Available online on 15.08.2021 at http://jddtonline.info

Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics

Open Access to Pharmaceutical and Medical Research

Copyright  © 2021 The  Author(s): This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial use provided the original author and source are credited

Open Access  Full Text Article                                                                                                                                         Review Article 

Systematic Review of Plants Used Against Respiratory Diseases Related to COVID-19 in Africa

 imageGabriel Agbor Agbor*, Rosette  Christelle Ndjib

Centre for Research on Medicinal Plants and Traditional Medicine, Institute of Medical Research and Medicinal Plants Studies, Cameroon

Article Info:

_________________________________________

Article History:

Received 04 June 2021      

Reviewed 09 July 2021

Accepted 17 July 2021  

Published 15 August 2021  

_________________________________________

Cite this article as: 

Agbor GA, Ndjib RC, Systematic Review of Plants Used Against Respiratory Diseases Related to COVID-19 in Africa, Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics. 2021; 11(4-S):141-141

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v11i4-S.4957                      

______________________________________________

*Address for Correspondence:  

Gabriel Agbor Agbor, Centre for Research on Medicinal Plants and Traditional Medicine, Institute of Medical Research and Medicinal Plants Studies, Cameroon

ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5860-9853 

 

Abstract

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

Background: Respiratory disorders are known to affect the airways including the nasal passages, bronchi and lungs causing blockages. The advent of COVID-19 has further aggravated the complications of the respiratory systems where conventional medicine is not reachable or affordable by the majority poor in Africa. Hence, the over 80% of the African population who turn to traditional medicine for their primary health care. 

Objective: This review is aimed to identify plants directed against respiratory diseases which can be useful in the fight against COVID-19. 

Methodology: Scientific articles selected in this study span the last ten years (2011-2021). Keywords such as “ethnobotany in Africa”, “ethnobotany and respiratory diseases” “medicinal plants and respiratory diseases”, “traditional medicine and COVID-19” were searched in open access search engines such as: Science Direct, Research Gate, Google Scholar, Pubmed, Web of Science, Scopus. The ethnobotanical indices were then calculated using Microsoft excel to determine the plants with the most therapeutic potential to be considered for the local management of COVID-19.

Results: Data obtained were classified according to country of origin of the author of the publication, the botanical family and the respiratory pathology being treated. Thirteen (13) references were finally selected with the represented country being Benin Republic. One hundred and forty-three plant species belonging to 60 families were registered. The most recurrent families were the Fabaceae and Lamiaceae (18 citations each). The plants in these families were used for the management of fifteen diseases and / or symptoms relating to the respiratory system. The most cited plants were: Ocimum gratissimum L. (4 citations), Entandrophragma cylindrium (Sprague), Scyphocephalium ochocoa Warb., Rubia cordifolia and Allium sativum L. (3 citations each). 

Conclusion: Based on the data obtained in this review Ocimum gratissimum stands out as the most used plant for the treatment of respiratory disorders.

Keywords: Respiratory diseases, Medicinal plants, COVID-19

 


 

INTRODUCTION

Respiratory diseases are known to affect the airways including the nasal passages, bronchi and lungs. It is very often difficult to classify them because they have different levels of severity and are closely dependent on the patient's age. They can be bronchitis, pneumonia, asthma, tuberculosis, sinusitis, and rhinitis representing the main factors of morbidity and mortality in both developed and developing nations of the world 1 Respiratory infections account for up to 38.6% of infectious diseases and are responsible for the death of around 14.9% of children in Africa 2.

Coronaviruses are emerging and reemerging enveloped RNA viruses that are distributed broadly among humans, mammals and birds. Coronaviruses vary significantly in the pathogenicity, and include highly pathogenic species such as MERS-CoV and COVID-19, and relatively harmless species such as the common cold. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Corona Virus (SARS-COV) is the causal agent of the outbreaks in 2002, 2003 in China 3. In December 2019, a new epidemic of SARS-COV was detected in several local health facilities from patients with pneumonia in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China 3. COVID-19 is a species of coronavirus (CoVs), an etiologic agent which can systemically cause disorder in the respiratory and digestive tract, resulting in severe infections in both humans and animals 4. Currently, no specific therapies for COVID-19 are available and investigations regarding the treatment of COVID-19 are still limited to preventive and supportive therapies, designed to prevent further complications and organ damage 5. The main symptoms described for COVID-19 were those of malaria (fever, fatigue, body aches, etc.), accompanied by symptoms of respiratory disorders (dry cough, breathing difficulties, chest pain, sore throat, etc.) and flu 6. After the panic caused by the first cases of contamination in Cameroon in March 2020, the population in search of preventive and even curative measures for COVID-19, flocked the traditional pharmacopoeia 7 in search of traditional medicine which have properties against any of the symptoms. The plants most in demand were largely those with anti-influenza, antimalarial and immunomodulatory properties including those with reported effects on respiratory disorders.

In another study, some plant-sourced antioxidant and immune-boosters, kaempferol, quercetin, luteolin-7-glucoside, demethoxycurcumin, naringenin, apigenin-7-glucoside, oleuropein, curcumin, catechin, epicatechin-gallate, zingerol, gingerol, and allicin were investigated as potential inhibitor candidates for COVID-19, in comparison to antiretroviral protease inhibitors 8. It was found that these plant products could act as potential inhibitors, meaning the source plants could be exploited as potential candidates for the development of improved traditional medicines (ITMs) as inhibitors of COVID-19.   

The use of traditional medicine dates back to prehistoric times and remains the major accessible and affordable treatment for the population in African countries. Today medicinal plants which are the main component of traditional medicine have been transformed into conventional drugs that are sold in pharmacies worldwide. Many other plants are currently undergoing investigation to ascertain their therapeutic efficacies and safety. Medicinal plants have long been known for their curative or protective effects against a broad range of microorganisms, such as viruses, protozoa, bacteria and parasites 9-11. There are reports stating the protective effect of plant extracts against viral diseases, such as HIV 1&2; Herpes simplex virus, Hepatitis B & C virus 12-14 just to name a few.  Considering that COVID-19 is a respiratory disorder, the present study systematically reviewed the plants used in Africa for the treatment of respiratory disorders.

  1. METHODOLOGY
    1. Collection of bibliographic data

The scientific articles selected were based on relation to respiratory diseases published within the last ten years (2011-2021). The open access search engines consulted included: Science Direct, Research gate, Google Scholar, Pubmed, Web of Science and Scopus. The plants listed were classified according to the country of origin of the author of the publication, the botanical family and the respiratory pathology being treated. Thus, a plant which treats ‘n’ distinct respiratory diseases will be cited ‘n’ times and is considered to most likely be effective against the coronavirus. Ethnobotanical indices were calculated to determine which plants may have their therapeutic potential related to management of COVID-19.

  1. Ethnobotanical indices
  1. The relative frequency of plant species Fr was calculated according to the formula bellow:

Fr = Nc / Nt

where Nc is the number of citations of the species and Nt the total number of citations of all species;

  1. The performance index of each of the species (PI) described by Betti 15 will theoretically identify which plants can be effective in the treatment of target respiratory diseases such as COVID-19. This index results from the interpretation of the following difference:

(Nc / N) - (Ncm / Nt)

Where Nc is the number of citations of a plant in the treatment of a respiratory pathology;

 N: the total number of citations of all the plants used in the treatment of this respiratory pathology; 

Ncm: the number of citations of the plant for all respiratory diseases and 

Nt: the total number of citations.

PI = 0 if (Nc / N) - (Ncm / Nt) <0 for zero performance

PI = 1 if 0 <(Nc / N) - (Ncm / Nt) ≤ 1/3 for average performance

PI = 2 if 1/3 <(Nc / N) - (Ncm / Nt) ≤ 2/3 for good performance

PI = 3 if (Nc / N) - (Ncm / Nt)> 3/3 for excellent performance

  1. The convergence score (S) of bibliographic use in the treatment of the main symptoms of COVID-19 and geographic use described by Chassagne 16 and amended in this study, was calculated according to the following formula: 

S = I1 / I2

With I1: Number of publications (on the bibliographic review used) which mention the use of the species in the management of respiratory diseases I2: Number of total publications.

  1. Data analysis

The listed plants were then recorded on a Microsoft Excel 2013 spreadsheet and the ethnobotanical indices calculated. Descriptive statistics was used to express the data obtained (Tables and Figures).

  1. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    1. Bibliographic information on the scientific publications selected

The bibliographic search listed out seventy-five (75) publications from African authors. Of these, fourteen (14) discussed the use of medicinal plants in the management of respiratory diseases in Africa. The publications had authors from seven (07) African countries among which Benin (64), Cameroon (41), Morocco (33) and Gabon (27) were the most represented (Figure 1).

The fourteen (14) articles that reported the use of medicinal plants in the management of respiratory disorders were further analyzed. In a similar study in West Africa twelve articles were selected to produce a rich repertoire of plants used against respiratory diseases 17. In their publication they identified African authors as follows: Benin (64), Cameroon (41), Morocco (33) and Gabon (27) whose publications discussed the use of plants for treatment of respiratory disorders. Thus, in the study of Haidara et al. 17 Benin had the highest number of authors reporting on medicinal plants and respiratory disorder followed by Cameroon and then Morocco in the third place. This result corroborated our data that presents Benin as the country with the most cited authors with interest in medicinal plants for the management of respiratory disorders. This could be justified by the fact that the Beninese is much more attached to traditional medicine with plants as the main ingredient. This data is also indicative that there is a high prevalence of respiratory disorder and that it is of importance to Benin researchers.

image

Figure 1: Spectrum of the authors' countries of origin according to the number of citations.

image

Figure 2: Spectrum of references used as a function of the number of citations.

Figure 2 presented the spectrum of references reviewed in this study and their number of citations. Of the fourteen (14) references retained for this review, Kouchadé et al. 18 was the most cited revealing several plants used against respiratory diseases. Kouchadé et al. 18 cited over 55 times and Mathouet et al. 19 cited over 30 times signifies the importance and impact of the results of these groups of researchers in the use of medicinal plants against respiratory diseases. 

  1. Characterization of plants directed against respiratory tract diseases

In the 14 articles reviewed, one hundred and seventy-nine (179) research citations were registered on the use of plants species in the treatment of respiratory disorders in Africa. A total of one hundred and forty-three (143) plants species were reportedly used in Africa in the management of respiratory diseases. However, we reported only those plants species that were cited at least twice (Figure 3). The most cited plants across board were: Ocimum gratissimum L. (04 citations), Entandrophragma cylindrium (Sprague), Scyphocephalium ochocoa Warb. Rubia cordifolia and Allium sativum L. (03 citations each) (Figure 3). A similar study in West Africa recorded 145 species while North Africa reported 57 species implicated in the treatment of respiratory disorder 20, 21. Equally, 24 species were reported in Gabon to have therapeutic effect on respiratory disorders 19. Hence West Africa may have a well-organized traditional medicine system that promotes traditional medicine.


 

                                        image

Figure 3: Spectrum of plants citations used in the treatment of respiratory diseases in Africa.

image

Figure 4: Frequency of citation of plants families in the management of respiratory disorder.

 


 

Sixty (60) plant families were reported in the present study. Twenty-three (23) families were cited at least three times. Amongst the 23 families Lamiaceae (18 citations) had the highest citation for respiratory disorders followed by the Fabaceae (08) and Myrtaceae (08) and then Solanaceae (07) (Figure 4). The rest of the families had below 7 citations. In African traditional medicine, the population uses plants that are within their immediate surrounding for treatment. This is the case of the Lamiaceae for Morocco and the Fabaceae for the countries of Central and West Africa. A typical example is that of Alchornea cordifolia that finds application as therapeutic agent in the respiratory system 22.


 

 

image

Figure 5: Number of plants cited for the treatment of respiratory disorders.


 

Fifteen respiratory conditions were listed from the literature search (Figure 5). Of the fifteen respiratory conditions listed, the generalized respiratory infections appear first (43 citations), followed by rhino-bronchitis (42 citations), cough (30 citations), lung infection (20 citations), asthma (19 citation) and angina (10 citations). These respiratory infections are those mostly seen in moderate to severe COVID-19 infection. One of the most important respiratory pathogens in COVID-19 is the human rhinovirus known to cause rhino-bronchitis 23 meanwhile cough is one of the most common presenting symptoms of COVID-19, along with fever and loss of taste and smell 24. When persist for weeks or months after SARS-CoV-2 infection, cough is accompanied by chronic fatigue, cognitive impairment, dyspnea, or pain 24. The situation of COVID-19 worsens in patients with preexisting conditions such as asthma and can be very fatal 25. COVID-19 infection gets worst with lung infections such as pneumonia. This is because the lungs responsible for gaseous exchange are compromised by pneumonia and COVID-19. Plants with therapeutic effects against these conditions could be of help to COVID-19 patients.

  1. Ethnobotanical clues on the uses of plants in the management of respiratory tract diseases.
    1. Citation Frequencies and Scores

The frequencies and citation scores obtained for the different plants were presented in Table 1.


 

 

Table 1: Frequencies and citations scores of plants used against respiratory diseases 

Medicinal plants 

Number of citations 

Score

Quotation frequencies

Abrus precatorius L. 

1

0.071

0.006

Acacia nilotica (L.) Wild. Ex Delile

2

0.143

0.011

Acmella caulirhiza (Wal.ex DC.) R.K. Jansen

1

0.071

0.006

Adenopus breviflorus Benth.

1

0.071

0.006

Aframomum septrum (Oliv &D.Hans) K.Schum.

1

0.071

0.006

Afrostyrax lepidophyllus Mildbr.

1

0.071

0.006

Alchornea cordifolia (Schum.&T Thonn.)Müll.Arg.

1

0.071

0.006

Alchornea floribunda Müll.Arg.

1

0.071

0.006

Allium cepa L.

1

0.071

0.006

Allium sativum L.

3

0.214

0.017

Amphimas ferrugineus Pierre ex Pellegr.

2

0.143

0.011

Anacardium occidentale L.

1

0.071

0.006

Annona muricata L.

1

0.071

0.006

Anogeissus leiocarpa (D.C.) Guill&Perr.

1

0.071

0.006

Apium graveolens L.

1

0.071

0.006

Argemone mexicana L.

2

0.143

0.011

Aucoumea klaineana Pierre

1

0.071

0.006

Baillonella toxisperma Pierre

1

0.071

0.006

Beilschmiedia sp

1

0.071

0.006

Berhavia diffusa L.

1

0.071

0.006

Bidens pilosa L.

1

0.071

0.006

Bombax costatum Pellegr. &Vuillet

1

0.071

0.006

Brassica napus L.

1

0.071

0.006

Brassica oleacera L.

1

0.071

0.006

Brassica rapa L.

1

0.071

0.006

Bridelia ferruginea Benth.

1

0.071

0.006

Buchholzia coriacea Engl.

1

0.071

0.006

Caesalpinia bonduc (L.) Roxb.

1

0.071

0.006

Canabis sativa L.

1

0.071

0.006

Capsicum annuum L.

2

0.143

0.011

Capsicum frutescens L.

1

0.071

0.006

Carapa procera DC.

1

0.071

0.006

Carica papaya L.

1

0.071

0.006

Casuarina equisetifolia L.

1

0.071

0.006

Catharanthus roseus (L.) G.Don.

1

0.071

0.006

Chamaecrista rotundifolia (Pers.) Greene

1

0.071

0.006

Citrus limon L.

1

0.071

0.006

Citrus medica L.

1

0.071

0.006

Clausena anisata (Wild.) Hook.F. ex Benth.

1

0.071

0.006

Clerodendrum capitatum (Wild.) 

1

0.071

0.006

Coffea arabica L.

1

0.071

0.006

Cola anomala K.Schum.

2

0.143

0.011

Combretum micranthum G.Don.

1

0.071

0.006

Corrigiola telephiifolia (Pourr.) Briq.

2

0.143

0.011

Costus afer Ker-Gawl

1

0.071

0.006

Costus lucanusianus J.Braun.

1

0.071

0.006

Costus tappentabeckianus J. Braun

1

0.071

0.006

Crocus sativus L.

1

0.071

0.006

Cuminum cyminum L .

1

0.071

0.006

Cynometra megalophylla Harms

1

0.071

0.006

Detarium microcarpum Guill. & Perr.

1

0.071

0.006

Dialium guineense Wild.

1

0.071

0.006

Dichaetanthera africana (Hook.f.) Jacq.

1

0.071

0.006

Dichapetaleum madagascariensis Poir.

1

0.071

0.006

Discopodium penninervum (Hochst.)

1

0.071

0.006

Emilia coccinea (Sims) G.Don

1

0.071

0.006

Entandrophragma cylindrium (Sprague)

3

0.214

0.017

Eucalyptus camaldulenis Dehn.

1

0.071

0.006

Eucalyptus globulus Labill.

2

0.143

0.011

Eucalyptus sp

2

0.143

0.011

Eugenia caryophyllata Bullock & S.G. Harrison

1

0.071

0.006

Euphorbia falcata L.

1

0.071

0.006

Ficus cyathistipula Warb.

1

0.071

0.006

Ficus exasperata P.Beauv.

1

0.071

0.006

Ficus sur Forssk

1

0.071

0.006

Ficus thonningii Blume

1

0.071

0.006

Flueggea virosa (Roxb. Ex Wild)

1

0.071

0.006

Foeniculum vulgare Mill. Subsp.

1

0.071

0.006

Garcinia kola Heckel

1

0.071

0.006

Gossypium arboreus L.

1

0.071

0.006

Gossypium barbadense L.

2

0.143

0.011

Grewia barombiensis K.Schum.

1

0.071

0.006

Grewia ferruginea A.Rich.

1

0.071

0.006

Hallea ledermannii (K.Krause)Verdc.

1

0.071

0.006

Heterotis rotundifolia (Sm.) Jacq.Fel.

1

0.071

0.006

Hyptis suaveolens (L.) Poit.

1

0.071

0.006

Illicium verum Hook.

1

0.071

0.006

Kalanchoe crenata (Andrews) Haw.

1

0.071

0.006

Kaya senegalensis (Desr.) A.Juss.

1

0.071

0.006

Lactuca capensis Thunb

2

0.143

0.011

Laggera alata (D.Don) Sch.Bip.Oliv.

1

0.071

0.006

Lantana camara L.

1

0.071

0.006

Laportea aestuans (L.) Chew

1

0.071

0.006

Lavandula multifida L.

1

0.071

0.006

Lavandula stoechas ssp.

1

0.071

0.006

Lippia multiflora Maldenke

1

0.071

0.006

Magnistipula tessmannii Engl.

2

0.143

0.011

Mangifera indica L.

2

0.143

0.011

Marrubium vulgare L.

2

0.143

0.011

Memecylon zenkeri Gilg

1

0.071

0.006

Mentha pulegium L.

1

0.071

0.006

Monodora myristica (Gaertn.) Dunal

2

0.143

0.011

Nicotiana tabacum L. 

1

0.071

0.006

Nigella sativa L.

2

0.143

0.011

Ocimum basilicum L.

2

0.143

0.011

Ocimum gratissimum L.

4

0.286

0.022

Origanum compactum (Benth.)

1

0.071

0.006

Parkia bigloboa (Jacq.) R.Br. Ex Benth.

2

0.143

0.011

Paullinia pinnata L.

1

0.071

0.006

Pergularia  daemia (Forssk.) C.

1

0.071

0.006

Persea americana Mill.

1

0.071

0.006

Piper guineense Schumach. &Thonn.

2

0.143

0.011

Piper nigrum L.

1

0.071

0.006

Piptadeniastrum africanum (Hook.F.) Brenan

1

0.071

0.006

Podocarpus falcatus (Thunb.) R.Br.ex Mirb

1

0.071

0.006

Polyscias fulva (Hiern) Harms

1

0.071

0.006

Propopis africana (Guill.&Perr.) Taub

1

0.071

0.006

Psychotria psychotrioides (D.C.) Roberty

1

0.071

0.006

Pterocarpus erinaceus Poir. 

1

0.071

0.006

Pycnanthus angolensis (Welw.) Warb.

1

0.071

0.006

Rauvolfia vomitoria Afz.

1

0.071

0.006

Rubia cordifolia L.

3

0.214

0.017

Ruta chalepensis L.

1

0.071

0.006

Saccharum officinarum L.

2

0.143

0.011

Salvia verbenaca L.

1

0.071

0.006

Satureja calamintha (L.)

1

0.071

0.006

Schwenckia americana L.

1

0.071

0.006

Scoparia dulcis L.

2

0.143

0.011

Scyphocephalium ochocoa Warb.

3

0.214

0.017

Securidata longepedunculata Fresen

2

0.143

0.011

Senna occidentalis (L.) Link

1

0.071

0.006

Senna septentrionalis (Viv.)

1

0.071

0.006

Solanum nigrum L.

1

0.071

0.006

Spondias monbin L.

1

0.071

0.006

Sporopermum glaberrimum Hoch.

1

0.071

0.006

Staudtia gabonensis Warb.

1

0.071

0.006

Strombosiopsis tetrandra Engl.

1

0.071

0.006

Syzygium aromaticum Merill.

2

0.143

0.011

Terminalia glaucescens Planc.ex Benth.

1

0.071

0.006

Terminalia laxiflora Engl.

1

0.071

0.006

Tetradenia riparia (Hochst.)

1

0.071

0.006

Tetrapleura tetraptera (Schmach. &Thonn.) Thonn.

1

0.071

0.006

Thonningia sanguinea Vahl.

1

0.071

0.006

Tragia ssenegalensis Müll.Arg.

1

0.071

0.006

Treculia obovoidea N.E.Br.

1

0.071

0.006

Trigonella foenum-graecum L.

1

0.071

0.006

Vernonia amygdalina Delile

1

0.071

0.006

Vicia faba L.

1

0.071

0.006

Vitellaria paradoxa C.F.Gaertn.ssp. paradoxa

2

0.143

0.011

Vitex doniana Sweet

2

0.143

0.011

Xylopia aethiopica (Dunal) A.Rich.

1

0.071

0.006

Zingiber officinale Roscoe

2

0.143

0.011

Ziziphus spina-christi (L.)

1

0.071

0.006

Citation frequency = No citation of a species/No. of citation of all samples

 


 

The relative frequency of plant species is the ratio between the number of citations of the species and the total number of citations of all species. Hence the lower the frequency the lower the importance of the species. It emerged from this table that almost all of the plants listed have a low frequency, low citations and a low convergence score. However, certain plants were able to stand out: Ocimum gratissimum (score of 0.286 and 0.022 frequency), Allium sativum (score of 0.214 and 0.017 frequency), Entandrophragma cylindricum (score of 0.214 and 0.017 frequency), Rubia cordifolia (score of 0.214 and 0.017 Frequency) and Scyphocephalium ochocoa (score of 0.214 and frequency 0.017).

Ocimum gratissimum is an aromatic plant used in the treatment of several diseases in many countries and has been reported to contain 8 major groups of different metabolites 26 which may be related to its medicinal properties.

  1. Theoretical performance of plants against respiratory diseases

The performance indices were calculated (Table 2) and only plants involved in several respiratory pathologies (in this case, the most cited pathologies) and which were in competition with others were taken into account. 


 

 

 

 

 

Table 2: Performance indices of plants directed against respiratory diseases

Scientific names/Illnesses treated 

Anthrax

Asthma

Bronchitis

Chronic Bronchitis

Lung Cancer

Common Cold

Pulmonary  infection

Respiratory Infection

Pneumonia

Rhino-bronchitis

Influenza

Sinusitis

Cough

Tuberculosis

Total citation/species

Abrus precatorius L. 

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

1

Acacia nilotica (L.) Wild. Ex Delile

-

2.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1.00

-

-

-

-

2

Acmella caulirhiza (Wal.ex DC.) R.K. Jansen

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Adenopus breviflorus Benth.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Aframomum septrum (Oliv &D.Hans) K.Schum.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

1

Afrostyrax lepidophyllus Mildbr.

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Alchornea cordifolia (Schum.&T Thonn.)Müll.Arg.

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Alchornea floribunda Müll.Arg.

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Allium cepa L.

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Allium sativum L.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

3

Amphimas ferrugineus Pierre ex Pellegr.

-

-

-

-

-

-

2.00

-

-

-

-

-

2.00

-

2

Anacardium occidentale L.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

1

Annona muricata L.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

1

Anogeissus leiocarpa (D.C.) Guill&Perr.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

1

Apium graveolens L.

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Argemone mexicana L.

-

-

-

-

-

-

2.00

-

-

-

-

-

2.00

-

2

Aucoumea klaineana Pierre

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

1

Baillonella toxisperma Pierre

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Beilschmiedia sp

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

1

Berhavia diffusa L.

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Bidens pilosa L.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Bombax costatum Pellegr.&Vuillet

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

1

Brassica napus L.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Brassica oleacera L.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Brassica rapa L.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Bridelia ferruginea Benth.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

1

Buchholzia coriacea Engl.

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Caesalpinia bonduc (L.) Roxb.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

1

Canabis sativa L.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Capsicum annuum L.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

2

Capsicum frutescens L.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Carapa procera DC.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

1

Carica papaya L.

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Casuarina equisetifolia L.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

1

Catharanthus roseus (L.) G.Don.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

1

Chamaecrista rotundifolia (Pers.) Greene

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

1

Citrus limon L.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Citrus medica L.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Clausena anisata (Wild.) Hook.F. ex Benth.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

1

Clerodendrum capitatum (Wild.) 

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

1

Coffea arabica L.

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Cola anomala K.Schum.

-

2.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

2.00

-

2

Combretum micranthum G.Don.

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Corrigiola telephiifolia (Pourr.) Briq.

-

-

-

-

-

2.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

1.00

-

2

Costus afer Ker-Gawl

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Costus lucanusianus J.Braun.

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Costus tappentabeckianus J. Braun

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

1

Crocus sativus L.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Cuminum cyminum L .

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Cynometra megalophylla Harms

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

1

Detarium microcarpum Guill.& Perr.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Dialium guineense Wild.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

1

Dichaetanthera africana (Hook.f.) Jacq.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

1

Dichapetaleum madagascariensis Poir.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

1

Discopodium penninervum (Hochst.)

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Emilia coccinea (Sims) G.Don

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

1

Entandrophragma cylindrium (Sprague)

-

-

1.00

-

-

-

-

1.00

-

-

1.00

-

-

-

3

Eucalyptus camaldulenis Dehn.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

1

Eucalyptus globulus Labill.

-

-

-

-

-

2.00

-

1.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

2

Eucalyptus sp

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1.00

-

-

-

-

2.00

-

2

Eugenia caryophyllata Bullock & S.G. Harrison

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Euphorbia falcata L.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Euphorbia hirta L.

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Ficus cyathistipula Warb.

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Ficus exasperata P.Beauv.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Ficus sur Forssk

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

1

Ficus thonningii Blume

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

1

Flueggea virosa (Roxb. Ex Wild)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

1

Foeniculum vulgare Mill. Subsp.

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Garcinia kola Heckel

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Gossypium arboreus L.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

1

Gossypium barbadense L.

-

2.00

2.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

2

Grewia barombiensis K.Schum.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

1

Grewia ferruginea A.Rich.

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

1

Hallea ledermannii (K.Krause)Verdc.

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Heterotis rotundifolia (Sm.) Jacq.Fel.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

1

Hyptis suaveolens (L.) Poit.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

1

Illicium verum Hook.

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Kalanchoe crenata (Andrews) Haw.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

1

Kaya senegalensis (Desr.) A.Juss.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

1

Lactuca capensis Thunb

-

-

-

2.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

2.00

-

2

Laggera alata (D.Don) Sch.Bip.Oliv.

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Lantana camara L.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

2.00

-

1

Laportea aestuans (L.) Chew

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Lavandula multifida L.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Lavandula stoechas ssp.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

1

Lippia multiflora Maldenke

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

1

Magnistipula tessmannii Engl.

-

-

-

-

-

-

2.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

2

Mangifera indica L.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1.00

-

1.00

-

-

-

-

2

Marrubium vulgare L.

-

-

-

-

-

2.00

-

1.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

2

Memecylon zenkeri Gilg

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Mentha pulegium L.

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

1

Monodora myristica (Gaertn.) Dunal

-

2.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1.00

-

-

-

-

2

Nicotiana tabacum L. 

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

1

Nigella sativa L.

-

2.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

2

Ocimum basilicum L.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

2

Ocimum gratissimum L.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1.00

-

1.00

-

-

-

-

4

Origanum compactum (Benth.)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Parkia bigloboa (Jacq.) R.Br. Ex Benth.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1.00

-

1.00

-

-

2.00

-

2

Paullinia pinnata L.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

1

Pergularia  daemia (Forssk.) C.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

1

Persea americana Mill.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Piper guineense Schumach.&Thonn.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1.00

-

-

-

-

2

Piper nigrum L.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Piptadeniastrum africanum (Hook.F.) Brenan

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Podocarpus falcatus (Thunb.)R.Br.ex Mirb

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Polyscias fulva(Hiern) Harms

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

1

Propopis africana (Guill.&Perr.) Taub

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Psychotria psychotrioides (D.C.) Roberty

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Pterocarpus erinaceus Poir. 

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

1

Pycnanthus angolensis (Welw.) Warb.

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Rauvolfia vomitoria Afz.

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

1

Rubia cordifolia L.

-

-

-

-

1.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3

Ruta chalepensis L.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Saccharum officinarum L.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

2

Salvia  verbenaca L.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Satureja calamintha (L.)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Schwenckia americana L.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

1

Scoparia dulcis L.

-

-

2.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

2

Scyphocephalium ochocoa Warb.

-

1.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1.00

-

3

Securidata longepedunculata Fresen

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1.00

-

-

-

-

2

Senna occidentalis (L.) Link

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

1

Senna septentrionalis (Viv.)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1.00

-

-

-

-

1

Solanum nigrum L.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1.00

-

-

-

-

1

Spondias monbin L.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

1

Sporopermum glaberrimum Hoch.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

1

Staudtia gabonensis Warb.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1.00

-

1

Strombosiopsis tetrandra Engl.

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Syzygium aromaticum Merill.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

2

Terminalia glaucescens Planc.ex Benth.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

3.00

-

1

Terminalia laxiflora Engl.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Tetradenia riparia (Hochst.)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Tetrapleura tetraptera (Schmach.&Thonn.) Thonn.

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Thonningia sanguinea Vahl.

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Tragia ssenegalensis Müll.Arg.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

2.00

-

1

Treculia obovoidea N.E.Br.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1.00

-

1

Trigonella foenum-graecum L.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Vernonia amygdalina Delile

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Vicia faba L.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Vitellaria paradoxa C.F.Gaertn.ssp. paradoxa

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1.00

-

1.00

-

-

-

-

2

Vitex doniana Sweet

-

2.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

2

Xylopia aethiopica (Dunal) A.Rich.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.00

-

-

-

-

1

Zingiber officinale Roscoe

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

2

Ziziphus spina-christi (L.)

3.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

Total citation/pathology

2

20

8

1

1

6

11

43

1

42

2

1

30

2

180

The numbers in the Table represents the Performance index (PI) of each plant species against a respiratory disorder. PI = 0 (-) signifies no performance, PI = 1 signifies average performance, PI = 2 signifies good performance and PI = 3 signifies excellent performance. 

 


 

The performance index determines which plant species is most suitable for the management of respiratory disorders. A performance index of zero signifies no performance which means there is no relationship between the plant species and the cited pathology meanwhile performance index of one is indicative of an average performance meaning there are possibilities that the plant species will treat the respective respiratory disorder. A performance index of two signifies good performance meaning there is a high probability the plant will treat the referenced respiratory disorder meanwhile a performance index of three signifies excellent performance which means the plant treats the referenced respiratory disorder. A particular plant species can have an excellent performance index for one respiratory disorder and a zero or poor performance index in another. This was the case with Acacia nilotica, Corrigiola telephiifolia, Eucalyptus globulus, Lantana camara, Marrubium vulgare, Monodora myristica, Nigella sativa, Parkia bigloboa, Tragia ssenegalensis and Vitex doniana (Table 2). In the present study the highest performance index obtained was three (3) which means the said plants species is most likely to treat the particular respiratory disorder for which it has the index. All the plants presented in this study were at least cited once for a particular respiratory disorder hence spreading the performance which automatically become low. Meanwhile the respiratory disorder citated across board the higher the performance index. Hence, a plant that is cited many times for different respiratory disorders may end up with a low performance index for individual respiratory disorder meanwhile it has a wide coverage for different respiratory disorders. Similar observations have earlier been reported in a study specific to vaginal infections 27. This was the case with Entandrophragma cylindrium, Ocimum gratissimum, Rubia cordifolia and Scyphocephalium ochocoa. Ocimum gratissimum was the most cited plant indicated in the therapy of four respiratory disorders meanwhile Entandrophragma cylindrium, Rubia cordifolia and Scyphocephalium ochocoa were indicated in three different pathologies. Thus, the frequency of citation is inversely proportional to the performance index. This is understood because performance index is related to a particular respiratory disorder while the frequency of citation of a plant is in relation to the fourteen respiratory disorders reported in this study. With respect to number of plants cited for the respective respiratory disorders, forty-three plants were cited to have therapeutic effect against respiratory infection without specifying the type of infection. Forty-two plants were cited to be effective against rhino-bronchitis, thirty plants against cough, twenty plants against Asthma, eleven against pulmonary infection and the rest were below seven citations. 

The performance of plants, calculated according to their contribution, was able to demonstrate that only plants involved in several respiratory pathologies, which were in competition with others were taken into account. Similar observations were earlier presented by Ndjib et al. 27 that performance index should always take into account the coverage of a plant. Thus, the plants entering into the composition of a recipe whose performance index is greater than or equal to 2 will be said to be more effective for the pathology indicated. As an example, with regards to respiratory infections, Capsicum annuum (PI = 1) has a poor performance unlike Tragia senegalensis Müll. Arg. (PI = 2) for the treatment of cough.

  1. CONCLUSION

The aim of this review was to determine the plants most likely to treat respiratory disorders related to COVID-19 infection in Africa. Although not exhaustive, this study made it possible to identify 143 plant species belonging to 60 families of plants in the management of 15 diseases and / or symptoms relating to the respiratory system. The most cited plants are: Ocimum gratissimum L. (04 citations), Entandrophragma cylindrium (Sprague), Scyphocephalium ochocoa Warb. Rubia cordifolia and Allium sativum L. (03 citations each). The most represented families are the Fabaceae and Lamiaceae (18 citations each). These plants are linked with the treatment of pneumonia, lung infection, cough and rhino-bronchitis which are associated with COVID-19. Hence, may be helpful in COVID-19 infection.

Data Availability: The datasets used and analyzed in the study are included in the review without any restriction.

Conflicts Of Interest: Authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions: GAA conceived and designed the review and participated in the collection of data and analysis; and revised the final form of the review. RCN carried out data collection and prepared the first draft of the review.

Funding Statement: This review did not receive any funding.

REFERENCES

1. Ait-Khaled, N., Odhiambo, J., Pearce, N., Prevalence of symptoms of asthma, rhinitis and eczema in 13-14-year-old children in Africa: the international study of asthma and allergies in childhood phase III. Allergy 2007; 62(3) :247-258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01325.x

2. Roth G. A. et al. Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality for 282 causes of death in 195 countries and territories, 1980-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 2018; 392:1736-1788 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32203-7

3. Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, Fan G, Liu Y, Liu Z, Xiang J, Wang Y, Song B, Gu X, Guan L, Wei Y, Li H, Wu X, Xu J, Tu S, Zhang Y, Chen H, Cao B. Clinical course and riskfactors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2020; 395:1054-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3

4. Malik W et al. Emerging novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) - Current scenario, evolutionary perspective based on genome analysis and recent developments. Vet Q. 2020:40(1):1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/01652176.2020.1727993

5. Rodríguez-Morales P, Going global - Travel and the 2019 novel coronavirus. Travel Med. Infect. Dis. 2019; 2020:33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101578

6. Sun J., He W-T, Wang L., Lai A., Ji X., Zhai X.L. COVID-19: epidemiology, evolution, and cross-disciplinary perspectives. Trends in Molecular Medicine, 2020; 26(5):483-496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2020.02.008

7. Fokouo Fogha J.V., Noubiap J.J. La lutte contre la COVID-19 au Cameroun nécessite un second souffle. Pan African Medical Journal; 2020; 37(1):14 https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.supp.2020.37.1.23535

8. Khaerunnisa S, Kurniawan H, Awaluddin R, Suhartati S, Soetjipto S (2020) Potential inhibitor of COVID-19 main protease (Mpro) from several medicinal plant compounds by molecular docking study. Preprints 2020:2020030226 https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202003.0226.v1

9. Kudi AC, Myint SH. Antiviral activity of some Nigerian medicinal plant extracts. J Ethnopharmacol 1999; 68(1-3):289-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8741(99)00049-5

10. Pringproa K, Khonghiran O, Kunanoppadol S, Potha T, Chuammitri P. In vitro virucidal and virustatic properties of the crude extract of Cynodon dactylon against porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. Vet Med Int 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/947589

11. Ramalhete C, da Cruz FP, Mulhovo S, Sousa IJ, Fernandes MX, Prudencio M, et al. Dual-stage triterpenoids from an African medicinal plant targeting the malaria parasite. Bioorg Med Chem 2014; 22(15):3887-3890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2014.06.019

12. Ravikumar YS, Ray U, Nandhitha M, Perween A, Raja Naika H, Khanna N, Das S. Inhibition of hepatitis C virus replication by herbal extract: Phyllanthus amarus as potent natural source. Virus Research 2011; 158(1-2):89-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2011.03.014

13. Xuan DT, Khanh DT. Chemistry and pharmacology of Bidens pilosa: an overview. Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation 2016; 16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40005-016-0231-6

14. Nigam M, Atanassova M, Mishra PA, Pezzani R, Devkota HP, Plygun S, Salehi B, Setzer W, Rad SJ. Bioactive compounds and health benefits of Artemisia Species. Natural Product Communications 2019; 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1934578X19850354

15. Betti J.L. An ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants among the baka pygmies in the dja biosphere reserve, Cameroon. African Study Monographs, 2004; 25(1):1-27.

16. Chassagne F. (2017). Cancer du foie au Cambodge : état des lieux épidémiologiques, description des médecines traditionnelles utilisées et évaluation d'espèces médicinales sélectionnées. Thèse PhD, Université de Paul Sabatier Toulouse III, France.

17. Haidara M., Diarra M.L., Doumbia S., Denou A., Dembele D., Diarra A., Sanogo R. Plantes médicinales de l'Afrique de l'Ouest pour la prise en charge des affections respiratoires pouvant se manifester au cours de la Covid-19. Int. J. Biol. Chem. Sci. 2020; 14(8):2941-2950 https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v14i8.22

18. Kouchadé A.S., Adomou A.C., Tossou G.M., Yédomonhan H., Dassou G. H. et Akoègninou A. Étude ethnobotanique des plantes médicinales utilisées dans le traitement des maladies infantiles et vendues sur les marchés au sud du Bénin. Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 2016; 28(2):4418-4438

19. Mathouet H., Aboughe Angone S., Mengome L., Eyele Mve Mba C., Rondi M.L., Souza A., Lamidi M. Ethnobotanic study of plants used in traditional medicine for some respiratory affections in Gabon. ScienceLib Editions Mersenne: 2014; 6(140905). ISSN 2111-4706

20. Fatima E.H., Akka F.B., Dahmani J., Belahbib N., Zidane L. Étude ethnobotanique des plantes médicinales utilisées dans le traitement des infections du système respiratoire dans le plateau central marocain. Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 2015; 25(2):3886-3897

21. Helali A., Mokhtari C., Meriem Ghoul M., Belhadef M.S. (2020). Prevent COVID-19 infection: What place for medicinal plants according to the Algerian population? Algerian Journal of Pharmacy. 2020; 3(1).2602-795X

22. Mambe F.T., Voukeng I.K., Beng V.P., Kuete V. Antibacterial activities of methanol extracts from Alchornea cordifolia and four other Cameroonian plants against MDR phenotypes. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences 2015; 11(2):121-127 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2015.12.001

23. Watanabe Y, Kamioka Y, Seki M. Rhinovirus-Infected Patients in the COVID-19 Pandemic. Period Infection and Drug Resistance 2021; 14:609-611. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S300001

24. Song WJ, Hui CKM, Hull JH, Birring SS, McGarvey L, Mazzone SB, Chung KF. Confronting COVID-19-associated cough and the post-COVID syndrome: role of viral neurotropism, neuroinflammation, and neuroimmune responses. Lancet Respir Med 2021; 9:533-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00125-9

25. Izquierdo JL, Almonacid C, González Y, Rio-Bermudez CD, Ancochea J, Cárdenas R, Lumbreras S, Soriano JB. The impact of COVID-19 on patients with asthma. Eur Respir J , 2021; 57:2003142. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.03142-2020

26. Kpètèhoto W.H., Hessou S., Tamègnon Dougnon V., Johnson R.C., Boni G., Houéto E.E., Assogba F., Pognon E., Loko F., Boko M., Gbénou J. Étude ethnobotanique, phytochimique et écotoxicologique de Ocimum gratissimum Linn (Lamiaceae) à Cotonou. Journal of Applied Biosciences, 2016; 109:10609-10617 ISSN 1997-5902 https://doi.org/10.4314/jab.v109i1.5

27. Ndjib R. C., Djova Steve Valdi, Amina Mamat, Kom Wayoué Christelle, Dibong Siegfried Didier and Nyegue Maximilienne Ascension In vitro antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of Alchornea cordifolia (Schumach & Thonn.) Müll.Arg. and Antrocaryon klaineanum Pierre extracts. International Journal of Botany: 2020; https://doi.org/10.22159/ijpps.2020v12i8.38272