Available online on 15.09.2022 at http://jddtonline.info

Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics

Open Access to Pharmaceutical and Medical Research

Copyright  © 2022 The  Author(s): This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial use provided the original author and source are credited

Open Access   Full Text Article                                                                                                                                                                                           Research Article 

Formulation and Evaluation of Floating Tablets of Pantoprazole

Vinod M*1, Chetankumar M*1, Somanath Bote1, Shivanand Kolageri2

Department of Pharmaceutics, BLDEA’s SSM College of Pharmacy and Research Centre, Vijayapura-586103

Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, BLDEA’s SSM College of Pharmacy and Research Centre, Vijayapura-586103

Article Info:

_______________________________________________

Article History:

Received 16 July 2022      

Reviewed 19 August 2022

Accepted 27 August 2022  

Published 15 Sep 2022  

_______________________________________________

Cite this article as: 

Vinod M, Chetankumar M, Bote S, Kolageri S, Formulation and Evaluation of Floating Tablets of Pantoprazole, Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics. 2022; 12(5):34-45

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v12i5.5577    _______________________________________________

*Address for Correspondence:  

Vinod M, Chetankumar M, Department of Pharmaceutics, BLDEA’s SSM College of Pharmacy and Research Centre, Vijayapura-586103

Abstract

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Background: Pantoprazole is a protein pump inhibitor (PPI) used to treat acute duodenal ulcers, acute benign gastric ulcers, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and as a preventative measure for duodenal ulcer. It has a local effect on the stomach and works by competitively inhibiting the enzyme H+/K+ ATP, which is found in the gastric parietal cells. For acute duodenal ulcers, acute benign gastric ulcers, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), the usual oral dosage recommendation is 45 mg, and it is taken for 8–12 weeks.  

Objectives: The preparation of pantoprazole floating tablets was attempted in the current investigation and optimize the formulation using different excipients like Hydroxy ethyl cellulose (HEC), cyclodextrin, sodium bicarbonate, citric acid and microcrystalline cellulose were used in the direct compression method to create pantoprazole floating tablets (250 mg).

Methods: The direct compression method has been used in the current effort to create floating tablets. The active ingredient, sodium bicarbonate, citric acid, microcrystalline cellulose, and hydroxy ethyl cellulose were sieved through sieve no. 60 and blended uniformly with a mortar and pestle. Using a Rotary tablet punch machine, the powder was compacted into tablets after talc and magnesium stearate were added as lubricants 

Results: Preformulation studies were conducted to select suitable excipients, drug/polymer interactions were validated by the FTIR investigation. The manufactured floating tablets were assessed for hardness, weight fluctuation, thickness, friability, drug content homogeneity, floating lag time, and in vitro dissolution experiment studies was conducted. The results were within the limit and were compared with the marketed formulation. 

Conclusion: According to the observations of the current investigation, a floating pantoprazole tablet increases the stomach residence time and bioavailability, increasing therapeutic efficacy. Formulations F1, F2, F4, F5, F7, and F8 showed good floating, but Formulations F3, and F6 showed moderate floating throughout all 8 formulations. The stability analyses that were done for all the formulations showed that the F7 and F8 formulations had good stability.

Keywords: Pantoprazole, Floating tablet, Hydroxy ethyl cellulose (HEC), Cyclodextrin, In-vitro drug release studies.

 


 

INTRODUCTION:

Gastro retentive drug delivery systems are created to be retained in the stomach for an extended period of time while releasing their active ingredients, allowing for sustained and prolonged medication input to the upper section of the gastrointestinal tract 1,2. Drugs that act locally in the stomach, have an absorption window in the stomach or upper part of the small intestine, are unstable in the intestinal or colonic environments, or have low solubility at high pH values are of particular interest for modified release drug delivery systems with prolonged residence times in the stomach 3. Since they are buoyant in the stomach for a longer duration without changing the gastric emptying rate, floating medication delivery methods have a lower bulk density than gastric fluids 4. Drug delivery by the oral route is the most practical and popular method. The polymers utilized in these systems and the formulations for controlled drug delivery have advanced significantly in recent years, enabling them to perform functions other than merely extending the drug's release time. These are designed to distribute the drug's active component gradually and predictably over a 12- to 24-hour period. Through more reliable medicine delivery, diminished side effects, increased convenience, and improved rates of patient compliance, they offer greater effectiveness in the treatment of chronic illness conditions. When a polymer, natural or synthetic, is correctly coupled with a drug or other active agent so that the active medication is delivered in a predetermined manner, this is known as controlled drug delivery. Less absorption, potential toxicity, and the creation of unfavorable byproducts are some drawbacks of these goods, notwithstanding their benefits. Floating drug delivery systems and other delivery methods with extended gastric residence times were developed to solve these problems. These systems fall under the category of gastro-retentive dosage forms, which are retained in the stomach for longer periods of time, assisting in the absorption of the drug for the intended duration of time. The floating system is an extensively used technique in this. Most often, the non-effervescent approach was used to prepare floating systems [.

When dissolved in water, hydroxyethyl cellulose, also known as hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC), creates a colloid solution. It is a semi-synthetic, inert, and viscoelastic polymer. It functions as a binder during the granulation process and in modified release formulations as well as a thickening agent, coating polymer, bio adhesive, solubility enhancer in solid dispersions, and binder. It is frequently employed as a delivery element in oral pharmaceutical products to give the controlled release of a drug, effectively increasing the time of release to extend the therapeutic effects of a drug 6.

Pantoprazole is a protein pump inhibitor (PPI) used to treat acute duodenal ulcers, acute benign gastric ulcers, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and as a preventative measure for duodenal ulcer. It has a local effect on the stomach and works by competitively inhibiting the enzyme H+/K+ ATP, which is found in the gastric parietal cells. For acute duodenal ulcers, acute benign gastric ulcers, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), the usual oral dosage recommendation is 45 mg, and it is taken for 8–12 weeks. The drug is suitable for FDDS due to short biological half-life (1-2 h) and local activity in stomach 7.

Floating system

Floating drug delivery systems (FDDS) float in the stomach without slowing down the gastric emptying rate since their bulk density is lower than that of gastric fluids. The medicine is slowly withdrawn from the system at the desired rate while the body is floating on the contents of the stomach. The stomach's residual system is emptied following medication release 8.


 

 

Classification of Floating Drug Delivery System:

Figure 1: Schematic diagram classification of floating drug delivery system

 


 

DRUG AND EXCIPIENTS PROFILE: 

Pantoprazole 9,10

Figure 2: Pantoprazole

Chemical formula                 : C16H15F2N3O4S

Chemical name    : 6-(difluoro methoxy)-2-[(3,4-dimethoxy pyridine-2yl)methane sulfinyl]-1H-1,3benzodiazole.

Molecular weight                  : 383.4 g/ml 

Category                                    : Acid reducer 

Solubility                                  : Freely soluble in water

Mechanism of action

A proton pump inhibitor (PPI), pantoprazole covalently binds to the (H+, K+)-ATP enzyme system at the secretory surface of the gastric parietal cell to block the last stage of stomach acid generation. Regardless of the stimulus, this action results in the suppression of both basal and induced stomach acid secretion. For all of the studied doses, the binding to the (H+, K+)-ATPase causes an antisecretory action to last longer than 24 hours.

Pharmacokinetics:

To ensure that pantoprazole is only absorbed once the tablet has left the stomach, pantoprazole sodium is produced as an enteric-coated tablet. From 10 mg to 80 mg, the peak serum concentration (Cmax) and area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC) both rise proportionally to oral and intravenous dosages. Multiple daily doses of pantoprazole have no effect on its pharmacokinetics or ability to accumulate. The max of pantoprazole increases considerably and is extremely variable when administered with meals.

Absorption:

To ensure that pantoprazole is only absorbed once the tablet has left the stomach, pantoprazole sodium is produced as an enteric-coated tablet. From 10 mg to 80 mg, the peak serum concentration (Cmax) and area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC) both rise proportionally to oral and intravenous dosages. Multiple daily doses of pantoprazole have no effect on its pharmacokinetics or ability to accumulate. The max of pantoprazole increases considerably and is extremely variable when administered with meals.

Distribution:

Pantoprazole appears to be distributed in a volume between 11.0 and 23.6 liters, mostly in extracellular fluid. About 98% of pantoprazole's serum protein binding is to albumin.

Metabolism:

Through the cytochrome P450 (CYP) system, pantoprazole is extensively metabolized in the liver. The method of administration has no effect on how pantoprazole is metabolized (intravenous or oral). The primary metabolic mechanism is demethylation by CYP2C19 followed by sulfation. CYP3A4 is another metabolic pathway. Even though these slow pantoprazole metabolizer subpopulations have elimination half-lives of 3.5 to 10.0 h, they nevertheless accumulate very little (23%) with once-daily dosage.

Elimination:

The amount of pantoprazole that was eliminated after a single oral or intravenous dose in healthy, normally metabolizing volunteers was roughly 71% in the urine and 18% in the feces as a result of biliary excretion. The unaltered drug pantoprazole was not excreted by the kidneys.

Drug-drug interactions:

Pantoprazole may be lowering plasma concentrations when used with atazanavir, indinavir, and nelfinavir. Atazanavir should not be administered together. Itraconazole and ketoconazole plasma levels may be affected; if at all possible, stay away from this combination. Digoxin serum levels may rise in response to proton pump inhibitors. Pantoprazole and zinc cannot be combined.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

MATERIALS:

All the materials used in the formulation and evaluation of floating tablets of pantoprazole are listed below, distilled water was used for all preparations.


 

 

Table 1: List of materials used with suppliers

SL.NO

Materials used

Grade

Manufacturer

1.

Pantoprazole

Pharma grade

R.P Pharma MUMBAI

2.

Hydroxyethyl cellulose

LR

Yarrow chem Mumbai

3.

Ethyl cellulose

LR

Central drug            house New Delhi

4.

Β-Cyclodextrin

LR

Himedia Laboratories Mumbai

5.

Microcrystalline cellulose

LR

Mylo-chem Mumbai

6.

Citric acid

LR

Qualigens chemicals Mumbai

7.

Sodium bicarbonate

LR

Mylo-chem Mumbai

8.

Talc

LR

Powder pack chem. Mumbai

9.

Magnesium stearate

LR

Mylo-chem Mumbai

 

 


 

METHODS:

Standard calibration curve for pantoprazole in Distilled water: 

Solution 1st:

Pantoprazole (pure medication), accurately weighed at 100 mg, was diluted in distilled water in a volumetric flask with a capacity of 100 mL (1000 g/mL). The stock solution was further diluted to a concentration of 100 g/ml 11.

Solution 2nd:

1 ml of this first stock solution was pipette out into a 100 ml volumetric flask, and the remaining volume was made up with distilled water that had a concentration of 10 g/ml from the second stock solution. From this pipette, measure out (1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 ml) evenly into a 10 ml volumetric flask, and add distilled water to make up the difference. Using a UV-visible double beam spectrophotometer, the absorbance of these solutions was determined in comparison to a blank sample at (291nm). The concentration in g/ml was then plotted on the X-axis and the absorbance on the Y-axis to create a calibration curve 12.

Preparation of Floating Tablets:

The direct compression method has been used in the current effort to create floating tablets. The active ingredient, sodium bicarbonate, citric acid, microcrystalline cellulose, and hydroxy ethyl cellulose were sieved through sieve no. 60 and blended uniformly with a mortar and pestle. Using a Rotary tablet punch machine, the powder was compacted into tablets after talc and magnesium stearate were added as lubricants 13.


 

 

 Figure 3: Formulated floating pantoprazole tablets

Table 2: Formulation; Ratio of polymers (1:2:3) quantity taken in (mg).

Ingredients

F1

F2

F3

F4

F5

F6

F7

F8

Pantoprazole

40

40

40

40

40

40

40

40

HEC

40

80

120

-

-

-

80

40

Ethylcellulose

40

40

40

40

40

40

20

20

β-cyclodextrin,

-

-

-

40

80

120

40

80

MCC

80

40

20

80

40

20

20

20

Citric acid

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

Na HCO3

20

20

10

20

20

10

20

20

Talc

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

Mg. stearate

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

Total weight. (mg)

250

250

250

250

250

250

250

250

 


 

Evaluation of pre-compression parameters of powder:

The angle of repose: The fixed funnel and free-standing cone approach both make use of a funnel with its tip fixed at a specific height, h, which was maintained above graph paper that was laid out on a level horizontal surface. The following equation can be used to calculate the angle of repose, where r is the radius of the conical pile.

𝜃 = 𝑇𝑎𝑛 − 1(ℎ/𝑟)

Where, 𝜃 is the angle of repose, h-is height of pile, r is radius of base of the pile

Table 3: Angle of Repose

Angle of repose (𝜽degree

Flow

≤25

Excellent

25-30

Good

30-40

Passable

40≥

Poor

Bulk density & Tapped density: The bulk density as well as the tapped bulk density were calculated. Granules weighing 2gm from each formula were added to the 10ml measuring cylinder after being lightly shaken to break up any formed agglomerates. The cylinder was allowed to drop down from a height of 2.5 cm at intervals of 2 seconds after its initial volume was recorded. Up until there was no longer any loudness change, the tapping was continued.

 

 

Carr’s index: The compressibility index of the granules was determined by Carr’s compressibility index

 

Hausner’s ratio: Hausner’s ratio is an indirect index of case of powder flow. 

Hausner’s ratio can be determined by the following equation. 

Hausner’s ratio = 𝝆𝒕/𝝆𝒅

Where = ρt is tapped density and ρd is bulk density 14.

Table 4: Hausner’s Ratio

Hausner’s ratio

Types of flow

Less than 1.25

Good flow

Greater than1.25

Poor flow

Between 1.25-1.5

The addition of a glidant normally improves the flow

 

Evaluation of post compression parameters of floating tablets of Pantoprazole:

  1. Appearance
  2. Thickness
  3. Hardness
  4. Weight variation test
  5. Friability test
  6. Drug content uniformity
  7. In vitro dissolution study
  8. In vitro residence time
  9. Drug-polymer interaction by FT-IR
  10. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC)
  11. Stability studies
  12. Shape of the tablet: Tablets from each formulation batch were examined under a microscope and revealed to have a round shape without any cracks.
  13. Thickness: The crown thickness of each tablet was measured by a Vernier caliper.
  14. Hardness: The Monsanto hardness tester is used to assess the tablet's hardness. Each tablet formulation's observed hardness ranged from 3.8 to 5.1 kg/cm2. This guarantees that all compositions have good handling properties.
  15. Weight variation test: Using an electronic balance, five pills of each formulation were weighed separately. Based on that, the average weight was determined. By comparing the weight of each tablet with the average tablet weight, the percent deviation was computed.
  16. Friability test: Three pills of each formulation were weighed precisely and put inside the friability chamber. 100 rotations of the apparatus were made. The tablets were reweighed after rotations to determine the weight reduction. The weight reduction shouldn't decrease by more than 1%.
  17. Drug content uniformity: Each formulation's five pills are weighed, then they are ground up in a mortar and combined. The 100ml volumetric flask then received 10mg of the substance. The pantoprazole concentration in ug/ml was determined by using a standard calibration curve of the drug. The drug was allowed to dissolve in the solvent (0.1N HCL), the solution was filtered, 1ml of the filtrate was taken in 50ml of volumetric flask, diluted up to 50ml mark with 0.1NHCL, and then analyzed spectrophotometrically at 291nm 15.
  18. In vitro dissolution studies: The paddle method of the USP dissolution test apparatus was used to calculate the in vitro release of pantoprazole floating tablet. At 370 0.50c and 100 rpm, the dissolving test was conducted using 900ml of 0.1nhcl. Five millilitres of the solution were taken out of the dissolving equipment and replaced with a new dissolution medium. A u-v visible spectrophotometer was used to test the samples' absorbance at 291 nm after they had been filtered. To calculate the release profile, the cumulative percentage of drug release was plotted against time 16.
  19. In vitro residence time: The amount of time needed for the tablet to float and ascend to the surface is known as the buoyancy lag time. The entire floating time for floating tablets was measured using the floating lag time test, and the floating behavior was checked. Floating lag time was used to determine the in vitro residence period. The tablets were dropped into the dissolution medium, which is 0.1NHCL, and the time it took for them to float to the surface of the dissolution media was recorded 17,18.
  20. Drug-polymer interaction by FT-IR: FT-IR was used to research drug polymer interaction. IR spectra of pantoprazole, HEC, and -cyclodextrin 19.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:

The main goal of this research was to create novel floating pantoprazole pills that would float in the stomach for a long duration, increasing their oral bioavailability by extending their gastric residence time.

Pre-formulation Studies:

Appearance: Physical appearance of the drug was found to be cream color powder drug was freely soluble in distilled water and insoluble in n-hexane.

The calibration curve of pantoprazole was obtained in distilled water at 291nm and Absorbance data for the calibration curve of pantoprazole in distilled water.


 

 

 

 

 

Table 5: Spectrophotometric data for estimation of pantoprazole

SL. No

Concentration (µg/ml)

Absorbance

1.

0

0

2.

1

0.201

3.

2

0.274

4.

3

0.384

5.

4

0.487

6.

5

0.577

 





 


Pre-Compression Evaluation of Pantoprazole Floating Tablets:

Table 6: Pre-compression parameters of pantoprazole floating tablet

Formulations

Angle of repose

Bulk density

Tapped density

Carr’s Index

Hausner’s ratio

F1

38.41

0.58

0.70

17.14

1.20

F2

32.61

0.60

0.73

17.80

1.21

F3

33.82

0.60

0.73

17.80

1.21

F4

36.50

0.55

0.65

15.38

1.18

F5

32.61

0.56

0.66

15.15

1.17

F6

33.02

0.57

0.67

14.92

1.17

F7

32.61

0.57

0.75

24

1.13

F8

33.42

0.57

0.68

16.17

1.19

 

Table 7: Evaluation data of pantoprazole floating tablet

Formulation

Thickness (mm) n=20

Weight variation

(mg)

Hard ness (kg/c m)

Friability (%)

Drug content (%)

Floating time (hrs)

Floating lag time (sec)

F1

3.845±0.045

245±05

4.9±0.11

0.81±0.09

97

12

63

F2

4.045±0.045

246±05

4.80±0.19

0.41±0.08

90.35

14

72

F3

5.04±0.040

248±05

4.70±0.38

0.28±0.04

94.1

12

83

F4

4.73±0.023

235±05

5.9±0.36

0.85±0.03

99.6

14

92

F5

4.385±0.0385

246±05

5.8±0.31

0.41±0.01

98.05

18

88

F6

4.41±0.041

247±05

5.9±0.32

0.35±0.02

97.1

7

86

F7

4.345±0.345

244±05

5.3±0.33

0.21±0.03

89.9

8

72

F8

4.14±0.141

248±05

5.1±0.28

0.36±0.07

89.6

11

68

 

 


 

The FT-IR study was carried out to find out the possible interaction between selected drug pantoprazole and polymers hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, Cassava starch and polyvinyl pyrrolidone. FT-IR of pantoprazole showed the following peaks at 3483.56, 3358.18, 3176.87, 2960.83, 1591.33, 1373.36 and 1049.31nm due to N-H, O-H, CH2, CH3, C-O, C-F and S=O functional groups shown in figure 5,6,7 and 8. F1 to F8 formulations were optimized based on floating time and drug release profile. The floating study of prepared tablets was carried out in 0.1N HCL buffer and the results are shown in table-8 and 9.

The main aim of this work was to develop new floating tablets of Pantoprazole to increase its oral bioavailability by prolonging its gastric residence time and allowed to float in the stomach for a long period.


 

Table 8: In vitro drug release of formulation F1, F2, F3, F4

Sl.

No

Time

(hrs)

Square root of time (hrs)

Log Time (hrs)

F1

F2

F3

F4

%

drug released

Log % drug released

% Drug released

Log % drug released

%

drug released

Log % drug released

%

drug released

Log % drug released

1

0.0

0.000

0.000

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

0.5

0.707

0.301

11.35

1.05

11.90

1.07

12.05

1.08

9.77

0.98

3

1.0

1.000

0.000

19.7

1.29

17.68

1.24

18.65

1.27

16.34

1.21

4

1.5

1.225

0.176

26.03

1.41

24.31

1.38

27.31

1.43

26.5

1.42

5

2.0

1.414

0.301

34.24

1.53

31.52

1.49

35.11

1.54

31.17

1.49

6

3.0

1.732

0.477

41.60

1.61

39.58

1.59

42.36

1.62

39.18

1.59

7

4.0

2.000

0.602

48.92

1.68

47.51

1.67

47.55

1.67

44.57

1.64

8

5.0

2.236

0.698

54.29

1.73

52.68

1.72

53.11

1.72

49.34

1.69

9

6.0

2.449

0.778

58.95

1.77

56.37

1.75

58.13

1.76

55.61

1.74

10

7.0

2.646

0.845

64.08

1.80

61.01

1.78

65.77

1.81

61.37

1.78

11

8.0

2.828

0.903

68.06

1.83

66.17

1.82

71.33

1.5

68.11

1.83

12

10

3.102

1.000

73.35

1.86

71.77

1.85

77.78

1.89

74.37

1.87

13

12

3.464

1.079

79.68

1.90

76.88

1.88

81.01

1.90

76.92

1.88

 

 

Table 9: In vitro drug release of formulation F5, F6, F7, F8                                                                       

Sl.

No

Time

(hrs)

Square root of time (hrs)

Log Time (hrs)

F5

F6

F7

F8

%

drug released

Log % drug released

% Drug released

Log % drug released

%

drug released

Log % drug released

%

drug released

Log % drug released

1

0.0

0.000

0.000

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

0.5

0.707

0.301

8.99

0.95

10.37

1.01

13.45

1.12

12.69

1.10

3

1.0

1.000

0.000

17.31

1.23

16.33

1.21

21.35

1.32

24.42

1.38

4

1.5

1.225

0.176

23.45

1.37

21.45

1.33

27.81

1.44

31.45

1.49

5

2.0

1.414

0.301

30.11

1.47

28.11

1.44

31.48

1.49

39.11

1.59

6

3.0

1.732

0.477

36.12

1.55

34.44

1.53

39.68

1.59

46.62

1.66

7

4.0

2.000

0.602

42.17

1.62

41.36

1.61

45.31

1.65

53.11

1.72

8

5.0

2.236

0.698

47.31

1.67

46.31

1.66

52.11

1.71

59.95

1.77

9

6.0

2.449

0.778

51.95

1.71

50.87

1.70

59.71

1.77

67.31

1.82

10

7.0

2.646

0.845

58.36

1.76

56.31

1.75

63.21

1.80

72.13

1.85

11

8.0

2.828

0.903

63.33

1.80

61.73

1.79

72.93

1.86

78.17

1.89

12

10

3.102

1.000

70.95

1.85

71.35

1.85

81.03

1.90

84.07

1.92

13

12

3.464

1.079

73.98

1.86

75.36

1.87

83.21

1.92

86.17

1.93

 

Table 10: Stability Studies

Sl. No

Time

F1

F2

F3

F4

F5

F6

F7

F8

1.

0

97

90.3

94.1

92.3

94.5

89.1

96.3

98.8

2.

1 month

96.5

87.0

92.6

90.1

91.

88.5

94.8

96.9

 


 

In-vitro floating time pattern of pantoprazole tablets:

In the present research floating tablets of pantoprazole were prepared by direct compression method using two polymers as Hydroxy ethyl cellulose and β-Cyclodextrin.

Pantoprazole floating tablets were prepared by using HEC and β-Cyclodextrin (F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8). The powder evaluation suggested that all the prepared powders exhibited good flow properties, as the angle of repose value were less than 300 (table-6) A good packing ability of the powder was indicated by carr’s index (table-6). The weight, thickness and drug contents of all the tablets were found to be uniform. The hardness was in the range of 5.0 to 6.5kg/cm2 and friability was in the range of 0.23 to 0.95% and drug content was in the range of 0.86 to 99.6% (table-7)


 

 

     

Table 11: Kinetic values of pantoprazole floating tablets

Formulation

Zero order equation

First order equation

Higuchi equation

Korsemeyer’s equation

n

r

n

r

n

r

n

r

F1

15.83

0.903

64.15

0.285

-2.255

0.992

0.909

0.591

F2

14.75

0.910

65.30

0.264

-2.733

0.992

0.887

0.612

F3

15.49

0.915

64.43

0.307

-2.941

0.991

0.911

0.597

F4

13.64

0.921

66.38

0.278

-3.976

0.989

0.864

0.615

F5

12.75

0.929

67.43

0.242

-3.905

0.992

0.855

0.614

F6

11.64

0.948

68.39

0.248

-4.760

0.991

0.843

0.637

F7

14.70

0.939

65.33

0.334

-3.631

0.991

0.917

0.597

F8

18.67

0.893

61.35

0.370

-1.459

0.989

0.964

0.560

 

 


 

CONCLUSION

In the current investigation, an effort was made to keep the dosage form in the stomach for longer. By creating floating drug delivery systems, this can be accomplished. These pills are made primarily by cutting down on lag time, which may also boost bioavailability. Beta-cyclodextrin was utilized as a polymer for the creation of floating tablets HEC. Talc, microcrystalline cellulose, ethyl cellulose, citric acid (a gas-generating agent), sodium bicarbonate, magnesium stearate, and other excipients are also utilized.

The absence of any interactions between the medication, polymer, and excipient was established by DSC and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. The manufactured floating tablets underwent tests to determine their stiffness, weight fluctuation, thickness, friability, homogeneity of the drug content, buoyancy lag time, total floating time, swelling index, and in vitro dissolution investigations. The 8 formulations F1, F2, F4, F5, F7, and F8 all exhibited strong floating characteristics, whereas F3 & F6 displayed moderate floating. Studies on stability were done for all the formulations, and F7 and F8 demonstrated good stability.

It was shown that the highest drug release from F7 & F8 was up to 86.17% within 12 hours. The following four models were tested: zero order, first order, Higuchi model, and Peppas model. It was discovered that medication release and floating ability were significantly influenced by the concentration of polymers and gas-generating agents. Thus, it may be concluded that a stable dose form for pantoprazole with controlled release can be created. The DSC investigation shows there is no drug-polymer interaction, and the stability study demonstrates the high stability of all tablet formulations.

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors declare that no financial or commercial ties that might be viewed as creating a conflict of interest existed throughout the research.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The authors are grateful to the Department of Pharmaceutics and Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, BLDEA’S SSM College of Pharmacy and Research Centre, Vijayapura for providing facilities to perform the research work.

REFERENCES

  1. Bagherwal A, Patidar DK, Sharma P. Formulation and evaluation of floating tablets of ciprofloxacin hydrochloride. Int J Comp Pharma 2010; 1:1-4. 
  2. Kumar R. Development and in-vitro evaluation of sustained release floating matrix tablets of metformin hydrochloride. Int J Pharm Sci Res 2010; 1:96-101. 
  3. Chodavarapu NP, Yendluri RB, Suryadevara H, Reddy P, Chhatoi P. Formulation and evaluation of abelmoschusesculentus mucilage-based metformin hydrochloride floating matrix tablets. Int J Pharm Tech 2011; 3:2725-45.
  4. Kshirsagar RV, Jain V, Wattamwar S. Effect of different viscocity grade HPMC polymer on gastroretantive drug delivery of metformin hydrochloride. Int J Appl Pharm 2009; 1:44-50.
  5. Doppalapudi Sandeep, A. P. Pratyusha, G. Sudheshna, K. Lakshmi prasanna, P. Sreekanth. Preparation and Evaluation of Pantoprazole sodium floating microspheres Res. J. Pharm. Dosage Form. and Tech. 2014; 6(3):218-222.
  6. Li CL, Martini LG, Ford JL, Roberts M. The use of hypromellose in oral drug delivery. Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology. 2005 May; 57(5):533-46. https://doi.org/10.1211/0022357055957
  7. Bharat W. Tekade, Umesh T. Jadhao, Pankaj H. Bari *, Dipali G.Chaudhary. Vijay. R. Patil. Formulation and evaluation of pantoprazole floating tablet by using natural gum J. Pharm. Sci. Innov. 2017; 6(4). https://doi.org/10.7897/2277-4572.06460
  8. Arun D, VenuGopal N, Shekar L, Ramarao B. A review of novel approach in bilayer tablet technology. International Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences. 2012 Apr; 1(1):1-8.
  9. Indian Pharmacopoeia. Delhi: The controller of publications. 1996; (1).
  10. Wade A, Weller P. Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients. London: Pharmaceutical press 1994; 4:151-52.
  11. JECFA. Metals and arsenic specifications revised. Published in FNP 31/2(1984)
  12. Sarambi PS, Sonawane A, Malipati SM, spectropphotometric estimataion of Ganciclovir in bulk drug and its formulation. INT.J. of pharm. Tch res. 2010; 2920:1264-1268.
  13. Sandip BS, Mahesh BN, Gautam DM, Prasad VR, Amit MP. Formulation and evaluation of gastroretentive floating tablets of acyclovir. World J. of pharmacy and pharm. Sci.2012; 1(4):1402-14012.
  14. Disckon RB, Rajeshbhai TH, Sureshkumar P, Jamsheer AKK, Senthil A. formulations and evaluation of gastroretentive floating tablets of Glipizide. INT.J.Of Res. In ayurveda&pharmacy.2011; 2930:9111-917.
  15. Sarangapani S, RajappanM, Lansoprazole from a floating dosage form based on the natural polymer of declonix regia, Int.j. of pharm. Tech. and res 2012; 4(3):1084-1095.
  16. Dhiman S, Sing TG, design and optimization of floating matrix tablets of famontidine by central composite design Asian J, of pharm and clinical res. 2012; 5(1); 45-49.
  17. Jagadale SC, Agavelakr AJ, Pandya SV, Kuchalkar BS, Chabuksawar AR, formulation and evaluation of gastroretentive drug delivery system of propranolol hydrochloride. 2009; 10(3):1071-1079. https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-009-9300-8
  18. Bhoi P, Dsh RK, Dalai MK, formulation and evaluation of matrix tablets of Diclofenac sodium. Int.j. of pharm.tech res. 2010;2(4):2420-2428.
  19. Josephine LJ, Mehul RT, Wilson B, Shanaz B, Bincy R, formulatioin and evalution of floating microspheres of anti-retro viral drug as a gastroretentive dosage form. Int.j.of res in pharmacy and chem.. 2011; 1(3):519-527.