Available online on 15.11.2023 at http://jddtonline.info
Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics
Open Access to Pharmaceutical and Medical Research
Copyright © 2023 The Author(s): This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial use provided the original author and source are credited
Open Access Full Text Article Research Article
Associations of Electrocardiographic Abnormalities in Stable Type 2 Diabetes Subjects: Experience from a Tertiary Health Facility in South Eastern Nigeria
Ezeude CM1* , Nkpozi MO2 , Abonyi MC3 , Onwuegbuna AA4 , Okechukwu UC3 , Anyanwu AC5 , Ikeabbah HE6 , Ezeude AM7
Article Info: ___________________________________________ Article History: Received 22 Aug 2023 Reviewed 04 Oct 2023 Accepted 27 Oct 2023 Published 15 Nov 2023 ____________________________________________ Cite this article as: Ezeude CM, Nkpozi MO, Abonyi MC, Onwuegbuna AA, Okechukwu UC, Anyanwu AC, Ikeabbah HE, Ezeude AM, Associations of Electrocardiographic Abnormalities in Stable Type 2 Diabetes Subjects: Experience from a Tertiary Health Facility in South Eastern Nigeria, Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics. 2023; 13(11):62-72 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v13i11.6006 ____________________________________________ *Address for Correspondence: Ezeude Chidiebele Malachy, Department of Internal Medicine, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria. |
Abstract ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Introduction: Cardiovascular abnormalities are prevalent in the setting of diabetes mellitus, even among stable subjects, necessitating the need for a regular cardiovascular disease screening for this group of patients. Electrocardiogram is a simple and reliable screening test for cardiovascular abnormalities that could be easily accessible even in resource poor and rural settings. This study was carried out to determine the association between cardiovascular risk factors and electrocardiographic abnormalities in stable type 2 diabetes subjects in South Eastern Nigeria. Materials and Methods: One hundred and thirty-six stable adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus were recruited consecutively from the out-patient diabetes clinic of Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital in South Eastern Nigeria. They were assessed for the risk factors for cardiovascular diseases that included smoking, obesity, dyslipidaemia, poor glycaemic control, hypertension, lack of exercise, presence of chronic kidney disease and metabolic syndrome. They also had a 12 lead electrocardiogram done. Results were analyzed using SPSS version 25. P value of ˂ 0.05 was considered significant. Result: A total of 128 subjects had complete results and were analyzed. There were 63 males and 65 females with a mean age of 58.43 ± 12.85 years and mean diabetes duration of 9.03 ± 7.36 years. A total of 45.3% of the subjects had electrocardiographic abnormalities. Hypertension was present in 54.9%, dyslipidaemia in 91.4%, central obesity in 74.3%, metabolic syndrome in 76.6% and chronic kidney disease in 57.9% of the subjects. Significant association was found between smoking and occurrence of AV block (p = 0.008), central obesity and QRS axis abnormality (p = 0.002), dyslipidaemia and ST segment abnormality (p = 0.001) and lack of exercise and ST segment abnormality (p = 0.000). No significant association was found between age, sex of the subjects, duration of DM, treatment modality for DM, level of glycaemic control, hypertension, presence of CKD and metabolic syndrome and any of the electrocardiographic abnormalities. Conclusion: Electrocardiographic abnormalities are common in stable type 2 diabetic subjects. There was significant association between smoking habit, central obesity, dyslipidaemia, lack of exercise and ECG abnormalities that included AV block, QRS axis and ST segment abnormalities. Keywords: Electrocardiographic abnormalities, stable type 2 diabetes subjects, cardiovascular disease, Nigeria. |
INTRODUCTION
Cardiovascular complications are prevalent in the setting of diabetes and the risk of developing Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) has been shown to be about two-fold higher in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) compared to the general population1. Cardiovascular abnormalities have been shown to be common even among stable T2DM subjects, necessitating the need for a regular cardiovascular disease screening for this group of patients2. Micro-vascular and macro-vascular abnormalities are implicated in the aetio-pathogenesis of CVDs in the background of type 2 diabetes mellitus3. Cardiac micro-vascular circulation abnormalities increase the risk of developing arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death4. High blood pressure and increased fasting blood glucose are major risk factors for micro-vascular complications while a high blood pressure is the major risk factor for macro-vascular complications among T2DM subjects3.
Electrocardiogram is a simple noninvasive test that has been proven over time to be an easily accessible, cost effective and reliable test for evaluating cardiac abnormalities and could be very handy in resource poor and rural settings.
Chest pain most of the times could be masked in T2DM subjects with myocardial ischaemia. This medical condition termed “silent myocardial ischaemia” is common among diabetic subjects with autonomic dysfunction and resting ECG abnormalities have been found to be markers of silent ischaemia among asymptomatic diabetic subjects5. Although resting ECG may not be sufficient to diagnose some cardiovascular abnormalities, including silent cardiovascular disease, however, the use of coding system such as the Minnesota coding system may improve its utility6.
In a scenario where a T2DM subject has a normal ECG finding despite a suspected myocardial ischaemia, exercise/stress ECG becomes the next choice screening test for the possible silent myocardial ischaemia7. Routine CVD screening in diabetic patients using ECG not only aims at identifying unrecognized CVDs, but also determining the risk for a future CVD event and thus equally serve as a vital preventive strategy for CVDs in diabetics8,9.
Common electrocardiographic abnormalities in T2DM subjects include sinus tachycardia, heart rate variability, ST-T changes, left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and others10.11. Globally, about 30% of asymptomatic T2DM patients showed ECG abnormalities11
The risk factors for CVDs in the setting of T2DM include central obesity, smoking, dyslipidaemia, hypertension, lack of exercise among others. A clustering of these risk factors is described as metabolic syndrome and improvement in these factors appear to reduce the risk of diabetes and its complications12.
The risk factors for ECG abnormalities evaluated by this study included smoking, obesity, dyslipidaemia, lack of exercise, poor glycaemic control, hypertension, presence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and metabolic syndrome.
There is a paucity of studies on the associations of ECG abnormalities in T2DM subjects, especially the stable outpatients in the sub-Saharan Africa generally and South Eastern Nigeria in particular. This study sets out to bridge this gap in knowledge and stimulate further studies on this very important topic.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This was a cross-sectional observational study conducted among clinically stable T2DM subjects who were evaluated for the risk factors of ECG abnormalities at the outpatient diabetes clinic at Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, (NAUTH) Nnewi in South Eastern Nigeria. This study was conducted between July, 2022 and April, 2023. A total of 136 T2DM subjects were recruited for the study, 128 subjects had complete results and were analyzed. A convenient sampling method was used for recruiting the study subjects as all consenting patients with T2DM that presented to the diabetes clinic and who met the inclusion criteria were recruited for the study as they were seen consecutively. Subjects were excluded if they were less than 30 years of age, had T1DM, were pregnant, had clinical signs suggestive CVD(s) or were very ill respectively. The subjects were met on two separate occasions. At the first meeting a focused medical history of each of the subjects was taken, a focused examination, blood pressure and anthropometric measurements were respectively done. Other relevant data were extracted using a researcher structured and administered study protocol. Next, a resting electrocardiogram was done using Schiller AT-102 plus 12 lead ECG Machine. Ten electrodes were placed in the specific anatomic positions to obtain quality tracings. The four limb leads were applied to the four limbs: the right and the left legs and the right and left arms. The six chest leads were applied at the precordial locations (V1-V6). The recording was done over a period of about 10 seconds after the connections were made.
The ECG recordings were interpreted by a cardiologist using the University of Minnesota Codes for Resting Electrocardiograms6. The second contact with the participants was on another clinic appointment between 8 a.m and 9 a.m, after they had fasted for about 10-12 hours as instructed. Biochemical tests that included fasting blood glucose (FBG), glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting lipid profile (FLP) and serum creatinine were done. A total of 7ml of blood was collected from each subject following a venipuncture of the cubital vein, while observing full aseptic procedures, 2ml for FBS, 1ml for HbA1c, 4ml for both FLP and serum creatinine.
The samples for HbA1c were collected in EDTA bottles and measured with automated CLOVER A1c Analyzer (Infopia, Korea) and CLOVER A1c Self-Test Cartridge using the boronate affinity method13. The samples for FPG were collected in fluoride oxalate bottles and measured by the Trinder glucose oxidase method14. The blood samples for FLP and serum creatinine were collected in plain bottles. High density lipoprotein (HDL) level was measured by precipitation technique15. Total cholesterol level was determined using the kit employing the enzymatic and the 4-hydroxybenzoate/4-aminophenazone system (BioSystems)16. Triglyceride level was determined using a kit employing enzymatic hydrolysis of triglyceride with lipases (Randox) and low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) was measured using a kit employing a precipitation technique17, 18. Serum creatinine was measured using Jaffe’s reaction19. Estimated glomerular filteration rate (eGFR) was estimated from calibrated serum creatinine values using the four-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study equation20. Weight and height were measured using Stadiometer (RGZ -120), waist circumference measured with a measuring tape and blood pressure measured using Accoson mercury Sphygmomanometer.
Statistical Analysis
Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25 (Chicago, IL, USA). Categorical data were analyzed and compared using Chi-square test: results presented in frequencies and percentages. The mean values of continuous variables were calculated and compared among groups using student’s t-test and analysis of variance (ANOVA). The level of significance was set at p < 0.05.
DEFINITION OF TERMS AND CRITERIA
RESULTS
A total of 128 T2DM subjects who had complete results and were analyzed. They were made up of 63 (49.2%) males and 65 (50.8%) females.
Clinical characteristics of the study subjects
The mean age of the subjects was 58.43 ± 12.85 years, mean duration of DM was 9.03 ± 7.36 years, mean BMI was 27.96 ± 5.61 kg/m2, mean HbA1c was 8.28 ± 2.11%, mean SBP was 131.28 ± 21.26 mmHg and mean DBP was 77.05 ± 12.41mmHg. Also the mean value of serum creatinine was 88.77 ± 24.88 mmol/L and the mean eGFR was 86.10 ± 27.7 mL/min. The mean TC was 4.57 ±1.32 mmol/L, Tg was 1.37 ± 0.84 mmol/L, HDL-C was 1.06 ± 0.27 mmol/L and LDL-C was 2.90 ± 1.19 mmol/L (details in Table 1).
For the co-morbid conditions, hypertension was present in 76 (59.4%) of the subjects, dyslipidaemia in 117 (91.4%), metabolic syndrome in 98 (76.6%), global obesity in 45 (35.2%), central obesity in 95 (74.3%) and CKD in 74 (57.9) of the study participants (details as in Table 4).
For diabetes treatment, 3 (2.3%) subjects were on diet alone, 91 (71.1%) on oral anti-diabetic drugs (OADs), 11 (8.6%) on insulin and 23 (18.0%) were on a combination of OADs and insulin (details in Table 3).
Socio demographic characteristics of the study subjects
Among the participants 106 (82.8%) subjects were married, 4 (3.2%) were single and 18 (14.1%) were widowed. 2 (1.6%) had no formal education, 45 (35.1%) had primary, 28 (21.9%) secondary and 54 (41.1%) had tertiary education. 18 (14.1%) subjects smoked cigarette: 16 (12.5%) smoked previously and 4 (3.1%) were still smoking. 22 (17.2%) subjects engaged in regular exercise (details in Table 2).
A total of 45.3% subjects had abnormal ECG findings that included Q-wave abnormality (4.7%), QRS abnormality (21.9%), LVH (10.2%), T-wave abnormality (21.9%), ST segment abnormality (3.9%), AV block (0.8%), BBB (4.7%), sinus rhythm abnormality (22.7%), atrial enlargement (21.1%) and CAD (23.4%).
Significant association was found between smoking habit and occurrence of AV block (p = 0.008), central obesity and QRS axis abnormality (p = 0.002), dyslipidaemia and ST segment abnormality (p = 0.001) and lack of exercise and ST segment abnormality (p = 0.000) (details in Tables 7, 11, 14 & 16).
No significant association was found between age, sex of the subjects, treatment modality for DM, duration of DM, level of glycaemic control, hypertension, presence of CKD and metabolic syndrome and any of the ECG abnormalities, although all the ECG abnormalities were more among the T2DM subjects with poor glycaemic control, hypertension, CKD and metabolic syndrome (details in Tables 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13 & 15).
Table 1: Baseline characteristics of the study population
Variable |
Minimum |
Maximum |
Mean ± SD |
Age (years) |
32.00 |
93.00 |
58.43 ± 12.85 |
Serum creatinine (mmo;/L) |
53.00 |
188.00 |
89.18 ± 24.61 |
eGFR (ml/min/24 hours) |
33.70 |
168.5.0 |
85.83 ± 24.95 |
TC (mmol/L) |
2.38 |
6.89 |
4.52 ± 1.12 |
Tg (mmol/L) |
0.70 |
3.48 |
1.35 ± 0.63 |
HDL (mmol/L) |
0.45 |
2.07 |
1.06 ± 0.27 |
LDL(mmol/L) |
1.82 |
4.90 |
3.06 ± 0.84 |
eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate, TC = total cholesterol; Tg = Triglyceride; HDL = high density lipoprotein; LDL = low density lipoprotein
Table 2: Socio-demographic characteristics of the study population
Variable |
Options |
Frequency n (%) |
Age (years) |
<45 45-64 >64 |
19 (14.8) 62 (48.4) 47 (36.7) |
Sex |
Male Female |
63 (49.2) 65 (50.8) |
Marital status |
Single Married Widowed |
4 (3.2) 106 (82.8) 18 (14.1) |
Previous smoking |
Yes No |
16 (12.5) 112 (87.5) |
Current smoking |
Yes No |
4 (3.1) 124 (96.9) |
Cigarette smoking |
Yes No |
18(14.1) 110(85.9) |
Exercise |
Yes No |
22 (17.2) 106 (82.8) |
Table 3: Clinical characteristics of the study subjects
Variable |
Options |
Frequency n (%) |
DM treatment |
Diet alone OADs Insulin Both OADs & Insulin |
3 (2.3) 91 (71.1) 11 (8.6) 23 (18.0) |
DM duration |
Short duration Long duration |
46 (35.9) 82 (64.1) |
Glycaemic control |
Good Poor |
29(22.7) 99 (77.3) |
Central obesity |
Yes No |
95 (74.2) 33 (25.8) |
Body mass index |
Normal Overweight Global obesity |
42 (32.8) 41 (32.0) 45 (35.2) |
Global obesity class |
Class I Class II Class III |
32 (71.1) 10 (22.2) 3 (6.7) |
Stage of CKD |
Stage I Stage II Stage III |
6 (8.1) 47 (63.5) 21 (28.4) |
Hypertensive |
Yes No |
76 (59.4) 52 (40.6) |
DM = diabetes mellitus; OADs = oral anti diabetic drugs; CKD = chronic kidney disease; ACEIs = angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors; ARBs = angiotensin receptor blockers
Table 4: Distribution of co-morbidities among the subjects
Variable |
Frequency n (%) |
|
|
Present |
Absent |
CKD |
74 (57.8) |
54 (42.2) |
Hypertension |
76 (59.4) |
52 (40.6) |
Dyslipidaemia |
117 (91.4) |
11 (8.6) |
Metabolic syndrome |
98 (76.6) |
30 (23.4) |
CKD = chronic kidney disease
Table 5: Association of ECG abnormalities with the age of the subjects
ECG abnormalities/Age |
Frequency n (%) |
p-value |
||
|
<45yrs |
45-64yrs |
>64yrs |
|
Q-wave pathology |
0 |
2 (1.6) |
4 (3.1) |
0.251 |
QRS axis abnormality |
3 (2.3) |
8 (6.3) |
17 (13.3) |
0.011 |
Left ventricular hypertrophy |
0 |
5 (3.9) |
8 (6.3) |
0.087 |
T-wave abnormality |
3 (2.3) |
13 (10.2) |
12 (9.4) |
0.667 |
ST segment abnormality |
1 (0.8) |
1 (0.8) |
3 (2.3) |
0.421 |
AV block |
0 |
1 (0.8) |
0 |
0.585 |
Bundle branch block |
1 (0.8) |
1 (0.8) |
4 (3.1) |
0.239 |
Sinus rhythm abnormality |
4 (3.1) |
16 (12.5) |
9 (7.0) |
0.893 |
Atrial enlargement |
4 (3.1) |
13 (10.2) |
10 (7.8) |
0.999 |
CAD |
5 (3.9) |
14 (10.9) |
11 (8.6) |
0.945 |
Table 6: Association of ECG abnormalities with the sex of the subjects
ECG abnormalities/Sex |
Frequency n (%) |
p-value |
|
|
Male |
Female |
|
Q-wave pathology |
2 (1.6) |
4 (3.1) |
0.425 |
QRS axis abnormality |
11 (8.6) |
17 (13.3) |
0.234 |
Left ventricular hypertrophy |
7 (5.5) |
6 (4.7) |
0.725 |
T-wave abnormality |
10 (7.8) |
18 (14.1) |
0.106 |
ST segment abnormality |
3 (2.3) |
2 (1.6) |
0.623 |
AV block |
1 (0.8) |
0 |
0.308 |
Bundle branch block |
3 (2.3) |
3 (2.3) |
0.969 |
Sinus rhythm abnormality |
9 (7.00 |
20 (15.6) |
0.083 |
Atrial enlargement |
13 (10.2) |
14 (10.9) |
0.900 |
CAD |
16 (12.5) |
14 (10.9) |
0.606 |
Table 7: Association of ECG abnormalities with smoking
ECG abnormalities/Smoking |
Frequency n (%) |
p-value |
|
|
Smoked |
Never smoked |
|
Q-wave pathology |
1 (0.8) |
5 (3.9) |
0.752 |
QRS axis abnormality |
6 (4.7) |
22 (17.2) |
0.106 |
Left ventricular hypertrophy |
3 (2.3) |
10 (7.8) |
0.224 |
T-wave abnormality |
5 (3.9) |
23 (18.0) |
0.332 |
ST segment abnormality |
0 |
5 (3.9) |
0.389 |
AV block |
1 (0.8) |
0 |
0.008 |
Bundle branch block |
0 |
6 (4.7) |
0.343 |
Sinus rhythm abnormality |
4 (3.1) |
25 (19.5) |
0.847 |
Atrial enlargement |
6 (4.7) |
21 (16.4) |
0.086 |
CAD |
8 (6.3) |
22 (17.2) |
0.007 |
Table 8: Association of ECG abnormalities with the treatment for Diabetes Mellitus
ECG abnormalities/DM treatment |
Frequency n (%) |
p-value |
||
OADs |
Insulin |
Both |
||
Q-wave pathology |
6 (4.7) |
0 |
0 |
0.465 |
QRS axis abnormality |
20 (15.6) |
0 |
8 (6.3) |
0.104 |
Left ventricular hypertrophy |
7 (5.5) |
2 (1.6) |
4 (3.1) |
0.385 |
T-wave abnormality |
18 (14.1) |
0 |
8 (6.3) |
0.028 |
ST segment abnormality |
3 (2.3) |
0 |
2 (1.6) |
0.559 |
AV block |
0 |
1 (0.8) |
0 |
0.013 |
Bundle branch block |
3 (2.3) |
0 |
3 (2.3) |
0.197 |
Sinus rhythm abnormality |
19 (14.9) |
3 (2.3) |
7 (5.5) |
0.897 |
Atrial enlargement |
16 (12.5) |
2 (1.6) |
9 (7.0) |
0.112 |
CAD |
20 (15.6) |
2 (1.6) |
8 (6.3) |
0.510 |
Table 9: Association of ECG abnormalities with the duration of Diabetes Mellitus
ECG abnormalities/DM duration |
Frequency n (%) |
p-value |
|
|
Long duration |
Short duration |
|
Q-wave pathology |
6 (4.7) |
0 |
0.060 |
QRS axis abnormality |
20 (15.6) |
8 (6.3) |
0.358 |
Left ventricular hypertrophy |
9 (7.0) |
4 (3.1) |
0.682 |
T-wave abnormality |
17 (13.3) |
11 (8.6) |
0.676 |
ST segment abnormality |
4 (3.1) |
1 (0.8) |
0.449 |
AV block |
0 |
1 (0.8) |
0.180 |
Bundle branch block |
3 (2.3) |
3 (2.3) |
0.462 |
Sinus rhythm abnormality |
19 (14.8) |
10 (7.8) |
0.905 |
Atrial enlargement |
17 (13.3) |
10 (7.8) |
0.893 |
CAD |
17 (13.3) |
13 (10.2) |
0.335 |
Table 10: Association of ECG abnormalities with glycaemic control
ECG abnormalities / HbA1c control |
Frequency n (%) |
p-value |
|
|
Good control |
Poor control |
|
Q-wave pathology |
2 (1.6) |
4 (3.1) |
0.593 |
QRS axis abnormality |
10 (7.8) |
18 (14.1) |
0.108 |
Left ventricular hypertrophy |
5 (3.9) |
8 (6.3) |
0.206 |
T-wave abnormality |
7 (5.5) |
21 (16.4) |
0.913 |
ST segment abnormality |
2 (1.6) |
3 (2.3) |
0.401 |
AV block |
0 |
1 (0.8) |
0.570 |
Bundle branch block |
2 (1.6) |
4 (3.1) |
0.593 |
Sinus rhythm abnormality |
7 (5.5) |
22 (17.2) |
0.691 |
Atrial enlargement |
8 (6.3) |
19 (14.8) |
0.460 |
CAD |
7 (5.5) |
23 (18.0) |
0.897 |
Table 11: Association of ECG abnormalities with central obesity
ECG abnormalities/Abdominal obesity |
Frequency n (%) |
p-value |
|
Present |
Absent |
||
Q-wave pathology |
5 (3.9) |
1 (0.8) |
0.601 |
QRS axis abnormality |
27 (21.2) |
1 (0.8) |
0.002 |
Left ventricular hypertrophy |
10 (7.8) |
3 (2.3) |
0.814 |
T-wave abnormality |
24 (18.8) |
4 (3.1) |
0.116 |
ST segment abnormality |
3 (2.3) |
2 (1.6) |
0.458 |
AV block |
0 |
1 (0.8) |
0.088 |
Bundle branch block |
6 (4.7) |
0 |
0.139 |
Sinus rhythm abnormality |
21 (16.4) |
8 (6.3) |
0.699 |
Atrial enlargement |
20 (15.6) |
7 (5.5) |
0.985 |
CAD |
23 (18.0) |
7 (5.5) |
0.726 |
Table 12: Association of ECG abnormalities with hypertension
ECG abnormalities/Hypertension |
Frequency n (%) |
p-value |
|
|
Present |
Absent |
|
Q-wave pathology |
5 (3.9) |
1 (0.8) |
0.221 |
QRS axis abnormality |
18 (14.1) |
10 (7.8) |
0.549 |
Left ventricular hypertrophy |
10 (7.8) |
3 (2.3) |
0.174 |
T-wave abnormality |
16 (12.5) |
12 (9.4) |
0.786 |
ST segment abnormality |
3 (2.3) |
2 (1.6) |
0.977 |
AV block |
0 |
1 (0.8) |
0.225 |
Bundle branch block |
4 (3.1) |
2 (1.6) |
0.710 |
Sinus rhythm abnormality |
17 (13.3) |
12 (9.4) |
0.499 |
Atrial enlargement |
17 (13.3) |
10 (7.8) |
0.669 |
CAD |
18 (14.1) |
12 (9.4) |
0.937 |
Table 13: Association of ECG abnormalities with CKD
ECG abnormalities / CKD |
Frequency n (%) |
p-value |
|
|
Present |
Absent |
|
Q-wave pathology |
5 (3.9) |
1 (0.8) |
0.195 |
QRS axis abnormality |
17 (13.3) |
11 (8.6) |
0.725 |
Left ventricular hypertrophy |
10 (7.8) |
3 (2.3) |
0.141 |
T-wave abnormality |
17 (13.3) |
11 (8.6) |
0.725 |
ST segment abnormality |
4 (3.1) |
1 (0.8) |
0.305 |
AV block |
1 (0.8) |
0 |
0.391 |
Bundle branch block |
4 (3.1) |
2 (1.6) |
0.653 |
Sinus rhythm abnormality |
18 (14.1) |
11 (8.6) |
0.854 |
Atrial enlargement |
20 (15.6) |
7 (5.5) |
0.054 |
CAD |
16 (12.5) |
14 (10.9) |
0.570 |
Table 14: Association of ECG abnormalities with dyslipidaemia
ECG abnormalities / Dyslipidaemia |
Frequency n (%) |
p-value |
|
|
Present |
Absent |
|
Q-wave pathology |
6 (4.7) |
0 |
0.744 |
QRS axis abnormality |
26 (20.3) |
2 (1.6) |
0.752 |
Left ventricular hypertrophy |
12 (9.4) |
1 (0.8) |
0.889 |
T-wave abnormality |
27 (21.1) |
1 (0.8) |
0.530 |
ST segment abnormality |
4 (3.1)) |
1 (0.8) |
0.001 |
AV block |
1 (0.8) |
0 |
0.954 |
Bundle branch block |
6 (4.7) |
0 |
0.744 |
Sinus rhythm abnormality |
29 (22.7) |
0 |
0.067 |
Atrial enlargement |
26 (20.3) |
1 (0.8) |
0.559 |
CAD |
26 (20.3) |
4 (3.1) |
0.503 |
Table 15: Association of ECG abnormalities with metabolic syndrome
ECG abnormalities/Metabolic Syndrome |
Frequency n (%) |
p-value |
|
Present |
Absent |
|
|
Q-wave pathology |
6 (4.7) |
0 |
0.165 |
QRS axis abnormality |
23 (18.0) |
5 (3.9) |
0.430 |
Left ventricular hypertrophy |
12 (9.4) |
1 (0.8) |
0.157 |
T-wave abnormality |
21 (16.4) |
7 (5.5) |
0.825 |
ST segment abnormality |
3 (2.3) |
2 (1.6) |
0.372 |
AV block |
1 (0.8) |
0 |
0.579 |
Bundle branch block |
6 (4.7) |
0 |
0.165 |
Sinus rhythm abnormality |
25 (19.5) |
4 (3.1) |
0.275 |
Atrial enlargement |
25 (19.5) |
2 (1.6) |
0.027 |
CAD |
22 (17.2) |
8 (6.3) |
0.633 |
Table 16 Association of ECG abnormalities with exercise habit
ECG abnormalities/exercise |
Frequency n (%) |
p-value |
|
|
Present |
Absent |
|
Q-wave pathology |
1 (0.8) |
5 (3.9) |
0.155 |
QRS axis abnormality |
3 (2.3) |
25 (19.5) |
0.088 |
Left ventricular hypertrophy |
2 (1.6) |
11 (8.6) |
0.054 |
T-wave abnormality |
2 (1.6) |
26 (20.3) |
0.487 |
ST segment abnormality |
2 (1.6) |
3 (2.3) |
0.000 |
AV block |
0 |
1 (0.8) |
0.824 |
Bundle branch block |
1 (0.8) |
5 (4.1) |
0.155 |
Sinus rhythm abnormality |
2 (1.6) |
27 (21.1) |
0.785 |
Atrial enlargement |
2 (1.6) |
25 (19.5) |
0.452 |
CAD |
3 (2.3) |
27 (21.1) |
0.116 |
DISCUSSION
This study evaluated the associations of electrocardiographic abnormalities in apparently stable T2DM subjects.
Association between ECG abnormalities and the cardiovascular risk factors
The risk factors for CVDs evaluated by this study included age and sex of the subjects, duration of diabetes, smoking and exercise habits, central obesity, dyslipidaemia, glycaemic control, hypertension, presence of CKD, DM treatment and metabolic syndrome.
This study found significant association between smoking habit and QRS axis abnormality, central obesity and QRS axis abnormality, dyslipidaemia and ST segment abnormality and exercise habit and ST segment abnormality. Khanal MK et al found significant association between age, body mass index (BMI) and duration of T2DM greater than 5 years and ECG abnormalities25. Sinamaw D et al found that overweight, fasting blood sugar (FBS) ≥ 130 mg/dl and duration of DM over 10 years were significantly associated with ECG abnormalities, while Harms PP et al found that hypertension was significantly associated with ECG abnormalities8,26. Bedane DA et al also found that BMI ≥ 25 Kg/m2 (over weight) and long duration of DM ≥ 10 years were associated with ECG abnormalities27.
This study did not find significant association between the age, sex of subjects, duration of DM, treatment modality for DM, glycaemic control, hypertension, presence of CKD, metabolic syndrome and ECG abnormalities. However, higher prevalence rates of all the ECG abnormalities evaluated were more among the subjects with poor glycaemic control, hypertension, CKD and metabolic syndrome.
Some other studies contrastingly found significant association between age and duration of T2DM and ECG abnormalities25,26-28. In India most of the ECG abnormalities in asymptomtic T2DM subjects were observed among those with DM duration of 5-10 years. Unlike the finding from this study, 70% of ECG abnormalities occurred in the subjects with poor glycaemic control, increased triglycerides and decreased HDL cholesterol29. Nazimeek-Siewmak B et al found that an elevated blood pressure (BP) and increased fasting blood sugar were major risk factors for microvascular complications while elevated BP is the major risk factor for macrovascular complications in T2DM subjects3.
The reason for the differences in these findings may be due to the differences in subject selection and in the study designs. Also the fact that majority (68%) of the subjects we studied were on lipid lowering agents as at the time of the study could also be a factor. In Italy, a study found significant graded association between decreasing eGFR values and the risk of cardiac conduction defects on electrocardiogram30. Equally Chang YK et al found a significantly higher odd ratio of micro albuminuria occurrence in patients with premature supraventricular contraction or tachycardia compared to those without ECG abnornomalities31. This study found that the prevalence rates of all the ECG abnormalities evaluated were higher among the subjects with CKD compared to those without CKD, although this was not statistically significant. This makes our finding similar to those of Mantovani A et al and Chang YK et al respectively.
Strength of the study
There is a dearth of published studies on the associated factors (risk factors) of electrocardiographic abnormalities in type 2 DM subjects, especially the apparently stable subjects in the sub-Saharan Africa. This group of patients could easily be missed during routine investigations for cardiovascular diseases and their risk factors. Some of existing data on this very vital topic are old compared to the geometrically rising trend in diabetes prevalence, and consequently its’ complications. This study intended to bridge these gaps in literature.
Limitations
This study is hospital-based and a similar community-based study may be needed to better reflect the true association of these risk factors and ECG abnormalities in our rural communities. Also being a cross sectional study, the “snap shot” nature did not allow the researchers make inferences about cause and effect of the risk factors for the ECG abnormalities in the population studied,
CONCLUSION
The electrocardiographic abnormalities were high in the subjects with T2DM, even among the apparently stable subjects and this is expected to rise further as the burden of DM, especially T2DM continues to rise.
There was significant association between smoking habit, central obesity, dyslipidaemia, exercise habit and ECG abnormalities that included AV block, QRS axis and ST segment abnormalities.
Ethical Approval
Ethical clearance was obtained from the Research Ethics Committee of the Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, Nnewi.
Competing Interests: None.
Authors contributions:
Ezeude CM – conception, design of research and manuscript writing
Nkpozi MO – design of research and manuscript writing
Abonyi MC – Literature search
Onwuegbuna AA – data collection and interpretation
Okechukwu UC– literature search and manuscript writing/ editing
Anyanwu AC – manuscript writing and editing
Ikeabbah HE – literature search and editing of the manuscript
Ezeude AM – data collection/cleaning, data analysis and manuscript editing
REFERENCES
1. Gregg EW, Cheng YJ, Srinivasan M, Lin J, Geiss LS, Albright AL et al. trends in cause-specific mortality among adults with and without diagnosed diabetes in the USA: an epidemiological analysis of linked national survey and vital statistics data. Lancet. 2018. 16 ; 391(10138):2430 - 2440. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30314-3 PMid:29784146
2. Ezeude CM, Ijeoma UN, Oguejiofor OC, Young EE, Nwatu CB, Onyenekwe BM et al. Asymptomatic Cardiovascular Disorders in a Cohort of Clinically Stable Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients in South Eastern Nigeria: A Cross Sectional Study. JAMMR. 2020; 32(14):58 - 66. https://doi.org/10.9734/jammr/2020/v32i1430590
3. Nazimek-Siewniak B, Moczulski D, Grzeszczak W. Risk of macrovascularand microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: Results of longitudinal study design. J Diabetes Complications. 2002; 16 (4):271-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1056-8727(01)00184-2 PMid:12126785
4. Kuzu F. The effect of type 2 diabetes on electrocardiographic markers of significant cardiac event. Pak J Med Sci. 2018; 34(3)626-632. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.343.14562 PMid:30034428 PMCid:PMC6041533
5. Dweck M, Campbell IW, Miller D, Francis CM. Clinical aspect of Silent myocardial ischaemia with particular reference to diabetes mellitus. Br J Diabetes Vasc Dis. 2018; 9:110-116. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474651409105249
6. Prineas RJ, Crow RS, Blackburn H. The Minnesota Code Manual of Electrocardiographic Findings: Standards and Procedures for Measurement and Classification. Boston, Mass: Wright-PSG; 1982.
7. Bacci S, Villella M, Villella A, Langialonga T, Grilli M, Rauseo A et al. Screening for silent myocardial ischaemia in type 2 diabetic patients with additional atherogenic risk and accuracy of the exercise stress test. Eur J Endocrinol. 2002; 147: 649 - 654. https://doi.org/10.1530/eje.0.1470649 PMid:12444897
8. Harms PP, van der Heijden AA, Rutters F, Tan HL, Beulens JWJ, Nijpel G et al. Prevalence of ECG abnormalities in people with type 2 diabetes: The Hoorn Diabetes Care System Cohort. J Diabetes Complications. 2021; 25 (2): 107810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2020.107810 PMid:33280986
9. Stern S, Sclarowsky S, The ECG in Diabetes Mellitus. Circulation. 2009; 120: 1633 - 1636. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.897496 PMid:19841309
10. International Diabetes Federation Guideline Development Group. Global guideline for type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Chin Pract. 2014; 104 (1): 1 - 52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2012.10.001 Mid:24508150
11. Simova I, Christov I, Bortolan G. A review on electrocardiographic changes in diabetic patients. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2015; 11(2): 103 - 6. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573399811666150113161417 PMid:25584936
12. Lee MK, Hank, Kim MK, Koh ES, Kim ES, Noam GE et al. Changes in Metabolic Syndrome and its components and the risk of type 2 diabetes: a nationwide cohort study. Sci Rep 2020; 10: 2 - 13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59203-z PMid:32047219 PMCid:PMC7012827
13. Fluckiger R, Woodtli T, Berger W. Quantitation of glycosylated haemoglobin by boronate affinity chromatography. Diabetes. 1984; 33: 73-76. https://doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.33.1.73 PMid:6690345
14. Mark V. An improved glucose oxidase method for determining blood, csf, urine glucose levels. Clin Chim Acta. 1996; 251: 19 - 24. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-8981(96)83704-1 PMid:8814347
15. Hirano T, Nohtomi K, Koba S, Muroi A, Ito Y. A simple and precise method for measuring HDL-cholesterol subfractions by a single precipitation followed by homogenous HDL-cholesterol assay. J lipid Res. 2008; 49: 1130 - 1136. https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.D700027-JLR200 PMid:18223297
16. Allain CC, Poon LS, Chan CSG, Richmond W, Fu C. Enzymatic determination of total serum cholesterol. Clin Chem. 1974; 20: 470 - 475. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/20.4.470 PMid:4818200
17. Bucolo G, David H. Quantitative determination of serum triglycerides by the use of enzymes. Clin Chem. 1973; 19: 476 - 482. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/19.5.476 PMid:4703655
18. Assmann G, Jabs HU, Kohnert U, Nolte W, Schriewer H. LDL-cholesterol determination in blood serum following precipitation of LDL with polyvinylsulphate. Clin Chim Acta. 1984; 140: 77 - 83. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-8981(84)90153-0 PMid:6744629
19. Toora BD, Rajagopal G. measurement of creatinine by Jaffe's reaction determination of concentration of sodium hydroxide required for maxmum color development in standard urine and protein free filtrate of serum. Indian J Exp Biol. 2002; 40 (3): 352 - 355. PMD12635710
20. Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, Greene T, Rogers N, Roth D et al. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular prediction equation. Ann Intern Med. 1999; 130: 461 - 70. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-130-6-199903160-00002 PMid:10075613
21. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL et al. Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension. 2003; 42: 1206 - 1252. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.0000107251.49515.c2 PMid:14656957
22. World Health Organization. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. WHO/NCD/NCS 99. Geneva ; WHO, 1999; pp 1 - 58.
23. National Cholesterol Education Program. Third Report of the Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (ATP 111 Final Report). Circulation. 2022; 106: 3141 - 3421.
24. U.S. Census Bureau, 2012 Population Estimates and 2012 National Projections. https://www.Census.gov
25. Khanal MK, Bhandari P, Dhungana RR, Gurung Y, Rawal LB, Pandey G, Bhandari M, Bhuiyan R, Devkota S, de Courten M, de Courten B. Electrocardiogram abnormalities and renal impairment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A healthcare facilities-based cross-sectional study in Dang district of Nepal. J Diabetes Investig. 2023 Apr;14(4):602-613. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdi.13985 PMid:36747483 PMCid:PMC10034961
26. Sinamaw, D., Getnet, M., Abdulkadir, M. et al. Patterns and associated factors of electrocardiographic abnormality among type 2 diabetic patients in Amhara National Regional State Referral Hospitals, Ethiopia: a multicenter institution-based cross-sectional study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 22, 230 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-022-02661-2 PMid:35590246 PMCid:PMC9118567
27. Bedane, D.A., Tadesse, S., Bariso, M. et al. Assessment of electrocardiogram abnormality and associated factors among apparently healthy adult type 2 diabetic patients on follow-up at Jimma Medical Center, Southwest Ethiopia: Cross-sectional study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 21, 312 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-02110-6 PMid:34167465 PMCid:PMC8223340
28. Sellers MB, Divers J, Lu L, Xu J, Smith SC, Bowden DW et al. Prevalence and determinants of electrocardiographic abnormalities in African Americans with type diabetes. J Epidemol Glob Health. 2014; 4 (4): 289 - 296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jegh.2014.04.003 PMid:25455646 PMCid:PMC4254487
29. Gupta S, Gupta RK, Kulshrestha M, Chaudhary RR. Evaluation of ECG abnormalities in patients with asymptomatic Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017; 11(4): 39-41. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2017/24882.9740 PMid:28571189 PMCid:PMC5449835
30. Mantovani A, Rigolon R, Turino T, Pichiri I, Falceri A, Rossi A, Temporelli PL, Bonapace S, Lippi G, Zoppini G, Bonora E, Byrne CD, Targher G. Association between decreasing estimated glomerular filtration rate and risk of cardiac conduction defects in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab. 2018 Dec;44(6):473-481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabet.2018.08.007 PMid:30195089
31. Chang YK, Fan HC, Hsu CC, Lim PS. The association between EKG abnormalities and the development of microalbuminuria in type 2 diabetes. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Dec 23;100(51):e28018. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000028018 PMid:34941042 PMCid:PMC8702232