Available online on 15.10.2023 at http://jddtonline.info
Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics
Open Access to Pharmaceutical and Medical Research
Copyright © 2023 The Author(s): This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial use provided the original author and source are credited
Open Access Full Text Article Research Article
Development and Evaluation of Solid Dispersion Formulations of Olanzepine
Kamal Jeet, Kapil Kumar, Aparna Joshi, Ikram, Vaishali Rajput*
Department of Pharmaceutics, Global Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Kashipur- 244713, Uttarakhand, India
|
Article Info: _____________________________________________ Article History: Received 07 July 2023 Reviewed 21 August 2023 Accepted 24 Sep 2023 Published 15 Oct 2023 _____________________________________________ Cite this article as: Jeet K, Kumar K, Joshi A, Ikram, Rajput V, Development and Evaluation of Solid Dispersion Formulations of Olanzepine, Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics. 2023; 13(10):109-116 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v13i10.5985 _____________________________________________ *Address for Correspondence: Vaishali Rajput, Department of Pharmaceutics, Global Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Kashipur- 244713, Uttarakhand, India |
Abstract _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ The purpose of present study was to enhance the aqueous solubility of olanzapine by using the Solid dispersion technique. Solid dispersions of olanzapine were prepared by the dispersion method using PGS and SSG as carriers. Drug-carrier ratios such as 1 : 1, 1 : 2, 1 : 4, 1 : 6, 1: 8 and 1 : 10 were tried for optimization. Characterization was done by phase solubility, in-vitro release, saturation solubility, permeation, wettability, XRD and FTIR analysis. Solid dispersions showed higher solubility and an improved drug release profile than the pure drug. Solid dispersion and physical mixture with a drug-polymer ratio of 1 : 10 showed the best release profile in comparison with the other samples. Phase solubility results verified the solubilization effect of the carrier. XRD and NIR analysis confirmed the reduction of crystallinity in the samples. The release study findings were well supported by the results of wettability, saturation solubility and permeability studies. IR analysis substantiated the inertness of the carrier. It was concluded that pregelatinised starch (PGS) and sodium starch glycollate (SSG) could be utilized as effective carriers to improve the aqueous solubility of poorly soluble drugs. Keywords: Olanzapine, solid dispersion, solubility, evaluation.
|
INTRODUCTION
The enhancement of oral bioavailability of poor water-soluble drugs remains oneof the most challenging aspects of drug development. The development of soliddispersions as a practically viable method to enhance bioavailability of poorlywater-soluble drugs overcame the limitations of previous approaches such as saltformation, solubilization by cosolvents, and particle size reduction.¹ The poor solubility and low dissolution rate of poorly water soluble drugs in
the aqueous gastro-intestinal fluids often cause insufficient bioavailability.²Lipophilic molecules, especially those belonging to the bio pharmaceuticsclassification system (BCS) class II and IV, dissolve slowly, poorly and irregularly,and hence pose serious delivery challenges, like in complete release from the dosageform, poor bioavailability, increasedfood effect, and high inter-patient variability.³ In 1961, Sekiguchi and Obi developed a practical method whereby many of the limitations with the bioavailability enhancement of poorly water soluble drugs can be overcome. This method, which was later, termed solid dispersion which involved the formation of eutectic mixture of drugs with water-soluble carriers by the melting of their physical mixtures4. The term solid dispersion refers to a group of solid products consisting of at least two different compounds, generally a hydrophilic matrix and a hydrophobic drug. The matrix can be either crystalline or amorphous. The drug can be dispersed molecularly, in amorphous particle (clusters) or in crystalline particles5. Solid dispersion can be prepared by various methods such as solvent evaporation and melting method. Solid dispersion technique has been extensively used to increase the solubility of a poorly water-soluble drug. According to this method, a drug is thoroughly dispersed in a water-soluble carrier by suitable method of preparation. The mechanism by which the solubility and the dissolution rate of the drug are increased includes: reduction of the particle size of drug to submicron size or to molecular size in the case where solid solution is obtained. The particle size reduction generally increases the rate of dissolution; secondly, the drug is changed from amorphous to crystalline form, the high energetic state which is highly soluble; finally, the wet ability of the drug particle is improved by the hydrophilic carrier6. Solid dispersion of drug helps to reduce the particle size of drug due to molecular dispersion7. Particle size reduction by micronization or nanonization can enhance the dissolution rate; however, the apparent solubility remains unaltered. At the molecular level, polymorphs offer a limited solubility advantage because of a small difference in free energy. In contrast, amorphous systems with excess thermodynamic properties and lower energetic barrier can offer significant solubility benefits.
MATERIAL AND METHOD
Olanzepine is purchased from Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Hyderabad, India. Sodium Alginate,Potassium Di-Hydrogen Orthophosphate, CaCO3, Ethanol, Calciumchloride, Sodium Hydroxide pellets, HCl, Sodium lauryl sulfate, Di-Sodium Hydrogen Phosphate a.R., PVP K30, PEG 6000 (mg), PEG 6000 (mg) and Octanol were purchased from Indo Chemicals Pvt. Ltd, Haryana, India.
Preparation of Olanzepine SD formulations
Fusion Technique8
Steps followed are-
Solvent evaporation method9
Following steps were used-
Characterization of SD
Micromeritic characterization
Angle (θ) of repose
SD formulations were weighed and kept and dropped from the funnel. A cone like structure gets appear. Heap was measured for radius (r in cm), height (h in cm). Following equation was used to get value of θ10.
Bulk density (BD)
It was determined by filling the already weighed granules (M) in a measuring cylinder. Bulk volume (BV) is recorded from it. BD was determined by following equation11.
Tapped density (TD)
The granules were filled in a measuring cylinder having known mass (M). After filling the granules were tapped 100 times. The tapped volume (TV), thus measured. TD was measured using below formula12.
Carr’s index (CI)
CI for the prepared granules was calculated by below formula13.
Hausner’s ratio (HR)
This also indicate the potential of granules to flow. It was calculated by below formula14.
If it is less than 1.25, means good flow, but if its value is more than 1.25 it means poor flow of any system.
Solubility estimation
Solubility of Olanzepine and SD formulations of Olanzepine was determined in triplicate using saturation solubility method. Excess amount of SD was mixed in a vial with 10ml buffer (pH 6.8). Content of vials was mixed vigorously for 30 minutes and further solutions were shaken mechanically to equilibrate. After 72 hrs each vial was rotated at 2500 rpm for 10 min in a centrifuge in order to separate the content. Later on it was filtered by the means of 0.45µ pore size membrane filter. Obtained filtrate was diluted with suitable solvent. The concentration of Olanzepine was measured by the means of UV spectrophotometr at 281 nm15.
Drug content
SD formulations were tested for estimation of amount of drug content by the means of UV spectrophotometer. SD formulations (equv. To 100mg) were weighed accurately and mixed in a flask with 5ml alcohol. It was mixed properly and diluted to 1oo ml with buffer (6.8 pH). After filterations, dilutions samples checked by UV spectrophotometer at 281nm16.
Percentage Yield
In order to determine the efficiency of used method to prepare SD formulations of Olanzepine, the yield was calculated. It was calculated on the basis of used amount of Olanzepine and PVP K30, PEG 6000 and other used ingredients and the final weight of the obtained product17.
In vitro dissolution study
USP (type II appar.) was used for this study. Paddle speed kept 75rpm and buffer temperature (900 ml, pH 6.8) was kept 37°C. SD formulations (500 mg equivalent wt of drug) were used
5ml sample were taken at regular interval and replaced 5ml buffer solution. Samples were checked through UV spectrophotometer at 281nm18.
Drug release kinetic data analysis:
The obtained data of in-vitro dissolution study was evaluated through PCP disso software for the kinetic models. Zero, first, Higuchi’s and Peppa’s model were studied19
Accelerated stability study
Based on different evaluation parameters SD formulation of Olanzepine of two batches SD4 and SD8 were found to be optimum formulations. These two formulations were subjected to accelerated study for the three months at different temperatures. The formulations of two batches SD4 and SD8 were air tight packed and kept for three months on 40°C and 75% RH. The samples were observed by UV spectrophotometer at 281nm for the absorbance. By the means of the calibration curve the amount of the Olanzepine was estimated19.
RESULT
PF (pre-formulation) studies:
Appearance: Pale yellow crystalline powder.
Figure 1: Olanzepine FTIR.
Figure 2: Olanzepine +PVP K30 FTIR+ PEG 6000 FTIR.
Table 1: SD formulations composition.
|
S. No. |
Formulation code |
PVP K30 |
β cyclodextrin (mg) |
PEG 6000 (mg) |
Method |
|
1 |
SD1 |
300 |
- |
300 |
Solvent evaporation method |
|
2 |
SD2 |
400 |
- |
400 |
Solvent evaporation method |
|
3 |
SD3 |
- |
400 |
100 |
Solvent evaporation method |
|
4 |
SD4 |
- |
300 |
200 |
Solvent evaporation method |
|
5 |
SD5 |
- |
200 |
300 |
Fusion method |
|
6 |
SD6 |
- |
100 |
400 |
Fusion method |
|
7 |
SD7 |
400 |
100 |
- |
Solvent evaporation method |
|
8 |
SD8 |
300 |
200 |
- |
Solvent evaporation method |
|
9 |
SD9 |
200 |
300 |
- |
Fusion method |
|
10 |
SD10 |
100 |
400 |
- |
Fusion method |
|
11 |
SD11 |
100 |
- |
100 |
Fusion method |
|
12 |
SD12 |
200 |
- |
200 |
Fusion method |
Figure 3: SEM images of formulation SD4 and SD8.
Table 2: Micromeritic properties of Olanzepine SD formulations.
|
Batch |
BD* (g/cm2) |
TD* (g/cm2) |
θ* |
CR* (%) |
HR* |
|
SD1 |
0.486±0.06 |
0.522±0.09 |
21.38±0.08 |
7.76±0.08 |
1.072 |
|
SD2 |
0.478±0.03 |
0.528±0.08 |
26.63±0.06 |
6.79±0.12 |
1.222 |
|
SD3 |
0.424±0.08 |
0.444±0.13 |
28.49±0.15 |
7.81±0.08 |
1.096 |
|
SD4 |
0.463±0.08 |
0.533±0.08 |
29.56±0.09 |
8.56±0.09 |
1.103 |
|
SD5 |
0.482±0.09 |
0.552±0.04 |
20.65±0.38 |
6.51±0.12 |
1.081 |
|
SD6 |
0.446±0.13 |
0.486±0.03 |
28.47±0.58 |
7.40±0.23 |
1.091 |
|
SD7 |
0.471±0.09 |
0.531±0.09 |
23.75±.19 |
6.98±0.36 |
1.086 |
|
SD8 |
0.423±0.11 |
0.543±0.11 |
24.83±0.09 |
8.79±0.28 |
1.084 |
|
SD9 |
0.442±0.08 |
0.467±0.07 |
23.68±0.04 |
9.43±0.19 |
1.104 |
|
SD10 |
0.495±0.21 |
0.555±0.05 |
25.42±0.11 |
6.61±0.09 |
1.082 |
|
SD11 |
0.467±0.08 |
0.487±0.13 |
27.58±0.14 |
7.04±0.13 |
1.087 |
|
SD12 |
0.476±0.13 |
0.516±0.08 |
24.31±0.42 |
8.90±0.09 |
1.085 |
Table 3: Properties of different SD formulations of Olanzepine
|
Batch code |
Solubility (mg/ml)* |
% Content* |
% Yield* |
|
SD1 |
0.215±0.31 |
98.52±0.24 |
91.73±0.21 |
|
SD2 |
0.188±0.42 |
98.35±0.41 |
96.48±0.31 |
|
SD3 |
0.187±0.51 |
99.48±0.52 |
94.32±0.41 |
|
SD4 |
0.198±0.08 |
96.63±0.11 |
97.62±0.18 |
|
SD5 |
0.186±0.11 |
99.79±0.09 |
95.49±0.09 |
|
SD6 |
0.198±0.22 |
97.57±0.06 |
96.53±0.21 |
|
SD7 |
0.215±.93 |
98.21±0.09 |
89.73±0.43 |
|
SD8 |
0.203±1.09 |
96.41±0.11 |
85.46±0.55 |
|
SD9 |
0.222±0.77 |
99.67±0.02 |
91.96±0.67 |
|
SD10 |
0.218±0.62 |
99.78±0.08 |
95.32±0.08 |
|
SD11 |
0.217±0.09 |
98.63±0.13 |
94.52±0.12 |
|
SD12 |
0.215±.93 |
97.21±0.09 |
89.73±0.43 |
Solubility of pure drug= 0.128mg/ml. * n = 3
Figure 4: In vitro dissolution profile of Olanzepine SD formulations (SD1-SD4).
Figure 5: In vitro dissolution profile of Olanzepine SD formulations (batch SD5-SD8).
Figure 6: Table 10: In vitro dissolution profile of Olanzepine SD formulations (SD9-SD12).
Table 4: Different release models for Olanzepine SD.
|
Code |
Zero |
First |
Higuchi |
Korsmeyer-Peppas |
|||||
|
R |
K |
R |
K |
R |
K |
Slope(n) |
R |
K |
|
|
SD1 |
0.9331 |
2.6735 |
0.9464 |
-0.0389 |
0.9627 |
8.5322 |
0.7418 |
0.9932 |
3.3079 |
|
SD2 |
0.9748 |
4.3742 |
0.9550 |
-0.0615 |
0.9530 |
10.8363 |
0.6403 |
0.9977 |
9.2404 |
|
SD3 |
0.8143 |
3.3783 |
0.9543 |
-0.0407 |
0.9326 |
9.2572 |
0.7152 |
0.9944 |
8.3949 |
|
SD4 |
0.8598 |
2.9234 |
0.9437 |
-0.0325 |
0.9463 |
9.3642 |
0.8688 |
0.9965 |
6.5982 |
|
SD5 |
0.9325 |
3.5862 |
0.9368 |
-0.0281 |
0.9242 |
10.8364 |
0.8635 |
0.9922 |
3.4810 |
|
SD6 |
0.9788 |
4.8714 |
0.9410 |
-0.0530 |
0.9611 |
8.4782 |
0.9417 |
0.9893 |
12.9121 |
|
SD7 |
0.9681 |
2.6382 |
.9464 |
-0.0675 |
.9737 |
9.3573 |
.5235 |
.9983 |
6.5471 |
|
SD8 |
0.8645 |
3.6361 |
0.9345 |
-0.0448 |
0.9635 |
10.8944 |
0.6076 |
0.9978 |
5.3378 |
|
SD9 |
0.8644 |
1.0225 |
0.9674 |
-0.0443 |
0.9366 |
9.3905 |
0.7264 |
0.9946 |
3.4016 |
|
SD10 |
0.9548 |
3.2187 |
0.9510 |
-0.0668 |
0.9644 |
9.9466 |
0.6722 |
0.9955 |
6.6969 |
|
SD11 |
0.8232 |
3.6474 |
0.9430 |
-0.0448 |
0.9454 |
8.4173 |
0.7187 |
0.9968 |
8.3554 |
|
SD12 |
0.8593 |
4.0264 |
0.9643 |
-0.0532 |
0.9844 |
9.6149 |
0.8014 |
0.9979 |
5.8353 |
Figure 7: Stability studies of Olanzepine SD formulations of batch SD8 at different temperature.
Figure 8: Stability studies of Olanzepine SD formulations of batch SD4 at different temperature.
DISCUSSION
Olanzepine was received from Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Hyderabad, India as a gift sample. The received sample was authenticated by different test i.e. melting point, test according to Indian Pharmacopoeia and analytical methodology was performed on sample to justify the authenticity of sample. The m.p of the received sample was in the range of 310-313ºC, that was matching with the data as mentioned in Indian pharmacopoeia. This justifies the authenticity of given sample of Olanzepine.
The absorption spectrum of drug was evaluated in between 200-500 nm. The sample was prepared with buffer (pH 6.8) having conc. 10 µg/ml. The absorption spectra of Olanzepine showed peak at 281 nm, which represents the maximum absorption (λmax).
FTIR studies were performed for Olanzepine and mixture of Olanzepine and PVP K30 and PEG 6000. There is no change in peak indicating compatibility of drug and polymers. Although there were some mild changes in band width this may be due to formation of band between drug and surfactants but all other peaks and band shows in presence of drug in formulation. In the FTIR spectra Olanzepine+PVP K30 and Olanzepine+PEG 6000, there was not any significant change in the peaks, it indicates that the compatibility of Olanzepine with PVP K30 and PEG 6000.
Twelve Olanzepine SD formulations were developed by incorporating different ingredients i.e. PVP K30, β cyclodextrin, PEG 6000 in different ratio by Fusion method and Solvent evaporation method. The bulk densities of the prepared granules was found to be in between 0.423±0.11 to 0.495±0.21. Low densities leads to increase in porosity and thus improved capacity of packing. The tapped densities of the prepared granules was found to be in between 0.444±0.13 to 0.555±0.05g/cm3.
All SD formulations has shown good flow properties. Repose angle values were in between 20.65±0.38 to 29.56±0.09. These values are in between 20 to 40, indicates good flow properties and they are non-aggregated. Carr’s index for all SD formulations were in between 6.61±0.09 to 9.43±0.19 %. These values indicate, excellent compressibility. So, they having good packabiltywhile filling in capsule. Hausner’s Ratio values for all twelve formulations were in the range of 1.074–1.222. As the amount were<1.25, means good flow was there.
% drug content in developed 12 SD formulations of Olanzepine was found to be in between 96.41±0.11 to 99.79±0.09 indicating good amount of drug in all formulations. This indicate very less waste of the drug during manufacture of the formulations.
The percentage yield of the floating beads was between 85.46±0.55 to 97.62±0.18.
Result of saturation solubility study revealed that there was increase in solubility. In current study drug has shown solubility of 0.132 mg/ml, while formulations has shown solubility range in between 0.186±0.11 to 0.222±0.77. Maximum solubility was shown by the SD formulations of batch SD9 having PVP K30. It revealed remarkable decrease in crystallinity of Olanzepine in molecular dispersion form with PVP-K30. Those formulations that were developed by fusion method has shown more solubility in comparison to those prepared by another method of solvent evaporation.Study reveals that Olanzepine released amount was depending on the used polymers amount. This study indicate that the amount of drug release is affected by the amount of polymers used. In 60 min study, the batch SD12 has shown maximum drug release 56.71±0.25%. Different kinetic model for in-vitro release study of SD formulations of Olanzepine are shown in Table 11. With the help of PCP disso software, obtained results were checked for different kinetic models.
The highest regression coefficient (r2) value was obtained for Korsmeyer– Peppas (0.9983) followed by Higuchi (0.9844), by, zero (0.9748), and first (0.9464) model using PCP disso version 2 software. Study reveals that release was governed by the diffusion.
Accelerated stability studies for 12 weeks shows that the selected SD formulations of Olanzepine SD4 and SD8 are capable to be stable at 450C as well as at refrigeration temperature. Therefore, the SD12 formulations of Olanzepine may be kept at room temperature without affecting the properties.
CONCLUSION
The present was an effort to develop and evaluate Olanzepine SD formulations with a view of improving its solubility and thus bioavailability. Study concludes successfully delivery of the Olanzepine by the the means of SD formulations. On basis different evaluation parameters, current study concludes, formulation of batch SD4 was the optimum formulation.
REFERENCES
1. Sarkar B, et al. Effect of sustained release solid dispersions on dissolution of poorly soluble drug. Asian J Biomed Pharm Sci 2011; 1(2):08-10.
2. Kumar A, Kumar K. Solid dispersion-strategy to enhance solubility and dissolution of poorly water soluble drugs. Universal Journal of Pharmaceutical Research2017; 2(5):50-54. https://doi.org/10.22270/ujpr.v2i5.RW4
3. K R Bobe, et al. Formulation and evaluation of solid dispersion of atorvatstatin with various carriers. Pharmacie Globale (IJCP) 2011, 1 (02).
4. Mahmoud A. Younis. Solid dispersion technology, a contemporary overview on a well established technique. Universal Journal of Pharmaceutical Research2017; 2(3):14-18. https://doi.org/10.22270/ujpr.v2i3.RW1
5. Tandale P, et al. Formulation and evaluation of extended release solid dispersions conatining simvastatin. Asian J Biomed Pharm Sci 2011; 1 (3):13-19.
6. Md. Shahidul Islam, Rasheda Akter Lucky. Development and in vitro dissolution study of binary and ternary solid dispersions of aceclofenac. Universal Journal of Pharmaceutical Research2019;4(1):29-34.
7. Wang Y, Bao Y, Liu J, Duan L, Cui Y. Olanzepine 5 mg Once Daily Improves Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms and Erectile Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Low Urin Tract Symptoms 2018; 10 (1):84-92. https://doi.org/10.1111/luts.12144 PMid:29341503
8. Jajere UM, Achadu AE. Fabrication and characterization of ezetimibe solid dispersion for solubility enhancement. Universal Journal of Pharmaceutical Research2017; 2(1):11-14. https://doi.org/10.22270/ujpr.v2i1.R3
9. Daugan A, et al. The discovery of Olanzepine: A novel and highly selective PDE5 inhibitor. 1: 5,6,11,11a-tetrahydro-1H-imidazo1',5':1,6pyrido3,4-bindole-1,3(2H)-dione analogues. J Med Chem 2003; 46 (21):4525-32. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm030056e PMid:14521414
10. Akhter S, Hossen MS, Salahuddin M, Sunny MA, Sathi FA, Islam MS. In vitro dissolution study of glimepiride from binary and ternary solid dispersion formulation. Universal Journal of Pharmaceutical Research 2019; 4(5):7-11. https://doi.org/10.22270/ujpr.v4i5.310
11. Mahajan HS, Kokate VB. Development and characterization of oral dissolving films of Olanzepine based on pregelatinized hydroxypropyl pea starch. Indian J Novel Drug Deliv. 2015; 7(3):100- 107.
12. Anwar W, Dawaba HM, Afouna MI, SamyAM. Screening study for formulation variables in preparation and characterization of candesartan cilexetil loaded nanostructured lipid carriers. Universal Journal of Pharmaceutical Research 2019; 4(6):8-19. https://doi.org/10.22270/ujpr.v4i6.330
13. Haaf F, Sanner A, Straub F. Polymers of N-Vinylpyrrolidone: Synthesis, Characterization and Uses. Polymer J 1985; 17:143-152. https://doi.org/10.1295/polymj.17.143
14. Magdum SS. Liquisolid technique for dissolution and bioavailability enhancement of poorly soluble drugs. Universal Journal of Pharmaceutical Research2017; 2(5):42-48. https://doi.org/10.22270/ujpr.v2i5.RW3
15. Yoshida K, Sakurai Y, Kawahara S, et al. Anaphylaxis to polyvinylpyrrolidone in povidone-iodine for impetigo contagiosum in a boy with atopic dermatitis. International Archives of Allergy and Immunology 2008; 146 (2):169-73. https://doi.org/10.1159/000113522
PMid:18204285
16. Singh S, Virmani T, Virmani R, Kumar P, Mahlawat G. Fast dissolving drug delivery systems: formulation, preparation techniques and evaluation. Universal Journal of Pharmaceutical Research2018;3(4):56-64. https://doi.org/10.22270/ujpr.v3i4.185
17. Verma BK, Pandey S, Arya P. Tablet granulation: current scenario and recent advances. Universal Journal of Pharmaceutical Research2017; 2(5): 30-35. https://doi.org/10.22270/ujpr.v2i5.RW1
18. Mahaparale PR, Gudsoorkar VR, et al. Studies on solid dispersions of meloxicam. Ind J Pharm Educ Res 2006; 40(4):241- 244.
19. ALGIN YAPAR E, BESKAN U, KARAVANA SY. A recent overview of locally administered topical otic dosage forms. Universal Journal of Pharmaceutical Research 2019; 4(4):39-42. https://doi.org/10.22270/ujpr.v4i4.299