Available online on 15.08.2021 at http://jddtonline.info
Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics
Open Access to Pharmaceutical and Medical Research
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s): This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial use provided the original author and source are credited
Open Access Full Text Article Research Article
Biochemical profile of Boswellia serrata and Rhus mysorensis
U.B. Kadam1*, K.M. Khalkar2, V.B. Kadam*2
1 Principal and Head, Department of Chemistry, Samajshree Prashant Dada Hire Arts, Comm. & Science College, Nampur, Malegaon (Nashik), India
2 P.G. Department of Botany and Research Centre, M.V.P Samaj’s K.T.H.M. College, Nashik, 422002 (M.S.) India
|
Article Info: _________________________________________ Article History: Received 19 June 2021 Reviewed 26 July 2021 Accepted 06 August 2021 Published 15 August 2021 _________________________________________ Cite this article as: Kadam UB, Khalkar KM, Kadam VB, Biochemical profile of Boswellia serrata and Rhus mysorensis, Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics. 2021; 11(4-S):131-133 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v11i4-S.4975
|
Abstract ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ The seasonal variation of proteins and amino acids content have been investigated from leaves, wood and bark of Boswellia serrata and Rhus mysorensis are the medicinal important plant of Laling forest Dhule district of Maharashtra. Comparative account of protein content of leaves, wood and bark of Rhus mysorensis showed higher level (range 1.897 to 2.754 mg/g dry wt.) than Boswellia serrata (range 1.846 to 2.312 mg/g dry/wt.). Comparative account of amino acid content of leaves, wood and bark of Rhus mysorensis showed higher level (range 0.911 to 1.074 mg/g dry wt.) than Boswellia serrata (range 0.745 to 0.896 mg/g dry wt.). Keywords: Protein, amino acid , Boswellia serrata and Rhus mysorensis |
|
*Address for Correspondence: U.B. Kadam, Principal and Head, Department of Chemistry, Samajshree Prashant Dada Hire Arts, Comm. & Science College, Nampur, Malegaon (Nashik), India |
|
In ancient times, Hindus, Babylonians, Persians, Romans, Chinese and Greeks as well as the people of old American civilizations used natural resins primarily for embalming and for its incense in cultural functions. They firmly believed that when these materials get in contact with fire, the smoke and the fragrance they produce not only soothe their souls but also please their gods. Burning of these natural resins had become an important component of their cultural life. They burned these resins during sacrificial ceremonies and in their daily rituals to prevent the influence of evil spirits on their souls or to honour the dead or living ones4,5 . Boswellia serrata (Salai/Salai guggul) (Family: Burseraceae; Genus: Boswellia) is a moderate to large sized branching tree that grows in dry mountainous regions of India, Northern Africa and the Middle East6,7. Since ancient times, three of these species have been considered as ‘true Frankincense’ producing trees8.
In addition to its beneficial use for arthritis, this gummy resin is also mentioned in traditional Ayurvedic and Unani texts as an effective remedy for diarrhoea, dysentery, ringworm, boils, fevers (antipyretic), skin and blood diseases, cardiovascular diseases, mouth sores, bad throat, bronchitis, asthma, cough, vaginal discharges, hair-loss, jaundice, hemorrhoids, syphilitic diseases, irregular menses and stimulation of liver. It is also diaphoretic, astringent, and diuretic and acts both as internal and external stimulant. Modern medicine and pharmacology strongly point out to its use as an antiarthritic, antiinflammatory, antihyperlipidemic (controls blood lipids), antiatherosclerotic (anticoronary plaque), analgesic (pain-reliever) and hepatoprotective (protects the liver)9,10.
The phytochemical constituents and medicinal properties of most of the medicinal plants were recorded in the last few decades by a number of workers18,19. These medicinal plants are subjected to various processes and are then administrated to the patients. The survey and documentation of medicinally important plants in each and every place is very much important for easy identification of local traditional healers, conservation and sustainable utilization. Plants have always played a major role in the treatment of human traumas and diseases worldwide. They have been used as sources of modern drugs, either by providing pure compounds, starting materials for partial synthesis of useful compounds or models for synthesis of new drugs. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) as much as 80% of world’s population depends on traditional medicine for their primary health care needs20.
1) Quantitative estimation of Protein: The protein was quantitatively estimated by the Lowry et.al., 1951 method .
Chemicals: 1) 0.1% N NaOH – (4gm in 1000ml)
2) 2% Na2CO3 (2 gm in 100 ml distilled water)
3) 0.5% CuSO4 (0.5 gm in 100 ml distilled water)
4) 1% Na- K tartarate
5) 5% Trichloro acetic acid /per Chloric acid
Reagents: 1) Lowry A-2% Na2CO3 in 0.1% N NaOH
2) Lowry B-5% CuSO4 in 1% Na- K tartarate
3) Lowry C-98 ml A and 2ml B,
4) Lowry D- Folin phenol reagent.
Procedure: 1 gm of plant material was homogenized with 10 ml 80% ethanol. The extract was centrifuged at 5000 rpm. For 5 minute and the supernatant was discarded 5% 10 ml Trichloro acetic acid (TCA) or per chloric acid (PCA) was add to residue and incubated at 800C for 20 minutes. The pellet was centrifuged and the supernatant was discarded. Residue was washed with 10 ml distilled water and again recentrifuged. The supernatant was discarded 2% 10 ml Na2CO3 in 0.1 N NaOH was added to the residue and incubated for an hour at 300C and again centrifuged and residue was discarded. The final volume of supernantant was measured and it was used as a sample for protein. 1 ml of aliquot of sample was taken and 5 ml reagent C was added to it mixed it thoroughly. The sample was incubated for 10 minutes and 1 ml of reagent D was added to it. The colour intensity was read at 660 nm using Spectrophotometer. The protein concentration of an unknown sample was calculated using standard graph.
2) Quantitative estimation of total Amino Acid: Estimation of total amino acid was carried out by Krishnamurthy et. al., 1989 method.
Reagents: 1) Alcoholic ninhydrin. (100 ml alcohol + 400 mg ninhydrin)
2) Glycine (std.) (10 mg glycine + 100 ml distilled water)
Procedure: 500 mg plant material was ground in mortar and pestle with few drops of cold 80% ethanol. Then 2.5 ml of distilled water and 10 ml of boiling 80% ethanol were add to it. The extract was centrifuged for 15 minutes at 1,000 rpm. Residue was discarded the supernatant was collected and total volume was made 15ml with distilled water. Test tube was kept 600C for 20 minutes. The test tube was cooled and 1 ml 50% ethanol was added. Read at 420 nm in spectrophotometer. Glycine was used as stand rand.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
1) Boswellia serrata - The continuous two year investigation showed that the seasonal variation in protein content of leaves are (range from 2.467 to 2.754 mg/g dry wt.), higher level of proteins observed at summer 2.754 mg/g dry wt. as compared to winter 2.557 and monsoon 2.467 mg/g dry wt.. In wood it was observed that at summer 2.292 mg/g dry wt. of protein accumulates and are higher than winter i.e. 2.265 mg/g dry wt. and monsoon 2.186 mg/g dry wt. The protein found in the bark ( range from 1.897 mg/g dry wt. to 2.087 mg/g dry wt.), higher level observed in summer 2.087mg/g dry wt. as compared to winter 1.990 mg/g dry wt. and monsoon 1.897 mg/g dry wt.. The percentage of protein were found to be increasing order of leaves < wood< bark.
The amino acids ranges of leaves show from 0.993 mg/g dry wt. to 1.074 mg/g dry wt. highest level observed at summer season i.e. 1.074 mg/g dry wt. as compared to winter i.e. 1.032 mg/g dry wt. and monsoon 0.993 mg/g dry wt.. In wood amino acids accumulation observed high at summer 1.013mg/g dry wt. as compared to winter i.e. 0.954 mg/g dry wt. and monsoon i.e. 0.917 mg/g dry wt. The amino acids accumulation in leaves show higher than wood and bark. Bark show higher accumulation of amino acids at summer 0.943 mg/g dry wt. than winter 0.923 mg/g dry wt. and monsoon 0.911 mg/g dry wt. The concentration of amino acids were found to be increasing order of leaves < wood<bark (Table No. 1; Graph No. 1).
2) Rhus mysorensis- The protein content of leaves show ranges from 2.166 to 2.312 mg/g dry wt. much more observed in summer 2.312 mg/g dry wt. than in winter 2.235 mg/g dry wt. and in monsoon 2.166 mg/g dry wt. In wood highest level protein observed at summer 2.187 mg/g dry wt. as compared to winter 2.123 mg/g dry wt. and monsoon 2.067 mg/g dry wt., while in bark proten accumulated much more in summer 2.011 mg/g dry wt. than winter 1.964 mg/g dry wt. and monsoon 1.846 mg/g dry wt. The percentage of protein were found to be increasing order of leaves< wood < bark.
The amino acid content of leaves showed higher than wood and bark. In leaves, amino acid ranges from 0.823 mg/g dry wt. to 0.896 mg/g dry wt., higher accumulation of amino acid observed at summer 0.896 mg/g dry wt. than winter 0.865 mg/g dry wt. and monsoon 0.823 mg/g dry wt. The range of amino acid content of wood was between 0.811 mg/g dry wt. to 0.854 mg/g dry wt., it show lower than leaves. Higher level observed at summer i.e. 0.854 mg/g dry wt. as compared to winter 0.823 mg/g dry wt. and monsoon 0.811 mg/g dry wt., while in bark, higher accumulation of amino acid observed at summer 0.801 mg/g dry wt. than in winter 0.787 mg/g dry wt. and monsoon 0.745 mg/g dry wt.
Table 1: Seasonal variation of proteins and amino acids levels of different plants parts of Boswellia serrata and Rhus mysorensis
|
PLANT PARTS |
SEASON |
PROTEINS (Mg/g dry. wt.) |
AMINO ACIDS (Mg/g dry.wt.) |
||
|
Plant 1 |
Plant 2 |
Plant 1 |
Plant 2 |
||
|
Leaves |
Summer |
2.754 |
2.312 |
1.074 |
0.896 |
|
Monsoon |
2.467 |
2.166 |
0.993 |
0.823 |
|
|
Winter |
2.557 |
2.235 |
1.032 |
0.865 |
|
|
Wood |
Summer |
2.292 |
2.187 |
1.013 |
0.854 |
|
Monsoon |
2.186 |
2.067 |
0.917 |
0.811 |
|
|
Winter |
2.265 |
2.123 |
0.954 |
0.823 |
|
|
Bark |
Summer |
2.087 |
2.011 |
0.943 |
0.801 |
|
Monsoon |
1.897 |
1.846 |
0.911 |
0.745 |
|
|
Winter |
1.990 |
1.964 |
0.923 |
0.787 |
|
Plant 1 - Boswellia serrata Plant 2 - Rhus mysorensis
1) Retnam, KR and Martin P. Ethnomedicinal Plants. Agrobios (India), Jodhpur. 2006 ;05
2) Felter H, Lloyd J. I and II. Cincinnati: Ohio Valley Company, US; Kings American Dispensatory. 1898.
3) Howes FN. Age-old resins of the Mediterranean region and their uses. Econ Bot.1950; 4:307-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02985086
4) Krishnamurthy T, Shiva MP. Salai guggul (from Boswellia serrata Roxb.): Its exploitation and utilization. Indian Forest.1979; 103:466-74.
5) Verghese J. Olibanum in focus. Perfumer Flavorist.1998; 13:2-11
6) Maupetit P.New constituents in olibanum resinoid and essential oils. Perfumer Flavorist.1984; 9:19-37.
7) Leung AY, Foster S. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Encyclopedia of common natural ingredients used in food, drugs and cosmetics 1996; pp. 389-91.
8) Wallis TE. London: J and A Churchill Limited; . Textbook of Pharmacognosy. 1967; pp. 500-1
9) Sharma S, Thawani V, Hingorani L. Pharmacokinetic study of 11-keto-beta-boswellic acid. Phytomedicine. 2004; 11:255-60. https://doi.org/10.1078/0944-7113-00290
10) Mathe C, Culioli G, Archier P. Characterization of archeological frankincense by gas chromatography mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr. 2004; 1023:277-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2003.10.016
11) Devesh Tewari HK, Pandey Sah AN, Meena HS, Manchanda A. Pharmacognostical and biochemical investigation of Ocimum kilimandscharicum plants available in western Himalayan region. Asian Journal of Plant Science and Research. 2012; 2(4):446-451
12) Doughari JH, El-mahmood AM, Tyoyina. Antimicrobial activity of leaf extracts of Senna obtusifolia (L). African Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 2008; 2(1):007- 013.
13) Priti MD, Yadav SR. Medicinal plants of South Western Maharashtra. In: Pullaiah T (Ed) Biodiversity in India. 1st Ed. Regency publications, New Delhi IV. 2006;180-181
14) Umberto Quattrocchi FLS. CRC World Dictionary of Medicinal and Poisonous plants. Common names, scientific names, Eponyms, Synonyms and Etymology. Published by CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group.2012; 3211-3212.
15) Madhava Chetty K, Sivaji K, Tulasi Rao K. Flowering plants of Chittoor District Andhra Pradesh India. Student Offset Printers, Tirupati. 2008; 76.
16) Jeevan Ram A, Reddy RV, Adharvana M, Chari R, Venkata Raju. Rare and Little Known Medicinal Plants from Nallamalais of the Eastern Ghats, India. Journal of Plant Sciences. 2007; 2:113-117. https://doi.org/10.3923/jps.2007.113.117
17) Venkata Subbaiah KP, Savithramma N. Bio-Prospecting And Documentation Of Traditional Medicinal Plants Used To Treat Itching, Psoriasis And Wounds By Ethnic Groups Of Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh, India. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research. 2012; 5(2):127-131.
18) Joshi S.G. Medicinal plants. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co.Pvt.Ltd. New Delhi.2000.
19) Nudrat Z. Sayed. and Usha Mukundan. Medicinal and aromatic plants of India Part I, Ukaaz Publications, Hyderabad. 2005
20) Azaizeh H., Fulder S., Khalil K., Said O. Ethnomedicinal knowledge of local Arab practitioners in the middle East Region. Fitoterapia. 2003; 74: 98-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0367-326X(02)00285-X