Available online on 15.01.2022 at http://jddtonline.info

Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics

Open Access to Pharmaceutical and Medical Research

Copyright   © 2022 The  Author(s): This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial use provided the original author and source are credited

Open Access  Full Text Article                                                                                                                        Research Article 

Formulation and Evaluation of Essential Oil Encapsulated Mosquito Repellent Gel

Pramod Kumar*1, Rohit Kumar Bijauliya2, Balbir Singh2Priti Yadav1 and Wasim Ahmed Khan3

Department of Pharmacy, Rameshwaram Institute of Technology and Management, Lucknow- 227202, India

BIU College of Pharmacy, Bareilly International University, Bareilly-243006, Uttar Pradesh, India

Modern College of Pharmacy, Kochhabhawar, Jhansi-284128, Uttar Pradesh, India

Article Info:

________________________________________

Article History:

Received 12 November 2021      

Reviewed 16 December 2021

Accepted 21 December 2021  

Published 15 January 2022  

________________________________________

Cite this article as: 

Kumar P, Bijauliya RK, Singh B, Yadav P, Khan WA, Formulation and Evaluation of Essential Oil Encapsulated Mosquito Repellent Gel, Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics. 2022; 12(1):23-29  

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v12i1.5265                  ___________________________________________

*Address for Correspondence:  

Pramod Kumar, Research Scholar, Department of Pharmacy, Rameshwaram Institute of Technology and Management,

Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India

Abstract

____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Mosquitoes can be found in almost every country. Many mosquito repellents have been introduced to the market in order to combat them. The mosquitos, on the other hand, developed a resistance to them. Not only that, but users are experiencing a variety of known and unknown negative side effects. As a result, a poly herbal insect repellent gel has been developed in an attempt to give dependable, long-lasting, and full protection from mosquito bites by destroying them. Three essential oils were included in the formulation of the mosquito repellent gel, as well as polymers such as tween 80, span 20, Carbopol 934, and triethanolamine. They were assessed based on their actions. Spreadibility, viscosity, swelling index, and mosquito repellent activity were used to evaluate the prepared mosquito repellent gel. As acceptance criterion, all parameters received favorable responses. The rheological study and mosquito repellent activity are highly correlated. Although the results of the current trials are promising, there is still room for more pharmacokinetic research.

Keywords: Essential Oil, Emulsion Formulations, Gel, Mosquito Repellent Activity 

 


 

INTRODUCTION: 

Mosquitoes are among the most vexing bloodsucking insects that plague humans 1, 2. Several mosquito species from the genera Anopheles, Culex, and Aedes serve as vectors for pathogens associated with diseases such as Dengue fever, Malaria, Yellow fever, Japanese encephalitis, and others 3. Mosquitoes alone transmit diseases to over 700 million people, and over one million people die each year around the world. Four and five as a result, mosquito control is a major public health concern globally 4, 5.

Because the majority of mosquito repellent products and devices on the market have been reported to be harmful to humans, the goal of this study is to develop an effective essential oil-based mosquito repellent gel.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: 

The selection of the plants was based on their availability as raw materials, scientific evidence and folkloric use as mosquito repellents. The essential were procured from local market of Lucknow.

 

Formulation Development:

A) Preparation of Emulsion:

  1. Firstly, take a 100 ml beaker and add 0.5 ml of lemon grass oil, 0.5 ml camphor oil and 0.5 ml eucalyptus oil.
  2. Then add 1ml of span 20 in beaker and shake for few minutes.
  3. Then taken another beaker (II) and add 1.5 ml of tween 80 and then add 3.5 ml distilled water in beaker (II) and shake for few minutes
  4. Then beaker (II) sample add dropwise in beaker (I) and shake till the until clear transparent emulsion are not obtained.

B) Preparation of Gel Base:

  1. Firstly, take 500 mg of Carbopol 934 was taken in a 500 ml beaker and 40 ml distilled water was added into the beaker.
  2. Now the mixture was kept on mechanical stirrer for 1 hours.
  3. Now add 2-3 drops of triethanolamine was added to clear and transparent gel was formed.

C) Preparation of Mosquito Repellent Gel: Firstly, take the prepared gel 40.5 gm in 500ml beaker and add prepared emulsion 7.5 ml then volume make up 50gm with distilled water and stirrer for few minutes till a clear transparent gel was formed. Finally, the gel was placed into a plastic container, allowing for testing 5.


 

 

 

Flow Chart 1: Formulation of Emulgel

 


 

Evaluation of Gels:  Gels were evaluated for their clarity, pH, viscosity, spreadability, by using standard procedure All studies were carried out in triplicate and average values were reported 6.

A) Clarity: Visual assessment of several formulations against a black and white background was used to grade their clarity, which was graded as follows: turbid: +, clear: ++, very clear (glassy): +++.7

B) pH: 2.5 g of gel was weighed and mixed with 25 mL of distilled water. A digital pH meter was used to determine the dispersion's pH. (Systronics pH system 3628.

C) Homogeneity: After the gels had been placed in the container, they were visually inspected for homogeneity and any aggregates 6

D) Spreadability: It was determined by wooden block and glass slide apparatus and for the determination of spreadibility excess of sample was applied in between two glass slides and was compressed to uniform thickness by placing 1000gm weight for 5 minutes. Weight (50 gm) was added to pan. The time required to separate the two slides, i.e. the time in which the upper glass slide moves over the lower plates was taken as measure of spreadability (S) 6. This formula was used to calculate spreadibility:

S = ML/T

Where, S= Spreadability, M= Weight tide to upper slide, 

L= Length moved on the glass slide, T= Time taken to separate the slide completely from each other

E) Viscosity Measurement: The gels' viscosity was measured with a Brookfield Viscometer and a tiny sample adaptor with the spindle number SC4-18/13R. A toque ranging from 10% to 100% was applied to the gel. The viscosity was calculated using the software Rheocal. 7

F) Extrudability: The Pfizer harness tester was used to conduct the extrudability test. In an aluminum tube, 15 gram of gel was placed. The plunger was adjusted to adequately grasp the tube. For 30 seconds, a pressure of 1 kg/cm2 was applied. The amount of gel extruded was measured and weighed. The operation was done three times at equal distances along the tube.  Test was carried out in triplicates 7.

F) Swelling Index: Using 2 gm of dermal polyherbal gel in a beaker containing 10 ml distilled water, the swelling index of the gel was calculated. The swollen formulation was removed from the beaker and placed on a petridish after one hour (CEVC G, 2004). The swelling index was calculated using the following formula:

Swelling index (Si) = Wt -Wo / Wt × 100

Where, Wt = weight of swollen at t time, Wo = original weight of gel at zero time.

G) Mosquito Repellant Activity: Initially, volunteers' forearms were carefully cleansed with soap and dried completely. The control was maintained within the mosquito cage using the left arm. Within 30 seconds, the frequency of the vector settled on the forearm. The investigation began when the mosquitoes landed in groups of more than ten. After 30 seconds, the arm was carefully withdrawn from the mosquito cage, and the right arm was wiped with mosquito repellent gel formulation, and the trial was repeated after 30, 60, 120, 240, and 480 minutes, in the same manner. The number of mosquitos that landed was counted and compared to a positive control group (Transfluthrin) 9. The study was performed in triplicate manner.

H) Accelerated Stability Studies: The For 90 days, the improved formulation was exposed to accelerated stability (40°C 2°C temperature; 75 percent 5 percent relative humidity). The prepared gel formulation was stored in a PVC container with a black foil covering. Physical appearance, pH, readability, viscosity, and extrudability were considered as key characteristics 10.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Physical Appearance of Essential Oil:

1. Lemon grass oil

2. Camphor oil

3. Eucalyptus oil

FTIR Study: FTIR Spectra of Eucalyptus oil, Camphor oil and Lemongrass oil in their pure form was recorded. The FTIR spectrum of essential oil are shown in figure 1, 2 and 3. The IR spectrum interpretation of essential oil (Eucalyptus oil, Camphor oil and Lemongrass oil) is given in Table 1, 2, 3.


 

 

 

Figure 1: FTIR of Eucalyptus oil

Table 1: Interpretation of FTIR of Eucalyptus oil

S. No.

Frequency (cm-1)

Assignments

1

3416.73

-OH Stretching

2

2959.95

-CH2 asymmetric stretching

3

1645.20

C-C binding with aromatic ring stretching

4

1446.78

Alkene type stretching

5

1375.59

C=C stretch

6

784.11

C-OH out of plane bending

 

 

Figure 2: FTIR of Camphor oil


 

Table 2: Interpretation of FTIR of Camphor

S. No.

Frequency (cm-1)

Assignments

1

3387.13

-OH Stretching

2

2924.28

-CH2 asymmetric stretching

3

1746.62

C-C binding with aromatic ring stretching

4

1458.79

Alkene type stretching

5

1377.01

C=C stretch

6

766.88

C-OH out of plane bending

 

 

Figure 3: FTIR of Lemongrass

Table 3: Interpretation of FTIR of Lemongrass oil

S. No.

Frequency (cm-1)

Assignments

1

3403.01

-OH Stretching

2

2926.07

-CH2 asymmetric stretching

3

1745.34

C-C binding with aromatic ring stretching

4

1458.49

Alkene type stretching

5

1161.94

C=C stretch

6

721.47

C-OH out of plane bending

 

FTIR spectrum showed characteristic peaks and bands which are representing the presence of functional groups which help in the identification of the drug. These bending and stretching in the FTIR spectrum expressed the structure of camphor oil, lemon grass oil and eucalyptus oil and the presence of functional groups in the active moiety which would be responsible for the characteristics of the drug, and it would also act as a helping tool for the identification of camphor oil, lemon grass oil and eucalyptus oil.

Compatibility Study of Essential Oil: Principle peaks of essential oil were observed retained; broadening of peaks may be due to overlapping of peaks of polymer system. From the spectral study it was observed that the FTIR spectrum of pure essential oil (camphor oil, eucalyptus oil, lemongrass oil) there was no significant change in the peaks essential oil polymer mixture. Therefore, it can be inferred that there was no specific interaction observed between the essential oil and the polymers.

 image

Figure 4: FTIR of mixture of Essential oils

Table 4: Interpretation of FTIR of mixture of Essential oils

S. No.

Frequency (cm-1)

Assignments

1

3405.42

-OH Stretching

2

2925.07

-CH2 asymmetric stretching

3

1746.18

C-C binding with aromatic ring stretching

4

1376.62

Alkene type stretching

5

1160.56

C=C stretch

6

722.75

C-OH out of plane bending

 

 

Figure 5: FTIR Study of emulsion

Table 5: Interpretation of FTIR of emulsion

S. No.

Frequency (cm-1)

Assignments

1

3416.18

-OH Stretching

2

2858.51

-CH2 asymmetric stretching

3

2086.16

C-C binding with aromatic ring stretching

4

1380.18

Alkene type stretching

5

1248.78

C=C stretch

6

770.43

C-OH out of plane bending

 

FORMULATION DEVELOPMENT:

A) Preparation of Emulsion: Various types of essential oil was used for the preparation of emulsion. List of ingredient show Table 6.

 

Table 6: Formulation of Emulsion 3%

S. No.

Chemicals

Quantity

1

Lemongrass oil

0.5 ml

2

Camphor oil

0.5 ml

3

Eucalyptus oil

0.5 ml

4

Tween 80

1.5 ml

5

Span 20

1 ml

6

Distilled Water

3.5 ml

 

B) Preparation of Gel Base: Formulation of gel base with the Carbopol and triethanolamine for the development of mosquito repellent gel.

Table 7: Formulation of Gel Base I

S. No.

Chemicals

Quantity

1

Carbopol 934

0.5 gm

2

Triethanolamine

Few drops

3

Distilled water

40 ml

 

Table 8: Formulation of Gel Base II

S. No.

Chemicals

Quantity

1

Carbopol 934

1.0 gm

2

Triethanolamine

Few drops

3

Distilled water

40 ml

 

Table 9: Formulation of Gel Base III

S. No.

Chemicals

Quantity

1

Carbopol 934

1.5 gm

2

Triethanolamine

Few drops

3

Distilled water

40 ml

 

C) Preparation of Mosquito repellent Gel: Preparation of mosquito repellent gel with the help of gel base and emulsion.

Table 10: Formulation of Mosquito Repellent Gel

S. No.

Chemicals

Quantity

1

Prepared gel

40.5 gm

2

Emulsion

7.5 ml

3

Distilled water

q.s

 

 

Figure 6: Gel base

EVALUATION OF GELS:

A) Clarity: The Carbopol 934 gels were found to be gleaming and clear. There were no particles in any of the gels at all shown in Table 11.

Table 11: Clarity of Gel

S. No.

Formulation

Clarity

1

Mosquito repellent gel (0.5%)

++

2

Mosquito repellent gel (1.0%)

+++

3

Mosquito repellent gel (1.5%)

++

Note: + Satisfactory, + + Good, + + + Excellent

B) pH: All Carbopol gel formulations tested had pH values ranging from 6.3 to 6.38 (shown in Table 12).

 

Figure 7: pH study of gel

Table 12: pH of Gel

S. No.

Formulation

pH

1

Mosquito repellent gel (0.5%)

6.31

2

Mosquito repellent gel (1.0%)

6.38

3

Mosquito repellent gel (1.5%)

6.45

 

C) Homogeneity: There were no lumps in any of the created materials. The final products were significantly clearer and more transparent.

Table 13: Homogeneity of Gel

S. No.

Formulation

Homogeneity

1

Mosquito repellent gel (0.5%)

Good

2

Mosquito repellent gel (1.0%)

Good

3

Mosquito repellent gel (1.5%)

Good

 

D) Spreadability: The value of spreadability indicates that the gel is easily spreadable by small amount of shear. Spreadability of Carbopol 934 in the range 18.76 -25.56 g.cm/sec indicating Spreadability of Carbopol 934 containing mosquito repellent gel was good (shown in Table 14).

 

Figure 8: Spreadibility study of gel

Table 14: Spreadability of Gel

S. No.

Formulation

Spreadability

1

Mosquito repellent gel (0.5%)

18.76

2

Mosquito repellent gel (1.0%)

21.76

3

Mosquito repellent gel (1.5%)

25.65

 

E) Viscosity measurement: The viscosity of formulated mosquito repellent gel was measured using a Brookfield viscometer. The rheological behavior of all formulated gels systems was studied. In gel system, consistency depends on the ratio of solid fraction, which produces the structure to liquid fraction. Viscosity of formulated mosquito repellent gels was found in range of 4456-4776 centipoises. 

Table 15: Viscosity of Gel

S. No.

Formulation

Viscosity

1

Mosquito repellent gel (0.5%)

4776

2

Mosquito repellent gel (1.0%)

4456

3

Mosquito repellent gel (1.5%)

4567

 

F) Extrudability: The extrusion of the gel from the tube is an important during its application and in patient acceptance. Gels with high consistency may not extrude from tube whereas, low viscous gels may flow quickly, and hence suitable consistency is required in order to extrude the gel from the tube. Carbopol gel compositions were found to have good extrudability.

Table 16: Extrudability of Gel

S. No.

Formulation

Extrudability

1

Mosquito repellent gel (0.5%)

++

2

Mosquito repellent gel (1.0%)

+++

3

Mosquito repellent gel (1.5%)

++

Note: + Satisfactory, + + Good, + + + Excellent

G) Mosquito Repellent Bioassay: The number of mosquitoes that aligned/left and aligned/bit the participants' treated portions of legs within 6 hours is shown in Table 17.


 

 

Table 17: Repellency Bioassay

Sample name

Sample C***

Normal Control

Positive Control

Time (min)

Repellency (%) ± Mean SD

Repellency (%) ± Mean SD

Repellency (%) ± Mean SD

0

0.0±0.00

0.0±0.00

0.0±0.00

15

0.0±0.00

0.0±0.00

40.66±2.89

30

14.0±7.63

4.0±0.00

65.33±2.86

45

20.0±5.00

4.0±0.00

95.0±0.00

60

51.0±2.44

4.0±0.00

100.0±0.00

Positive control = Transfluthrin conc. (0.88 % w/w) (Dose = 10µl/ml on cardboard sheet)

***SAMPLE C CARDBOARD SIZE: L x B= 2.9 x 2.4 cms

 


 

H) Stability Studies: The drug content was analyzed and there was a marginal difference between the formulations stored at different temperatures as shown in Table 18. Mosquito repellent gel formulations retained good stability throughout the study.

Table 18: Stability Studies

Parameters

Initial

1 month

2 months

3 months

pH

6.38

6.35

6.33

6.30

Spreadability

21.76

21.74

21.70

21.70

Viscosity

4456

4450

4448

4446

 

CONCLUSION: 

Based on the findings of this study, proper essential oil selection was a requirement for creating and creating a mosquito repellent. According to the IR investigations, the polymer chosen, Carbopol 934, was proven to be compatible with the necessary Mosquito repellent gel. The pH, viscosity and spredability, of the gel were found to be affected by different polymer concentrations. When Mosquito repellent gel Carbopol 934 is used with essential oil, patients experience better and faster results. The rate of penetration is increased by increasing the concentration of essential oil to its optimum concentration. 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: The author is thankful with deepest core of heart to Mr. Rohit Kumar Bijauliya (Assistant Professor), BIU College of Pharmacy, Bareilly International University, Bareilly for his valuable guidance.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Nil

REFERENCES:

  1. Imeda C, Katani S, Kitu A, Kitufe N, Magesa S, Magogo F, Malebo H, Wiketye V: Repellence effectiveness of essential oils from some Tanzanian Ocimum and Hyptis plant species against afro-tropical vectors of malaria and lymphatic filariasis. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research 2013; 7:653-660
  2. Makhaik M, Naik SN, Tewary DK: Evaluation of anti-mosquito properties of essential oils. Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research 2005; 64:129-133
  3. Adeogun AO, Adewuyi GO, Etatuvie SO, Fawehinmi AB, Lawal HO: Bioassay of Herbal Mosquito Repellent Formulated from the Essential Oil of Plants. Journal of Natural Products 2012; 5:109-115
  4. Mohomed AA, Tarek IAAM, Zarrag IAA: Larvicidal and repellent effect of some Tribulus terrestris L., (Zygophyllaceae) extracts against the dengue fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). Journal of Saudi Chemical Society 2012: 1-7.
  5. Ranasinghe MSN, Arambewela L and Samarasinghe S: Development of Herbal Mosquito Repellent Formulations. Int J Pharm Sci Res 2016; 7(9): 3643-48. https://doi.org/10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.7(9).3643-48
  6. Shivhare UD, Jain KB, Mathur VB et al. Formulation development and evaluation of diclofenac sodium gel using water soluble polycrylamide polymer. Digest Journal of Nanomaterials and Biostructures 2009; 4:285-290
  7. Charles M. Heard, Simon J. Ketoprofen release from permeation across & rheology of simple gel formulation that stimulate increasing dryness; Int. Journal of pharmaceutics, 2003; 268:37-45 https://doi.org/10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.7(9).3643-48
  8. Bettini, P. L. Catellani, P. Santi, G. Massimo Translocation of drug particles in HPMC matrix gel layer: effect of drug solubility and influence on release rate, Journal of Controlled Release, 2001: 70(3):383-391. https://doi.org/10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.7(9).3643-48
  9. Guterres Silvia S, Marta P. Alves. Human skin penetration & distribution of Nimesulide from hydrophilic gels containing nanocarriers, Int. journal of pharmaceutics, 2007; 341:215-220. https://doi.org/10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.7(9).3643-48
  10. Alberto B. Clinical pharmacokinetics & metabolism of Nimesulide. Inflammo Pharmacology, 2001; 9:81-89. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856001300248353