Available online on 15.12.2021 at http://jddtonline.info
Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics
Open Access to Pharmaceutical and Medical Research
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s): This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial use provided the original author and source are credited
Open Access Full Text Article Research Article
A histopathological comparison of prophylactic effects of Rosmarinic Acid and Oleanolic Acid isolated from Salvia species (sage) in scopolamine induced dementia model
Engin Deveci1*, Ebru Gökalp Özkorkmaz1, Fırat Aşır1, Fırat Şahin1, Işılay Sezen Ermiş1, Abdülselam Ertaş2, Hasan Akkoç3, Sevgi İ. Kandemir4, Mehmet Uğur Çevik5, Ahmet Onay6, Ceren Erantepli1
1 Department of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Dicle University, 21010, Diyarbakır, Turkey
2 Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Dicle University, 21010, Diyarbakır, Turkey
3 Department of Medical Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Dicle University, 21010, Diyarbakır, Turkey
4 Department of Medical Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Dicle University, 21010, Diyarbakır, Turkey
5 Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Dicle University, 21010, Diyarbakır, Turkey
6 Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Dicle University, 21010, Diyarbakır, Turkey
|
Article Info: _________________________________ Article History: Received 12 October 2021 Reviewed 28 November 2021 Accepted 05 December 2021 Published 15 December 2021 _________________________________ Cite this article as: Deveci E, Özkorkmaz EG, Aşır F, Şahin F, Ermiş IS, Ertaş A, Akkoç H, Kandemir SI, Çevik MU, Onay A, Erantepli C, A histopathological comparison of prophylactic effects of Rosmarinic Acid and Oleanolic Acid isolated from Salvia species (sage) in scopolamine induced dementia model, Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics. 2021; 11(6-S):37-42 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v11i6-S.5129 _________________________________ *Address for Correspondence: Engin Deveci, Department of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Dicle University, 21010, Diyarbakır, Turkey ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2353-1184 |
Abstract ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Objective: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia, can be created in experimental models by using toxins. Possible therapeutic effects of secondary metabolites Rosmarinic (RA) and Oleanolic acids (OA) obtained from Salvia species (sage) were investigated using histopathological and immunohistochemical tecniques in experimental Alzheimer's-like dementia model induced by scopolamine. Study Design: Male BALB/c mice (n: 48) of 3-4 weeks old, divided into 6 groups; control received only saline(i.p.) for 21 days, scopolamine group received 3 mg/kg of scopolamine (i.p.) between 8-21th days. Scopolamine + RA group received 5 mg/kg RA (i.p.) between days 0 and 21 and 3 mg/kg of scopolamine (i.p.) between 8-21th days. Scopolamine + OA group received 5 mg/kg of OA (i.p.) between days of 0-21 and 3 mg/kg of scopolamine (i.p.) between 8-21th days. RA group received 5 mg/kg RA (i.p.) between 0-21th days. OA group received 5 mg/kg of OA (i.p.) between 0-21th days. Animals were sacrificed under anesthesia, brain tissues were excised and placed in 10% formaldehyde, embedded in paraffin wax. 5 µm sections were cut, stained for histopathological examinations. Immunoreactivity for Beta-amyloid accumulation was observed. ImageJ 153 software was used to analyze IHC figures. Positive signaling for DAB density was calculated, ANOVA test with the post hoc dunnett's or tukey test were applied, p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: In scopolamine+RA treated group, tissue degeneration was less compared to the scopolamine group. Scopolamine+OA group revealed signs of pyknosis in neurons. The amyloid beta immunoexpression was positive in scopolamine group partially positive in scopolamine+OA group but, negative in RA treated scopolamine group. Intensity of signal in scopolamine group was statistically increased compared to control (p=0.0102). Intensity of signal was reduced in Scopolamine+RA and Scopolamine+OA groups, was statistically significant (p=0.0281 and p=0.0362, respectively). Conclusion: We suggest that pretreatment of RA and OA decreased beta amyloid formation and ameliorated tissue structure but, further studies with different methods are needed to be commercially available. Keywords: Scopolamine, dementia, Rosmarinic acid, Oleanolic acid, histopathology, Amyloid beta |
Dementia is defined as a disorder in brain functions. Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia. Alzheimer's disease is a chronic neurodegenerative disease characterized by progressive memory loss, language skills, disorientation, depression and behavioral disorders 1, 2. In the pathophysiology of AD, two main brain cell types involved in the immune/inflammatory response in Alzheimer's disease are astrocytes and microglia. The numbers of astrocytes are more in Alzheimer's patients and these cells are activated to produce prostaglandins that cause inflammation. Active microglial cells produce free radicals damaging cell structure and function3. When exposed to oxidative stress, these active microglia cells form a peptide known as amyloid beta (beta amyloid, Aß) that kills neurons, which aggregates on the outer surface of neurons in the blood vessels and brain called amyloidosis. Amyloid beta is available in two forms; Aβ–40 and Aβ-42. After the fibrillar structure formed by these two forms, amyloid plaque formation is observed. Amyloid plaque formation causes oxidative damage and Neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) formation4,5. Considering the pathophysiology of AD, the key role begins at the point of Aβ production.
Researchers have revealed that the deterioration in cholinergic function impairs short-term memory and results with memory impairment similar to AD. Scopolamine, a well-known anticholinergic drug, is frequently used for experimental purpose to induce dementia in experimental animal models 6,7. Administration of scopolamine produces deficits on tests of visual recognition memory, visuospatial recall, verbal recall, visuospatial praxis, psychomotor speed and visuoperceptual function8,9. It has been accounted that scopolamine nonselectively blocks the binding sites of acetylcholine (ACh) muscarinic receptors in the cerebral cortex and causes unequal release of ACh which destroys the hippocampus nerves and leads to impairment in learning and memory in a dose-dependent manner in mice 10.
In the treatment of AD, several studies have been carried out to prevent the progression of the disease by developing inhibitors as an alternative. Nutrition and food chemistry research in recent years has focused on herbal products with anti-Alzheimer's, anti-cancer and antioxidant potential. As epidemiological evidence confirms that medicinal plants are important sources in reducing the frequency of cancer, diabetes, atherosclerosis etc., obtaining drugs from medicinal plants are being investigated for therapeutic purposes. Salvia L. (Lamiaceae) also known as sage, have been used in traditional medicine as a tonic, antirheumatic and chronic pain reliever since ancient times. Salvia L., which contains active substances with antioxidant effect and has more than 1000 species in the world and 100 species are represented in Anatolia, of these 53 are endemic 11. Some members of the genus Salvia L. have been the subject of intense research due to their different medicinal values such as wound healing12,13 . Salvia species have a diversity of secondary metabolites giving them antimicrobial and antioxidant property that are used against pathological diseases such as atherosclerosis, brain dysfunctions and cancer14. Recent studies proved that genus Salvia is an important potential source of antioxidants and anticholinesterases. A Salvia species, S. plebeia is used in traditional medicine in China, Korea, and Japan to treat diseases such as jaundice, inflammation, and hemorrhoids. Pharmacological studies have shown that S. plebeia species has a wide range of biological activities such as antityrosinase, antioxidant and antianaphylactic effects15. Salvia species are known for their memory enhancing purposes based on their pharmacokinetic properties16,17 . Salvia having these qualifications are considered to be of potential value in AD therapy.
The major phytochemicals in flowers, leaves, and stem of Salvia are well identified including alkaloids, carbohydrate, fatty acids, phenolic compounds (flavonoids, tannins), steroids, terpenes/terpenoids 18 . Rosmarinic acid (RA) (C18 H1608) from flavonoids and Oleanolic acid (OA) (C30 H4803) from terpenes/terpenoid contents were used for the current study. There are several studies in the literature regarding the effects of these compounds, especially RA. RA beneficially inhibits invasion, angiogenesis and metastasis of tumor cells 19,20 . In addition to the anti-cancer potential of these compounds, they are used in the areas of cosmetic and meat industries etc., due to their high antioxidant properties so their market value is high. RA is rapidly eliminated from human and rat blood circulation after oral administration and have been reported to exhibit low toxicity in the literature 21 .
In this study, prophylactic and therapeutic effects of secondary metabolites Rosmarinic and Oleanolic acids obtained from Salvia species were investigated and compared in mice with Alzheimer's-like dementia induced with scopolamine using histopathological and immunohistochemical tecniques.
2. METHODS
2.1. Plant material and extraction procedures
Salvia plant materials were collected from their natural habitats in the Eastern Anatolian Region of Turkey, Diyarbakır (collection date 2018) and air-dried. Aerial parts of the dried plant were macerated with 55–75% v/v EtOH (Merck) in water at 40 °C for 3 h and filtrated 22. Stock solutions of Oleanolic and Rosmarinic Acid compounds with analytical purity were prepared and administered at a concentration of 1mg/ml.
2.2. Experimental design and groups
The experimental protocol was approved by the Local Ethical Committee of Health Sciences, Dicle University, Diyarbakır, Turkey (Reg. no. 2018/20). The research was performed in accordance with the ARRIVE guidelines and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (NIH Publications). Experimental animals were obtained from Dicle University Health Sciences Research and Application Center (DUSAM). This study was supported by Dicle University Research Projects Unit (DUBAP) with the Project number (TIP.19.026).
In the experimental protocol, 48 male 3-4 weeks old BALB/c mice were used. The animals were housed in a room with a 12-hour dark, 12-hour light cycle, with 50–70% humidity, at room temperature (25 °C ± 3 °C), in cages containing up to 8 animals, with free access to water and pellet.
According to the experimental protocol, injections were performed daily at the same time period intraperitoneally (ip). Scopolamine (Scopolamine hydrobromide CAS no: 6533-68-2, Sigma-Aldrich) and, RA and OA extracts dissolved in ethanol were applied 0.2 ml for each as described above.
The groups were created as follows;
Group 1: Control group (n:8) received 0.2 ml of 0.9% saline (i.p.) solution daily for 21 days.
Group 2: Scopolamine group (n:8) received 0.2 ml 0.9% saline (i.p.) solution daily between 0-7th days. 3 mg/kg of scopolamine (i.p.) was administered daily between 8-21th days.
Group 3: Scopolamine + Rosmarinic acid group (n:8) received 5 mg/kg Rosmaric acid (i.p.) daily between days 0 and 21. Between 8-21th days they received 3 mg/kg of scopolamine (i.p.) daily.
Group 4: Scopolamine + Oleanolic acid group (n:8) received 5 mg/kg of Oleanolic acid (i.p.) between days of 0-21 daily. Between 8-21th days they received 3 mg/kg of scopolamine (i.p.) daily.
Group 5: Rosmarinic acid group (n:8) received 5 mg/kg Rosmaric Acid (i.p.) daily between 0-21th days.
Group 6: Oleanolic acid group (n:8) received 5 mg/kg of Oleanolic acid (i.p.) daily between 0-21th days.
2.3. Anesthesia and Surgical Procedures
At the end of experiments, all subjects were sacrificed by cervical decapitation under ether anesthesia. The cerebral samples (hippocampal and cortical tissue) were taken immediately. The excised tissues were taken in 10% formaldehyde for routine histological tissue preparation and finally embedded in paraffin blocks.
2.4. Hematoxylin Eosin examination
Tissue sections of 5 μm thickness were cut with a microtome (Leica, Germany) and taken on slides, then placed into xylene for 2x15 min. After the decreasing alcohol series, slides were taken in hematoxylin stain (Sigma, US) for 6 min. Washed in running tap water for 5 min, they were kept in eosin for 4 min. Immediately after 1 min. increasing alcohol series, then slides were incubated in xylene for 2x15 min. Finally, sections were mounted with entellan (Sigma, US) for histopathological examinations.
2.5. Immunohistochemical Procedure
Remaining sections taken from paraffin blocks were processed for deparaffinization, passed through alcohol series and taken into distilled water. Slides were dried without damaging the tissue then marked with Dakopen (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). In order to inhibit tissue endogenous peroxidase, 3% hydrogen peroxide was applied for 20 min. Ultra V block (TA-125-UB, Thermo Fisher Scientific, US) was dropped onto the sections for 8 min prior to the addition of the primary antibodies, which were incubated at +4° C overnight (Beta Amyloid Antibody (cat # 71-5800) Thermo Fischer Scientific, US, 1:100). Sections were washed with biotinylated secondary antibody (Thermo Fischer Scientific, US) for 14 minutes. Streptavidin peroxidase (Thermo Fischer Scientific, US) was dropped onto sections. Chromogen DAB (Thermo Fischer Scientific, US) was applied and counter stained with Harris hematoxylin and slides were mounted with entellan. Sections were examined under Light microscope (Zeiss, Imager A2, Germany), and the levels of amyloid beta accumulation were compared.
2.6. Signal quantification and statistical analysis
Signal quantification for positive beta amyloid accumulation was done by Image J 153 software by analyzing IHC figures. DAB density was calculated by setting image threshold and measuring signals. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS IBM 24.0 software. Differences of means between groups were calculated by one-way ANOVA test and then with the post hoc dunnett's or tukey test were applied for multiple comparison test. The p<0.05 level was considered statistically significant in the results.
3. RESULTS
3.1. Histopathological findings
Hematoxylin-eosin stained sections of control group cerebral tissues revealed normal neuron structures and cerebral tissue integrity (Figure 1.A). In scopolamine group, signs of pyknosis were remarkable especially in neuron structures. Degenerations were observed in areas of tissue structure. Presence of amyloid plaque structure was found in the areas close to the neurons (Figure 1.B). RA showed improvements in areas of tissue degeneration in the sections of scopalamine+RA group. Structure of amyloid plaques was not observed and protective activity in the structure of neurons was prominent (Figure 1.C). The tissue integrity was improved in neuron structures thanks to protective activity of OA (Figure 1.D). However, OA has seemed to be less protective than RA from the histopathological point of view (Figure 1.E)
Figure 1. A) Control group; A neuron in normal structure (black arrow). B) Scopolamine group; A degenerated neuron (black arrow), tissue degeneration (red arrow), amyloid plaque structure (orange arrow). C) Scopolamine + RA Group; A neuron (black arrow) and degenerated tissue (red arrow) showing improvement compared to the scopolamine group. D) Scopolamine + OA Group; tissue degeneration (red arrows) and a pycnotic neuron. E) RA Group; A neuron in normal structure (black arrow) and F) OA Group; A neuron in normal structure (black arrow).
3.1. Immunohistochemical findings
Beta amyloid expressions in cerebral tissue of all groups were shown in Figure 2. The expression of amyloid beta in the control group was negative. On the other hand, the presence of neurons with positive structure of scopolamine group amyloid beta antibody staining was detected (Figure 2 A, B). When the sections of RA and OA groups were compared for amyloid beta expression, it was clearly decreased due to the protective activity of RA. We can suggest that the protective activity of OA is not effective as much as RA (Figure 2 C, D).
Figure 2. A) Control group; Negative amyloid beta expression (black arrow). B) Scopolamine group; Positive amyloid beta expression (red arrow). C) Scopolamine + Rosmarinic Acid Group; Negative amyloid beta expression (black arrow). D) Scopolamine + Oleanolic Acid Group; Negative amyloid beta expression (black arrow) and Positive amyloid beta expression (red arrow). E) Rosmarinic Acid Group; Negative amyloid beta expression in neurons (black arrow) F) Oleanolic Acid Group; Negative amyloid beta expression in neurons (black arrow)
3.2. Statistical findings
Positive beta-amyloid antibody signal was quantified by ImageJ 153 software. Scopolamine group showed the highest density of measured signal, while control group resulted in lowest score. Intensity of signal in scopolamine was statistically increased compared to control group (p=0.0102). Intensity of signal was reduced in Scopolamine + Rosmarinic Acid and Scopolamine + Oleanolic Acid groups, and this decrease was statistically significant (p=0.0281 and p=0.0362, respectively). Results were shown in Table 1 and Figures 3.
Table 1. Positive beta-amyloid signaling by all groups.
|
Groups |
Total area |
Mean+SD |
P value |
|
Control group |
2073600 |
0.103±5.119 |
|
|
Scopolamine group |
2073600 |
3.521±25.759 |
0.0102* |
|
Scopolamine + Rosmarinic Acid |
2073600 |
1.092±4.842 |
0.0281** |
|
Scopolamine + Oleanolic Acid |
2073600 |
1.788±8.565 |
0.0362*** |
|
Rosmarinic Acid |
2073600 |
0.166±6.512 |
|
|
Oleanolic Acid |
2073600 |
0.204±7.206 |
|
Note: Area represents the size of the IHC image. Mean grey value gives the quantified signal of antibody of interest. * Scopolamine vs control; ** Scopolamine + Rosmarinic Acid vs Scopolamine; ***Scopolamine + Oleanolic Acid vs Scopolamine
Figure 3. Graphical illustration of Table 1. Positive beta-amyloid signaling for groups
Sc: Scopolamine, RA: Rosmarinic acid, OA: Oleanolic acid.
4. DISCUSSION
Aging population is increasing day by day so researchers have to encounter with a significant rise in the incidence of age-related neurodegenerative diseases one of which is dementia. Several toxins are being used in experimental models to examine dementia based on their mechanism of action for learning and memory impairment such as scopolamine, which mimics the disease pathology of Alzheimer’s disease like dementia23.
The knowledge regarding the chemical composition and health-related benefits of Salvia species widely used in complementary and traditional medicine, are considerable. Salvia species contain compounds that have antioxidant, antidementia, anti-inflammatory, anticancer, antinociceptive, antimicrobial, antimutagenic, hypoglycemic and hypolipidemic effects 18. A review study on potential cognitive enhancing and protective effects of Salvia summarizes that 50 µL of S. lavandulaefolia essential oil, administered 1–3 times per day over a 3-week period, statistically significant reductions in caregiver-rated neuropsychiatric symptoms, and improvements in attention over the 6-week period has been reported24,16. The medicinal plant Salvia has been used for Alzheimer’s disease25. In another randomized placebo-controlled trial study on patients with Alzheimer's disease for the effects of S. officinalis on memory and cognitive functions a 60 drops/day of alcoholic extract for week 16 has resulted with an improvement of cognitive functions26. Clinical and animal studies presented that S. officinalis advanced cognitive performance in patients with cognitive impairment or dementia27.
Our histopathological results with hematoxylin-eosin staining, in scopolamine group, depicted remarkable signs of pyknosis in neuron structures. Degenerations in areas of the tissue structure and presence of amyloid plaque structure was found in the areas close to the neurons (Figure 1.B). In scopalamine+RA group , no amyloid plaques were observed (Figure 1.C). OA treated scopalamine brain tissue sections showed tissue integrity and improvements in neuron structures (Figure 1.D). However, OA has seem to be less protective than RA from the histopathological point of view (Figure 1.) In immunohistochemical analysis, the presence of neurons with positive structure of scopolamine group amyloid beta antibody staining was detected (Figure 2 A, B). When the sections of Scopalamine +RA and Scopalamine +OA groups were compared with ImageJ analysis and statistically analysed for amyloid beta immunoexpression, it was found to be decreased due to the prophylactic activity of RA (Table 1, Figure 3). We suggest that the protective activity of OA is not as effective as RA in scopalamine administered groups (Figure 2 C, D and Table 1).
CONCLUSION
From a histopathological perspective, Salvia extracts RA and OA seems to decrease amyloid plaques formation. Yet, we observed that RA had a more comprehensive protective activity than OA in the scopolamine-induced Alzheimer like dementia experimental mice model. RA and OA might be promising components for developing therapeutic agents to ameliorate dementia but, their long term effects require investigation.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This study was supported by Dicle University Research Projects Unit (DUBAP) with the Project number (TIP.19.026).
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES
1. Thomé GR, Oliveira VA, Chitolina Schetinger MR, et al. Selenothymidine protects against biochemical and behavioral alterations induced by ICV-STZ model of dementia in mice. Chem Biol Interact. 2018; 294:135-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2018.08.004
2. Maurer K, Volk S, Gerbaldo H. Auguste D and Alzheimer's disease. Lancet. 1997; 349(9064):1546-1549. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(96)10203-8
3. Niwa K, Porter VA, Kazama K, Cornfield D, Carlson GA, Iadecola C. A beta peptides enhance vasoconstriction in cerebral circulation. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2001; 281(6):H2417-H2424. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.2001.281.6.H2417
4. Wang JZ, Liu F. Microtubule-associated protein tau in development, degeneration and protection of neurons. Prog Neurobiol. 2008; 85(2):148-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2008.03.002
5.Serý O, Povová J, Míšek I, Pešák L, Janout V. Molecular mechanisms of neuropathological changes in Alzheimer's disease: a review. Folia Neuropathol. 2013; 51(1):1-9. https://doi.org/10.5114/fn.2013.34190
6. Shah D, Blockx I, Guns PJ, et al. Acute modulation of the cholinergic system in the mouse brain detected by pharmacological resting-state functional MRI. Neuroimage. 2015; 109:151-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.01.009
7. Upadhyay P, Sadhu A, Singh PK, et al. Revalidation of the neuroprotective effects of a United States patented polyherbal formulation on scopolamine induced learning and memory impairment in rats. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018; 97:1046-1052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2017.11.008
8. Klinkenberg I, Blokland A. The validity of scopolamine as a pharmacological model for cognitive impairment: a review of animal behavioral studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010; 34(8):1307-1350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.04.001
9. Portero-Tresserra M, Del Olmo N, Martí-Nicolovius M, Guillazo-Blanch G, Vale-Martínez A. D-cycloserine prevents relational memory deficits and suppression of long-term potentiation induced by scopolamine in the hippocampus. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014; 24(11):1798-1807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2014.10.002
10. Riedel G, Kang SH, Choi DY, Platt B. Scopolamine-induced deficits in social memory in mice: reversal by donepezil. Behav Brain Res. 2009; 204(1):217-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2009.06.012
11. Hatipoglu S.D., N. Zorlu, T. Dirmenci, A.C. Goren, T. Ozturk, G. Topcu, 'Determination of volatile organic compounds in fourty five Salvia species by thermal desorption-GC-MS technique " Rec. Nat. Prod. 2016; 10:659-700.
12. Güzel S, Özay Y, Kumaş M, et al. Wound healing properties, antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of Salvia kronenburgii Rech. f. and Salvia euphratica Montbret, Aucher & Rech. f. var. euphratica on excision and incision wound models in diabetic rats. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019; 111:1260-1276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2019.01.038
13. Ozay Y, Guzel S, Gokalp Ozkorkmaz E, et al. Biochemical, Histopathologic, and Genotoxic Effects of Ethanol Extract of Salvia hypargeia (Fisch. & Mey.) on Incisional and Excisional Wounded Diabetic Rats. J Invest Surg. 2021; 34(1):7-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2019.1590483
14. Martínez-Cruz O, Paredes-López O. Phytochemical profile and nutraceutical potential of chia seeds (Salvia hispanica L.) by ultra high performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr A. 2014; 1346:43-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2014.04.007
15. Chen L, Kang YH. Antioxidant and enzyme inhibitory activities of Plebeian herba (Salvia plebeia R. Br.) under different cultivation conditions. J Agric Food Chem. 2014; 62(10):2190-2197. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf404570s
16. Perry NS, Bollen C, Perry EK, Ballard C. Salvia for dementia therapy: review of pharmacological activity and pilot tolerability clinical trial. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2003; 75(3):651-659. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0091-3057(03)00108-4
17. Tildesley NTJ, Kennedy DO, Perry EK, Ballard CG, Savelev S, Wesnesa KA, Scholey AB. Salvia lavandulaefolia(Spanish Sage) enhances memory in healthy young volunteers. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior 2003; 75:669-674. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0091-3057(03)00122-9
18. Ghorbani A, Esmaeilizadeh M. Pharmacological properties of Salvia officinalis and its components. J Tradit Complement Med. 2017
7(4):433-440. Published 2017 Jan 13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcme.2016.12.014
19. Krajcovicova Z, Meluš, V (2013). Bioactivity and potential health benefits of Rosmarinic acid. Minireview. University Review, 2013; 7(2):8-14.
20. Ngo SN, Williams DB, Head RJ. Rosemary and cancer prevention: preclinical perspectives. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2011; 51(10):946-954. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2010.490883
21. Petersen M, Abdullah Y, Benner J, et al. Evolution of rosmarinic acid biosynthesis. Phytochemistry. 2009; 70(15-16):1663-1679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2009.05.010
22. Durling NE, Catchpole OJ, Grey JB, et al. Extraction of phenolics and essential oil from dried sage (Salvia officinalis) using ethanol-water mixture. Food Chemistry, 2007; 101(4):1417-1424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.03.050
23. More SV, Kumar H, Cho DY, Yun YS, Choi DK. Toxin-Induced Experimental Models of Learning and Memory Impairment. Int J Mol Sci. 2016; 17(9):1447. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17091447
24. Lopresti AL. Salvia (Sage): A Review of its Potential Cognitive-Enhancing and Protective Effects. Drugs R D. 2017; 17(1):53-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40268-016-0157-5
25. Perry EK, Pickering AT, Wang WW, Houghton PJ, Perry NS. Medicinal plants and Alzheimer's disease: from ethnobotany to phytotherapy. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1999; 51(5):527-534. https://doi.org/10.1211/0022357991772808
26. Akhondzadeh S, Noroozian M, Mohammadi M, Ohadinia S, Jamshidi AH, Khani M. Salvia officinalis extract in the treatment of patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease: a double blind, randomized and placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2003; 28(1):53-59. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2710.2003.00463.x
27. Miroddi M, Navarra M, Quattropani MC, Calapai F, Gangemi S, Calapai G. Systematic review of clinical trials assessing pharmacological properties of Salvia species on memory, cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2014; 20(6):485-495. https://doi.org/10.1111/cns.12270