: a rapidly increasing, long-term threat. Environmental research. 2008;108(2):131-9.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2008.07.025
15. Azoulay D, Villa P, Arellano Y, Gordon MF, Moon D, Miller KA, Thompson K, Kistler A. Plastic & health: the hidden costs of a plastic planet. Geneva: CIEL; 2019.
16. Galloway TS. Micro-and nano-plastics and human health. Marine anthropogenic litter. 2015:343-66.
17. Emenike EC, Okorie CJ, Ojeyemi T, Egbemhenghe A, Iwuozor KO, Saliu OD, Okoro HK, Adeniyi AG. From oceans to dinner plates: The impact of microplastics on human health. Heliyon. 2023;1;9(10)
18. Ragusa A, Notarstefano V, Svelato A, Belloni A, Gioacchini G, Blondeel C, Zucchelli E, De Luca C, D’Avino S, Gulotta A, Carnevali O. Raman microspectroscopy detection and characterisation of microplastics in human breastmilk. Polymers. 2022. 30;14(13):2700. DOI:  10.3390/polym14132700
19. Braun T, Ehrlich L, Henrich W, Koeppel S, Lomako I, Schwabl P, Liebmann B. Detection of microplastic in human placenta and meconium in a clinical setting. Pharmaceutics. 2021.22;13(7):921. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13070921
20. Liu S, Liu X, Guo J, Yang R, Wang H, Sun Y, Chen B, Dong R. The association between microplastics and microbiota in placentas and meconium: the first evidence in humans. Environmental science & technology. 2022   21;57(46):17774-85.: DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.2c04706
21. Barceló D, Picó Y, Alfarhan AH. Microplastics: Detection in human samples, cell line studies, and health impacts. Environmental toxicology and pharmacology. 2023 28:104204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2023.104204
22. Leslie HA. Review of microplastics in cosmetics. IVM Institute for Environmental Studies. 2014;476:1-33. 
23. Bureau ME. Report on the State of Environment of Macau, 2015. Internet].[cited 08th March 2018]. Available from: http://www. dspa. gov. mo/StateReportHTML/2016/index_en. htm. (2018)
24. Pironti C, Ricciardi M, Motta O, Miele Y, Proto A, Montano L. Microplastics in the environment: intake through the food web, human exposure and toxicological effects. Toxics. 2021.16;9(9):224. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics9090224
25. Vethaak AD, Legler J. Microplastics and human health. Science. 2021.12;371(6530):672-4. DOI: DOI: 10.1126/science.abe5041
26. Prata JC, da Costa JP, Lopes I, Duarte AC, Rocha-Santos T. Environmental exposure to microplastics: An overview on possible human health effects. Science of the total environment. 2020.1;702:134455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134455 
27. Blackburn K, Green D. The potential effects of microplastics on human health: What is known and what is unknown. Ambio. 2022;51(3):518-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-021-01589-9
28. Smith M, Love DC, Rochman CM, Neff RA. Microplastics in seafood and the implications for human health. Current environmental health reports. 2018;5:375-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-018-0206-z
29. Santillo D, Miller K, Johnston P. Microplastics as contaminants in commercially important seafood species. Integrated environmental assessment and management. 2017;13(3):516-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.1909
30. Peñate CO. Microplastics in drinking water, food, and everyday products. Environmental Health Association of Québec (ASEQ-EHAQ). 2021.
31. Dusza HM, Katrukha EA, Nijmeijer SM, Akhmanova A, Vethaak AD, Walker DI, Legler J. Uptake, transport, and toxicity of pristine and weathered micro-and nanoplastics in human placenta cells. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2022;130(9):097006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP10873