Available online on 15.10.2023 at http://jddtonline.info
Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics
Open Access to Pharmaceutical and Medical Research
Copyright © 2023 The Author(s): This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial use provided the original author and source are credited
Open Access Full Text Article Review Article
Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
1 Professor & Principal, CMR College of Pharmacy, Kandlakoya, Medchal, Telangana, India
2 Department of Pharm. D, CMR College of Pharmacy, Kandlokoya, Medchal, Telangana, India.
|
Article Info: _____________________________________________ Article History: Received 23 July 2023 Reviewed 17 Sep 2023 Accepted 01 Oct 2023 Published 15 Oct 2023 _____________________________________________ Cite this article as: Rama Rao T, Pratiksha B, Navyasri C, Kalita DJ, Alam S, Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease, Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics. 2023; 13(10):149-153DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v13i10.6226 _____________________________________________ *Address for Correspondence: Tadikonda Rama Rao, Professor & Principal, CMR College of Pharmacy, Kandlakoya Village, Medchal Road, Hyderabad - 501401. |
Abstract _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is characterized by the buildup of fat in the liver, and it is not caused by excessive alcohol consumption. NAFLD is highly prevalent, affecting approximately 30% of the population in developed countries and around 10% in developing nations. As a result, NAFLD has become the most prevalent liver condition worldwide. The development of NAFLD is closely linked to insulin resistance, making it common among individuals who have central obesity or diabetes. Insulin resistance and excess body fat contribute to a higher influx of lipids into the liver and an increased production of new fats within the liver, known as de novo hepatic lipogenesis. These processes ultimately lead to the accumulation of triglycerides in the liver, a characteristic feature of NAFLD. NAFLD is closely associated with components of the metabolic syndrome, and individuals with type 2 diabetes have an increased risk of developing cirrhosis and its related complications. While cardiovascular disease and extra hepatic malignancy are the leading causes of death in people with NAFLD, the presence of advanced liver fibrosis is a significant indicator of liver-related outcomes and overall mortality. Non-invasive tests that combine various methods can be used to assess the extent of liver fibrosis. Patients diagnosed with cirrhosis should undergo screenings for hepatocellular carcinoma (a type of liver cancer) and esophageal varices. Currently, there are no approved therapies for NAFLD; however, there are several drugs in advanced stages of development that show promise for future treatment options. Keywords: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, Weight management, Bariatric surgery, Metabolic surgery, Conservative therapy. |
Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a condition that falls on the more severe end of the spectrum within NAFLD. It lies between NAFL, which is a milder form of the disorder, and the broader category of NAFLD. NAFLD itself has the potential to progress to cirrhosis and fibrosis over time.(4,5) Hepatic steatosis is present in NAFLD but there is no sign of inflammation, whereas in NASH, it is linked to lobular inflammation and apoptosis, which can result in fibrosis and cirrhosis.(4-7)
Prior to the middle of the previous decade, NASH was largely regarded as a dangerous disorder that virtually exclusively affected obese females who have Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), a prognosis that is generally favorable, and who have cardiovascular disease, stroke, and diabetes risk factors.4-7
Due to the rise in obesogenic lifestyles, the aging population, and the increasing prevalence of type 2 diabetes, it is estimated that by 2030, there will be a significant surge in NASH-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cases, with an anticipated increase of 137%. Additionally, liver-related deaths associated with NASH are projected to rise by 178% during the same period. These projections highlight the urgent need for interventions and strategies to address the growing burden of NASH and its associated complications.11
Pathophysiology:
The progression of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) has been explained by the "two-hits hypothesis." However, recent evidence suggests a more intricate mechanism known as the "multiple parallel hits hypothesis." This theory proposes that various factors act simultaneously rather than in a sequential manner. These factors include insulin resistance (IR), genetic and epigenetic influences, mitochondrial dysfunction, endoplasmic reticulum stress, gut microbiota, chronic low-grade inflammation and dysfunction of adipose tissue. According to this theory, these factors collectively contribute to the development and progression of both NAFLD and NASH. This multifactorial perspective provides a more comprehensive understanding of the complex processes involved in NAFLD pathogenesis.12-15
Figure 1: Schematic representation of the pathophysiological mechanisms of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) development. LPS: lipopolysaccharides; TNF-α: tumor necrosis factor-alpha; IL-6: interleukine-6; TLR: toll-like receptor; FFAs: free fatty acids.
It has been proposed that the development of NASH is a two-step process based on this body of evidence. The first stage of this process involves the accumulation of fat in the liver, which will make insulin resistance worse. The second stage of this process involves cellular and molecular alterations brought on by oxidative stress and the oxidation of fatty acids in the liver as a result of numerous factors, including cytokine injury, hyperinsulinemia, hepatic iron and/or lipid peroxidation, variation in the extracellular matrix, altered energy homeostasis, and altered immune system function.(14,15) The process of insulin resistance development is complex. As is the situation for many people with NASH who have metabolic syndrome (MS), the rise in fat. Insulin resistance is primarily caused by bulk and adipocyte differentiation.
NAFLD, or Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease, can be classified into two distinct types based on their underlying causes and mechanisms.
The first type of NAFLD is closely associated with metabolic syndrome. Metabolic syndrome refers to a cluster of conditions such as obesity, insulin resistance, high blood pressure, and dyslipidemia. In this type, insulin resistance is considered the primary pathophysiological mechanism. Insulin resistance impairs the body's ability to effectively utilize insulin, leading to elevated blood glucose levels. This, in turn, promotes the accumulation of fat in the liver, resulting in NAFLD.
The second type of NAFLD is linked to infectious pathologies. Infections such as hepatitis C and HIV can contribute to the development of liver steatosis, which is the accumulation of fat in the liver. Additionally, certain medications can also cause this type of NAFLD. Examples include total parenteral nutrition (intravenous feeding), glucocorticoids (steroids), tamoxifen (used for breast cancer treatment), tetracycline (an antibiotic), amiodarone (used for heart rhythm disorders), methotrexate (used for various medical conditions), valproic acid (used for epilepsy and mood disorders), and exposure to vinyl chloride (a chemical). Furthermore, specific toxins or inherited/acquired metabolic diseases, such as lipodystrophy (abnormal fat distribution), cachexia (severe weight loss and muscle wasting), or intestinal bypass surgery, can also be associated with this second type of NAFLD. 16,17
The prevalence of NAFLD (Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) can indeed vary depending on the screening methods employed in different studies. The wide range you mentioned, from 29.6% to 87.1%, highlights the variability in reported prevalence rates.18-20 hyperglycemia and insulin resistance (IR) play significant roles in the development of NAFLD (Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease) and the progression to liver fibrosis. The relationship between elevated blood glucose levels and liver damage is well-established.
Hyperglycemia, which refers to persistently high levels of glucose in the blood, can induce toxicity in the liver. When blood glucose levels are chronically elevated, it can lead to increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and oxidative stress.23 This oxidative stress can damage liver cells and initiate inflammation within the liver, contributing to the development of NAFLD.21 Indeed, there is evidence suggesting a correlation between HbA1c (glycated hemoglobin) levels and liver fat content in individuals with NAFLD. HbA1c is a marker of long-term blood glucose control, and higher levels are indicative of poorer glycemic control over time. A study demonstrating a linear correlation between HbA1c and liver fat content suggests that elevated HbA1c levels are associated with a greater accumulation of fat in the liver.
The coexistence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and insulin resistance (IR) has been found to contribute to an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Both T2DM and IR are characterized by impaired glucose metabolism and elevated blood glucose levels, which can have detrimental effects on cardiovascular health.23-27
Figure 2: Schematic representation of NAFLD associated cardiorenal disease and type 2 diabetes development
Signs and symptoms:
During physical examination, hepatomegaly (enlarged liver) can be detected in some individuals with NAFLD. This enlargement is typically a result of fatty infiltration in the liver. As fat accumulates in the liver cells, the liver may increase in size and become palpable during a physical examination.
Hepatomegaly can be an indication of liver disease, including NAFLD, but it is important to note that not all individuals with NAFLD will have an enlarged liver, and hepatomegaly can also be caused by other liver conditions or factors. A thorough evaluation and diagnostic tests are necessary to confirm the underlying cause of hepatomegaly in each individual case.28
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is often associated with metabolic syndrome (MS), which is a cluster of conditions that increase the risk of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes.29,30 NAFLD is often associated with an unhealthy lifestyle, including poor dietary habits, sedentary behavior, and lack of physical activity. These lifestyle factors contribute to the development and progression of NAFLD. However, research has also shown that making positive changes in lifestyle can lead to improvements in NAFLD.
Studies have demonstrated that adopting a healthier lifestyle, including regular exercise, a balanced diet, weight loss (especially in cases of obesity), and appropriate management of metabolic risk factors such as diabetes and dyslipidemia, can result in improvements in liver function and reduction in transaminase levels (e.g., ALT and AST).31-34
Because NAFLD causes no symptoms in most cases, it frequently comes to medical attention when tests done for other reasons point to a liver problem. This can happen if your liver looks unusual on ultrasound or if you have an abnormal liver enzyme test.
In situations where other tests fail to provide conclusive results, your physician may suggest a liver biopsy, which involves the removal of a small tissue sample from your liver. This sample is then carefully examined in a laboratory to identify any signs of inflammation or scarring.
It's important to note that a liver biopsy can cause some discomfort, and there are certain inherent risks associated with the procedure. Your doctor will provide you with a thorough explanation of these risks and discuss them with you in detail. During the biopsy, a needle is inserted through your abdominal wall and into the liver to extract the tissue sample.
The treatment for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) typically involves lifestyle changes and management of underlying conditions. Here are some common approaches:
Numerous studies have explored pharmacological interventions to manage the development and progression of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), although no drugs are currently approved specifically for its treatment. However, certain medications have shown promise in clinical trials.
One example is pioglitazone, which is an approved drug for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Pioglitazone targets adipose tissue metabolism and inflammation by activating peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ), a transcription factor. By increasing the uptake of fatty acids by adipocytes, pioglitazone reduces hepatic steatosis and the flow of fatty acids to the liver. It also upregulates adiponectin, an adipokine with anti-steatogenic properties.
Diagnosing NAFLD and its more severe form, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), typically requires a liver biopsy, but this procedure has limitations. Therefore, noninvasive tests based on biomarkers and transient elastography have gained importance in clinical practice. Diagnostic panels such as the NAFLD fibrosis score, FIB-4, and Fibro Meter have been validated and are used to assess NAFLD/NASH. Transient elastography is particularly useful in evaluating advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis.
The complications of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) can vary in severity and are often associated with the histological stage and grade of liver disease. The most significant complications, listed in descending order, include:
Conclusion:
In conclusion, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a prevalent condition characterized by the accumulation of fat in the liver. It ranges from simple steatosis to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and can progress to advanced fibrosis, cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and cardiovascular disease.
The primary approach to managing NAFLD involves lifestyle modifications, including weight loss, a healthy diet, regular exercise, and controlling underlying conditions such as diabetes and obesity. These measures can help reduce liver fat, improve liver function, and mitigate the risk of complications.
While there are currently no approved pharmacological treatments specifically for NAFLD, certain medications, such as pioglitazone, have shown promise in clinical trials. However, further research is needed to identify more effective pharmacological interventions.
The complications associated with NAFLD, including cardiovascular disease, hepatocellular carcinoma, and end-stage liver disease, highlight the importance of early detection, monitoring, and appropriate management. Regular check-ups, lifestyle modifications, and adherence to treatment plans are essential in preventing or slowing down disease progression and reducing the risk of complications.
It is crucial for individuals with NAFLD to work closely with healthcare professionals to develop a personalized treatment and monitoring plan that addresses their specific needs and reduces the impact of NAFLD on their overall health and well-being.
References:
1. Briohny W, Smith LA. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences. 2011;48(3):97–113.
2. Elizabeth E, Powell V, Wong M. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. The lancet. 2021;2212–24.
3. Sanyal AJ, Brunt EM, Kleiner DE, Kowdley KV, Chalasani N, Lavine JE, et al. Endpoints and clinical trial design for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology [Internet]. 2011;54(1):344–53. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hep.24376
4. Ahmed A, Wong RJ, Harrison SA. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease review: Diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol [Internet]. 2015;13(12):2062–70. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2015.07.029
5. Machado MV, Diehl AM. Pathogenesis of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Gastroenterology [Internet]. 2016;150(8):1769–77. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.066
6. Nasr P, Ignatova S, Kechagias S, Ekstedt M. Natural history of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a prospective follow-up study with serial biopsies: Hepatol Commun. Hepatol Commun. 2018;2(2):199–210.
7. Younossi Z, Anstee QM, Marietti M, Hardy T, Henry L, Eslam M, et al. Global burden of NAFLD and NASH: trends, predictions, risk factors and prevention. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol [Internet]. 2018;15(1):11–20. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2017.109
8. Younossi ZM, Golabi P, de Avila L, Paik JM, Srishord M, Fukui N, et al. The global epidemiology of NAFLD and NASH in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hepatol [Internet]. 2019;71(4):793–801. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2019.06.021
9. Angulo P, Kleiner DE, Dam-Larsen S, Adams LA, Bjornsson ES, Charatcharoenwitthaya P, et al. Liver fibrosis, but no other histologic features, is associated with long-term outcomes of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology [Internet]. 2015;149(2):389-397.e10. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2015.04.043
10. Ekstedt M, Hagstrom H, Nasr P, Fredrikson M, Stal P, Kechagias S. Fibrosis stage is the strongest predictor for disease- specific mortality in NAFLD after up to 33 years of follow-up. Hepatology. 2015;61(5):1547–54.
11. Estes C, Razavi H, Loomba R, Younossi Z, Sanyal AJ. Modeling the epidemic of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease demonstrates an exponential increase in burden of disease: Estes et al. Hepatology [Internet]. 2018;67(1):123–33. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hep.29466
12. Lonardo A, Nascimbeni F, Maurantonio M, Marrazzo A, Rinaldi L, Adinolfi LE. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Evolving paradigms. World J Gastroenterol [Internet]. 2017;23(36):6571–92. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i36.6571
13. Acierno C, Caturano A, Pafundi PC, Nevola R, Sasso ALE. C: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and type 2 diabetes: Pathophysiological mechanisms shared between the two faces of the same coin. Explor Med. 2020;1:287–306.
14. Edmison J, Mccullough AJ. Pathogenesis of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: human data Clin Liver Dis. 2007;11:75–104.
15. Day CP, Saksena S. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: definitions and pathogenesis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002;17 Suppl 3:S377-84.
16. Chitturi S, Farrell GC. Etiopathogenesis of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Semin Liver Dis [Internet]. 2001;21(1):27–41. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2001-12927
17. Fromenty B, Pessayre D. Impaired mitochondrial function in microvesicular steatosis. Efects of drugs, ethanol, hormones and cytokines. J Hepatol. 1997;26(2):43–53.
18. Bril F, Cusi K. Management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with type 2 diabetes: A call to action. Diabetes Care [Internet]. 2017;40(3):419–30. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc16-1787
19. Williams CD, Stengel J, Asike MI, Torres DM, Shaw J, Contreras M, et al. Prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis among a largely middle-aged population utilizing ultrasound and liver biopsy: a prospective study. Gastroenterology [Internet]. 2011;140(1):124–31. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2010.09.038
20. Dai W, Ye L, Liu A, Wen SW, Deng J, Wu X, et al. Prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) [Internet]. 2017;96(39):e8179. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008179
21. Portillo P, Yavuz S, Bril F, Cusi K. Role of insulin resistance and diabetes in the pathogenesis and treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Curr Hepatol Rep [Internet]. 2014;13(2):159–70. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11901-014-0229-3
22. Lonardo A, Bellentani S, Byrne CD, Cortez-Pinto CSH, Grieco H, Machado A, et al. Epidemiological modifiers of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Study Group. 2015;47:997–1006.
23. Inchiostro S, Bertoli G, Zanette G, Donadon V. Evidence of higher insulin resistance in NIDDM patients with ischaemic heart disease. Diabetologia [Internet]. 1994;37(6):597–603. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s001250050153
24. Torella D, Ellison GM, Torella M, Vicinanza C, Aquila I, Iaconetti C, et al. C: Carbonic anhydrase activation is associated with worsened pathological remodeling in human ischemic diabetic cardiomyopathy. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014;
25. Marfella R, Sasso FC, Siniscalchi M, Paolisso P, Rizzo MR, Ferraro F, et al. Peri-procedural tight glycemic control during early percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with a lower rate of in-stent restenosis in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. J Clin Endocrinol Metab [Internet]. 2012;97(8):2862–71. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jc.2012-1364
26. Sasso FC, Rinaldi L, Lascar N, Marrone A, Pafundi PC, Adinolfi LE, et al. Role of tight glycemic control during acute coronary syndrome on CV outcome in type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Res [Internet]. 2018;2018:3106056. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3106056
27. Zhou Y-Y, Zhou X-D, Wu S-J, Hu X-Q, Tang B, van Poucke S, et al. Synergistic increase in cardiovascular risk in diabetes mellitus with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a meta-analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol [Internet]. 2018;30(6):631–6. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000001075
28. Bacon BR, Farahvash MJ, Janney CG, Neuschwander-Tetri BA. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: an expanded clinical entity. Gastroenterology [Internet]. 1994;107(4):1103–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0016-5085(94)90235-6
29. Bhatia LS, Curzen NP, Calder PC, Byrne CD. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a new and important cardiovascular risk factor? Eur Heart J [Internet]. 2012;33(10):1190–200. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehr453
30. Targher G, Bertolini L, Poli F, Rodella S, Scala L, Tessari R, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and risk of future cardiovascular events among type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes [Internet]. 2005;54(12):3541–6. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.54.12.3541
31. Ou H, Fu Y, Liao W, Zheng C, Wu X. Association between smoking and liver fibrosis among patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol [Internet]. 2019;2019:1–5. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/6028952
32. Targher G, Bertolini L, Padovani R, Rodella S, Tessari R, Zenari L, et al. Prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and its association with cardiovascular disease among type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care [Internet]. 2007;30(5):1212–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc06-2247
33. Lonardo A, Sookoian S, Pirola CJ, Targher G. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and risk of cardiovascular disease. Metabolism [Internet]. 2016;65(8):1136–50. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2015.09.017
34. Hamabe A, Uto H, Imamura Y, Kusano K, Mawatari S, Kumagai K, et al. Impact of cigarette smoking on onset of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease over a 10-year period. J Gastroenterol [Internet]. 2011;46(6):769–78. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00535-011-0376-z
35. Machado MV, Michelotti GA, Pereira TA, Xie G, Premont R, Cortez-Pinto H, et al. Accumulation of duct cells with activated YAP parallels fibrosis progression in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol [Internet]. 2015;63(4):962–70. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2015.05.031