Available online on 15.09.2021 at http://jddtonline.info

Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics

Open Access to Pharmaceutical and Medical Research

Copyright   © 2021 The  Author(s): This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial use provided the original author and source are credited

Open Access  Full Text Article                                                                                                                                        Research Article 

Physicochemical, Druggable, ADMET Pharmacoinformatics and Therapeutic Potentials of Azadirachtin - a Prenol Lipid (Triterpenoid) from Seed Oil Extracts of Azadirachta indica A. Juss.

T. Loganathan1, A. Barathinivas2, C. Soorya3, S. Balamurugan4, T. G. Nagajothi5, S. Ramya3, R. Jayakumararaj3*

Department of Plant Biology and Plant Biotechnology, LN Government College (Autonomous), Ponneri - 601204, TN, India

Department of Zoology, Yadava College for Men, Tirupalai- 625 017, Madurai, TamilNadu, India 

Department of Botany, Government Arts College, Melur – 625106, Madurai, TamilNadu, India

Department of Mathematics, Government Arts College, Melur – 625106, Madurai, TamilNadu, India

Department of Botany, R D Government Arts College, Sivagangai – 630561, TamilNadu, India

Article Info:

_________________________________________

Article History:

Received 06 July 2021      

Reviewed 09 August 2021

Accepted 16 August 2021  

Published 15 Sep 2021  

_________________________________________

Cite this article as: 

Loganathan T, Barathinivas A, Soorya C, Balamurugan S, Nagajothi TG, Ramya S, Jayakumararaj R, Physicochemical, Druggable, ADMET Pharmacoinformatics and Therapeutic Potentials of Azadirachtin - a Prenol Lipid (Triterpenoid) from Seed Oil Extracts of Azadirachta indica A. Juss., Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics. 2021; 11(5):33-46  

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v11i5.4981  

______________________________________________

*Address for Correspondence:  

R. Jayakumararaj, Department of Plant Biology and Plant Biotechnology, LN Government College (Autonomous), Ponneri - 601204, TN, India

Abstract

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

Azadirachtin (AZA) is the most abundant bioactive secondary metabolite (BASM) in neem seed oil extract (NSOE) of Azadirachta indica A. Juss. AZA is localised in different parts of the plant (seeds, fruits, flowers, leaves, stem, bark and root) however, with varying degree of concentration. It has been documented that maximum concentration of AZA is present to the tune of 48000 μg g-1 in the seeds. It has been established that the environmental conditions determines the overall content and composition of BASM in different parts of the plant. Neem plant parts are most commonly used as therapeutic agents in remote villages in India for its ethnomedicinal therapeutic potentials; however, its physicochemical, druggable and pharmacological properties inadequately described. In the present study an attempt has been made to evaluate the physicochemical, druggable and pharmacological properties of Azadirachtin in NSOE of A. indica from ADMET perspectives.

Keywords: NEEM; Azadirachta indicaAzadirachtin; Pharmacoinformatics; ADMET; Drug-Likeness; Toxicology

 


 

INTRODUCTION

Azadirachta indica A. Juss commonly known as Neem or Margosa belongs to the family Meliaceae1-3. Popular as Miracle tree it is a natural store-house of phyto-drugs since the dawn of civilization4,5. This tree is one of the most versatile plant across the country and elsewhere known for its use in various Indigenous/ Traditional Systems of Medicine. A. indica has its origin from India and is commonly distributed in the South East Asian (SEA) Region (Bangladesh, Srilanka, Bhutan, Myanmar, Pakistan, and Nepal)6, however, it has been disseminated world over, in particular the tropical and sub-tropical regions7

Neem is a perennial, small to medium-sized (10 - 15 m) and fast-growing tree and grows well in locations with temperature to a maximum of 48-50 °C, the plant needs low annual rainfall (400 – 800 mm/annum). Furthermore, the plant grows well in poor/ degraded/ mined soils. However, growth is affected by low temperature (poor growth below 14 °C) and frosts. Being the storehouse/ repository of wide array of BASM, Neem tree remains the ideal target of interest for research. As most of the BASM are localised in the leaves and seeds, destruction of whole plant is not required for the isolation/ extraction of bioactive principles. Furthermore, being perennial, annual replenishment of leaves and seeds prevents whole-plant harvest. BASM of Neem contains high proportion of water-soluble substances that favours DIY extraction and application in folklore medicine. Moreover, majority of these metabolites are eco-friendly bioactive compounds that are biodegradable in nature, adhere to GRAS standards, therefore harmless to man and environment8

A. indica shows therapeutics potential in healthcare and management due to rich source of BASM9-11. The most important active constituent is azadirachtin, while others include nimbolinin, nimbin, nimbidin, nimbidol, sodium nimbinate, gedunin, salannin, and quercetin. Leaves contain BASM such as nimbin, nimbanene, 6-desacetylnimbinene, nimbandiol, nimbolide, ascorbic acid, n-hexacosanol, 7-desacetyl-7-benzoylazadiradione, 7-desacetyl-7-benzoylgedunin, 17-hydroxyazadiradione, and nimbiol12-14. Quercetin and β-sitosterol, polyphenolic flavonoids, obtained from fresh leaves have significant antibacterial and antifungal properties; while seeds are comparably rich in azadirachtin14

Since antiquity all parts of the plant, including root, stem, bark, leaves, fruits, and seeds are used to cure various ailments in humans and domestic animals therefore, Neem has been considered as a multi-purposes village dispensary15-25. In fact, therapeutic applications attributed to Neem include abortive, analgesic, antibacterial, anticancer, antidiabetic, antifungal, anti-helminthic, anti-hyperglycemic, anti-inflammatory, antimalarial, antipyretic, antispasmodic, anti-spermatogenic, antiviral, diuretic, hyper-cholesteremic, immuno-modulatory, mouth-wash, contraception, dental plaque, head lice, heart disease, insect repellent, malaria, pesticide, psoriasis, skin diseases, wound healing, gastro-intestinal ailments26-55

Neem is influenced by a myriad of factors, namely geographic area, climate, genetic variability, agronomic conditions, plant morphology and physiology, collection and storage of plant material which determines the therapeutic potential. Further, this variation affects the development processes as regulation of secondary metabolite synthesis is directly linked to gene expression. This boils down to the fact that growth of Neem plant and the biochemical composition of the active principle is significantly influenced by external parameters. Kaushik et al56. and Tomar et al57. independently, analysed trees from different regions of India and observed significant difference in the AZA content of seeds collected in different regions. Furthermore, Kaushik et al56. evaluated the effect of climatic conditions in the AZA content of seeds and indicated that AZA values of samples from semi-arid regions with mild winters were different from values observed in hot sub-humid, hot arid and hot semi-arid with cold winter regions. Similarly, Zheng et al.58 pointed out that season and ecosystem properties significantly affect neem seed oil yield and, in a less extent, AZA content. In fact, AZA quantity obtained in seed was significantly influenced by precipitation, with lower values observed in rainy season. Likewise, the procedure and time of collection of the plant material also influences AZA concentration in the seeds. In the case of seeds, AZA concentration is maximized when clean and healthy seeds are collected59,60

Indeed, it has been reported that mechanical damage, insect infestation and fungal infection of seeds significantly affect quantity and quality of AZA content. Since its isolation for the first time in 1968, AZA has been the subject of intense research, particularly of biological, synthetic and structural studies61. Azadirachtin - limonoid group of compound is a bioactive secondary metabolite present in neem seeds12,13,26,27,60. It is a highly oxidized tetranortriterpenoid that asserts a plethora of oxygen-bearing functional group which includes an enol-ether, acetal, hemiacetal, tetra-substituted epoxide structure with variety of carboxylic esters (Fig. 1). Increasing interest in AZA is mainly due to the unique biomolecular properties, including broad spectrum of activity even in trace amounts, no or low toxicity to mammals. Its complex structure makes its synthesis a daunting task. Biological activities attributed to AZA include application as a bioinsecticide, biopesticide, insect-pest repellent as it is non-toxicity to humans. Azadirachtin has been identified as potential inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2 main protease62-64 and is expected to play a major role in the management of COVID-19. Furthermore, pharmacological characterization is expected to validate Azadirachtin as novel drug lead65-68.


 

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Class

:

Equisetopsida C. Agardh

 

Subclass

:

Magnoliidae Novák Ex Takht.

Superorder

:

Rosanae Takht.

Order

:

Sapindales Juss. Ex Bercht.

Family

:

Meliaceae Juss.

Genus

:

Azadirachta A. Juss.

Species 

:

Azadirachta indica A. Juss.

Common Name 

:

Neem

Vernacular Name

:

Vempu (Tamil)

 

 

 

 


 

Botanical Description:  Tree, up to 15 m tall. Branches glabrous; Leaves imparipinnate, pulvinus at the base; leaflets alternate to opposite, 2.5 - 7.0 cm long, 1.5 - 4.0 cm broad, ovate, subsessile, acuminate; Flowers white, sweet-scented; Sepals obovate, 1.5 mm long, puberulous, imbricate. Petals 6 mm long, obvoate to oblong, white, margin ciliate; Staminal tube 5 mm long, puberulous, 10-striate, 10-toothed; teeth 2-lobed; anthers oblong, basifixed; Ovary sub-globose; style linear 2.5 mm long; stigma trifid. Fruit: Drupe oblong, 1.3 - 2.0 cm long, greenish-yellow, Seed: 1-seeded. Plants were collected from the fields in the wild Palani Hills, Western Ghats, INDIA as described previously33

GC-MS Analysis 

Neem Seed Oil Extracts of A. indica was obtained from the seed samples collected from the foothills of Alagar Hills, Alagarkovil Reserve Forest, Dindigul District, Tamil Nadu, India. Phyto-components were identified using GC–MS detection system as described previously, however with modification, whereby portion of the extract was analysed directly by headspace sampling. GC–MS analysis was accomplished using an Agilent 7890A GC system set up with 5975C VL MSD (Agilent Technologies, CA, USA). Capillary column used was DB-5MS (30×0.25 mm, film thickness of 0.25 μm; J&W Scientific, CA, USA). Temperature program was set as follows: initial temperature 50°C held for 1 min, 5°C per min to 100°C, 9°C per min to 200°C held for 7.89 min, and the total run time was 40 min. The flow rate of helium as a carrier gas was 0.811851 mL/ min. MS system was performed in electron ionization (EI) mode with Selected Ion Monitoring (SIM). The ion source temperature and quadruple temperature were set at 230°C and 150°C, respectively. Identification of phyto-components was performed by comparison of their retention times and mass with those of authentic standards spectra using computer searches in NIST 08.L and Wiley 7n.l libraries3,33

ADMET Prediction 

PubChem database was applied to get the smiles structures of the natural compounds, and was further used for the ADMET prediction. The qualitative assessment of pharmacokinetics viz; absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicity (ADMET) profile of selected compounds were predicted computationally by using SwissADME and toxicity prediction using TOPKAT (Accelrys, Inc., USA). QikProp develops and employs QSAR/QSPR models using partial least squares, principal component analysis and multiple linear regression to predict physico-chemical significant descriptors68-70.


 

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 

Chemical kingdom

Organic compounds

Super class

Lipids and lipid-like molecules

Class

Prenol lipids

Subclass

Triterpenoids

PubChem Identifier

102146586

Synonyms

Azadirachtanin

Canonical SMILES 

CC(=O)O[C@@H]1OC[C@@]23C([C@@]1(C)[C@H](OC(=O)C)C[C@@H]2O)C[C@H]([C@@]1([C@@H]3C(=O)[C@H](OC(=O)C)[C@@]2(C1=CC[C@H]2c1ccoc1)C)C)O

InChI Key

YQSXXKRVYCLMRM-SIUABMRBSA-N

 


 

Physicochemical Properties: The molecular weight of AZA was 720.72 (g/mol); the calculated LogP value was -0.20; LogD - 0.14; LogSw - -4.34. The total number of stereo-centers in the molecule was 16; the stereo-chemical complexity of the molecule was 0.457; the calculated Fsp3 value of AZA was 0.771; The overall calculated Topological polar surface area of AZA was 215.34(Å2). Likewise the calculated number of hydrogen bond donors in the molecule was 3; whereas the number of hydrogen bond acceptors was 16; the number of smallest set of smallest rings (SSSR) in the molecule analyzed was 2; the size of the biggest system ring in the molecule was 15; similarly, the total number of rotatable bonds in the molecule was 6; the number of rigid bonds was 38; the number of charged groups was 0; similarly the total charge of the compound was 0; the number of carbon atoms in the molecule was 35; whereas the number of heteroatoms in AZA was calculated as 16; the number of heavy atoms in the molecule was calculated as 51; the ratio between the number of non-carbon atoms and the number of carbon atoms in the compound was 0.46 (Fig. 2,3).

Druggability Properties: Lipinski's rule of 5 violations of the molecule was 2; Veber rule was Low for the molecule; similarly Egan rule for the molecule was also Low; the Oral PhysChem score (Traffic Lights) for the molecule was recorded as 5; GSK's 4/400 score for the molecule was Good; Pfizer's 3/75 score for the molecule was Good; Weighted quantitative estimate of drug-likeness (QEDw) score for the molecule was 0.164; Solubility Forecast Index was Good and the solubility score was 9441.49; 

ADMET Properties: Only when the ADME/Tox properties of a drug like compound are of high quality, and when the target has been validated, the compound could be developed into a pharma-drug. In silico drug-likeness evaluation of Azadirachtin for Human Intestinal Absorption (HIA+) value had a probability of 0.890; Blood Brain Barrier (BBB-) value for the molecule had a probability of 0.773; Caco-2 permeable (Caco2-) value for the molecule had a probability of 0.711 (Fig. 4); P-glycoprotein substrate (Substrate) value for the molecule had a probability of 0.835; P-glycoprotein inhibitor I (Inhibitor) value for the molecule had a probability of 0.672; P-glycoprotein inhibitor II (Non-inhibitor) value for the molecule had a probability of 0.534. CYP450 2C9 substrate (Non-substrate) value for the molecule had a probability of 0.857; CYP450 2D6 substrate (Non-substrate) - 0.872; CYP450 3A4 substrate (Substrate) - 0.714; CYP450 1A2 inhibitor (Non-inhibitor) - 0.887; CYP450 2C9 inhibitor (Non-inhibitor) - 0.845; CYP450 2D6 inhibitor (Non-inhibitor) - 0.944; CYP450 2C19 inhibitor (Non-inhibitor) - 0.833; CYP450 3A4 inhibitor (Non-inhibitor) - 0.770; CYP450 inhibitory promiscuity (Low CYP Inhibitory Promiscuity) - 0.886; Ames test (Non AMES toxic) - 0.756; Carcinogenicity (Non-carcinogens) - 0.946; Biodegradation (Not ready biodegradable) - 1.000; Rat acute toxicity (4.348 LD50, mol/kg) - PNA; hERG inhibition (predictor I) (Weak inhibitor) - 0.992; hERG inhibition (predictor II) (Non-inhibitor) - 0.569 respectively. Computational methods for analysing and estimating the toxicity of natural bioactive compounds are considered as useful tool for validation as it provides in-depth understanding of toxicogenomics. Therefore, determining the toxicity of BASM in-silico is warranted to identify their potential harmful effects on humans, animals, plants, besides the environment as in-vivo animal tests are constrained by time, ethical considerations, and financial burden. Data pertaining to the descriptors viz., Toxicity, Environmental toxicity, Tox21 pathway and Toxicophore Rules for Azadirachtin are summarized in Table 2. Furthermore, GPCR ligand, ion channel modulator, kinase inhibitor, nuclear receptor ligand, protease inhibitor, enzyme inhibitor score for AZA were calculated as -0.71; -1.51; -1.46; -0.67; -0.35 and -0.71 respectively (Fig. 3). Swiss Target Prediction towards Macrophage migration inhibitory factor, Heat shock protein (HSP 90-alpha), Kappa Opioid receptor, Mu opioid receptor, Delta opioid receptor, Thrombin, Squalene synthetase, Glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta, Glycogen synthase kinase-3 alpha, Protein kinase C alpha, Apoptosis regulator Bcl-X, HMG-CoA reductase, Zinc finger protein GLI1, Proto-oncogene c-JUN, Vanilloid receptor for the compound has been provided in Table 4. Chemical and biological investigations on Azadirachta indica bioactive compounds indicates that the compound is safe for use as a drug molecule3,72,72.

CONCLUSION

The present study is an example to insights into the broad scope of pharmacoinformatics to plant based natural product research with an emphasis on drug discovery. The study indicates that plant based natural products still possess an extraordinary challenge that has to be solved before taken for drug development. However, it is anticipated that as more quality data on natural product research, such as bio-activity, biomolecularinformatics, cheminformatics, toxicoinformatics integrated together with new algorithms and machine learning techniques to accelerate natural product based drug discovery. Furthermore, online databases serve as attractive sources for identifying novel natural product scaffolds with promising drug-like properties in NPs which is expected to accelerate the pace of Drug Discovery.  

REFERENCES

1. Kalaivani T, Meignanam E, Premkumar N, Siva R, Vijayakumar V, Rajasekaran C, Ramya S, Jayakumararaj R. Studies on hepatoprotective properties of leaf extracts of Azadirachta indica A. Juss (Meliaceae). Ethnobotanical Leaflets 2009; 2009(1):20.

2. Schmutterer H, Ascher KR. Neem tree (Azadirachta indica A. Juss.) and other meliaceous plants VCH; 1995 https://doi.org/10.1002/3527603980

3. Loganathan T, Barathinivas A, Soorya C, Balamurugan S, Nagajothi TG, Ramya S, & Jayakumararaj R GCMS Profile of Bioactive Secondary Metabolites with Therapeutic Potential in the Ethanolic Leaf Extracts of Azadirachta indica - A Sacred Traditional Medicinal Plant of INDIA Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics. 2021 (IN-PRESS)

4. Zeenat F, Ravish MS, Ahmad W, Ahmad I. Therapeutic, phytochemistry and pharmacology of Azadirachta indica: A review. Int J Unani Integr Med. 2018; 2(1):20-8.

5. Biswas K, Chattopadhyay I, Banerjee RK, Bandyopadhyay U. Biological activities and medicinal properties of neem (Azadirachta indica). Current Science. 2002:1336-45.

6. Negi PS, Jayaprakasha GK, Jena BS. Distribution and introduction cultivation state of Azadirachta indica Food Chemistry. 2002; 80:293-7.

7. Yan_ping ZH, Yong_qi LA, Xing_ming PE, Juan LI. Global Distribution and Introduction Cultivation State of Azadirachta indica [J]. Forest Inventory and Planning. 2002; 3(2)5-9.

8. Ramya S, & Jayakumararaj R. Antifeedant activity of selected ethno-botanicals used by tribals of Vattal Hills on Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner). Journal of Pharmacy Research. 2009; 2(8):1414-1418.

9. Islas JF, Acosta E, Zuca G, Delgado-Gallegos JL, Moreno-Treviño MG, Escalante B, Moreno-Cuevas JE. An overview of Neem Azadirachta indica and its potential impact on health. Journal of Functional Foods. 2020; 74:104171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2020.104171

10. Rahmani A, Almatroudi A, Alrumaihi F, Khan A. Pharmacological and therapeutic potential of neem (Azadirachta indica). Pharmacognosy Reviews. 2018; 12(24). https://doi.org/10.4103/phrev.phrev_8_18

11. Bhowmik D, Chiranjib YJ, Tripathi KK, Kumar KS. Herbal remedies of Azadirachta indica and its medicinal application. J Chem Pharm Res. 2010; 2(1):62-72.

12. Chen J, Fan X, Zhu J, Song L, Li Z, Lin F, Yu R, Xu H, Zi J. Limonoids from seeds of Azadirachta indica A. Juss. and their cytotoxic activity. Acta pharmaceutica sinica B. 2018; 8(4):639-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2017.12.009

13. Khanal P, Magadum P, Patil BM, Hullatti KK. In silico docking study of Limonoids from Azadirachta indica with pfpk5: A Novel Target for Plasmodium falciparum. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2019; 81(2):326-32. https://doi.org/10.36468/pharmaceutical-sciences.514

14. Kraus W, Cramer R, Sawitzki G. Tetranortriterpenoids from the seeds of Azadirachta indica Phytochemistry. 1981; 20(1):117-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9422(81)85229-6

15. Willy S, Nilan R, Kekare MB, Vikas V. Estimation of two bioactive compounds from Azadirachta indica A. Juss. leaves using HPLC. International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences. 2010; 1(2).

16. Mitra CR, Garg HS, Pandey GN. Identification of nimbidic acid and nimbidinin from Azadirachta indica Phytochemistry. 1971; 10(4):857-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(00)97156-5

17. Moga MA, Bălan A, Anastasiu CV, Dimienescu OG, Neculoiu CD, Gavriș C. An overview on the anticancer activity of Azadirachta indica (Neem) in gynecological cancers. International journal of molecular sciences. 2018; 19(12):3898. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19123898

18. Baildya N, Khan AA, Ghosh NN, Dutta T, Chattopadhyay AP. Screening of potential drug from Azadirachta indica (Neem) extracts for SARS-CoV-2: an insight from molecular docking and MD-simulation studies. Journal of Molecular Structure 2021; 1227:129390 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2020.129390

19. Eid A, Jaradat N, Elmarzugi N. A Review of chemical constituents and traditional usage of Neem plant (Azadirachta indica). Palestinian Medical and Pharmaceutical Journal. 2017; 2(2):75-81.

20. Hossain MA, Al-Toubi WA, Weli AM, Al-Riyami QA, Al-Sabahi JN. Identification and characterization of chemical compounds in different crude extracts from leaves of Omani neem. Journal of Taibah University for Science. 2013; 7(4):181-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtusci.2013.05.003

21. Kumar R, Sharma S, Devi L. Investigation of total phenolic, flavonoid contents and antioxidant activity from extracts of Azadirachta indica of Bundelkhand Region. Int. J. Life. Sci. Scienti. Res. eISSN. 2018; 2455(1716):1716. https://doi.org/10.21276/ijlssr.2018.4.4.10

22. Siddiqui BS, Afshan F, Faizi S, Naqvi SN, Tariq RM. Two insecticidal tetranortriterpenoids from Azadirachta indica Phytochemistry. 2000; 53(3):371-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(99)00548-8

23. Awolu OO, Obafaye RO, Ayodele BS. Optimization of solvent extraction of oil from neem Azadirachta indica and its characterizations. Journal of Scientific Research and Reports. 2013; 10:304-314 https://doi.org/10.9734/JSRR/2013/3705

24. Agrawal S, Popli DB, Sircar K, Chowdhry A. A review of the anticancer activity of Azadirachta indica (Neem) in oral cancer. Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research. 2020 Apr 1; 10(2):206-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2020.04.007

25. Agrawal S, Popli DB, Sircar K, Chowdhry A. A review of the anticancer activity of Azadirachta indica (Neem) in oral cancer. Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research. 2020 Apr 1; 10(2):206-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2020.04.007

26. Upadhyay SN, Dhawan S, Garg S, Talwar GP. Immunomodulatory effects of neem Azadirachta indica oil. International Journal of Immunopharmacology. 1992; 14(7):1187-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/0192-0561(92)90054-O

27. Muhammad A, Kashere MA. NEEM, Azadirachta indica L.(A. Juss): an eco-friendly botanical insecticide for managing farmers 'insects pest problems - a review. FUDMA Journal of Sciences. 2020; 4(4):484-91. https://doi.org/10.33003/fjs-2020-0404-506

28. Benelli G, Canale A, Toniolo C, Higuchi A, Murugan K, Pavela R, Nicoletti M. Neem (Azadirachta indica): towards the ideal insecticide?. Natural product research. 2017; 31(4):369-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2016.1214834

29. Schmutterer H. Properties and potential of natural pesticides from the neem tree, Azadirachta indica Annual review of entomology. 1990; 35(1):271-97. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.35.010190.001415

30. Gupta SC, Prasad S, Tyagi AK, Kunnumakkara AB, Aggarwal BB. Neem (Azadirachta indica): An Indian traditional panacea with modern molecular basis. Phytomedicine. 2017; 34:14-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2017.07.001

31. Hashmat I, Azad H, Ahmed A. Neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss) - A nature's drugstore: an overview. Int Res J Biol Sci. 2012; 1(6):76-9.

32. Ramya S, Neethirajan K & Jayakumararaj R. Profile of bioactive compounds in Syzygium cumini-a review. J. Pharm. Res 2012; 5(8):4548-4553.

33. Soorya C, Balamurugan S, Basha AN, Kandeepan C, Ramya S, Jayakumararaj R. Profile of Bioactive Phyto-compounds in Essential Oil of Cymbopogon martinii from Palani Hills, Western Ghats, INDIA. Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics. 2021; 11(4):60-5. https://doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v11i4.4887

34. Saleem S, Muhammad G, Hussain MA, Bukhari SN. A comprehensive review of phytochemical profile, bioactives for pharmaceuticals, and pharmacological attributes of Azadirachta indica Phytotherapy research. 2018; 32(7):1241-72. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.6076

35. Sarkar S, Singh RP, Bhattacharya G. Exploring the role of Azadirachta indica (neem) and its active compounds in the regulation of biological pathways: an update on molecular approach. 3 Biotech. 2021; 11(4):1-2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-021-02745-4

36. Ahmad S, Maqbool A, Srivastava A, Gogol S. Biological detail and therapeutic effect of Azadirachta indica (neem tree) products-a review. J. Evidence Based Med. Healthcare. 2019; 6(22):1607-1612. https://doi.org/10.18410/jebmh/2019/324

37. Alzohairy MA. Therapeutics role of Azadirachta indica (Neem) and their active constituents in diseases prevention and treatment Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2016; 2016 https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7382506

38. Venugopal V. Antidermatophytic activity of neem Azadirachta indica leaves in vitro. Indian Journal of Pharmacology. 1994; 26(2):141.

39. Tembe-Fokunang EA, Charles F, Kaba N, Donatien G, Michael A, Bonaventure N. The potential pharmacological and medicinal properties of neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss) in the drug development of phytomedicine Journal of Complementary and Alternative Medical Research. 2019; 23:1-8 https://doi.org/10.9734/jocamr/2019/v7i130093

40. Srivastava SK, Agrawal B, Kumar A, Pandey A. Phytochemicals of Azadirachta indica source of active medicinal constituent used for cure of various diseases: A Review. Journal of Scientific Research. 2020; 64(1):385-90. https://doi.org/10.37398/JSR.2020.640153

41. Krist S. Neem Oil. InVegetable Fats and Oils 2020 (pp. 467-473). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30314-3_75

42. Jain S, Ganeshpurkar A, Dubey N. Molecular Docking of some Neem Constituents with COX-2 and NOs: An in silico Study. Pharmacognosy Communications. 2020 Jul 1; 10(3):134-5. https://doi.org/10.5530/pc.2020.3.26

43. Rajasekaran C, Meignanam E, Vijayakumar V, Kalaivani T, Ramya S, Premkumar N, Siva R, Jayakumararaj R Investigations on antibacterial activity of leaf extracts of Azadirachta indica A. Juss (Meliaceae): a traditional medicinal plant of India. Ethnobotanical Leaflets. 2008; 2008(1):161-.167

44. Roy S, Bhattacharyya P. Possible role of traditional medicinal plant Neem Azadirachta indica for the management of COVID-19 infection. Int. J. Res. Pharm. Sci. 2020:122-5. https://doi.org/10.26452/ijrps.v11iSPL1.2256

45. Patel SM, Venkata KC, Bhattacharyya P, Sethi G, Bishayee A. Potential of neem (Azadirachta indica L.) for prevention and treatment of oncologic diseases. In Seminars in cancer biology 2016; 40:100-115. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcancer.2016.03.002

46. Paul R, Prasad M, Sah NK. Anticancer biology of Azadirachta indica L (neem): a mini review. Cancer biology & therapy. 2011; 12(6):467-76. https://doi.org/10.4161/cbt.12.6.16850

47. Lloyd AC, Menon T, Umamaheshwari K. Anticandidal activity of Azadirachta indica Indian Journal of Pharmacology. 2005; 37(6):386. https://doi.org/10.4103/0253-7613.19076

48. Waheed A., Miana G.A., Ahmad S.I. Clinical investigation of hypoglycemic effect of seeds of Azadirachta indica in type 2 (NIDDM) diabetes mellitus. Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. 2006; 19:322-325.

49. Khan MR, Chonhenchob V, Huang C, Suwanamornlert P. Antifungal Activity of Propyl Disulfide from Neem (Azadirachta indica) in Vapor and Agar Diffusion Assays against Anthracnose Pathogens (Colletotrichum gloeosporioides and Colletotrichum acutatum) in Mango Fruit. Microorganisms. 2021 Apr; 9(4):839. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9040839

50. Afolabi OJ, Simon-Oke IA, Oladokun OI. Antiplasmodial Activity of Ethanolic Extract of Neem Leaf (Azadirachta indica) in Albino Mice Infected with Plasmodium berghei. Int Arch Clin Pharmacol. 2021; 7:024. https://doi.org/10.23937/2572-3987.1510024

51. Dharshini AD, Muralidharan NP. Neem as antiviral agents. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2020 Jan 1; 12. https://doi.org/10.31838/ijpr/2020.SP1.017

52. Patil SM, Shirahatti PS, Ramu R, Prasad N. Azadirachta indica A. Juss (neem) as a contraceptive: An evidence-based review on its pharmacological efficiency. Phytomedicine. 2021; 19:153596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2021.153596

53. Kalaivani T, Meignanam E, Premkumar N, Siva R, Vijayakumar V, Rajasekaran C, Ramya S, Jayakumararaj R. Studies on hepatoprotective properties of leaf extracts of Azadirachta indica A. Juss (Meliaceae). Ethnobotanical Leaflets 2009; 2009(1):20.

54. Isdadiyanto S, Sitasiwi AJ, Mardiati SM. The lipid profile of rats (Rattus norvegicus L.) induced by high fat ration after exposed to ethanolic neem (Azadirazchta indica) leaf extract. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2020 Apr 1 (Vol. 1524, No. 1, p. 012126). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1524/1/012126

55. Dwivedi VD, Bharadwaj S, Afroz S, Khan N, Ansari MA, Yadava U, Tripathi RC, Tripathi IP, Mishra SK, Kang SG. Anti-dengue infectivity evaluation of bioflavonoid from Azadirachta indica by dengue virus serine protease inhibition. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics. 2021; 39(4):1417-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2020.1734485

56. Kaushik N, Singh BG, Tomar UK, Naik SN, Vir S, Bisla SS, Sharma KK, Banerjee SK, Thakkar P. Regional and habitat variability in azadirachtin content of Indian neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss). Current Science. 2007:1400-1406.

57. Tomar UK, Singh G, Kaushik N. Screening Azadirachta indica tree for enhancing azadirachtin and oil contents in dry areas of Gujarat, India. Journal of Forestry Research. 2011; 22(2):217-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-011-0153-0

58. Zheng Y, Wu J, Wang Y, Peng X, Zhang Y. Seed yield and azadirachtin content of Azadirachta indica in four ecosystems of southwest China. Industrial Crops and Products. 2018; 122:23-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.05.040

59. Gahukar RT. Factors affecting content and bioefficacy of neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss.) phytochemicals used in agricultural pest control: a review. Crop Protection. 2014; 62:93-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2014.04.014

60. Singh B, Pandya D, Mankad A. A Review on Different Pharmacological & Biological Activities of Azadirachta indica A. Juss and Melia azedarach L. The Journal of Plant Science Research 2020; 36(1/2):57-63.

61. Veitch GE, Boyer A, Ley SV. The azadirachtin story. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2008; 47(49):9402-29. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200802675

62. Borkotoky S, Banerjee M. A computational prediction of SARS-CoV-2 structural protein inhibitors from Azadirachta indica (Neem). Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics. 2020; 8:1-1. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2020.1774419

63. Muhammed D, Odey BO, Alozieuwa BU, Alawode RA, Okunlola BM, Ibrahim J, Lawal A, Berinyuy EB. Azadirachtin-A a bioactive compound from Azadirachta indica is a potential inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2 main protease. AROC in Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology. 2021; 1(1):1-8. https://doi.org/10.53858/arocpb01010108

64. Fernandes SR, Barreiros L, Oliveira RF, Cruz A, Prudêncio C, Oliveira AI, Pinho C, Santos N, Morgado J. Chemistry, bioactivities, extraction and analysis of azadirachtin: State-of-the-art. Fitoterapia. 2019; 134:141-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fitote.2019.02.006

65. Adegbola PI, Semire B, Fadahunsi OS, Adegoke AE Molecular docking and ADMET studies of Allium cepa, Azadirachta indica and Xylopia aethiopica isolates as potential anti-viral drugs for Covid-19. Virus Disease. 2021; 32(1):85-97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13337-021-00682-7

66. Durán-Iturbide NA, Díaz-Eufracio BI, Medina-Franco JL. In silico ADME/Tox profiling of natural products: A focus on BIOFACQUIM. ACS omega. 2020; 5(26):16076-84. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c01581

67. Medina-Franco JL, Saldívar-González FI. Cheminformatics to characterize pharmacologically active natural products. Biomolecules. 2020; 10(11):1566. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10111566

68. Soorya C, Balamurugan S, Ramya S, Neethirajan K, Kandeepan C, & Jayakumararaj R. Physicochemical, ADMET and Druggable properties of Myricetin: A Key Flavonoid in Syzygium cumini that regulates metabolic inflammations. Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics, 2021; 11(4):66-3. https://doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v11i4.4890

69. Gleeson M P. Generation of a set of simple, interpretable ADMET rules of thumb J Med Chem, 2008, 51(4):817-34. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm701122q

70. Xiong G, Wu Z, Yi J, Fu L, Yang Z, Hsieh C, Yin M, Zeng X, Wu C, Lu A, Chen X. ADMETlab 2.0: an integrated online platform for accurate and comprehensive predictions of ADMET properties. Nucleic Acids Research. 2021 Apr 24. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab255

71. Govindachari TR. Chemical and biological investigations on Azadirachta indica (the neem tree). Current science. 1992; 63(3):117-22.

72. Lakshmi T, Krishnan V, Rajendran R, Madhusudhanan N. Azadirachta indica: A herbal panacea in dentistry-An update. Pharmacognosy reviews. 2015; 9(17):41. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-7847.156337


 

 

Table 1 Physicochemical, Medicinal Chemistry and ADMET properties of AZA


 
 
 

1. Physicochemical Property 

Property 

Value

Comment 

Molecular Weight 

720.26

Contain hydrogen atoms. Optimal:100~600 

Volume 

670.289

Van der Waals volume 

Density 

1.075

Density = MW / Volume 

nHA 

16

Number of hydrogen bond acceptors. Optimal:0~12 

nHD 

3

Number of hydrogen bond donors. Optimal:0~7 

nRot 

10

Number of rotatable bonds. Optimal:0~11 

nRing 

8

Number of rings. Optimal:0~6 

MaxRing 

14

Number of atoms i The biggest ring. Optimal:0~18 

nHet 

16

Number of heteroatoms. Optimal:1~15 

fChar 

0

Formal charge. Optimal:-4 ~4 

nRig 

38

Number of rigid bonds. Optimal:0~30 

Flexibility 

0.263

Flexibility = nRot /nRig 

Stereo Centers 

16

Optimal: £ 2 

TPSA 

215.34

Topological Polar Surface Area. Optimal:0~140 

logS 

-3.837

Log of the aqueous solubility. Optimal: -4~0.5 log mol/L 

logP 

1.306

Log of the octanol/water partition coefficient. Optimal: 0~3 

logD 

1.493

logP at physiological pH 7.4. Optimal: 1~3 

2. Medicinal Chemistry 

Property 

Value

Comment 

QED 

0.14

A measure of drug-likeness based o The concept of desirability; Attractive: > 0.67; unattractive: 0.49~0.67; too complex: < 0.34 

SAscore 

7.579

Synthetic accessibility score is designed to estimate ease of synthesis of drug-like molecules. n SAscore ³ 6, difficult to synthesize; SAscore <6, easy to synthesize 

Fsp3 

0.771

The number of sp3 hybridized carbons / total carbon count, correlating with melting point and solubility. n Fsp3 ³0.42 is considered a suitable value. 

MCE-18 

215.065

MCE-18 stands for medicinal chemistry evolution. n MCE-18³45 is considered a suitable value. 

NPscore 

3.457

Natural product-likeness score. n This score is typically i The range from -5 to 5. The higher the score is, the higher the probability is that the molecule is a NP. 

Lipinski Rule 

Rejected

MW £ 500; logP £ 5; Hacc £ 10; Hdon £ 5 n If two properties are out of range, a poor absorption or permeability is possible, one is acceptable. 

Pfizer Rule 

Accepted

logP > 3; TPSA < 75 Compounds with a high log P (>3) and low TPSA (<75) are likely to be toxic. 

GSK Rule 

Rejected

MW £ 400; logP £ 4 n Compounds satisfying the GSK rule may have a more favourable ADMET profile 

Golden Triangle 

Rejected

200 £ MW £ 50; -2 £ logD £ 5 n Compounds satisfying the Golden Triangle rule may have a more favourable ADMET profile. 

PAINS 

0 alerts

Pan Assay Interference Compounds, frequent hitters, Alpha-screen artifacts and reactive compound. 

ALARM NMR 

1 alerts

Thiol reactive compounds. 

BMS 

0 alerts

Undesirable, reactive compounds. 

Chelator Rule 

0 alerts

Chelating compounds. 

3. Absorption

Property 

Value

Comment 

Caco-2 Permeability 

-5.261

Optimal: higher than -5.15 Log unit 

MDCK Permeability 

0.000138

low permeability: < 2 × 10-6 cm/s n medium permeability: 2–20 × 10-6 cm/s n high passive permeability: > 20 × 10-6 cm/s 

Pgp-inhibitor 

1

Category 1: Inhibitor; Category 0: Non-inhibitor; The output value is the probability of being Pgp-inhibitor 

Pgp-substrate 

0.975

Category 1: substrate; Category 0: Non-substrate; The output value is the probability of being Pgp-substrate 

HIA 

0.66

Human Intestinal Absorption Category 1: HIA+( HIA < 30%); Category 0: HIA-( HIA < 30%); The output value is the probability of being HIA+ 

F20% 

0.649

20% Bioavailability Category 1: F20%+ (bioavailability < 20%); Category 0: F20%- (bioavailability ³ 20%); The output value is the probability of being F20%+ 

F30% 

0.985

30% Bioavailability Category 1: F30%+ (bioavailability < 30%); Category 0: F30%- (bioavailability ³ 30%); The output value is the probability of being F30%+ 

4. Distribution 

Property 

Value

Comment 

PPB 

38.52%

Plasma Protein Binding n Optimal: < 90%. Drugs with high protein-bound may have a low therapeutic index. 

VD 

1.581

Volume Distribution n Optimal: 0.04-20L/kg 

BBB Penetration 

0.246

Blood-Brain Barrier Penetration Category 1: BBB+; Category 0: BBB-; The output value is the probability of being BBB+ 

Fu 

37.25%

The fraction unbound in plasms n Low: <5%; Middle: 5~20%; High: > 20% 

5. Metabolism 

Property 

Value

Comment 

CYP1A2 inhibitor 

0

Category 1: Inhibitor; Category 0: Non-inhibitor; 

The output value is the probability of being inhibitor. 

CYP1A2 substrate 

0.993

Category 1: Substrate; Category 0: Non-substrate; 

The output value is the probability of being substrate. 

CYP2C19 inhibitor 

0.017

Category 1: Inhibitor; Category 0: Non-inhibitor; 

The output value is the probability of being inhibitor. 

CYP2C19 substrate 

0.724

Category 1: Substrate; Category 0: Non-substrate; 

The output value is the probability of being substrate. 

CYP2C9 inhibitor 

0.014

Category 1: Inhibitor; Category 0: Non-inhibitor; 

The output value is the probability of being inhibitor. 

CYP2C9 substrate 

0.005

Category 1: Substrate; Category 0: Non-substrate; 

The output value is the probability of being substrate. 

CYP2D6 inhibitor 

0.003

Category 1: Inhibitor; Category 0: Non-inhibitor; 

The output value is the probability of being inhibitor. 

CYP2D6 substrate 

0.107

Category 1: Substrate; Category 0: Non-substrate; 

The output value is the probability of being substrate. 

CYP3A4 inhibitor 

0.719

Category 1: Inhibitor; Category 0: Non-inhibitor; 

The output value is the probability of being inhibitor. 

CYP3A4 substrate 

0.857

Category 1: Substrate; Category 0: Non-substrate; 

The output value is the probability of being substrate. 

6. Excretion 

Property 

Value

Comment 

CL 

1.748

Clearance n High: >15 mL/min/kg; moderate: 5-15 mL/min/kg; low: <5 mL/min/kg 

T1/2 

0.016

Category 1: long half-life; Category 0: short half-life; long half-life: >3h; short half-life: <3h The output value is the probability of having long half-life. 

7. Toxicity 

Property 

Value

Comment 

hERG Blockers 

0.03

Category 1: active; Category 0: inactive; The output value is the probability of being active. 

H-HT 

0.342

Human Hepatotoxicity Category 1: H-HT positive (+); Category 0: H-HT negative (-); The output value is the probability of being toxic. 

DILI 

0.32

Drug Induced Liver Injury. Category 1: drugs with a high risk of DILI; Category 0: drugs with no risk of DILI. The output value is the probability of being toxic. 

AMES Toxicity 

0.844

Category 1: Ames positive (+); Category 0: Ames negative (-); The output value is the probability of being toxic. 

Rat Oral Acute Toxicity 

0.978

Category 0: low-toxicity; Category 1: high-toxicity; The output value is the probability of being highly toxic. 

FDAMDD 

0.961

Maximum Recommended Daily Dose Category 1: FDAMDD (+); Category 0: FDAMDD (-) The output value is the probability of being positive

Skin Sensiti zation 

0.005

Category 1: Sensitizer; Category 0: Non-sensitizer; The output value is the probability of being sensitizer. 

Carcinogen city 

0.976

Category 1: carcinogens; Category 0: non-carcinogens; The output value is the probability of being toxic. 

Eye Corrosion 

0.003

Category 1: corrosives; Category 0: non-corrosives The output value is the probability of being corrosives. 

Eye Irritation 

0.01

Category 1: irritants; Category 0: non-irritant The output value is the probability of being irritants. 

Respiratory Toxicity 

0.963

Category 1: respiratory toxicants; Category 0: respiratory non-toxicants The output value is the probability of being toxic. 

8. Environmental toxicity 

Property 

Value

Comment 

Bioconcentration Factors 

0.985

Bioconcentration factors are used for considering secondary poisoning potential and assessing risks to human health via the food chain. The unit is -log10[(mg/L)/(1000*MW)] 

IGC50 

3.752

Tetrahymena pyriformis 50 percent growth inhibition concentration The unit is -log10[(mg/L)/(1000*MW)] 

LC50FM 

5.88

96-hour fathead minnow 50 percent lethal concentration The unit is -log10[(mg/L)/(1000*MW)] 

LC50DM 

5.549

48-hour daphnia magna 50 percent lethal concentration The unit is -log10[(mg/L)/(1000*MW)] 

9. Tox21 pathway

Property 

Value

Comment 

NR-AR 

0.022

Androgen receptor Category 1: actives; Category 0: inactives; The output value is the probability of being active. 

NR-AR-LBD 

0.816

Androgen receptor ligand-binding domain Category 1: actives; Category 0: inactives; Output value is probability of being active. 

NR-AhR 

0.014

Aryl hydrocarbon receptor Category 1: actives; Category 0: inactives; The output value is the probability of being active. 

NR-Aromatase 

0.773

Category 1: actives; Category 0: inactives; The output value is the probability of being active. 

NR-ER 

0.209

Estrogen receptor Category 1: actives; Category 0: inactives; The output value is the probability of being active. 

NR-ER-LBD 

0.778

Estrogen receptor ligand-binding domain Category 1: actives; Category 0: inactives; The output value is the probability of being active. 

NR-PPAR-gamma 

0.923

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma Category 1: actives; Category 0: inactives; The output value is the probability of being active. 

SR-ARE 

0.711

Antioxidant response element Category 1: actives; Category 0: inactives; The output value is the probability of being active. 

SR-ATAD5 

0.976

ATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5 Category 1: actives; Category 0: inactives; The output value is the probability of being active. 

SR-HSE 

0.769

Heat shock factor response element Category 1: actives; Category 0: inactives; The output value is the probability of being active. 

SR-MMP 

0.968

Mitochondrial membrane potential Category 1: actives; Category 0: inactives; The output value is the probability of being active. 

SR-p53 

0.999

Category 1: actives; Category 0: inactives; The output value is the probability of being active. 

10. Toxicophore Rules 

Property 

Value

Comment 

Acute Toxicity Rule 

0 alerts

20 substructures; acute toxicity - oral administration 

Genotoxic Carcinogenicity Rule 

8 alerts

117 substructures; carcinogenicity or mutagenicity 

Non-Genotoxic Carcinogenicity Rule 

1 alerts

23 substructures; carcinogenicity through non-genotoxic mechanisms 

Skin Sensitization Rule 

5 alerts

155 substructures; skin irritation 

Aquatic Toxicity Rule 

7 alerts

99 substructures ; toxicity to liquid(water) 

Non-Biodegradable Rule 

2 alerts

19 substructures; non-biodegradable 

SureChEMBL Rule 

2 alerts

164 substructures; Med-Chem unfriendly status 










 

Table 2 Summary of Physicochemical, Druggability, ADMET of AZA 

PROPERTY 

VALUE

Physicochemical Properties

 

Molecular weight

720.72 g/mol

LogP

-0.20

LogD

0.14

LogSw

-4.34

Number of stereo-centers

16

Stereochemical complexity

0.457

Fsp3

0.771

Topological polar surface area

215.34 Å2

Number of hydrogen bond donors

3

Number of hydrogen bond acceptors

16

Number of smallest set of smallest rings (SSSR)

2

Size of the biggest system ring

15

Number of rotatable bonds

6

Number of rigid bonds

38

Number of charged groups

0

Total charge of the compound

0

Number of carbon atoms

35

Number of heteroatoms

16

Number of heavy atoms

51

Ratio between The number of non-carbon atoms and the number of carbon atoms

0.46

Druggability Properties

 

Lipinski's rule of 5 violations

2

Veber rule

Low

Egan rule

Low

Oral PhysChem score (Traffic Lights)

5

GSK's 4/400 score

Good

Pfizer's 3/75 score

Good

Weighted quantitative estimate of drug-likeness (QEDw) score

0.164

Solubility

9441.49

Solubility Forecast Index

Good

ADMET Properties

 

Property

Value

Probability

Human Intestinal Absorption

HIA+

0.890

Blood Brain Barrier

BBB-

0.773

Caco-2 permeable

Caco2-

0.711

P-glycoprotein substrate

Substrate

0.835

P-glycoprotein inhibitor I

Inhibitor

0.672

P-glycoprotein inhibitor II

Non-inhibitor

0.534

CYP450 2C9 substrate

Non-substrate

0.857

CYP450 2D6 substrate

Non-substrate

0.872

CYP450 3A4 substrate

Substrate

0.714

CYP450 1A2 inhibitor

Non-inhibitor

0.887

CYP450 2C9 inhibitor

Non-inhibitor

0.845

CYP450 2D6 inhibitor

Non-inhibitor

0.944

CYP450 2C19 inhibitor

Non-inhibitor

0.833

CYP450 3A4 inhibitor

Non-inhibitor

0.770

CYP450 inhibitory promiscuity

Low CYP Inhibitory Promiscuity

0.886

Ames test

Non AMES toxic

0.756

Carcinogenicity

Non-carcinogens

0.946

Biodegradation

Not ready biodegradable

1.000

Rat acute toxicity

4.348 LD50, mol/kg

PNA

hERG inhibition (predictor I)

Weak inhibitor

0.992

hERG inhibition (predictor II)

Non-inhibitor

0.569

The physicochemical properties were computed using FAF-Drugs4 (28961788) and RDKit open-source cheminformatics platform. The druggabiity scoring schemes were computed using FAF-Drugs4 (28961788) and FAF-QED (28961788) open-source cheminformatics platform. ADMET features were predicted using admetSAR (23092397) open-source tool.

 

Table 3 Molecular Properties and of Bioactivity Score of AZA

Property 

Score 

miLogP 

1.42

TPSA 

215

n-atoms 

51

MW 

721

n-ON 

16

n-OHNH 

3

n-violations 

2

n-rotb 

10

Volume 

612

Bioactivity 

Score

GPCR ligand 

-0.71

Ion channel modulator 

-1.51

Kinase inhibitor 

-1.46

Nuclear receptor ligand 

-0.67

Protease inhibitor 

-0.35

Enzyme inhibitor 

-0.71

 

Table 4 Swiss Target Prediction

Target

Common name

Uniprot ID

ChEMBL ID

Target Class

Probability*

Known actives (3D/2D)

Macrophage migration inhibitory factor

MIF

P14174

CHEMBL2085

Enzyme

0.06613

0 /  1

Heat shock protein HSP 90-alpha

HSP90AA1

P07900

CHEMBL3880

Other cytosolic protein

0.06613

0 /  2

Kappa Opioid receptor

OPRK1

P41145

CHEMBL237

Family A G protein-coupled receptor

0.00

0 /  128

Mu opioid receptor

OPRM1

P35372

CHEMBL233

Family A G protein-coupled receptor

0.00

0 /  35

Delta opioid receptor

OPRD1

P41143

CHEMBL236

Family A G protein-coupled receptor

0.00

0 /  21

Thrombin

F2

P00734

CHEMBL204

Protease

0.00

0 /  2

Squalene synthetase   (by homology)

FDFT1

P37268

CHEMBL3338

Enzyme

0.00

0 /  28

Glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta

GSK3B

P49841

CHEMBL262

Kinase

0.00

0 /  1

Glycogen synthase kinase-3 alpha

GSK3A

P49840

CHEMBL2850

Kinase

0.00

0 /  1

Protein kinase C alpha

PRKCA

P17252

CHEMBL299

Kinase

0.00

0 /  1

Apoptosis regulator Bcl-X

BCL2L1

Q07817

CHEMBL4625

Other ion channel

0.00

0 /  1

HMG-CoA reductase

HMGCR

P04035

CHEMBL402

Oxidoreductase

0.00

0 /  1

Zinc finger protein GLI1

GLI1

P08151

CHEMBL5461

Transcription factor

0.00

0 /  1

Proto-oncogene c-JUN

JUN

P05412

CHEMBL4977

Transcription factor

0.00

0 /  2

Vanilloid receptor   (by homology)

TRPV1

Q8NER1

CHEMBL4794

Voltage-gated ion channel

0.00

0 /  1

 

 

 

 


Parse error: syntax error, unexpected string content "5d95230bc235864415f2a2323444ee...", expecting ")" in /home/jddtonline/domains/jddtonline.info/public_html/cache/fc-geoIP-all.php on line 26936