Comparative Molecular Field Analysis on 4(3H) Quinazolinone derivatives for the Development of Potential Antimicrobial Agents

  • Sumit Bhattacharya SVN Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Swami Vivekanand University, Sagar, Madhya Pradesh, India
  • Vaibhav Rajoriya Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Dr. Harisingh Gour University (A Central University), Sagar, (M.P.) 470003, India
  • Pradip Jana Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Dr. Harisingh Gour University (A Central University), Sagar, (M.P.) 470003, India
  • Varsha Kashaw SVN Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Swami Vivekanand University, Sagar, Madhya Pradesh, India

Abstract

Objective: Objective of present paper was to perform comparative Molecular Field Analysis on 4(3H) Quinazolinone derivatives for the Development of Potential Antimicrobial Agents.


Method: 4(3H)-quinazolinone is one of the most frequently studied heterocyclic moiety possessing wide range of biological activities. Three dimensional quantitative structure activity analysis (3D QSAR) has been carried out on some already reported 4(3H)-quinazolinone derivatives to explore the structural requirements for antifungal and antibacterial activities. QSAR models were generated with comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) using partial least square (PLS) method. CoMFA descriptors were calculated on aligned structures to understand the steric and electrostatic field contribution on the biological activity.


Result and Discussion: The generated CoMFA models for antifungal activity showed a cross-validation coefficient (q2) of 0.578, non-cross validation coefficient (r2) of 0.923 and standard error of 0.0177. The predictive ability of the model was validated using external validation with predictive factor (r2pred) of 0.94 for antifungal activity. The significant statistical parameters indicated the reliability and good predictive power of the developed model. The 3D contour maps generated from CoMFA models were analyzed for key structural requirements for improved activity.


Conclusion: This study will help to further optimize quinazoline-4(3H)-one derivatives for antimicrobial activities.


Keywords: 4(3H)-quinazolinones; 3D QSAR; Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA); antifungal activity; antibacterial activity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Sumit Bhattacharya, SVN Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Swami Vivekanand University, Sagar, Madhya Pradesh, India

SVN Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Swami Vivekanand University, Sagar, Madhya Pradesh, India

Vaibhav Rajoriya, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Dr. Harisingh Gour University (A Central University), Sagar, (M.P.) 470003, India

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Dr. Harisingh Gour University (A Central University), Sagar, (M.P.) 470003, India

Pradip Jana, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Dr. Harisingh Gour University (A Central University), Sagar, (M.P.) 470003, India

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Dr. Harisingh Gour University (A Central University), Sagar, (M.P.) 470003, India

Varsha Kashaw, SVN Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Swami Vivekanand University, Sagar, Madhya Pradesh, India

SVN Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Swami Vivekanand University, Sagar, Madhya Pradesh, India

References

1. Jatav V, Kashaw S, Mishra P, Synthesis, antibacterial and antifungal activity of some novel 3-[5-(4-substituted phenyl) 1,3,4-thiadiazole-2-yl]-2-styryl quinazoline-4 (3H)-ones. Medicinal Chemistry Research 2008; 17(2-7):169-81.
2. Dixit A, Kashaw SK, Gaur S, Saxena AK, Development of CoMFA, advance CoMFA and CoMSIA models in pyrroloquinazolinesas thrombin receptor antagonist, Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry 2004; 12(13):3591-8.
3. Jian Y, He Y, Yang J, Han W, Zhai X, Zhao Y, Li Y, Molecular modeling study for the design of novel peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonists using 3D-QSAR and molecular docking. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2018; 19(2):630-35.
4. Clark M, Cramer III RD, Van Opdenbosch N, Validation of the general purpose Tripos 5.2 force field. Journal of Computational Chemistry 1989; 10(8): 982-1012.
5. Golbraikh A, Tropsha A, Beware of q2, Journal of molecular graphics and modelling, 2002; 20(4):269-76.
Statistics
188 Views | 109 Downloads
How to Cite
1.
Bhattacharya S, Rajoriya V, Jana P, Kashaw V. Comparative Molecular Field Analysis on 4(3H) Quinazolinone derivatives for the Development of Potential Antimicrobial Agents. JDDT [Internet]. 15Mar.2019 [cited 9Aug.2022];9(2):603-11. Available from: http://jddtonline.info/index.php/jddt/article/view/2706

Most read articles by the same author(s)