Available online on 15.11.2021 at http://jddtonline.info

Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics

Open Access to Pharmaceutical and Medical Research

Copyright  © 2021 The  Author(s): This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial use provided the original author and source are credited

Open Access  Full Text Article                                                                                                                                       Research Article 

Development and Evaluation of Gastro Retentive Floating Drug Delivery System of Ondansetron Hydrochloride

Abadhesh Kumar Niranjan*  , Aditya Kumar

Department of Pharmaceutics, Hygia Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Ghaila road, Gazipur Balram, Lucknow-226020, Uttar Pradesh, India 

Article Info:

_________________________________________

Article History:

Received 09 September 2021      

Reviewed 29 October 2021

Accepted 13 November 2021  

Published 20 November 2021  

_________________________________________

Cite this article as: 

Niranjan AK, Kumar A, Development and Evaluation of Gastro Retentive Floating Drug Delivery System of Ondansetron Hydrochloride, Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics. 2021; 11(6):150-158

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v11i6.5084             

_________________________________________

*Address for Correspondence:  

Abadhesh Kumar Niranjan, Associate Professor, Department of Pharmaceutics, Hygia Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Ghaila road, Gazipur Balram, Lucknow- 226020, Uttar Pradesh, India

ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2407-6902

Abstract

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

The Aim of the present study was to develop & evaluate Gastro-retentive floating Tablet of Ondansetron hydrochloride. The Objective was to calibrate and validate the UV- spectroscopy analytical method and to prepare and optimize the GR Floating tablets of Ondansetron hydrochloride in terms of dissolution release profile. The FDDS of the drug can minimize the fluctuation of drug plasma levels and result to associated adverse reactions, dosing frequency, and improved patient compliance. Conventionally, Ondansetron hydrochloride is taken up 2-3 times daily in the treatment of nausea and vomiting. Gastro retentive floating tablet of Ondansetron hydrochloride is better suited for treatment of postoperative nausea vomiting. In the present study, nine Gastro retentive Floating tablet formulations (F1, F2.....F9) of Ondansetron hydrochloride were prepared by the  method of direct compression and polymers HPMC K15 were used and Guargum and Chitosan, in different quantity to normalise their effect on the’ release profile of drug . Target release profile was >80% release of drug in 12 hours. Tablets were evaluated for various parameters namely: thickness, weight variation’, friability, hardness, assay, in-vitro buoyancy study & drug release. Formulation F8 containing Chitosan (26.66% w/w), Guargum (26.66% w/w) and Sod. Carbonate (25.83% w/w) had the desirable release profile.

Keywords: Ondansetron hydrochloride; Gastro retentive floating tablet, Chitosan, Guar gum, Drug release

 


 

INTRODUCTION

Drug taken by oral administration is that the foremost easy and favourite suggests that of any other drug delivery to the systematic circulation of the body. Nowadays Oral drug delivery system have been accelerated interest in pharmaceutical industries field to gain enhanced therapeutic benefits of drug, like simple dose drug ‘administration, patient conformity and flexibility’ in formulation of drug. Medicine which can be simply absorbed by alimentary canal or gastro intestinal tract (GIT) and have short half-life therefore it is eliminated very fast from the body cavity. Regular dosage of medicine is necessary to gain appropriate therapeutic effect 1.

To stay away from these type of restriction, the appropriate result of Oral Sustained-Controlled release Formulations have a good chance to release the drug gradually into the alimentary canal and in the Gastro- intestinal tract 2 (GIT) and It maintain an efficient amount of concentration level of drug in the circulation for lengthy time period. Once a drug taken by oral (administrative drug) route, such type of   drug delivery path would be prevented release of drug in the abdomen and the drug release during a very guarded manner, so that the drug are often equipped instantly on the absorption site among the GIT channel 3.

These path of Drug Delivery Systems (DDS) mainly face   two type of  adverse condition; firstly it shows very less gastric retention time (GRT) and  also shows Unpredictable minimum GET, which may end in partial drug unleash from the measure type between the absorptive zone (Stomach or higher area of small intestine’) resulting in diminish effectualness of administered drug dose. To specific site of drug which is taken by the path of ‘orally administered controlled release’ measure form DDS, It is fascinating to know a prolong retention period by the path of drug delivery. long-lasting gastric retentive drug improves  the drug bioavailability., will increase the amount of drug dosage unleash, decreases   drug wastage, and enhance solubility   of the drug that square measure became less soluble throughout a high level  proton concentration setting 4. Conjointly prolonged GRT among the abdomen are often helpful in the confined action among the uppermost region of the GIT (Ex. Ulcer treatment), (Amit Kumar Nayak 2010).

Gastro-retentive DDS is associated to prolong approach of stomachal period, by use of targeting site-specific drug which is released among GIT   upper channel  for local or general effects 5. Gastro mindful measure forms will stay among the stomachal part for long time periods and thus considerably increase the stomachal withholding time gastric retention time (GRT) of medication. the previous few years many gastro retentive drug delivery system(DDS) approaches being designed and developed, including high density (sinking) systems which means preserved within rock bottom of the abdomen, rarity (floatation) systems which is reason of  buoyancy in stomachal fluid, Muco-adhesive systems which increase bioadhesion of drug in to abdomen , membrane extendible swellable, unfoldable, or systems that have a limits removal of the measure forms  by the help of the sphincter of abdomen magnetic systems, super porous gel systems 6, etc.

Requirement of Gastro-retention

  1. The drugs which are absorbed in the variable gastric emptying time.
  2. Those drugs which are absorbed by the help of GIT’s proximal part.
  3. General or Sustained drug delivery (SDD) intended to the stomach and proximal part of the small intestine to treat many types of diseases 7.
  4. Drugs which are insoluble and not degrade at the basic pH levels.
  5.  Certain type of ‘peptic ulcers caused by H. Pylori. (Amit Kumar Nayak et al., 2010’).

Aspects of GRDDS Formulation: 

  1. The drug should not contain any effect on gastric motility of GIT 8
  2. It should be suitable to ingest for patients.
  3. The formulation must show complete ‘degradation and evacuation of the system when the drug completely releases. 
  4. It shows very effective retention in the stomach 9.
  5. The drug must contain proper amount of drug dose loading capacity & also control drug release report.
  6. It should not give any side effects or other common unwanted action.(Vinod K.R. et al., 2010)

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ondansetron was obtained as a gift from Aurobindo Pharma Ltd. Gaddapotharam, Andhra Pradesh. HPMC K 15 M, Chitosan & Guar gum were procured from Sigma Aldrich. All other substances were of analytical grade. All chemicals were pure and of analytical grade.

Drug Identification

Organoleptic property of the drug

The drug evaluated for the organoleptic property like color, odor.

Melting point observation

Melting point of ONDCL is found to be 182ºC.

Analytical Methodology

Determination of λmax of ONDCL

0.1mg/ml concentration of ONDCL stock solution was prepared in distilled water and further (0.5ml in 10ml) diluted with water to obtain 5µg/ml concentration solution. This prepared solution of compound was scanned in UV-Visible spectrophotometer in the range of 200-400nm using distilled water as blank at the wavelength of 310nmλmaxof ONDCL was recorded.

Standard Calibration Curve

Preparation of standard stock solution 

ONDCL 10mg was weighed in100ml volumetric flask and the solution prepare to the mark in volumetric flask with distilled water to acquire 0.1mg/ml solution.

Preparation of calibration and samples validation 

Calibration sample (5, 10, 15, 20, 25µg/ml) in the singlet and validation samples (6, 16, 24µg/ml) in triplicate were prepared by appropriate dilution of stock solution.

Preparation of calibration curve

The absorbance reading of calibration and validation samples were measured against distilled water as blank in UV-Vis. spectrophotometer at 310nm (λmax). Then absorbance values of the calibration sample were plotted against their respective concentration to obtain the calibration curve.

Validation of the analytical method

Linearity 

The absorbance value of the calibration sample was plotted against their respective concentration to obtain the calibration curve, and linear regression was performed 10. Linearity was accessed by correlation coefficient determination (r2).

Accuracy

Mean concentration value for each data of validation samples were calculated and %error (a measure of accuracy) for each concentration calculation with the formula, 

%error = (calculated mean concentration-actual concentration) / actual concentration*100.

Precision

Percentage relative standard deviation value was calculated (as a measure of precision) for each set of concentration by given formula, 

%RSD = standard deviation/calculated mean concentration*100.

Drug excipients interaction study by FT-IR

The interaction studies of various excipients with ONDCL 11 recorded by FT-IR Analysis.


 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 1: The ratio of ONDCL and excipients blend. (Yadav Priyanka. 2014)

Sr. No.

Excipients

Ratio w/w

Total blend mg

 

1

Pure Drug

1:1

100

 

2

Drug +HPMC K15

1:1

100

 

3

Drug + Guargum

1:1

100

 

4

Drug + Sod. Bicarbonate

1:1

100

 

5

Drug + Chitosan

1:1

100

 

 

 

Preparation of blend for Formulation

Table 2: Ingredients used in tablets formulations;

Sr.no

Ingredients

F1

F2

F3

F4

F5

F6

F7

F8

F9

1

Ondansetron

32

32

32

32

32

32

32

32

32

2

Sod. Carbonate

42.5

47.5

52.5

57.5

62.5

67.5

72.5

77.5

82.5

3

HPMC K 15 M

80

40

40

160

-----

-----

80

-----

80

4

Guar gum

40

80

40

-----

160

-----

80

80

-----

5

Chitosan

40

40

80

-----

-----

160

-----

80

80

6

Mg     stearate

2.5

2.5

2.5

2.5

2.5

2.5

2.5

2.5

2.5

7

Purified Talc

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

8

Lactose

60

55

50

45

40

35

30

25

20

 

Total Quantity

300

300

300

300

300

300

300

300

300

 


 

Evaluations of Powder Blend for Tableting

Pre-compressional evaluation of powder blend:

For pre-compressional study of the powder blend of all the formulations was examine by the as angle of repose, tapped density, Hausner’s ratio and bulk density 12.  

Angle of repose (θ)

The formulated powder blend is intended to measurement of θ and this is found in the range of 27º.08’ - 30º.26’, which shows a good flow property of formulated powder blend’. Results were given in Table no. 8.

Bulk density: For the measurement of Bulk density of the material (powder blend) in the range between 0.299 g/ml - 0.307 g/ml, which shows that the formulated powder blends were not too bulky 13. That result was shown in Table no. 8.

Tapped density: Tapped density of the powder blend was within the range between 0.422 g/ml - 0.45 g/ml. The results were shown in Table no. 8.

Hausner’s Ratio: For the measurement of the Hausner’s ratio of the compound material was found to be within 1.36 to 1.43, which shows that flow properties are good for formulated powder blend 14. The results were shown in Table no. 8.

In the above results -It had been concluded that the angle of repose (< 30º) indicate good flow properties of the formulated powder blend. It was additionally followed by very good flow properties. Density and hardness of powder were interconnected properties. And also powder density may be tablet porosity, influence compressibility, dissolution, and other properties. Results indicate that the powder blend of all the formulations possessed adequate flow properties (Amit K. Jain et al., 2011).

Formulation of ONDCL Gastroretentive Floating Tablets

Method of Preparation

All the materials were weighed and sieved by 300µm (#50) sieve and mix with a mortar and pestle. The powder blend was directly compressed into core tablet using 9mm circular biconcave punch on Rotatory tablet punching machine 15. Tablets were like 32 mg of ONDCL (tablet weight 300mg).

Evaluation of Floating Tablets of ONDCL

Post-compressional estimation of Ondansetron hydrochloride floating tablet:

Formulated Tablets which were subjected to assessment tests these also shows general appearance, friability, hardness, diameter, thickness, weight variation and drug content 16.

General appearance:

Prepared tablets were white and some batches show some variation in colour, round, biconvex shaped without any defect on sides. Every tablet was pleasurable to the eye in appearance 17.

Hardness of tablet:

Hardness is the basic parameter of tablets were measured by the instrument Monsanto hardness tester and was  found between of 3.5 – 4 kilogram per square centimeter, which shows that good mechanical strength   and   provide great ability to withstand chemical and physical stress though handling during transportation and loading- unloading 18. The results were shown in Table 9.

Diameter and Thickness of tablets:

The diameter and thickness of all the formulations were measured by instrument Vernier scale micrometer 19 and were ranged between 3.5 – 4mm, this  indicate the   uniformity of tablets  with having the similar particle size distribution in the formulation and no deformity. The results were mentioned in Table no. 9.

Friability Test of the tablets:   Friability of all the formulation was lie between 0.1% -0.80% and the friability was less than 1% altogether the formulations, which shows that a good mechanical resistance of the tablet. The values of Hardness test and friability Percentage indicates good handling property of finally prepared tablets 20. Results were shown in Table no. 9.

Weight variation Test of the all formulation:

For the analysis of weight variation it should performed according to the procedure given in the pharmacopoeia. All the developed tablet formulations (Fl to F9) passes weight variation test because the percentage weight variation range within the pharmacopoeial standard limit (±5%). hence all the formulations of tablet are acceptable. The results are given in Table no. 9.

Evaluation/ Estimation of tablet ingredient:

In the formulation for estimation of percentage of all the ingredient was in the range 99% to 104% and this confirm ‘that the drug was uniformly distributed in’ the all tablets. Here the share of drug content in the entire formulations tablets are compressed with official specification: as per U.S.P (Ranges: 90% to 110%) 21. The results/data were shown in Table no. 9.

From the above result it had been concluded that each one the tablet formulation shows standard pharmacopoeial specification & formulated with the pharmacopoeial standard for friability, drug content, and weight variation. (Jain A K. or USP 30, NF2007)

 In Vitro Buoyancy Studies:

The formulations takes time to emerge on the superior medium known as FLT (Floating Lag Time) sometime BLT (Buoyancy Lag Time) and the complete duration of time taken by individual tablet is named as TFT 22, 23 (Total Floating Time) (Margret Chandria et al., 2009; Riteshkumar et al., 2010; Ravikumar et al., 2009). In this regard the buoyancy studies results are often accomplished that the batch have HPMC only polymers and its combined with Sodium carbonate gives more relevant floating lag time in comparison to batch containing Guar gum polymers alone and its combination with HPMC. Floating of the tablet formulation shows variation from polymer to polymer that is governed by both the buoyancy of the hydrocolloid leading matter and the dissolution media. (Nagarwal et al, 2010).

The conditions of dissolution test were as follows (IP. 2018)


 

 

Table 3: Dissolution test Conditions;

Apparatus

Type-I Indian pharmacopeia (Paddle type)

Analytical method

UV-spectroscopy (310nm) 

Dissolution media

500ml distilled water

Speed and time      

50 rpm for 15 hours

Temperature             

37±0.5ºC

Sample amount           

5ml with replacement

Sampling time             

30min, 1h, 2h, 3h, 4h, 5h, 6h, 7h, 8h, 9h, 10h, 11h, 12h, 13h, 14h, 15h.

 

 


 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Analytical Method Development

Calibration of pure drug

The pure drug absorbances with their respective concentrations are mentioned in below table. 

Table 4: Pure drug absorbance with their respective concentrations

Concentration(µg/ml)

Absorbance(nm)

5

0.154

10

0.300

15

0.458

20

0.605

25

0.741

 

image

Figure 1:   Calibration curve of pure drug and excipients by UV- spectroscopy

Calibration data of drug with excipients 

The calibration data of drug with excipients is shown in below table.


 

 

 


 

Table 5:   Concentration and absorbance value of the calibration sample

Concentration (µg/ml)

Absorbance(nm)

5

0.141

10

0.287

15

0.426

20

0.574

25

0.715

 

image

Figure 2:  Calibration curve of pure drug and excipients by UV- spectroscopy


 

 


 

Validation of UV analytical method

Linearity and range: Worth of correlation coefficient was found to be r2 = 0.999 in Conc. Taken from 5, 10, 15, 20, 25(µg/ml), that indicated a linear graph in between concentration and absorbance. The spectrum for this method was 5-25(µg/ml).

Accuracy and precision: The exactness (measured by % error) and precision (measured by % RSD) for both intraday and interday studies, as mentioned below, were found within the acceptable range of 2%. Thus method was accurate as well as precise. The SD, RSD, accuracy, and precision data of intraday are recorded in table given below.


 

 

Table 6: Intraday accuracy and precision by UV spectroscopy method

Actual conc. (µg/ml)

Mean conc. (µg/ml).

SD

% RSD

% Bias

% Drug recovery

6

6.24

0.020117

0.003221

4.08

104

16

15.73

0.053224

0.003383

-1.66

98.33

24

24.03

0.034843

0.001449

0.15

100.15

 

 

The RSD, accuracy, and precision data of intraday are recorded in table given below.

Table 7: Intraday accuracy and precision by UV spectroscopy method

Actual Conc. (µg/ml)

Day 1

Day 2

Day 3

Mean conc.

% Error

% RSD

6

5.88

6.24

6.06

6.06

1

2.9

16

15.96

15.73

16.09

15.92

-0.45

1.14

24

23.29

24.03

24.00

23.77

-0.94

1.76

 

 

Estimation Parameter of Powder Blend

The estimation parameter like angle of repose, bulk density, tapped density, Hausner's ratio, given the following table given below.

Table 8: Evaluation parameters and values;

Parameters

F1

F2

F3

F4

F5

F6

F7

F8

F9

Bulk density

0.299

0.30

0.30

0.306

0.30

0.30

0.30

0.306

0.307

Tapped density

0.45

0.44

0.43

0.434

0.434

0.428

0.428

0.422

0.424

Hausner’s ratio

1.43

1.41

1.43

1.41

1.44

1.426

1.42

1.37

1.36

Angle of repose

27º.08’

27º.36’

28º.16’

27º.76’

28º.34’

28º.55’

29º.21’

30º.11’

30º.26’

 

 

 

 

FT-IR Analysis

image

Figure 3: FTIR of ONDCL (Pure Drug)

image

Figure 4:  FTIR of ONDCL and HPMC K15M

image

Figure 5: FTIR of ONDCL and Guargum

image

Figure 6: FTIR of ONDCL and Sodium Carbonate

image

Figure 7: FTIR of ONDCL and Chitosan

Evaluation of Formulated Tablets

 In the estimation parameters of the formulations like diameter, hardness, weight variation, thickness, friability, and percentage drug Ingredient were given in below table.

Table 9: Evaluation parameters and their values

PARAMETERS

F-1

F-2

F-3

F-4

F-5

F-6

F-7

F-8

F-9

Weight variation

99±1

99±1

99±1

99±1

99±1

99±1

99±1

99±1

99±1

Thickness

1.67

1.66

1.68

1.69

1.68

1.67

1.68

1.66

1.67

Diameter

4.00

3.99

3.52

3.73

3.50

3.63

3.52

3.53

3.93

Hardness

3±0.5

3±0.5

3±0.5

3±0.5

3±0.5

3±0.5

3±0.5

3±0.5

3±0.5

Friability

0.8%

0.5%

0.7%

0.6%

0.8%

0.5%

0.4%

0.1%

0.3%

%  drug content

102%

104%

100.2%

101.1%

99.2%

99%

99.9%

99.2%

98.5%

 

Dissolution test

The dissolution study of Gastro Retentive Floating tablets of ONDCL using USP type 2 dissolution apparatus which shown in table no. 10.

Table 10: All formulations percentage drug release with the respect of time

% Drug release

Time(h)

F-1

F-2

F-3

F-4

F-5

F-6

F-7

F-8

F-9

0.5

62.159

49.165

46.131

42.404

29.120

29.056

26.556

22.47540

22.654

1

78.476

70.493

64.118

70.807

47.275

45.813

41.49

32.55081

31.564

2

91.482

94.601

80.233

96.073

68.121

64.341

46.58

43.14467

42.236

3

94.063

108.64

83.331

105.60

74.004

73.953

63.78

50.31844

49.523

4

95.312

114.09

84.745

108.30

85.377

76.324

66.78

54.95942

57.425

5

97.573

117.68

86.409

110.23

86.817

79.292

72.91

57.71926

59.452

6

98.062

120.00

87.271

112.59

87.872

79.921

73.45

60.57032

62.845

7

105.74

125.76

90.326

118.48

93.074

81.743

66.71

61.72459

63.953

8

109.04

127.71

93.310

128.12

96.268

86.616

78.15

62.925

66.482

9

110.19

130.44

93.016

131.18

97.839

88.394

80.03

65.5647

67.968

10

112.78

132.18

99.190

133.27

98.449

89.792

81.43

66.5781

69.435

11

113.28

132.61

101.07

132.77

99.747

90.729

82.67

73.74959

72.624

12

114.66

127.67

101.12

137.07

99.804

90.743

87.56

82.62827

79.652

13

116.33

130.59

101.30

131.32

100.98

91.405

89.11

87.90040

88.785

14

117.40

134.28

102.85

132.48

101.36

92.333

92.22

94.80778

93.245

15

117.79

128.98

101.25

133.70

102.76

93.867

96.63

98.96598

96.865

 

image

Figure 8: Release profile of ONDCL


 

The Gastro Retentive formulation (F8) of ONDCL was given maximum release in the distilled water, so this formulation could be used for further study.

In Vitro Buoyancy Studies:

Among the nine formulations, the formulations F1 – F9 (containing various type of Natural polymer and HPMC K15M) Floated immediately.

All the formulations remained buoyant up to 24hours. The results were represented in Table no. 11 & Figure 9.


 

 

Table 11: Floating Study of ONDCL Tablets

Formulation Code

Buoyancy Lag Time

Total Floating Time (Hrs)

F1

Floats Immediately

>24hrs

F2

Floats Immediately

>24hrs

F3

Floats Immediately

>24hrs

F4

Floats Immediately

>24hrs

F5

Floats Immediately

>24hrs

F6

Floats Immediately

>24hrs

F7

Floats Immediately

>24hrs

F8

Floats Immediately

>24hrs

F9

Floats Immediately

>24hrs

 

Figure 9: Floating Study (A. F1, F2 & F3 Floats instantly, B. F4, F5 & F6 Floats instantly,C. F7, F8, & F9 Floats instantly, D. F1, F2 & F3 Still Floats after 12 Hours E. F4, F5 & F6 Still Floats After 12 Hours, F. F7, F8, & F9 Still Floats After 12 Hours)


 

CONCLUSION

In the present study result is visibly point out the probability to prepare Ondansetron hydrochloride in the form of FDDS with extension of GRT and controlled drug release. The upcoming studies may be extension to disclose the pharmacokinetic parameters which is associated to bioavailability and clinical studies of upcoming compounds, which may prove that this type of the formulation safely administered for the curing from nausea with improved therapeutic efficacy. Gastro retentive Floating tablet (F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7 F8 & F9) of the Ondansetron hydrochloride were directly compressed formulation which was prepared by using HPMC K15, Chitosan, Guargum and Sodium Bicarbonate. ‘All the formulations were studied for hardness, weight variation, thickness, friability’, assay, drug release and Floating studies. Formulation Fhad achieved the target release profile of >80% in 12h. F-8 formulation stored for further product development studies.

Acknowledgments 

The authors are grateful to Hygia Institute of Pharmaceutical Education & Research, Lucknow, U.P. for providing research facilities.

Conflict of Interest 

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

1. Kulkarni A, Bhatia M, Development and evaluation of region selective bilayer floating tablets of atenolol and lovastatin for biphasic release profile. Ira. J. Pharm. Res., 2009; 8(1):15-25.

2. Agarwal G, Agarwal S, Karrar PK, Goel S, "Oral Sustained Release Tablets: An Overview with a Special emphasis on Matrix Tablet". American Journal of Advance Drug Delivery, 2017; 5 (02):27-32.

3. Bagherwal A, Patidar DK, Sharma P, Studies on formulation and evaluation of floating tablets of ciprofloxacin HCl. Int. J. Compr. Pharm., 2010; 5(02):1-4.

4. ApuSarker A, Pthana, D.Shrestha, Golam K, and Reza-ulJalil."Investigation of In vitro Release Kinetics of Carbamazepine from Eudragits RSPO and RLPO Matrix tablets". Trop J Pharm, 2009; 8 (2):145 https://doi.org/10.4314/tjpr.v8i2.44523

5. Brahmankar D.M., Jaiswal S.B., "Biopharmaceutics and Pharmacokinetics A Treatise", Vallabh prakashan, New Delhi, 1995; 10th edition: 347-352.

6. BD Priya, BV Lakshmi, V Bhavya, V Ramya, D Aparna, T Prasanti, and AL Rao. "Simultaneous determination of ranitidine hydrochloride in bulk and tablet dosage form by UV spectrophotometry". J pharm research, 2017; 1(5):1-6 https://doi.org/10.23880/OAJPR-16000128

7. Deshmukh T. B., Deo S.S., Inam F., Lambat T.L., Gurubaxani S. B., and Choudhari A.V. "Development and validation of Ondansetron hydrochloride in pharmaceutical dosage form by RP-HPLC method". IJASET, 2015; 1: 15-20.

8. Emami J, Tejeddin M, Ahmadi F. "Preparation and in-vitro evaluation of sustained release matrix tablets of Flutamide using synthetic and naturally occurring polymers". Int. J. Pharm. Res, 2008; 7(4):247-257.

9. Gilbert and Neil."Tablets".VARGHESE publishing house. 400014, 1990; 430-456.

10. Gohel C., Patel P., and BariyaShital H. "Studies in Preparation and Evaluation of pH- Independent Sustained-Release Matrix Tablets of Verapamil HCl Using Directly Compressible Eudragits", Pharmaceutical Development and Technology, 2003; 8(4):323-333 https://doi.org/10.1081/PDT-120024686

11. https://www.drugbank.ca/salts/DBSALT000921

12. https://scholar.google.com/

13. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=grdds.

14. Indian Pharmacopoeia 2007, Govt. of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Delhi: Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission, Ghaziabad, "Tablets", 2007; 44:662-663.

15. Indian Pharmacopoeia 2018, Govt. of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Delhi: Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission, Ghaziabad,"Ondansetron Tablets" 2018; 3:2792-2793.

16. Indian Pharmacopoeia 2018, Govt. of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Delhi: Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission, Ghaziabad,"Ondansetron hydrochloride"2018; 3:2787.

17. Ibric Svetlana, jovanovic Milica, Djuric Zorica, Jelen Parojcic, solomun Ljiljana. "The Application of Generalize regression neural network in the modelling and optimization of aspirin extended release tablets with Eudragits RSPO as matrix substance". Journal of controlled release, 2002; 82:213-232 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-3659(02)00044-5

18. Jadhav S, Kharat R, Ansari A, Tamboli A."Estimation of Ondansetron hydrochloride in bulk and formulation by the second-order derivative area under curve UV-spectrophotometric method". Pharma tutor, 2015; no.3 (8):42-46.

19. KD Tripathi, "Essential of medical pharmacology". Book, 2008; 6th edition https://doi.org/10.5005/jp/books/10282

20. Medikone S, Mukthinuthalapati MA, and Bukkapatnam V. "Novel analytical techniques for the determination of Ondansetron hydrochloride in pharmaceutical dosage forms by spectrophotometry". Jcps journal on analytical technique, 2015; no. 8 (4):863-866.

21. Mushabbarbasha MD, B Praveena, M. Srinidhi, SK. A. Rahanaman. "Method development and validation of Ondansetron in bulk and pharmaceutical dosage form by stability-indicating rp-HPLC method". Internation Journal of pharma tech research, 2013; (1)5:86-98.

22. Makhija N. Sapnna, and Vavia R. Pradeep. "Once daily sustained release tablets of venlafaxine, anovel antidepressant", European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, 2002; 54:15 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0939-6411(02)00049-8

23. Nicholas, Leon, Herbert, and Joseph. "Sustained release dosage form." VARGHESE publishing house. 400014, 1990; 430-456.

24. Patra S, Chaudhury A. A., Kar R.K., and Barik B. B. Spectrophotometry method for Ondansetron. Ijps journal on Ondansetron, 2007; no.69 (6):840-841. https://doi.org/10.4103/0250-474X.39449

25. Panchal VU, and chauhan PS. "Simultaneous determination of Ondansetron hydrochloride and pantoprazole sodium in their bulk dosage form by ratio derivative spectroscopy". UJPBS, 2013; 1(01):37-41.

26. Kalaichelvi R, MadhvanRao B, Manikanta S, Gopainath G, Usha M, Venkata Raman D, Srinivasa D, Jayachandran E. "Uv spectrophotometric method for determination of ondansetron hydrochloride in pure and its formulation".International journal of pharmacy and pharmaceutical sciences, no.4, 2012; 151-152.

27. SuneethaA, and ChandanaPriya T. "Rp - HPLC method for simultaneous estimation of paracetamol and Ondansetron in bulk and oral suspension". Journal of pharmaceutical research, 2014; (4):106-110. https://doi.org/10.18579/jpcrkc/2014/13/4/78375

28. Yadav S., Padhi S., and Kumar P. "Design and characterization of floating tablet of ondansetron hydrochloride for gastricretation", Pharmacophore, 2014; 5(4):467-476