Antioxidant and antifungal activity of Geophila repens (L.) I. M. Johnst. (Rubiaceae)
Objectives: The present study was conducted to investigate the potential of leaf extract of Geophila repens (L.) I.M. Johnst. (Rubiaceae) to exhibit antioxidant and antifungal potential.
Methods: Extraction of powdered leaf material was carried out by maceration process using methanol. Antioxidant activity of leaf extract was assessed by DPPH free radical scavenging assay and ferric reducing assay. Antifungal activity of leaf extract was determined by Poisoned food technique.
Results: Leaf extract was shown to scavenge DPPH radicals dose dependently with IC50 value of 51.39µg/ml. An increase in the absorbance on increasing concentration of leaf extract indicated ferric reducing activity. The extract showed more or less similar inhibitory activity against Aspergillus niger and Bipolaris sp. (>50% inhibition).
Conclusion: The results of the study indicate that leaf extract possesses bioactive principles with activity against oxidative damage and seed-borne fungi which are to be purified and screened for antioxidant and antifungal activity.
Keywords: Geophila repens, Maceration, DPPH, Ferric reducing, Seed-borne fungi, Poisoned food technique
2. Chavan JJ, Gaikwad NB, Kshirsagar PR, Dixit GB, Total phenolics, flavonoids and antioxidant properties of three Ceropegia species from Western Ghats of India, S Afr J Bot, 2013; 88:273–277.
3. Junaid S, Rakesh KN, Dileep N, Poornima G, Kekuda PTR, Mukunda S, Total phenolic content and antioxidant activity of seed extract of Lagerstroemia speciosa L, Chem Sci Trans, 2013; 2(1):75-80.
4. Nandhakumar E, Indumathi P, In vitro antioxidant activities of methanol and aqueous extract of Annona squamosa (L.) fruit pulp, J Acupunct Meridian Stud, 2013; 6(3):142-148.
5. Sisein EA, Biochemistry of free radicals and antioxidants, Sch Acad J Biosci, 2014; 2(2):110-118.
6. Sora GTS, Haminiuk CWI, da Silva MV, Zielinski AAF, Goncalves GA, Bracht A, Peralta RM, A comparative study of the capsaicinoid and phenolic contents and in vitro antioxidant activities of the peppers of the genus Capsicum: an application of chemometrics, J Food Sci Technol, 2015; 52(12):8086 8094.
7. Moukette BM, Pieme CA, Njimou JR, Biapa CPN, Marco B, Ngogang JY, In vitro antioxidant properties, free radicals scavenging activities of extracts and polyphenol composition of a non-timber forest product used as spice: Monodora myristica, Biol Res, 2015; 48:15.
8. Raghavendra HL, Kekuda PTR, Akarsh S, Ranjitha MC, Ashwini HS, Phytochemical analysis, antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of different parts of Pleocaulus sessilis (Nees) Bremek (Acanthaceae), Int J Green Pharm, 2017; 11(2):98-107.
9. Panchal VH, Dhale DA, Isolation of seed-borne fungi of sorghum (Sorghum vulgare pers.), J Phytol, 2011; 3(12):45-48.
10. Pathak N, Zaidi RK, Fungi associated with wheat seed discolouration and abnormalities in in-vitro study, Agric Sci, 2013; 4(9):516-520.
11. Masangwa JIG, Aveling TAS, Kritzinger Q, Screening of plant extracts for antifungal activities against Colletotrichum species of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp), J Agric Sci, 2013; 151:482-491.
12. Rao VT, Studies on seedborne fungi of soybean and its management, Agrotechnol, 2014; 2(4):243.
13. Omidpanah S, Sadeghi H, Sarcheshmeh MM, Manayi A, Evaluation of antifungal activity of aqueous extracts of some medicinal plants against Aspergillus flavus, pistachio aflatoxin producing fungus in vitro, Drug Dev Ther, 2015; 6(2):66-69.
14. Kandhare AS, Effect of common and dominant seed-borne fungi on protein content of pulses, American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics, 2016; 2(4):41-43.
15. Nagpurne VS, Patwari JM, Studies on antimicrobial activity of medicinal plants against seed-borne pathogenic fungi, Int Res J Biol Sci, 2016; 5(6):54-56.
16. Kekuda PTR, Raghavendra HL, Antifungal activity of Helichrysum buddleioides DC. against seed borne fungi, EC Microbiology, 2017; 6(2) 54-59.
17. Deb SC, Khair A, Effects of seed-borne fungi on germination and seedling vigor of aromatic rice varieties, Indian J Plant Sci, 2018; 7(1): 22-31.
18. Khare CP, Indian Medicinal Plants. An illustrated dictionary, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 2007, Pp 284.
19. Bhat GK, Flora of South Kanara, Akriti Prints, Mangalore, India, 2014, Pp 638.
20. DeFilipps RA, Maina SL, Crepin J, Medicinal Plants of the Guianas (Guyana, Surinam, French Guiana), Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, Accessed online at http://botany.si.edu/bdg/medicinal/index.html.
21. Portillo A, Vila R, Freixa B, Adzet T, Canigueral S, Antifungal activity of Paraguayan plants used in traditional medicine, J Ethnopharmacol, 2001; 76(1):93-98.
22. Dash UC, Sahoo AK, In vitro antioxidant assessment and a rapid HPTLC bioautographic method for the detection of anticholinesterase inhibitory activity of Geophila repens, J Integr Med, 2017; 15(3):231-241.
23. Rao H, Lai P, Gao Y, Chemical composition, antibacterial activity, and synergistic effects with conventional antibiotics and nitric oxide production inhibitory activity of essential oil from Geophila repens (L.) I.M. Johnst, Molecules, 2017; 22:1561.
24. Shanta MA, Ahmed T, Uddin MN, Majumder S, Hossain MS, Rana MS, Phytochemical screening and in vitro determination of antioxidant potential of methanolic extract of Streospermum chelonoides, J Appl Pharm Sci, 2013; 3(3):117-121.
25. Sherikar AS, Mahanthesh MC, Evaluation of aqueous and methanolic extract of leaves of Epipremnum aureum for radical scavenging activity by DPPH Method, total phenolic content, reducing capacity assay and FRAP assay, J Pharmacogn Phytochem, 2015; 4(4):36-40.
26. Ahmed D, Khan MM, Saeed R, Comparative analysis of phenolics, flavonoids, and antioxidant and antibacterial potential of methanolic, hexanic and aqueous extracts from Adiantum caudatum leaves, Antioxidants, 2015; 4:394-409.
27. Molyneux P, The use of the stable free radical diphenylpicrylhydrazyl (DPPH) for estimating antioxidant activity, Songklanakarin J Sci Technol, 2004; 26(2):211-219.
28. Jayanthi P, Lalitha P, Reducing power of the solvent extracts of Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms, Int J Pharm Pharm Sci, 2011; 3(3):126-128.
29. Phatak RS, Hendre AS, Total antioxidant capacity (TAC) of fresh leaves of Kalanchoe pinnata, J Pharmacogn Phytochem, 2014; 2(5):32-35.
30. Kishore N, Dwivedi R.S, Zerumbone: a potential fungitoxic agent isolated from Zingiber cassumunar Roxb, Mycopathologia, 1992; 120(3):155-159.
31. Thembo KM, Vismer HF, Nyazema NZ, Gelderblom WCA, Keterere DR, Antifungal activity of four weedy plant extracts against selected mycotoxigenic fungi, J Appl Microbiol, 2010; 109:1479-1486.
32. Yazdani D, Tan YH, Abidin ZMA, Jaganath IB, A review on bioactive compounds isolated from plants against plant pathogenic fungi, J Med Plants Res, 2011; 5(30) 6584-6589.
33. Ngadze E, In vitro and greenhouse evaluation of botanical extracts for antifungal activity against Phythopthora infestans, J Biopestic, 2014; 7(2):199-204.
34. Pawar BT, Antifungal activity of some seed extracts against seed-borne pathogenic fungi, Int Arch Appl Sci Technol, 2015; 6(2):44-46.
35. Karthik KN, Ankith GN, Avinash HC, Rajesh MR, Kekuda PTR, Raghavendra HL, Antifungal activity of some botanicals against seed-borne fungi, J Agric Food Nat Resour, 2017; 1(1):40-43.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).