Available online on 15.11.2023 at http://jddtonline.info

Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics

Open Access to Pharmaceutical and Medical Research

Copyright  © 2023 The  Author(s): This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial use provided the original author and source are credited

Open Access  Full Text Article                                                                                                                                                     Research Article

Associations of Electrocardiographic Abnormalities in Stable Type 2 Diabetes Subjects: Experience from a Tertiary Health Facility in South Eastern Nigeria

Ezeude CM1* , Nkpozi MO2 , Abonyi MC3 , Onwuegbuna AA4 , Okechukwu UC3 , Anyanwu AC5 , Ikeabbah HE6 , Ezeude AM7 

  1. Department of Internal Medicine, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria.
  2. Department of Internal Medicine, Abia State University Teaching Hospital, Aba, Nigeria.
  3. Department of Internal Medicine, Enugu State University of Science and Technology, Enugu, Nigeria.
  4. Department of Ophthalmology, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria.
  5. Department of Internal Medicine, Federal University Teaching Hospital, Owerri, Nigeria.
  6. Department of Surgery, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria.
  7. Department of Nursing Sciences, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, Nnewi, Nigeria. 

Article Info:

___________________________________________

 Article History:

Received 22 Aug 2023      

Reviewed 04 Oct 2023

Accepted 27 Oct 2023  

Published 15 Nov 2023  

____________________________________________

Cite this article as: 

Ezeude CM, Nkpozi MO, Abonyi MC, Onwuegbuna AA, Okechukwu UC, Anyanwu AC, Ikeabbah HE, Ezeude AM, Associations of Electrocardiographic Abnormalities in Stable Type 2 Diabetes Subjects: Experience from a Tertiary Health Facility in South Eastern Nigeria, Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics. 2023; 13(11):62-72

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v13i11.6006                                            ____________________________________________

*Address for Correspondence:  

Ezeude Chidiebele Malachy, Department of Internal Medicine, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria.

Abstract

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Introduction: Cardiovascular abnormalities are prevalent in the setting of diabetes mellitus, even among stable subjects, necessitating the need for a regular cardiovascular disease screening for this group of patients. Electrocardiogram is a simple and reliable screening test for cardiovascular abnormalities that could be easily accessible even in resource poor and rural settings. This study was carried out to determine the association between cardiovascular risk factors and electrocardiographic abnormalities in stable type 2 diabetes subjects in South Eastern Nigeria.

Materials and Methods: One hundred and thirty-six stable adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus were recruited consecutively from the out-patient diabetes clinic of Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital in South Eastern Nigeria. They were assessed for the risk factors for cardiovascular diseases that included smoking, obesity, dyslipidaemia, poor glycaemic control, hypertension, lack of exercise, presence of chronic kidney disease and metabolic syndrome. They also had a 12 lead electrocardiogram done. Results were analyzed using SPSS version 25. P value of ˂ 0.05 was considered significant.

Result: A total of 128 subjects had complete results and were analyzed. There were 63 males and 65 females with a mean age of 58.43 ± 12.85 years and mean diabetes duration of 9.03 ± 7.36 years. A total of 45.3% of the subjects had electrocardiographic abnormalities. Hypertension was present in 54.9%, dyslipidaemia in 91.4%, central obesity in 74.3%, metabolic syndrome in 76.6% and chronic kidney disease in 57.9% of the subjects. Significant association was found between smoking and occurrence of AV block (p = 0.008), central obesity and QRS axis abnormality (p = 0.002), dyslipidaemia and ST segment abnormality (p = 0.001) and lack of exercise and ST segment abnormality (p = 0.000). No significant association was found between age, sex of the subjects, duration of DM, treatment modality for DM, level of glycaemic control, hypertension, presence of CKD and metabolic syndrome and any of the electrocardiographic abnormalities.

Conclusion: Electrocardiographic abnormalities are common in stable type 2 diabetic subjects. There was significant association between smoking habit, central obesity, dyslipidaemia, lack of exercise and ECG abnormalities that included AV block, QRS axis and ST segment abnormalities.

Keywords: Electrocardiographic abnormalities, stable type 2 diabetes subjects, cardiovascular disease, Nigeria.

 


 

INTRODUCTION

Cardiovascular complications are prevalent in the setting of diabetes and the risk of developing Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) has been shown to be about two-fold higher in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) compared to the general population1. Cardiovascular abnormalities have been shown to be common even among stable T2DM subjects, necessitating the need for a regular cardiovascular disease screening for this group of patients2. Micro-vascular and macro-vascular abnormalities are implicated in the aetio-pathogenesis of CVDs in the background of type 2 diabetes mellitus3. Cardiac micro-vascular circulation abnormalities increase the risk of developing arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death4. High blood pressure and increased fasting blood glucose are major risk factors for micro-vascular complications while a high blood pressure is the major risk factor for macro-vascular complications among T2DM subjects3.

Electrocardiogram is a simple noninvasive test that has been proven over time to be an easily accessible, cost effective and reliable test for evaluating cardiac abnormalities and could be very handy in resource poor and rural settings. 

Chest pain most of the times could be masked in T2DM subjects with myocardial ischaemia. This medical condition termed “silent myocardial ischaemia” is common among diabetic subjects with autonomic dysfunction and resting ECG abnormalities have been found to be markers of silent ischaemia among asymptomatic diabetic subjects5. Although resting ECG may not be sufficient to diagnose some cardiovascular abnormalities, including silent cardiovascular disease, however, the use of coding system such as the Minnesota coding system may improve its utility6

In a scenario where a T2DM subject has a normal ECG finding despite a suspected myocardial ischaemia, exercise/stress ECG becomes the next choice screening test for the possible silent myocardial ischaemia7. Routine CVD screening in diabetic patients using ECG not only aims at identifying unrecognized CVDs, but also determining the risk for a future CVD event and thus equally serve as a vital preventive strategy for CVDs in diabetics8,9.

Common electrocardiographic abnormalities in T2DM subjects include sinus tachycardia, heart rate variability, ST-T changes, left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and others10.11. Globally, about 30% of asymptomatic T2DM patients showed ECG abnormalities11

The risk factors for CVDs in the setting of T2DM include central obesity, smoking, dyslipidaemia, hypertension, lack of exercise among others. A clustering of these risk factors is described as metabolic syndrome and improvement in these factors appear to reduce the risk of diabetes and its complications12

The risk factors for ECG abnormalities evaluated by this study included smoking, obesity, dyslipidaemia, lack of exercise, poor glycaemic control, hypertension, presence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and metabolic syndrome.

There is a paucity of studies on the associations of ECG abnormalities in T2DM subjects, especially the stable outpatients in the sub-Saharan Africa generally and South Eastern Nigeria in particular. This study sets out to bridge this gap in knowledge and stimulate further studies on this very important topic.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a cross-sectional observational study conducted among clinically stable T2DM subjects who were evaluated for the risk factors of ECG abnormalities at the outpatient diabetes clinic at Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, (NAUTH) Nnewi in South Eastern Nigeria. This study was conducted between July, 2022 and April, 2023. A total of 136 T2DM subjects were recruited for the study, 128 subjects had complete results and were analyzed. A convenient sampling method was used for recruiting the study subjects as all consenting patients with T2DM that presented to the diabetes clinic and who met the inclusion criteria were recruited for the study as they were seen consecutively. Subjects were excluded if they were less than 30 years of age, had T1DM, were pregnant, had clinical signs suggestive CVD(s) or were very ill respectively. The subjects were met on two separate occasions. At the first meeting a focused medical history of each of the subjects was taken, a focused examination, blood pressure and anthropometric measurements were respectively done. Other relevant data were extracted using a researcher structured and administered study protocol. Next, a resting electrocardiogram was done using Schiller AT-102 plus 12 lead ECG Machine. Ten electrodes were placed in the specific anatomic positions to obtain quality tracings. The four limb leads were applied to the four limbs: the right and the left legs and the right and left arms. The six chest leads were applied at the precordial locations (V1-V6). The recording was done over a period of about 10 seconds after the connections were made. 

The ECG recordings were interpreted by a cardiologist using the University of Minnesota Codes for Resting Electrocardiograms6. The second contact with the participants was on another clinic appointment between 8 a.m and 9 a.m, after they had fasted for about 10-12 hours as instructed. Biochemical tests that included fasting blood glucose (FBG), glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting lipid profile (FLP) and serum creatinine were done. A total of 7ml of blood was collected from each subject following a venipuncture of the cubital vein, while observing full aseptic procedures, 2ml for FBS, 1ml for HbA1c, 4ml for both FLP and serum creatinine. 

The samples for HbA1c were collected in EDTA bottles and measured with automated CLOVER A1c Analyzer (Infopia, Korea) and CLOVER A1c Self-Test Cartridge using the boronate affinity method13. The samples for FPG were collected in fluoride oxalate bottles and measured by the Trinder glucose oxidase method14. The blood samples for FLP and serum creatinine were collected in plain bottles. High density lipoprotein (HDL) level was measured by precipitation technique15. Total cholesterol level was determined using the kit employing the enzymatic and the 4-hydroxybenzoate/4-aminophenazone system (BioSystems)16. Triglyceride level was determined using a kit employing enzymatic hydrolysis of triglyceride with lipases (Randox) and low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) was measured using a kit employing a precipitation technique17, 18. Serum creatinine was measured using Jaffe’s reaction19. Estimated glomerular filteration rate (eGFR) was estimated from calibrated serum creatinine values using the four-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study equation20. Weight and height were measured using Stadiometer (RGZ -120), waist circumference measured with a measuring tape and blood pressure measured using Accoson mercury Sphygmomanometer.

Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25 (Chicago, IL, USA). Categorical data were analyzed and compared using Chi-square test: results presented in frequencies and percentages. The mean values of continuous variables were calculated and compared among groups using student’s t-test and analysis of variance (ANOVA). The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. 

DEFINITION OF TERMS AND CRITERIA

  1. Hypertension was defined as systolic BP ≥ 140mmHg and or diastolic BP ≥ 90 mmHg measured on at least 2 separate occasions or if a patient is already on anti-hypertensive medications21.
  2. Poor glycaemic control was taken as HbA1C ≥ 7.0%22.
  3. Global obesity was defined by body mass index (BMI) >30 (kg/M2)22.
  4. Central obesity (abdominal obesity) was defined as waist circumference (WC) > 102 cm in men and 88 cm in women23
  5. Dyslipidaemia was taken as HDL-C < 40 mg/dl or TG ≥ 150 mg/dl or LDL-C ≥100 mg/dl or total cholesterol (TC) ≥ 200 mg/dl or if the patient is on lipid lowering agents23.
  6. Diabetes mellitus was defined by fasting plasma glucose of ≥ 7.0 mmol/l (126 mg/dl) measured on at least 2 separate occasions or the patient is already on glucose lowering agents22.
  7. Type 1 DM was defined as subjects with DM who are dependent on insulin for survival and are at risk for ketoacidosis23.
  8. Type 2 DM was defined as patients with DM on diet therapy either alone or in combination with oral glucose lowering agent(s) for glycaemic control23.
  9.  Major ECG abnormality was defined as pathological Q waves (codes 1-1 and 1-2), marked ST depression ST depression (codes 4-1 and 4-2) and/or T wave inversion (codes 5-1 and 5-2), bundle branch block (codes 7-1 and 7-2) or some significant arrhythmias. Minor ECG abnormalities were defined as high voltage, axis deviation and lesser degrees of ST-T wave abnormality (4-3,5-3). “Ischaemic ECG” was defined as pathological Q waves (any code 1), ST and or T wave inversion of any degree (any code 4 or 5) or left bundle branch block (code 7, 1-1). Left ventricular hypertrophy was defined as a combination of high voltage and either ST depression or T wave inversion on the basis of appropriate Minnesota code6.
  10. Metabolic syndrome was defined by the presence of three (3) or more of the following five (5) criteria: WC > 101.6 cm in men and 88.9 cm in women, BP > 130/80 mmHg, fasting TG > 150 mg/dl (1.7 mmol/l), fasting HDL ˂ 40 mg/dl (1.0 mmol/l) for men and 50 mg/dl (1.3 mmol/l) for women and FBS > 100 mg/dl (5.5 mmol/l) or the patient is a known diabetic23.
  11. Young age was taken as 18-44 years, middle age as 45-64 years and old age as 65 years and above24.
  12. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was determined by eGFR ˂ 90 ml/min/24 hours or patient had proteinuria20.

RESULTS

A total of 128 T2DM subjects who had complete results and were analyzed. They were made up of 63 (49.2%) males and 65 (50.8%) females. 

Clinical characteristics of the study subjects

The mean age of the subjects was 58.43 ± 12.85 years, mean duration of DM was 9.03 ± 7.36 years, mean BMI was 27.96 ± 5.61 kg/m2, mean HbA1c was 8.28 ± 2.11%, mean SBP was 131.28 ± 21.26 mmHg and mean DBP was 77.05 ± 12.41mmHg. Also the mean value of serum creatinine was 88.77 ± 24.88 mmol/L and the mean eGFR was 86.10 ± 27.7 mL/min. The mean TC was 4.57 ±1.32 mmol/L, Tg was 1.37 ± 0.84 mmol/L, HDL-C was 1.06 ± 0.27 mmol/L and LDL-C was 2.90 ± 1.19 mmol/L (details in Table 1).

For the co-morbid conditions, hypertension was present in 76 (59.4%) of the subjects, dyslipidaemia in 117 (91.4%), metabolic syndrome in 98 (76.6%), global obesity in 45 (35.2%), central obesity in 95 (74.3%) and CKD in 74 (57.9) of the study participants (details as in Table 4).

For diabetes treatment, 3 (2.3%) subjects were on diet alone, 91 (71.1%) on oral anti-diabetic drugs (OADs), 11 (8.6%) on insulin and 23 (18.0%) were on a combination of OADs and insulin (details in Table 3).

Socio demographic characteristics of the study subjects

Among the participants 106 (82.8%) subjects were married, 4 (3.2%) were single and 18 (14.1%) were widowed. 2 (1.6%) had no formal education, 45 (35.1%) had primary, 28 (21.9%) secondary and 54 (41.1%) had tertiary education. 18 (14.1%) subjects smoked cigarette: 16 (12.5%) smoked previously and 4 (3.1%) were still smoking. 22 (17.2%) subjects engaged in regular exercise (details in Table 2).

A total of 45.3% subjects had abnormal ECG findings that included Q-wave abnormality (4.7%), QRS abnormality (21.9%), LVH (10.2%), T-wave abnormality (21.9%), ST segment abnormality (3.9%), AV block (0.8%), BBB (4.7%), sinus rhythm abnormality (22.7%), atrial enlargement (21.1%) and CAD (23.4%).

Significant association was found between smoking habit and occurrence of AV block (p = 0.008), central obesity and QRS axis abnormality (p = 0.002), dyslipidaemia and ST segment abnormality (p = 0.001) and lack of exercise and ST segment abnormality (p = 0.000) (details in Tables 7, 11, 14 & 16). 

No significant association was found between age, sex of the subjects, treatment modality for DM, duration of DM, level of glycaemic control, hypertension, presence of CKD and metabolic syndrome and any of the ECG abnormalities, although all the ECG abnormalities were more among the T2DM subjects with poor glycaemic control, hypertension, CKD and metabolic syndrome (details in Tables 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13 & 15).


 

 

 

Table 1: Baseline characteristics of the study population

Variable

Minimum

Maximum

Mean ± SD

Age (years)

32.00

93.00

58.43 ± 12.85

Serum creatinine (mmo;/L)

53.00

188.00

89.18 ± 24.61

eGFR (ml/min/24 hours)

33.70

168.5.0

85.83 ± 24.95

TC (mmol/L)

2.38

6.89

4.52 ± 1.12

Tg (mmol/L)

0.70

3.48

1.35 ± 0.63

HDL (mmol/L)

0.45

2.07

1.06 ± 0.27

LDL(mmol/L)

1.82

4.90

3.06 ± 0.84

eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate, TC = total cholesterol; Tg = Triglyceride; HDL = high density lipoprotein; LDL = low density lipoprotein

 

 

 

Table 2: Socio-demographic characteristics of the study population

Variable

Options

Frequency n (%)

Age (years)

<45

45-64

>64

19 (14.8)

62 (48.4)

47 (36.7)

Sex

Male

Female

63 (49.2)

65 (50.8)

Marital status

Single

Married

Widowed

4 (3.2)

106 (82.8)

18 (14.1)

Previous smoking                      

Yes

No

16 (12.5)

112 (87.5)

Current smoking

Yes

No

4 (3.1)

124 (96.9)

Cigarette  smoking

Yes

No

18(14.1)

110(85.9)

Exercise

Yes

No

22 (17.2)

106 (82.8)

 

 

Table 3: Clinical characteristics of the study subjects

Variable

Options

Frequency n (%)

DM treatment

Diet alone

OADs

Insulin

Both OADs & Insulin

3 (2.3)

91 (71.1)

11 (8.6)

23 (18.0)

DM duration

Short duration

Long duration

46 (35.9)

82 (64.1)

Glycaemic control

Good

Poor

29(22.7)

99 (77.3)

Central obesity

Yes

No

95 (74.2)

33 (25.8)

Body mass index

Normal

Overweight

Global obesity

42 (32.8)

41 (32.0)

45 (35.2)

Global obesity class

Class I

Class II

Class III

32 (71.1)

10 (22.2)

3 (6.7)

Stage of CKD

Stage I

Stage II

Stage III

6 (8.1)

47 (63.5)

21 (28.4)

Hypertensive

Yes

No

76 (59.4)

52 (40.6)

DM = diabetes mellitus; OADs = oral anti diabetic drugs; CKD = chronic kidney disease; ACEIs = angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors; ARBs = angiotensin receptor blockers

Table 4: Distribution of co-morbidities among the subjects

Variable

Frequency n (%)

 

Present

Absent

CKD

74 (57.8)

54 (42.2)

Hypertension

76 (59.4)

52 (40.6)

Dyslipidaemia

117 (91.4)

11 (8.6)

Metabolic syndrome

98 (76.6)

30 (23.4)

CKD = chronic kidney disease

 

Table 5: Association of ECG abnormalities with the age of the subjects

ECG abnormalities/Age

Frequency n (%)

p-value

 

<45yrs

45-64yrs

>64yrs

 

Q-wave pathology

0

2 (1.6)

4 (3.1)

0.251

QRS axis abnormality

3 (2.3)

8 (6.3)

17 (13.3)

0.011

Left ventricular hypertrophy

0

5 (3.9)

8 (6.3)

0.087

T-wave abnormality

3 (2.3)

13 (10.2)

12 (9.4)

0.667

ST segment abnormality

1 (0.8)

1 (0.8)

3 (2.3)

0.421

AV block

0

1 (0.8)

0

0.585

Bundle branch block

1 (0.8)

1 (0.8)

4 (3.1)

0.239

Sinus rhythm abnormality

4 (3.1)

16 (12.5)

9 (7.0)

0.893

Atrial enlargement

4 (3.1)

13 (10.2)

10 (7.8)

0.999

CAD

5 (3.9)

14 (10.9)

11 (8.6)

0.945

 

 

Table 6: Association of ECG abnormalities with the sex of the subjects

ECG abnormalities/Sex

Frequency n (%)

p-value

 

Male

Female

 

Q-wave pathology

2 (1.6)

4 (3.1)

0.425

QRS axis abnormality

11 (8.6)

17 (13.3)

0.234

Left ventricular hypertrophy

7 (5.5)

6 (4.7)

0.725

T-wave abnormality

10 (7.8)

18 (14.1)

0.106

ST segment abnormality

3 (2.3)

2 (1.6)

0.623

AV block

1 (0.8)

0

0.308

Bundle branch block

3 (2.3)

3 (2.3)

0.969

Sinus rhythm abnormality

9 (7.00

20 (15.6)

0.083

Atrial enlargement

13 (10.2)

14 (10.9)

0.900

CAD

16 (12.5)

14 (10.9)

0.606

 

 

Table 7: Association of ECG abnormalities with smoking 

ECG abnormalities/Smoking

Frequency n (%)

p-value

 

Smoked

Never smoked

 

Q-wave pathology

1 (0.8)

5 (3.9)

0.752

QRS axis abnormality

6 (4.7)

22 (17.2)

0.106

Left ventricular hypertrophy

3 (2.3)

10 (7.8)

0.224

T-wave abnormality

5 (3.9)

23 (18.0)

0.332

ST segment abnormality

0

5 (3.9)

0.389

AV block

1 (0.8)

0

0.008

Bundle branch block

0

6 (4.7)

0.343

Sinus rhythm abnormality

4 (3.1)

25 (19.5)

0.847

Atrial enlargement

6 (4.7)

21 (16.4)

0.086

CAD

8 (6.3)

22 (17.2)

0.007

 

 

Table 8: Association of ECG abnormalities with the treatment for Diabetes Mellitus

ECG abnormalities/DM treatment

Frequency n (%)

p-value

OADs

Insulin

Both

Q-wave pathology

6 (4.7)

0

0

0.465

QRS axis abnormality

20 (15.6)

0

8 (6.3)

0.104

Left ventricular hypertrophy

7 (5.5)

2 (1.6)

4 (3.1)

0.385

T-wave abnormality

18 (14.1)

0

8 (6.3)

0.028

ST segment abnormality

3 (2.3)

0

2 (1.6)

0.559

AV block

0

1 (0.8)

0

0.013

Bundle branch block

3 (2.3)

0

3 (2.3)

0.197

Sinus rhythm abnormality

19 (14.9)

3 (2.3)

7 (5.5)

0.897

Atrial enlargement

16 (12.5)

2 (1.6)

9 (7.0)

0.112

CAD

20 (15.6)

2 (1.6)

8 (6.3)

0.510

 

 

Table 9: Association of ECG abnormalities with the duration of Diabetes Mellitus

ECG abnormalities/DM duration

Frequency n (%)

p-value

 

Long duration

Short duration

 

Q-wave pathology

6 (4.7)

0

0.060

QRS axis abnormality

20 (15.6)

8 (6.3)

0.358

Left ventricular hypertrophy

9 (7.0)

4 (3.1)

0.682

T-wave abnormality

17 (13.3)

11 (8.6)

0.676

ST segment abnormality

4 (3.1)

1 (0.8)

0.449

AV block

0

1 (0.8)

0.180

Bundle branch block

3 (2.3)

3 (2.3)

0.462

Sinus rhythm abnormality

19 (14.8)

10 (7.8)

0.905

Atrial enlargement

17 (13.3)

10 (7.8)

0.893

CAD

17 (13.3)

13 (10.2)

0.335

 

Table 10: Association of ECG abnormalities with glycaemic control

ECG abnormalities / HbA1c control

Frequency n (%)

p-value

 

Good control

Poor control

 

Q-wave pathology

2 (1.6)

4 (3.1)

0.593

QRS axis abnormality

10 (7.8)

18 (14.1)

0.108

Left ventricular hypertrophy

5 (3.9)

8 (6.3)

0.206

T-wave abnormality

7 (5.5)

21 (16.4)

0.913

ST segment abnormality

2 (1.6)

3 (2.3)

0.401

AV block

0

1 (0.8)

0.570

Bundle branch block

2 (1.6)

4 (3.1)

0.593

Sinus rhythm abnormality

7 (5.5)

22 (17.2)

0.691

Atrial enlargement

8 (6.3)

19 (14.8)

0.460

CAD

7 (5.5)

23 (18.0)

0.897

 

 

Table 11: Association of ECG abnormalities with central obesity 

ECG abnormalities/Abdominal obesity

Frequency n (%)

p-value

Present

Absent

Q-wave pathology

5 (3.9)

1 (0.8)

0.601

QRS axis abnormality

27 (21.2)

1 (0.8)

0.002

Left ventricular hypertrophy

10 (7.8)

3 (2.3)

0.814

T-wave abnormality

24 (18.8)

4 (3.1)

0.116

ST segment abnormality

3 (2.3)

2 (1.6)

0.458

AV block

0

1 (0.8)

0.088

Bundle branch block

6 (4.7)

0

0.139

Sinus rhythm abnormality

21 (16.4)

8 (6.3)

0.699

Atrial enlargement

20 (15.6)

7 (5.5)

0.985

CAD

23 (18.0)

7 (5.5)

0.726

 

 

Table 12: Association of ECG abnormalities with hypertension

ECG abnormalities/Hypertension

Frequency n (%)

p-value

 

Present

Absent

 

Q-wave pathology

5 (3.9)

1 (0.8)

0.221

QRS axis abnormality

18 (14.1)

10 (7.8)

0.549

Left ventricular hypertrophy

10 (7.8)

3 (2.3)

0.174

T-wave abnormality

16 (12.5)

12 (9.4)

0.786

ST segment abnormality

3 (2.3)

2 (1.6)

0.977

AV block

0

1 (0.8)

0.225

Bundle branch block

4 (3.1)

2 (1.6)

0.710

Sinus rhythm abnormality

17 (13.3)

12 (9.4)

0.499

Atrial enlargement

17 (13.3)

10 (7.8)

0.669

CAD

18 (14.1)

12 (9.4)

0.937

 

Table 13: Association of ECG abnormalities with CKD

ECG abnormalities / CKD

Frequency n (%)

p-value

 

Present

Absent

 

Q-wave pathology

5 (3.9)

1 (0.8)

0.195

QRS axis abnormality

17 (13.3)

11 (8.6)

0.725

Left ventricular hypertrophy

10 (7.8)

3 (2.3)

0.141

T-wave abnormality

17 (13.3)

11 (8.6)

0.725

ST segment abnormality

4 (3.1)

1 (0.8)

0.305

AV block

1 (0.8)

0

0.391

Bundle branch block

4 (3.1)

2 (1.6)

0.653

Sinus rhythm abnormality

18 (14.1)

11 (8.6)

0.854

Atrial enlargement

20 (15.6)

7 (5.5)

0.054

CAD

16 (12.5)

14 (10.9)

0.570

 

 

Table 14: Association of ECG abnormalities with dyslipidaemia

ECG abnormalities / Dyslipidaemia

Frequency n (%)

p-value

 

Present

Absent

 

Q-wave pathology

6 (4.7)

0

0.744

QRS axis abnormality

26 (20.3)

2 (1.6)

0.752

Left ventricular hypertrophy

12 (9.4)

1 (0.8)

0.889

T-wave abnormality

27 (21.1)

1 (0.8)

0.530

ST segment abnormality

4 (3.1))

1 (0.8)

0.001

AV block

1 (0.8)

0

0.954

Bundle branch block

6 (4.7)

0

0.744

Sinus rhythm abnormality

29 (22.7)

0

0.067

Atrial enlargement

26 (20.3)

1 (0.8)

0.559

CAD

26 (20.3)

4 (3.1)

0.503

 

 

Table 15: Association of ECG abnormalities with metabolic syndrome

ECG abnormalities/Metabolic

Syndrome

Frequency n (%)

p-value

Present

Absent

 

Q-wave pathology

6 (4.7)

0

0.165

QRS axis abnormality

23 (18.0)

5 (3.9)

0.430

Left ventricular hypertrophy

12 (9.4)

1 (0.8)

0.157

T-wave abnormality

21 (16.4)

7 (5.5)

0.825

ST segment abnormality

3 (2.3)

2 (1.6)

0.372

AV block

1 (0.8)

0

0.579

Bundle branch block

6 (4.7)

0

0.165

Sinus rhythm abnormality

25 (19.5)

4 (3.1)

0.275

Atrial enlargement

25 (19.5)

2 (1.6)

0.027

CAD

22 (17.2)

8 (6.3)

0.633

 

Table 16 Association of ECG abnormalities with exercise habit

ECG abnormalities/exercise

Frequency n (%)

p-value

 

Present

Absent

 

Q-wave pathology

1 (0.8)

5 (3.9)

0.155

QRS axis abnormality

3 (2.3)

25 (19.5)

0.088

Left ventricular hypertrophy

2 (1.6)

11 (8.6)

0.054

T-wave abnormality

2 (1.6)

26 (20.3)

0.487

ST segment abnormality

2 (1.6)

3 (2.3)

0.000

AV block

0

1 (0.8)

0.824

Bundle branch block

1 (0.8)

5 (4.1)

0.155

Sinus rhythm abnormality

2 (1.6)

27 (21.1)

0.785

Atrial enlargement

2 (1.6)

25 (19.5)

0.452

CAD

3 (2.3)

27 (21.1)

0.116

 


 

DISCUSSION              

This study evaluated the associations of electrocardiographic abnormalities in apparently stable T2DM subjects.

Association between ECG abnormalities and the cardiovascular risk factors

The risk factors for CVDs evaluated by this study included age and sex of the subjects, duration of diabetes, smoking and exercise habits, central obesity, dyslipidaemia, glycaemic control, hypertension, presence of CKD, DM treatment and metabolic syndrome.

This study found significant association between smoking habit and QRS axis abnormality, central obesity and QRS axis abnormality, dyslipidaemia and ST segment abnormality and exercise habit and ST segment abnormality. Khanal MK et al found significant association between age, body mass index (BMI) and duration of T2DM greater than 5 years and ECG abnormalities25. Sinamaw D et al found that overweight, fasting blood sugar (FBS) ≥ 130 mg/dl and duration of DM over 10 years were significantly associated with ECG abnormalities, while Harms PP et al found that hypertension was significantly associated with ECG abnormalities8,26. Bedane DA et al also found that BMI ≥ 25 Kg/m2 (over weight) and long duration of DM ≥ 10 years were associated with ECG abnormalities27.

This study did not find significant association between the age, sex of subjects, duration of DM, treatment modality for DM, glycaemic control, hypertension, presence of CKD, metabolic syndrome and ECG abnormalities. However, higher prevalence rates of all the ECG abnormalities evaluated were more among the subjects with poor glycaemic control, hypertension, CKD and metabolic syndrome.

Some other studies contrastingly found significant association between age and duration of T2DM and ECG abnormalities25,26-28. In India most of the ECG abnormalities in asymptomtic T2DM subjects were observed among those with DM duration of 5-10 years. Unlike the finding from this study, 70% of ECG abnormalities occurred in the subjects with poor glycaemic control, increased triglycerides and decreased HDL cholesterol29. Nazimeek-Siewmak B et al found that an elevated blood pressure (BP) and increased fasting blood sugar were major risk factors for microvascular complications while elevated BP is the major risk factor for macrovascular complications in T2DM subjects3

The reason for the differences in these findings may be due to the differences in subject selection and in the study designs. Also the fact that majority (68%) of the subjects we studied were on lipid lowering agents as at the time of the study could also be a factor. In Italy, a study found significant graded association between decreasing eGFR values and the risk of cardiac conduction defects on electrocardiogram30. Equally Chang YK et al found a significantly higher odd ratio of micro albuminuria occurrence in patients with premature supraventricular contraction or tachycardia compared to those without ECG abnornomalities31. This study found that the prevalence rates of all the ECG abnormalities evaluated were higher among the subjects with CKD compared to those without CKD, although this was not statistically significant. This makes our finding similar to those of Mantovani A et al and Chang YK et al respectively.

Strength of the study

There is a dearth of published studies on the associated factors (risk factors) of electrocardiographic abnormalities in type 2 DM subjects, especially the apparently stable subjects in the sub-Saharan Africa. This group of patients could easily be missed during routine investigations for cardiovascular diseases and their risk factors. Some of existing data on this very vital topic are old compared to the geometrically rising trend in diabetes prevalence, and consequently its’ complications. This study intended to bridge these gaps in literature.

Limitations

This study is hospital-based and a similar community-based study may be needed to better reflect the true association of these risk factors and ECG abnormalities in our rural communities. Also being a cross sectional study, the “snap shot” nature did not allow the researchers make inferences about cause and effect of the risk factors for the ECG abnormalities in the population studied,

CONCLUSION

The electrocardiographic abnormalities were high in the subjects with T2DM, even among the apparently stable subjects and this is expected to rise further as the burden of DM, especially T2DM continues to rise.

There was significant association between smoking habit, central obesity, dyslipidaemia, exercise habit and ECG abnormalities that included AV block, QRS axis and ST segment abnormalities.

Ethical Approval

Ethical clearance was obtained from the Research Ethics Committee of the Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, Nnewi.

Competing Interests: None. 

Authors contributions: 

Ezeude CM – conception, design of research and manuscript writing

Nkpozi MO – design of research and manuscript writing

Abonyi MC – Literature search

Onwuegbuna AA – data collection and interpretation

Okechukwu UC– literature search and manuscript writing/ editing

Anyanwu AC – manuscript writing and editing

Ikeabbah HE – literature search and editing of the manuscript

Ezeude AM – data collection/cleaning, data analysis and manuscript editing

REFERENCES

1. Gregg EW, Cheng YJ, Srinivasan M, Lin J, Geiss LS, Albright AL et al. trends in cause-specific mortality among adults with and without diagnosed diabetes in the USA: an epidemiological analysis of linked national survey and vital statistics data. Lancet. 2018. 16 ; 391(10138):2430 - 2440. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30314-3 PMid:29784146

2. Ezeude CM, Ijeoma UN, Oguejiofor OC, Young EE, Nwatu CB, Onyenekwe BM et al. Asymptomatic Cardiovascular Disorders in a Cohort of Clinically Stable Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients in South Eastern Nigeria: A Cross Sectional Study. JAMMR. 2020; 32(14):58 - 66. https://doi.org/10.9734/jammr/2020/v32i1430590

3. Nazimek-Siewniak B, Moczulski D, Grzeszczak W. Risk of macrovascularand microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: Results of longitudinal study design. J Diabetes Complications. 2002; 16 (4):271-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1056-8727(01)00184-2 PMid:12126785

4. Kuzu F. The effect of type 2 diabetes on electrocardiographic markers of significant cardiac event. Pak J Med Sci. 2018; 34(3)626-632.  https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.343.14562 PMid:30034428 PMCid:PMC6041533

5. Dweck M, Campbell IW, Miller D, Francis CM. Clinical aspect of Silent myocardial ischaemia with particular reference to diabetes mellitus. Br J Diabetes Vasc Dis. 2018; 9:110-116. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474651409105249

6. Prineas RJ, Crow RS, Blackburn H. The Minnesota Code Manual of Electrocardiographic Findings: Standards and Procedures for Measurement and Classification. Boston, Mass: Wright-PSG; 1982.

7. Bacci S, Villella M, Villella A, Langialonga T, Grilli M, Rauseo A et al. Screening for silent myocardial ischaemia in type 2 diabetic patients with additional atherogenic risk and accuracy of the exercise stress test. Eur J Endocrinol. 2002; 147: 649 - 654. https://doi.org/10.1530/eje.0.1470649 PMid:12444897

8. Harms PP, van der Heijden AA, Rutters F, Tan HL, Beulens JWJ, Nijpel G et al. Prevalence of ECG abnormalities in people with type 2 diabetes: The Hoorn Diabetes Care System Cohort. J Diabetes Complications. 2021; 25 (2): 107810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2020.107810 PMid:33280986

9. Stern S, Sclarowsky S, The ECG in Diabetes Mellitus. Circulation. 2009; 120: 1633 - 1636. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.897496 PMid:19841309

10. International Diabetes Federation Guideline Development Group. Global guideline for type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Chin Pract. 2014; 104 (1): 1 - 52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2012.10.001 Mid:24508150

11. Simova I, Christov I, Bortolan G. A review on electrocardiographic changes in diabetic patients. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2015; 11(2): 103 - 6. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573399811666150113161417 PMid:25584936

12. Lee MK, Hank, Kim MK, Koh ES, Kim ES, Noam GE et al. Changes in Metabolic Syndrome and its components and the risk of type 2 diabetes: a nationwide cohort study. Sci Rep 2020; 10: 2 - 13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59203-z PMid:32047219 PMCid:PMC7012827

13. Fluckiger R, Woodtli T, Berger W. Quantitation of glycosylated haemoglobin by boronate affinity chromatography. Diabetes. 1984; 33: 73-76. https://doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.33.1.73 PMid:6690345

14. Mark V. An improved glucose oxidase method for determining blood, csf, urine glucose levels. Clin Chim Acta. 1996; 251: 19 - 24. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-8981(96)83704-1 PMid:8814347

15. Hirano T, Nohtomi K, Koba S, Muroi A, Ito Y. A simple and precise method for measuring HDL-cholesterol subfractions by a single precipitation followed by homogenous HDL-cholesterol assay. J lipid Res. 2008; 49: 1130 - 1136. https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.D700027-JLR200 PMid:18223297

16. Allain CC, Poon LS, Chan CSG, Richmond W, Fu C. Enzymatic determination of total serum cholesterol. Clin Chem. 1974; 20: 470 - 475. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/20.4.470 PMid:4818200

17. Bucolo G, David H. Quantitative determination of serum triglycerides by the use of enzymes. Clin Chem. 1973; 19: 476 - 482. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/19.5.476 PMid:4703655

18. Assmann G, Jabs HU, Kohnert U, Nolte W, Schriewer H. LDL-cholesterol determination in blood serum following precipitation of LDL with polyvinylsulphate. Clin Chim Acta. 1984; 140: 77 - 83. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-8981(84)90153-0 PMid:6744629

19. Toora BD, Rajagopal G. measurement of creatinine by Jaffe's reaction determination of concentration of sodium hydroxide required for maxmum color development in standard urine and protein free filtrate of serum. Indian J Exp Biol. 2002; 40 (3): 352 - 355. PMD12635710

20. Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, Greene T, Rogers N, Roth D et al. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular prediction equation. Ann Intern Med. 1999; 130: 461 - 70. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-130-6-199903160-00002 PMid:10075613

21. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL et al. Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension. 2003; 42: 1206 - 1252. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.0000107251.49515.c2 PMid:14656957

22. World Health Organization. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. WHO/NCD/NCS 99. Geneva ; WHO, 1999; pp 1 - 58.

23. National Cholesterol Education Program. Third Report of the Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (ATP 111 Final Report). Circulation. 2022; 106: 3141 - 3421.

24. U.S. Census Bureau, 2012 Population Estimates and 2012 National Projections. https://www.Census.gov

25. Khanal MK, Bhandari P, Dhungana RR, Gurung Y, Rawal LB, Pandey G, Bhandari M, Bhuiyan R, Devkota S, de Courten M, de Courten B. Electrocardiogram abnormalities and renal impairment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A healthcare facilities-based cross-sectional study in Dang district of Nepal. J Diabetes Investig. 2023 Apr;14(4):602-613. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdi.13985 PMid:36747483 PMCid:PMC10034961

26. Sinamaw, D., Getnet, M., Abdulkadir, M. et al. Patterns and associated factors of electrocardiographic abnormality among type 2 diabetic patients in Amhara National Regional State Referral Hospitals, Ethiopia: a multicenter institution-based cross-sectional study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 22, 230 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-022-02661-2 PMid:35590246 PMCid:PMC9118567

27. Bedane, D.A., Tadesse, S., Bariso, M. et al. Assessment of electrocardiogram abnormality and associated factors among apparently healthy adult type 2 diabetic patients on follow-up at Jimma Medical Center, Southwest Ethiopia: Cross-sectional study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 21, 312 (2021).  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-02110-6 PMid:34167465 PMCid:PMC8223340

28. Sellers MB, Divers J, Lu L, Xu J, Smith SC, Bowden DW et al. Prevalence and determinants of electrocardiographic abnormalities in African Americans with type diabetes. J Epidemol Glob Health. 2014; 4 (4): 289 - 296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jegh.2014.04.003 PMid:25455646 PMCid:PMC4254487

29. Gupta S, Gupta RK, Kulshrestha M, Chaudhary RR. Evaluation of ECG abnormalities in patients with asymptomatic Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017; 11(4): 39-41. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2017/24882.9740 PMid:28571189 PMCid:PMC5449835

30. Mantovani A, Rigolon R, Turino T, Pichiri I, Falceri A, Rossi A, Temporelli PL, Bonapace S, Lippi G, Zoppini G, Bonora E, Byrne CD, Targher G. Association between decreasing estimated glomerular filtration rate and risk of cardiac conduction defects in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab. 2018 Dec;44(6):473-481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabet.2018.08.007 PMid:30195089

31. Chang YK, Fan HC, Hsu CC, Lim PS. The association between EKG abnormalities and the development of microalbuminuria in type 2 diabetes. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Dec 23;100(51):e28018. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000028018 PMid:34941042 PMCid:PMC8702232