Evaluation of in vitro anti snake venom activity of Justicia adhatoda leaves extract against Russell’s viper snake venom
Venomous snake bites possess significant amount of mortality as well as morbidity in tropical and subtropical regions of the world including India. The snake Russell’s viper (Daboia russelii) is responsible for thousands of deaths in India. Although antivenom are the only treatment available and the effects associated with several side effects. As an alternative, plants have been extensively studied in order to obtain an alternative treatment. The uses of plants against the effects of snake bites have been long recognized more scientific attention has been given since last 20 years. Extracts from plants have been used among traditional healers, especially in tropical areas there are plentiful sources, as therapy for snakebite for a long time. The present study aimed to provide a scientific explanation for the use of Justicia adhatoda plant against snakebite. The acetone extract of Justicia adhatoda leaves were tested for in vitro inhibitory activity on toxic venom enzymes like 5' nucleotidase, L-amino acid oxidase, phosphomonoesterase, phosphodiesterase, acetylcholine esterase and hyaluronidase from the Russell’s viper snake venom. The result showed the potential of plant leaves extract against the enzymes present in the snake venom. Justicia adhatoda inhibits most of the snake venom enzymes like L-amino acid oxidase, phosphomonoesterase, phosphodiestarase and acetylcholine esterase.
Keywords: Daboia russelii, Enzyme inhibition, Acetone Extract of Justicia adhatoda (AEJA), etc.
2. Gutierrez JM., Warrell DA., Williams DJ. The need for full integration of snakebite envenoming within a global strategy to combat the neglected tropical diseases: the way forward. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2013; 7(6).
3. Leon G et al. Immune response towards snake venoms. Inflamm Allergy Drug Targets 2011; 10(5):381-98.
4. Deshpande, Rushikesh & Motiram Motghare, Vijay & Laxman Padwal, Sudhir & Pore, Rakesh & Bhamare, Chetanraj & Deshmukh, Vinod & Nutan Pise, Harshal. Adverse drug reaction profile of anti-snake venom in a rural tertiary care teaching hospital. Journal of Young Pharmacists 2013; 5. 41–45.
5. Shinwari, Zabta. Medicinal plants research in Pakistan. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research 2010; 4. 161-176.
6. Meenatchisundaram S, Parameswari G, Michael A. Studies on antivenom activity of Andrographis paniculata and Aristolochia indica plant extracts against Daboia russelli venom by in vivo and in vitro methods. Ind J Sc Tech. 2009; 2(4):76–79.
7. Sulochana AK, Raveendran D, Krishnamma AP, Oommen OV. Ethnomedicinal plants used for snake envenomation by folk traditional practitioners from Kallar forest region of South Western Ghats, Kerala, India. J Intercult Ethnopharmacol 2015; 4(1):47–51.
8. Goswami, PK. & Samant, M & Srivastava, RS. Snake venom, anti-snake venom & potential of snake venom. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences 2014; 6.4-7.
9. Rowe M, de Gast GC, Platts-Mills TA, Asherson GL, Webster AD, Johnson SM: Lymphocyte 5'-nucleotidase in primary hypogammaglobulinaemia and cord blood. Clin Exp Immunol 1980, 39(2):337-343.
10. Li ZY, Yu TF, Lian EC: Purification and characterization of L-amino acid oxidase from king cobra (Ophiophagus hannah) venom and its effects on human platelet aggregation. Toxicon 1994, 32(11):1349-1358.
11. Pukrittayakamee S, Warrell DA, Desakorn V, McMichael AJ, White NJ, Bunnag D: The hyaluronidase activities of some Southeast Asian snake venoms. Toxicon 1988, 26(7):629-637.
12. Bessey OA, Lowry OH, Brock MJ. A method for the rapid determination of alkaline phosphates with five cubic millimeters of serum. J Biol Chem 1946, 164:321 -329.
13. Lo TB, Chen YH, Lee CY: Chemical studies of Formosan cobra (Naja naja atra) venom. Part 1. Chromatographic separation of crude venom on CM-Sepadex and preliminary characterization of its components. J Chin Chem Soc 1966, 13(1):165-177.
14. Ellman GL, Courtney KD, Andres V Jr, Feather-Stone RM. A new and rapid colorimetric determination of acetylcholinesterase activity. Biochem Pharmacol 1961, 7(1):88-95.
15. Samy RP, Thwin MM, Gopalakrishnakone P, Ignacimuthu S. Ethnobotanical survey of folk plants for the treatment of snakebites in Southern part of Tamilnadu, India. J Ethnopharmacol. 2008; 115:302–31.
16. Ushanandini S, Nagaraju S, Nayaka SC, Kumar KH, Kemparaju K, Girish KS. The anti- ophidian properties of Anacardium occidentale bark extract. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 2009; 31:607–15.
17. Ushanandini S, Nagaraju S, Harish Kumar K, Vedavathi M, Machiah DK, Kemparaju K, et al. The antisnake venom properties of Tamarindus indica (leguminosae) seed extract. Phytother Res. 2006; 20:851–8.
18. Dhananjaya BS, Kesthuru S Girish, Cletus D'Souza. Anti-venom potential of aqueos extract of stem bark of Mangifera indica L against Daboia russelli (Russells viper) venom. Ind J Biochem Biophys. 2011; 48:175-83.
19. Shirwaikar A, Rajendran K, Bodla R, Kumar CD: Neutralization potential of Viper russelli (Russell’s viper) venom by ethanol leaf extract of Acalypha indica. J Ethano pharmacol. 2004; 94(2-3):267-273.
20. Bhavya J , Shrikanth, V. M., Mirajkar, K. K., & More, S. S. “In vitro screening and evaluation of antivenom phytochemicals from Azima tetracantha Lam. leaves against Bungarus caeruleus and Vipera russelli” journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases 2014; vol. 20,1 12. 1.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (SeeÂ The Effect of Open Access).