Available online on 15.04.2023 at http://jddtonline.info

Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics

Open Access to Pharmaceutical and Medical Research

Copyright  © 2023 The  Author(s): This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial use provided the original author and source are credited

Open Access   Full Text Article                                                                                                                                                               Research Article 

Unraveling the Multi-Target Pharmacological Mechanism of Brassica rapa in Diabetes Treatment: Integration of Network Pharmacology and Molecular Docking Approaches

Suresh Kumar Gopal*1Manivannan Rangasamy2, Nivetha Balasubramaniyan3, Kamalakannan Dhanabalan4, Bhuvaneshwari Kannan5, Ammu Ramamurthy5, Aravinthan Arumugam5, Anitha Kuppusamy5, Dinesh Kumar Vijayakumar5

  1. Associate Professor, Department of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Excel College of Pharmacy, The Tamil Nadu Dr MGR Medical University, Komarapalayam.
  2. Professor & Principal, Excel College of   Pharmacy, Excel College of Pharmacy, The Tamil Nadu Dr MGR Medical University, Komarapalayam.
  3. Assistant Professor, Department Of Pharmacy Practice, Excel College of Pharmacy, The Tamil Nadu Dr MGR Medical University, Komarapalayam.
  4. Professor, Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis, Excel College of Pharmacy Excel College of Pharmacy, The Tamil Nadu Dr MGR Medical University, Komarapalayam.
  5. Excel College of Pharmacy, The Tamil Nadu Dr MGR Medical University, Komarapalayam.

Article Info:

__________________________________________

Article History:

Received 10 Feb 2023      

Reviewed  14 March 2023

Accepted 22 March 2023  

Published 15 April 2023  

__________________________________________

Cite this article as: 

Suresh Kumar G, Manivannan R , Nivetha B, Kamalakannan D, Bhuvaneshwari K, Ammu R, Aravinthan A, Anitha K, Dinesh Kumar V, Unraveling the Multi-Target Pharmacological Mechanism of Brassica rapa in Diabetes Treatment: Integration of Network Pharmacology and Molecular Docking Approache, Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics. 2023; 13(4):13-27

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v13i4.5783                         __________________________________________*Address for Correspondence:  

G. Suresh Kumar, Associate Professor, Department of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Excel College of Pharmacy, The Tamil Nadu Dr MGR Medical University, Komarapalayam.

Abstract

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Brassica rapa has been widely reported as an anti-diabetic plant and is widely used in traditional medicine for the treatment of various disorders. However, the molecular mechanism underlying the plant's anti-diabetic activity has not been elucidated. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the possible molecular mechanism of B.rapa for managing diabetes mellitus through network pharmacology and molecular docking studies. The active ingredients and associated target proteins were obtained from a literature review and the Swiss Target Prediction platform and validated using the PubChem database. The disease-associated genes were retrieved from the Genecard database. The B. rapa-DM target network was analyzed using the STRING database, and the results were integrated and visualized using Cytoscape software. The molecular mechanism and therapeutic effect of B.rapa for the treatment of DM were determined by Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses using the Enrichr Platform. Fifty-two active ingredients were screened from B. rapa, and 1528 putative target genes were identified from these ingredients. Four hundred and fifty-four overlapping targets matched with DM were considered potential therapeutic targets. First, ten key targets (ALB, AKT1, TNF, GAPDH, MAPK3, EGFR, VEGFA, CTNNB1, CASP3, and STAT3) were found by topological analysis. Then, the results of GO and KEGG suggested that the anti-diabetes effect of B. rapa was strongly associated with the AGE-RAGE signaling pathway in diabetic complications, Neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction, Lipid and atherosclerosis, PI3K-Akt signaling pathway, and Calcium signaling pathway. The AKT1 (Serine/Threonine Protein Kinase) enzyme is targeted by major bioactive constituents of B.rapa. Molecular Docking studies revealed that Liquiritin (docking score -6.1 Kcal/mol) showed the highest binding affinity with AKT1. These results suggest that Brassica rapa may play a role in regulating several pathways that are involved in the development of Diabetes Mellitus.

Keywords: Network pharmacology, molecular mechanisms, Brassica rapa, Diabetes Mellitus (DM)        

 


 

INTRODUCTION

Over the past few decades, the prevalence of diabetes mellitus has increased, making it a common, albeit potentially devastating, medical condition1. Diabetes is considered a global health issue, with high morbidity and mortality rates. Nearly 463 million people are affected by DM, and it is estimated to increase to 700 million by 2045 globally2.Both environmental and genetic factors play a major role in the development of Diabetes mellitus. Environmental factors, such as inactivity, drugs and toxic agents, obesity, viral infections, and geographical location, can contribute to the onset of diabetes. While type I diabetes is not a genetically predestined disease, an increased susceptibility can be inherited. Genetic susceptibility plays a crucial role in the etiology and manifestation of type II diabetes, with concordance rates in monozygotic twins approaching 100%3.Oral hypoglycemic drugs such as biguanides, sulfonylureas, glitazones, DPP-4 inhibitors, and insulin therapy are commonly used to treat diabetes. However, long-term use of these drugs can lead to decreased efficacy and hyperinsulinemia, while major side effects associated with DM include weight loss, lactic acidosis, ketoacidosis, anemia, bone fractures, and gastrointestinal and cardiovascular complications. Therefore, there is a need to explore medicinal plants that have potential anti-diabetic activity4.

Computational investigations have gained new insights into identifying the phytoconstituents found in medicinal plants for therapeutic purposes. Network pharmacology is an emerging frontier in the drug discovery process, as it integrates the principles of systems medicine with those of information science5. Network Pharmacology plays a major role in exploring the biological network of drug candidates, and helps in constructing poly-target drug molecules to optimize medication efficacy6.

Brassica rapa is an edible plant that belongs to the brassicaceae family. The plant contains flavanoids such as isorhamnetin, kaempferol, and quercetin glycosides, as well as glucosinolates, phenylpropanoid derivatives, indole alkaloids, organic acids, and various minerals such as copper, manganese, and calcium. It possesses antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-arthritic, antimicrobial, antifungal, hepatic protective, and nephroprotective properties7. Studies have shown that Brassica rapa, in combination with Eleocharis dulcis, has a hypoglycemic effect with no reported side effect8.

Several studies have investigated the anti-diabetic activity of Brassica rapa, but the exact mechanism of action has not been systematically elucidated. In this study, we used bioinformatic analysis, including network pharmacology and molecular docking, to explore the mechanisms of Brassica rapa in the treatment of diabetes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Collection and Screening of Active Compounds

A comprehensive review of previous phytochemical investigations on Brassica rapa was conducted, resulting in the compilation of a list of 52 compounds isolated or identified. The literature search was carried out through the utilization of the Scopus and Web of Science-Clarivate databases, employing the keyword "Brassica rapa" and covering literature up until December 2022. The compounds were then converted to the Canonical SMILES format utilizing the PubChem database.

 Drug-Likeness Prediction

Lipinski's Rule of Five (RO5) is a widely accepted criterion for assessing the suitability of a molecule as an oral drug in humans. The evaluation of drug-likeness is based on several parameters, including molecular weight, octanol-water partition coefficient (XLogP3), topological polar surface area, rotatable bond count, hydrogen bond acceptor count, and hydrogen bond donor count. To determine the drug-likeness of the phytoconstituent, the SMILES format was uploaded into the SwissADME server (http://www.swissadme.ch), a web-based platform that evaluates the pharmacokinetics, drug-likeness, and medicinal chemistry friendliness of small molecules. Subsequently, a screening process was carried out using the default parameters9.

Screening for Potential Target Genes for Brassica rapa Active Constituents against Diabetes Mellitus

The prediction of targets for phytoconsitutents was conducted using two databases: PharmMapper (http://lilab.ecust.edu.cn/pharmmapper/) and SwissTargetPrediction (http://www.swisstargetprediction.ch/).PharmMapper, a web-based platform, determines potential drug targets by comparing the query compound to its internal pharmacophore model database through a reverse pharmacophore process 10. SwissTargetPrediction, a web server, predicts targets of bioactive small molecules based on a combination of 2D and 3D similarity measures with known ligands 11. The 3D molecular structure file of phytoconsitutents was imported into PharmMapper, while its canonical SMILES was entered into SwissTargetPrediction. The resulting candidate targets were then normalized through the UniProt database (http://www.uniprot.org/).

Screening of Targets for DM

The next phase in comprehending the molecular mechanism of herbs utilized to treat medical conditions involves the prediction of genes associated with diseases. In this context, the target genes for Diabetes Mellitus were obtained from the Human Gene Database (GeneCards, https://www.genecards.org/). GeneCards is a comprehensive database that integrates information on all annotated and predicted human genes from around 150 different databases. The target genes related to diabetes were retrieved by searching for keywords such as "diabetes" or "diabetes mellitus"(Yang et al., 2019). The score ranks diseases based on their proximity to the gene and takes into account the reliability of the sources, with a criteria score of greater than 5. This approach is commonly used in network pharmacology research and is applied for further screening of the target genes 12.

Acquisition of Intersection Target

The ingredient targets of Brassica rapa and the Diabetes mellitus -related targets were uploaded to Venny 2.1.0 (https://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny/) for intersection to obtain the potential targets of Brassica rapa for the treatment of DM

Protein-Protein Interaction 

Protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analysis is an effective method for comprehending the molecular mechanisms of diseases and identifying novel drug targets. In this study, the researchers constructed a PPI network for the protein targets of Brassica rapa using the String database (https://string-db.org/), which is a widely utilized resource for searching and predicting protein interactions. The String database comprises a vast amount of experimental data, text mining results from PubMed abstracts and other databases, as well as bioinformatic predictions, making it a comprehensive and informative website for PPI analysis. The thickness of the lines in the network symbolizes the level of data support, or confidence. The minimum interaction score used in this analysis was medium confidence (0.400), which is also the default threshold13.

Network Analysis

After obtaining the PPI network from STRING, the researchers utilized the CytoHubba plugin of Cytoscape, a software for visualizing and analyzing complex networks, to analyze the core regulatory genes of the network and identify crucial targets. The CytoHubba plugin is specifically designed for hub analysis and identification of significant proteins in PPI networks. It applies various centrality measures to detect highly connected proteins, or "hubs," in the network, which are believed to play a vital role in regulating protein interactions. By recognizing these key targets, researchers can attain a deeper understanding of the molecular mechanisms of the disease and potentially discover new drug targets for further investigation14.

Gene Ontology Enrichment Analysis

The Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) is a robust analytical tool utilized to interpret gene expression data obtained from genome-wide experiments. These enrichment analysis tools aid in linking prior knowledge with newly generated data and discovering the nature of genes in both health and disease conditions 15, 16. The Enrichr platform was utilized for the KEGG and GO analysis of targets predicted for Diabetes mellitus (DM). Enrichr is a comprehensive web server for gene enrichment analysis and annotation, integrating a variety of databases such as KEGG, GEO, GO, PPI databases, ChEA 2016, OMIM, etc 17. The following steps were taken to perform the enrichment analysis and gene annotation: Firstly, the list of target genes related to phytoconsitutents of Brassica rapa was input into the Enrichr web server. Secondly, the signaling pathway information was selected based on clinical and pathological data.

Ligand preparation

The Pubchem database was utilized to obtain the compound structures. Avogadro, a free molecular editor, was used to optimize the geometric structures of the compounds using the GAFF force field and the steepest descent algorithm with 5000 steps per update. The energy-optimized phytochemicals were then used for docking 18. Out of the 42 identified phytochemical compounds from Brassica rapa, only ten were selected for the docking study. The 3D structures of the compounds were prepared, minimizing energy, adding hydrogen atoms, and assigning charges as needed, using the UCSF Chimera structure build module. These structures were saved in the PDB format and optimized for docking using UCSF Chimera tools19. 

Retrieval and Preparation of target protein

The Crystal Structure of AKT1 in Complex with Covalent-Allosteric AKT Inhibitor 27 (PDB ID: 6HHG) was retrieved from the RSCB PDB (https://www.rcsb.org/). It was solved using X-ray diffraction with a resolution of 2.30 Å 20. The initial PDB protein structure cannot be utilized for molecular docking as it lacks crucial information such as bond orders, formal atomic charges, and correct alignment of terminal amide groups. 

The raw X-ray crystal structure of the 6HHG protein was purified by removing all the solvent molecules. The implicit hydrogen atoms were then added to the atoms to meet their appropriate valences. Unimportant ligands and ions were deleted from the protein structure. Subsequently, the structure was optimized by defining the bond orders, bond angles, and topology, and formal atomic charges were assigned to the amino acid residues. The energy minimization of the protein was performed using SPDBV 4.1, and the computation was carried out in a vacuum with the GROMOSS96 43B1 parameter set. 

Active site analysis

The probable binding sites found in the three-dimensional structure of AKT1 was searched using the Computed Atlas of Surface Topography of Proteins (CASTp) server21. The website was used to identify the binding sites, active sites, surface structural pockets area, shape, and volume of every pocket and internal cavity of proteins. It also shows the number, boundary of mouth openings of each pocket, molecular reachable surface, and area of each pocket.

Docking

Molecular docking experiments were carried out using the AutoDock Vina tool, which is included in the UCSF Chimera software version 1.10.2, with the default parameters and a grid box (30.085 -36.412 -16.653) 22. The View Dock tool was used to explore the predicted score values (19) (23). UCSF Chimera was used to check docking results, binding sites, and image processing. The 2D and 3D protein-ligand interactions were visualized in Discovery Studio Visualizer.

 

RESULTS

Screening of chemical compounds in Brassica rapa and selection for the potential active compounds

A comprehensive literature review was conducted, yielding a compilation of 52 compounds present in Brassica rapa, as depicted in Table 1 (Supplementary File 1). The predominant compounds identified were Glucosinolates, Isothiocyanates, Flavonoids, Sulfur Compounds, Indoles, Phenylpropanoids, Lignin, Diarylheptanoids, and Volatiles. The drug-like potential of the compounds was assessed using Lipinski's rule of five, with the relevant parameters provided in Table 2(Supplementary File 2). Out of the 52 compounds that fulfilled the established criteria, their potential targets were explored via the Swiss Target Prediction databases, leading to the acquisition of information for 52 compound.

Target Identification and Analysis

The active constituents of Brassica rapa were subjected to target prediction utilizing the PharmMapper and Swiss Target Prediction databases. The merged target data revealed 1528 potential target genes of the 52 active constituents. Upon identifying the promising targets of the compounds, a comprehensive search was conducted on the GeneCards databases, resulting in the retrieval of 2803 genes associated with Diabetes mellitus (DM). A Venny tool was employed to predict the common targets of both DM and the compound-related genes, leading to the selection of 454 potential genes of Brassica rapa as key targets. Further information on these targets can be found in Table 3 (Supplementary File 3) and   Figure 1.

Figure 1: Common targets in Venn diagram.

 Integration of Protein-Protein Interaction Network

The 454 potential genes of Brassica rapa were utilized in the construction of a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network using the STRING database. The PPI network, depicted in Figure 2, demonstrates the interrelationship among multiple targets in the context of disease development through the representation of nodes and their interactions. The network comprises 450 nodes and 7897 edges. A network analyzer tool was employed to analyze the PPI network of overlapping genes. According to the results of the CytoHubba calculation, ALB was found to be at the center of the network with the highest degree, followed by AKT1, TNF, GAPDH, MAPK3, EGFR, VEGFA, CTNNB1, and CASP3, which were designated as hub targets that may play a pivotal role in the advancement of Diabetes Mellitus. The degree values were represented by color changes from red to yellow in Figure 3 and Table 3, where higher degree values are indicated by more intense yellow hues


 

 

 

Figure 2: Protein–protein interaction (PPI) network and Hub gene analysis. (a) PPI network performed by STRING database. Contains 197 common DEGs. (http://string-db.org/; version 11.5).

 

Table 4: Active compounds of Brassica rapa related to hub targets.

Gene Symbol

Gene Name

Uniprot ID

Degree

ALB

Albumin

P02768

241

AKT1

RAC-alpha serine/threonine-protein kinase

P31749

232

TNF

Tumor necrosis factor ligand

Q9UNG2

230

GAPDH

Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase

P04406

217

MAPK3

Mitogen-activated protein kinase

L7RXH5

171

EGFR

Epidermal growth factor receptor

P00533

169

VEGFA

Vascular endothelial growth factor A

P15692

166

CTNNB1

Catenin beta-1

P35222

159

CASP3

Caspase-3

P42574

149

STAT3

Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3

P40763

147

 


 

 

Figure 3:  PPI network of the top 10 hub genes generated by (Cytoscape plugin cytoHubba; https://apps.cytoscape.org/apps/cytohubba; version 0.1) (the redder the colour, the more important it is).

GO and KEGG Pathway Enrichment Analyses

GO Enrichment Analysis

To clarify the multiple mechanisms of Brassica rapa on Diabetes mellitus from a systematic level, we performed an enrichment analysis for the biological process (BP), molecular function (MF), and cellular component (CC) of the retrieved protein targets of Brassica rapa. The significantly enriched BP terms were mainly involved in Positive Regulation Of Intracellular Signal Transduction (GO:1902533), Proteolysis (GO:0006508), Protein Phosphorylation (GO:0006468), Regulation Of Cell Population Proliferation (GO:0042127), Positive Regulation Of Cellular Process (GO:0048522),Cellular Response To Cytokine Stimulus (GO:0071345), Positive Regulation Of MAPK Cascade (GO:0043410), Positive Regulation Of Cell Population Proliferation (GO:0008284),Regulation Of Apoptotic Process (GO:0042981) and Negative Regulation Of Apoptotic Process (GO:0043066) (Figure 4 and Table 5). The most frequently occurring protein targets were AKT1, PTPN6, GPER1, VEGFA, BCL2, RELA, SIRT1, TNF, KDR, EGFR, FLT4, IGF1R, IGF1, PTK2B, AKT2, ADAM10, FGFR1, FLT1, PDGFRA and CSF1R. 

The significantly enriched MF terms of these targets are shown in (Figure 5 and Table 6). The results suggested that targets of Brassica rapa  were strongly correlated with the molecular functions such as Endopeptidase Activity (GO:0004175),G-Protein-Coupled Receptor Activity (GO:0004930),Protein Homodimerization Activity (GO:0042803), Transition Metal Ion Binding (GO:0046914),Serine-Type Peptidase Activity (GO:0008236),Serine-Type Endopeptidase Activity (GO:0004252), Protein Serine/Threonine Kinase Activity (GO:0004674),Protein Tyrosine Kinase Activity (GO:0004713),Heme Binding (GO:0020037) and Histone Deacetylase Activity (GO:0004407). As shown in (Figure 6 and Table 7), the top ten cellular components were Integral Component Of Plasma Membrane (GO:0005887) , Secretory Granule Lumen (GO:0034774),Intracellular Organelle Lumen (GO:0070013), Membrane Raft (GO:0045121),Vacuolar Lumen (GO:0005775),Neuron Projection (GO:0043005), Ficolin-1-Rich Granule Lumen (GO:1904813), Focal Adhesion (GO:0005925),Ficolin-1-Rich Granule (GO:0101002) and Cell-Substrate Junction (GO:0030055). These above mentioned observations are valued in improved understanding of the mechanism of DM.


 

 

 

Table 5: Gene Ontology Term, Biological Process, Direct (Top 10).

S.No

Name

p-value

Adjusted p-Value

Odd Ratio

Combined Score

1

Positive Regulation Of Intracellular Signal Transduction (GO:1902533)

2.551e-35

9.858e-32

7.73

615.41

2

Proteolysis (GO:0006508)

9.472e-30

1.830e-26

10.08

673.86

3

Protein Phosphorylation (GO:0006468)

1.168e-26

1.505e-23

6.67

398.55

4

Regulation Of Cell Population Proliferation (GO:0042127)

7.113e-26

6.873e-23

5.23

302.74

5

Positive Regulation Of Cellular Process (GO:0048522)

4.303e-25

3.326e-22

5.67

317.84

6

Cellular Response To Cytokine Stimulus (GO:0071345)

7.602e-25

4.897e-22

6.46

358.74

7

Positive Regulation Of MAPK Cascade (GO:0043410)

9.213e-25

5.087e-22

9.01

498.80

8

Positive Regulation Of Cell Population Proliferation (GO:0008284)

2.130e-24

1.029e-21

6.44

350.95

9

Regulation Of Apoptotic Process (GO:0042981)

8.929e-24

3.835e-21

5.03

266.74

10

Negative Regulation Of Apoptotic Process (GO:0043066)

4.186e-23

1.618e-20

6.13

315.76

 

Figure 4: Functional enrichment analysis of the GO in terms of biological processes. (network, with combined scores in descending order. (A) Bar graph showing the pathways and their combined scores.    (B) A clustergram of related genes.

 

Table 6: Gene ontology term, molecular function, direct (Top 10).

S.No

Name

p-value

Adjusted               p-Value

Odd Ratio

Combined Score

1

Endopeptidase Activity (GO:0004175)

3.86E-23

2.52E-20

7.85

405.38

2

G Protein-Coupled Receptor Activity (GO:0004930)

9.54E-19

3.11E-16

7.2

298.6

3

Protein Homodimerization Activity (GO:0042803)

4.60E-15

9.08E-13

4.1

135.41

4

Transition Metal Ion Binding (GO:0046914)

5.57E-15

9.08E-13

4.84

158.93

5

Serine-Type Peptidase Activity (GO:0008236)

7.97E-15

1.04E-12

10.17

330.24

6

Serine-Type Endopeptidase Activity (GO:0004252)

2.09E-14

2.27E-12

11.24

353.96

7

Protein Serine/Threonine Kinase Activity (GO:0004674)

6.52E-13

6.08E-11

5.02

140.94

8

Protein Tyrosine Kinase Activity (GO:0004713)

4.11E-12

3.35E-10

9.55

250.34

9

Heme Binding (GO:0020037)

2.06E-11

1.49E-09

10.24

251.88

10

Histone Deacetylase Activity (GO:0004407)

1.12E-10

6.98E-09

39.51

905.41

 

 

Figure 5: Functional enrichment analysis of the GO in terms of molecular function. (network, with combined scores in descending order. (A) Bar graph showing the pathways and their combined scores. 

 

Table 7: Gene ontology term, Cellular Component, direct (Top 10).

S.No

Name

p-value

Adjusted       p-Value

Odd Ratio

Combined Score

1

Integral Component Of Plasma Membrane (GO:0005887)

2.16E-28

5.44E-26

4.17

265.4

2

Secretory Granule Lumen (GO:0034774)

2.68E-16

3.38E-14

6.13

219.7

3

Intracellular Organelle Lumen (GO:0070013)

1.62E-14

1.36E-12

3.55

112.75

4

Membrane Raft (GO:0045121)

3.52E-13

2.22E-11

7.79

223.46

5

Vacuolar Lumen (GO:0005775)

1.12E-10

5.64E-09

6.72

154.04

6

Neuron Projection (GO:0043005)

4.89E-10

2.05E-08

3.46

74.16

7

Ficolin-1-Rich Granule Lumen (GO:1904813)

2.74E-09

9.87E-08

7.13

140.65

8

Focal Adhesion (GO:0005925)

5.49E-09

1.73E-07

3.8

72.34

9

Ficolin-1-Rich Granule (GO:0101002)

7.89E-09

1.94E-07

5.45

101.61

10

Cell-Substrate Junction (GO:0030055)

8.29E-09

1.94E-07

3.73

69.38

 

 

Figure 6: Functional enrichment analysis of the GO in terms of Cellular processes. (network, with combined scores in descending order. (A) Bar graph showing the pathways and their combined scores.

 


 

Pathway Enrichment Analysis

In terms of KEGG analysis, The top 10 significantly enriched pathways were screened out based on the threshold of  p Value (Figure 7 and Table 8). The results indicated that these genes were mainly associated with the Pathways in cancer, AGE-RAGE signaling pathway in diabetic complications, Neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction, Lipid and atherosclerosis, Proteoglycans in cancer, Prostate cancer, HIF-1 signaling pathway, PI3K-Akt signaling pathway and Calcium signaling pathway. These results suggest that Brassica rapa may play a role in regulating several pathways that are involved in the development of Diabetes Mellitus. For example, the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway is a critical signaling pathway that is involved in insulin signaling, glucose uptake, and regulation of cell growth and survival. The enrichment of this pathway in the targets of Brassica rapa suggests that it may have a positive effect on insulin signaling and glucose metabolism. The AGE-RAGE signaling pathway in diabetic complications is also involved in the development of diabetic complications and oxidative stress. The enrichment of this pathway in the targets of Brassica rapa suggests that it may have a protective effect against the development of diabetic complications. The Neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction pathway is involved in the regulation of neurotransmitter release and synaptic plasticity, and its enrichment in the targets of Brassica rapa suggests that it may have a positive effect on neuronal function. These observations provide a foundation for further investigation into the potential therapeutic effects of Brassica rapa in the treatment of Diabetes Mellitus.


 

 

 

Table 8: KEGG pathway enrichment (Top 10).

S.No

Name

p-value

Adjusted p-Value

Odd Ratio

Combined Score

1

Pathways in cancer

1.437e-49

4.167e-47

10.20

1147.00

2

AGE-RAGE signaling pathway in diabetic complications

8.586e-34

1.245e-31

26.22

1996.09

3

Neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction

7.445e-32

7.196e-30

9.51

681.57

4

Lipid and atherosclerosis

1.516e-31

1.099e-29

12.93

917.36

5

Proteoglycans in cancer

3.667e-29

2.127e-27

12.52

819.66

6

Prostate cancer

9.516e-29

4.600e-27

22.73

1466.37

7

HIF-1 signaling pathway

3.192e-28

1.322e-26

20.08

1271.36

8

PI3K-Akt signaling pathway

3.890e-28

1.410e-26

8.45

533.34

9

Calcium signaling pathway

3.123e-27

1.006e-25

10.59

646.61

10

Human cytomegalovirus infection

2.323e-26

6.736e-25

10.79

636.66

 

 

Figure 7: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis of 454 common targets of Brassica rapa and DM, (A) histogram of the top 10 KEGG pathways.

 


 

Molecular Docking

Molecular docking is an essential computational tool in the drug discovery domain. It is done to further select the potential compounds and study the bond formation in the protein–ligand complex at the binding site. Through systematic analysis of the PPI network, the gene AKT1 (Serine/ Threonine Protein Kinase) is selected for molecular docking. The crystal structure of target proteins (PDB ID: 6HHG) were retrieved from PDB. Structural refinement was completed by using the UCSF chimera tool. Energy minimization was completed at 1000 decent steps, while the non-standard residues were also removed from the receptors of the protein to avoid clashes and incorrect configurations. 

Molecular docking was performed to screen out the putative targets of constituents with the ability to lower the risk of DM. Docking analysis successfully predicted the strong binding affinity between constituents and the binding pockets of target proteins. Docking scores, along with binding energy, were employed as key criteria for compound screening (Table 9). Clusters having a maximum absolute value of binding energy and highest conformation were selected.

Out of 52 phytoconsitutents present in Brassica rapa, the Liquiritin, Licochalcone A, Liquiritigenin,4,4′-Dihydroxy-3′- Methoxychalcone, Arvelexin, Syringin, Dihydrosyringin, Triandrin, Glucoberteroin, 5-Methylthiopentyl Isothiocyanate, Trans-6-Shogaol,6-Paradol, Hexylacetate And   Dihydroxybenzoquinone   were docked against AKT1 protein to calculate binding energy and inhibitory constant (Ki) values. The docking results showed that all the phytochemicals expressed different behaviour while making interactions with the protein.

Liquiritin from Brassica rapa showed binding affinity of −6.1 kcal/mol and interacted with Asn 31and Val 7 residues of AKT1 protein. Asn 31forming Pi-sigma with bond distance of 2.84 and Val 7 interacted with Pi-alkyl with bond distance of 3.73 respectively.

 The molecular interaction analysis of AKT1 protein with Liquiritigenin utilizes the least energy of –5.5 kcal/mol. The AKT1– Liquiritigenin conformation depicts 2 pi-alkyl bond with  Val 106 and Val 7 aminocids residues. AKT1 protein docking analysis with Licochalcone showed Four alkyl bonds with Val 4; two conventional bond with Leu 110; and one pi-alkyl bond with Val 106; One Carbon bond with Lys 112; and amide pi stacked with Thr 105 [Figure 8 (A)–(J)] with a binding energy value of –5.6 kcal/mol.

The docking study of AKT1 protein with 4,4′-Dihydroxy-3′- Methoxychalcone has utilized a energy value of –5.3 kcal/mol and four conventional bond  with Ser 56,Asn 31 and Asn 53;and one Pi-alkyl bond with Pro 51: and one alkyl bond with Ala 58 aminoacid residues.

AKT1 protein with Syringin a binding energy of –5.0 kcal/mol and showed seven conventional bonds with ile 6, Asn  31, Lys 112 and Gly 109 ;and two carbon bond interactions with Asp 3; and one pi –alkyl bond with Val ;and one Alkyl bond with Ala 5 aminoacid residues. 

The AKT1 protein - 6-Paradol complex formation utilized a energy value of –4.4 kcal/mol and results in two alkyl bond with Val 106 and Ala 5 ; and two conventional bond with Ile 6 and Asn 31 aminoacid residues. 

AKT1 protein with Dihydroyringin utilizes a binding energy of –4.9 kcal/mol and showed five conventional bond interactions with Gly 109, Asn 31, Ile 6, Val7; and one alkyl bond interactions with Val7; and one alkyl bond with Ala 5 aminoacid residues.

Arvexelin showed binding affinity of −4.5 kcal/mol and displays three Pi-Alkyl interactions with Val 7 and Val 106; and one conventional bond interactions with Val 7 aminoacid residues. Glucoberteroin shows three alkyl interactions with Val 7; and two conventional bond interactions with Lys 112 and Gly 109; and two carbon bond interactions with Gly 109 and Asp 3 aminoacid residues with binding energy −4.7 kcal/mol. Hexylacetate docked with AKT1 protein with binding affinity of −3.5 kcal/mol and possess three alkyl interactions with Val 7 and Val 106; and one conventional bond with Asn 31 amino acid.


 

 

Table 9: The docking score of the bioactive constituents of Brassica rapa bound to the AKT1 Protein.

S.No

Phytochemical

Binding Affinity (Kcal/Mole)

Amino acid present in Binding Site

Type of bond

Bond Distance

1

4,4′-Dihydroxy-3′- Methoxychalcone

-5.3

Ala 58

Alkyl

3.75

Ser 56

Conventional

2.22

Conventional

2.99

Asn 31

Conventional

2.71

Asn 53

Conventional

1.93

Carbon

3.64

Pro 51

Pi - Alkyl

5.43

2

Arvexelin

-4.5

Val 7

Pi - Alkyl

4.82

Val 106

Conventional

2.36

Pi - Alkyl

4.88

Pi - Alkyl

5.11

Asn 31

Carbon

3.4

3

Dihydroyringin

-4.9

Gly 109

Conventional

2.81

Lys 112

Unfavorable Donor Donor

2.36

Asn 31

Conventional

2.47

Conventional

2.13

Ala 5

Alkyl

4.2

Ile 6

Conventional

2.59

Val7

Conventional

2.12

Pi Alkyl

4.86

Asp3

Carbon Hydrogen Bond

3.44

4

Glucoberteroin

-4.7

Val7

Alkyl

3.74

Alkyl

4.33

Val 106

Alkyl

5.22

Lys 112

Conventional

2.12

Gly 109

Conventional

1.98

Carbon

2.66

Asp 3

Carbon

3.45

5

Hexylacetate

-3.5

Val 7

Alkyl

3.9

Val 106

Alkyl

4.69

Alkyl

4.47

Asn 31

Conventional

2.72

6

Licochalcone

-5.6

Val 4

Alkyl

5.49

Alkyl

4.89

Alkyl

4.18

Alkyl

4.97

Leu 110

Conventional

3.63

Conventional

3.55

Lys 112

Carbon

2.34

Val 106

Pi Alkyl

4.87

Thr 105

Amide Pi Stacked

4.42

7

Liquiritigenin

-5.5

Val 106

Pi Alkyl

5.23

Val 7

Pi Alkyl

3.79

8

Liquiritin

-6.1

Asn 31

Pi Sigma

2.84

Val 7

Pi Alkyl

3.73

9

6-Paradol

-4.4

Val 106

Alkyl

4.48

Val7

Pi Alkyl

4.53

Ala 5

Alkyl

3.9

Ile 6

Conventional

2.44

Asn 31

Conventional

2.57

10

Syringin

-5.0

ILE 6

Conventional

2.27

Val 7

Pi -Alkyl

5.01

Ala 5

Alkyl

3.89

Asn  31

Conventional

2.52

Conventional

2.44

Conventional

2.33

Asp 3

Carbon

3.57

Carbon

3.45

Lys 112

Conventional

2.22

Gly 109

Conventional

2.42

Conventional

2.13

 

Figure 8: Molecular docking of active compounds and AKT1 Protein

 

 

 

 

(A)

 

The position of the molecular docking and the type of amino acid residue formed between the ligand 4,4′-Dihydroxy-3′- Methoxychalcone with AKT1 Protein

 

(B)

 

The position of the molecular docking and the type of amino acid residue formed between the ligand Arvexelin with AKT1 Protein

 

(C)

 

The position of the molecular docking and the type of amino acid residue formed between the ligand Dihydroyringin with AKT1 Protein

 

(D)

 

The position of the molecular docking and the type of amino acid residue formed between the ligand Glucoberteroin with AKT1 Protein

 

 

 

 

(E)

 

The position of the molecular docking and the type of amino acid residue formed between the ligand Hexylacetate with AKT1 Protein

 

(F)

 

The position of the molecular docking and the type of amino acid residue formed between the ligand Licochalcone with AKT1 Protein

 

(G)

 

The position of the molecular docking and the type of amino acid residue formed between the Liquiritigenin ligand with AKT1 Protein

 

(F)

 

The position of the molecular docking and the type of amino acid residue formed between the ligand Liquritin with AKT1 Protein

 

(I)

 

The position of the molecular docking and the type of amino acid residue formed between the ligand 6-Paradol with AKT1 Protein

 

(J)

 

The position of the molecular docking and the type of amino acid residue formed between the ligand Syringin with AKT1 Protein

 

 


 

DISCUSSION

This literature review focused on identifying the active compounds in Brassica rapa and their potential targets for the treatment of Diabetes Mellitus (DM). A total of 52 compounds were identified and subjected to target prediction using the PharmMapper and Swiss Target Prediction databases. The results showed that the active constituents of Brassica rapa had the potential to interact with 1528 potential target genes. After further analysis, 454 potential genes of Brassica rapa were selected as key targets for DM.

The 454 potential genes were then used to construct a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network using the STRING database. The PPI network demonstrated the interrelationships among the targets in the context of DM development. The network analysis tool revealed that ALB, AKT1, TNF, GAPDH, MAPK3, EGFR, VEGFA, CTNNB1, and CASP3 were the hub targets that could play a pivotal role in the advancement of DM.

To understand the mechanisms of Brassica rapa on DM from a systematic level, an enrichment analysis was performed for the biological process (BP), molecular function (MF), and cellular component (CC) of the protein targets of Brassica rapa. The results showed that the BP terms were mainly involved in Positive Regulation of Intracellular Signal Transduction, Proteolysis, Protein Phosphorylation, Regulation of Cell Population Proliferation, Positive Regulation of Cellular Process, and Cellular Response to Cytokine Stimulus. The most frequently occurring protein targets were AKT1, PTPN6, GPER1, VEGFA, BCL2, RELA, SIRT1, TNF, KDR, EGFR, FLT4, IGF1R, IGF1, PTK2B, AKT2, ADAM10, FGFR1, FLT1, PDGFRA, and CSF1R.

The significantly enriched MF terms indicated that the targets of Brassica rapa were strongly correlated with Endopeptidase Activity, G Protein-Coupled Receptor Activity, Protein Homodimerization Activity, Transition Metal Ion Binding, Serine-Type Peptidase Activity, Serine-Type Endopeptidase Activity, Protein Serine/Threonine Kinase Activity, Protein Tyrosine Kinase Activity, Heme Binding, and Histone Deacetylase Activity. The top five cellular components were Integral Component of Plasma Membrane, Secretory Granule Lumen, Intracellular Organelle Lumen, Membrane Raft, and Vacuolar Lumen.

The KEGG analysis revealed that the targets of Brassica rapa were significantly enriched for pathways such as Pathways in Cancer, AGE-RAGE signaling pathway in diabetic complications, Neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction, Lipid and Atherosclerosis, Proteoglycans in Cancer, Prostate Cancer, HIF-1 signaling pathway, PI3K-Akt signaling pathway, and Calcium Signaling Pathway. These results suggest that Brassica rapa may play a role in regulating several pathways involved in the development of Diabetes Mellitus, including the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway, which is critical for insulin signaling, glucose uptake, and regulation of cell growth and survival.

The AKT1 (also known as protein kinase B) protein plays a crucial role in the development of diabetes. This protein is involved in several signaling pathways that regulate glucose metabolism, insulin signaling, and cell survival. In individuals with diabetes, the insulin signaling pathway is disrupted, leading to high blood glucose levels and insulin resistance. AKT1 activation promotes glucose uptake by cells and inhibits insulin-stimulated gluconeogenesis.

Studies have shown that the activation of AKT1 is crucial in maintaining glucose homeostasis and that its loss or reduction leads to insulin resistance and glucose intolerance. The overactivation of AKT1, on the other hand, has been associated with the development of type 2 diabetes. This suggests that the regulation of AKT1 activity is crucial in preventing and treating diabetes. In conclusion, AKT1 plays a significant role in the development of diabetes and its regulation may have therapeutic potential in the treatment of this disease. 

The results of a molecular docking study performed on a set of phytochemicals found in Brassica rapa and their potential to interact with the AKT1 protein. The study utilized a crystal structure of AKT1 protein (PDB ID: 6HHG) and screened out the phytochemicals for their binding affinity with the protein. The study found that Liquiritin, Licochalcone A, Liquiritigenin, 4,4′-Dihydroxy-3′-Methoxychalcone, Arvelexin, Syringin, Dihydrosyringin, Triandrin, Glucoberteroin, 5-Methylthiopentyl Isothiocyanate, Trans-6-Shogaol, 6-Paradol, Hexylacetate, and Dihydroxybenzoquinone had different binding affinities with the AKT1 protein, as indicated by the binding energy and inhibitory constant (Ki) values.

The study found that Liquiritin had a binding affinity of −6.1 kcal/mol and interacted with Asn 31 and Val 7 residues of the AKT1 protein. Liquiritigenin had the lowest energy utilization of −5.5 kcal/mol, while Licochalcone A had a binding energy value of −5.6 kcal/mol. The study also found that Syringin had a binding energy of −5.0 kcal/mol, 6-Paradol had a binding energy of −4.4 kcal/mol, Dihydrosyringin had a binding energy of −4.9 kcal/mol, Arvexelin had a binding affinity of −4.5 kcal/mol, and Glucoberteroin had a binding energy of −4.7 kcal/mol. Hexylacetate had a binding affinity of −3.5 kcal/mol.

Overall, the molecular docking study provides valuable insights into the potential of these phytochemicals to interact with the AKT1 protein and suggests further research is needed to explore the relationship between these interactions and the risk of diabetes mellitus.

REFERENCES:

1. Tomic D, Shaw JE, Magliano DJ. The burden and risks of emerging complications of diabetes mellitus. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2022 Sep; 18(9):525-39. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41574-022-00690-7

2. Islam F, Khadija JF, Islam MR, Shohag S, Mitra S, Alghamdi S, et al. Investigating Polyphenol Nanoformulations for Therapeutic Targets against Diabetes Mellitus. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 Jun 21; 2022:e5649156. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5649156

3. Adeghate E, Schattner P, Dunn E. An Update on the Etiology and Epidemiology of Diabetes Mellitus. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006; 1084(1):1-29. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1372.029

4. Zhang T, Zhang Q, Zheng W, Tao T, Li RL, Wang LY, et al. Fructus Zanthoxyli extract improves glycolipid metabolism disorder of type 2 diabetes mellitus via activation of AMPK/PI3K/Akt pathway: Network pharmacology and experimental validation. J Integr Med. 2022 Nov; 20(6):543-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joim.2022.07.004

5. Noor F, Tahir ul Qamar M, Ashfaq UA, Albutti A, Alwashmi ASS, Aljasir MA. Network Pharmacology Approach for Medicinal Plants: Review and Assessment. Pharmaceuticals. 2022 May; 15(5):572. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15050572

6. Martiz RM, Patil SM, Abdulaziz M, Babalghith A, Al-Areefi M, Al-Ghorbani M, et al. Defining the Role of Isoeugenol from Ocimum tenuiflorum against Diabetes Mellitus-Linked Alzheimer's Disease through Network Pharmacology and Computational Methods. Mol Basel Switz. 2022 Apr 7; 27(8):2398. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27082398

7. Azra Riaz, Moona Baig, Ahad Abdul Rehman, Rafeeq Alam Khan. Brassica rapa Juice Decreases Lipids and Glucose Levels with Improved Atherogenic Index in Rats. Int J Sci Res Updat. 2022 Jul 30; 4(1):086-95. https://doi.org/10.53430/ijsru.2022.4.1.0091

8. Arif A, Gillani SR, Hussain H. Eleocharis dulcis individually and in combination with Brassica rapa as a best cure of diabetes with zero side effects. J Food Process Preserv [Internet]. 2022; 46(9).  https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.16444

9. Mao Y, Peng X, Xue P, Lu D, Li L, Zhu S. Network Pharmacology Study on the Pharmacological Mechanism of Cinobufotalin Injection against Lung Cancer. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2020 Feb 17; 2020:e1246742. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1246742

10. Wang X, Shen Y, Wang S, Li S, Zhang W, Liu X, et al. PharmMapper 2017 update: a web server for potential drug target identification with a comprehensive target pharmacophore database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Jul 3; 45(Web Server issue):W356-60. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx374

11. Daina A, Michielin O, Zoete V. SwissTargetPrediction: updated data and new features for efficient prediction of protein targets of small molecules. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Jul 2; 47(W1):W357-64. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz382

12. Stelzer G, Rosen N, Plaschkes I, Zimmerman S, Twik M, Fishilevich S, et al. The GeneCards Suite: From Gene Data Mining to Disease Genome Sequence Analyses. Curr Protoc Bioinforma. 2016 Jun 20; 54:1.30.1-1.30.33.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cpbi.5

13. Szklarczyk D, Morris JH, Cook H, Kuhn M, Wyder S, Simonovic M, et al. The STRING database in 2017: quality-controlled protein-protein association networks, made broadly accessible. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Jan 4; 45(D1):D362-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw937

14. Chin CH, Chen SH, Wu HH, Ho CW, Ko MT, Lin CY. cytoHubba: identifying hub objects and sub-networks from complex interactome. BMC Syst Biol. 2014 Dec 8; 8(Suppl 4):S11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-8-S4-S11

15. Tipney H, Hunter L. An introduction to effective use of enrichment analysis software. Hum Genomics. 2010 Feb; 4(3):202-6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-7364-4-3-202

16. Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, Gillette MA, et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Oct 25; 102(43):15545-50. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0506580102

17. Kuleshov MV, Jones MR, Rouillard AD, Fernandez NF, Duan Q, Wang Z, et al. Enrichr: a comprehensive gene set enrichment analysis web server 2016 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Jul 8; 44(W1):W90-97. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw377

18. Hanwell MD, Curtis DE, Lonie DC, Vandermeersch T, Zurek E, Hutchison GR. Avogadro: an advanced semantic chemical editor, visualization, and analysis platform. J Cheminformatics. 2012 Aug 13; 4(1):17. https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-2946-4-17

19. Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, Meng EC, et al. UCSF Chimera--a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem. 2004 Oct; 2 5(13):1605-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20084

20. Berman HM, Battistuz T, Bhat TN, Bluhm WF, Bourne PE, Burkhardt K, et al. The Protein Data Bank. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2002 Jun; 58(Pt 6 No 1):899-907. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444902003451

21. Dundas J, Ouyang Z, Tseng J, Binkowski A, Turpaz Y, Liang J. CASTp: computed atlas of surface topography of proteins with structural and topographical mapping of functionally annotated residues. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Jul 1; 34(Web Server issue):W116-118. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl282

22. AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading - PubMed [Internet]. [cited 2023 Mar 9]. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19499576/

23. Ef P, Td G, Cc H, Gs C, Dm G, Ec M, et al. UCSF Chimera--a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem [Internet]. 2004 Oct [cited 2023 Feb 12]; 25(13). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15264254/  https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20084


 

 


Parse error: syntax error, unexpected string content "5d95230bc235864415f2a2323444ee...", expecting ")" in /home/jddtonline/domains/jddtonline.info/public_html/cache/fc-geoIP-all.php on line 26936