Pharmacognostical and Phytochemical evaluation of root of Asparagus racemosus Willd.
Aim of this is to examine the Pharmacognastical and Phytochemical properties of Asparagus racemosus. The qualitative microscopy, Phytochemical screening, physicochemical evolution, fluorescence analysis and HPTLC studies were carried out according to the standard procedure recommended in WHO guidelines. The root had compactly arranged, uniseriate, polygonal to radially elongated, thick walled cell represent the outermost piliferous layer. Immediately laying below the epidermis is extensively developed, several layers of thick cortex made up of parenchymatous cells. The cortical cells contain raphide bundles. The innermost one or two layer of cortex immediately outside the endodermis comprises thick-walled cells, with the numerous oval or circular pits on their walls. Endodermis is composed of a single layer of compactly arranged, barrel-shaped parenchymatous cells. Inner to endodermis is a single layer of thin-walled, parenchymatous cells constituting the pericycle in the form of a ring, which surrounds a central stele. Phytochemical investigation of root shows total ash (6.5 %w/w), acid insoluble ash (1.3% w/w), and water-soluble ash (2.2% w/w).Â Loss on drying is (5.5% w/w). Cold extractive value in pet, ether (0.5%% w/w) in chloroform (3.4% w/w), methanol (8.0 % w/w) and in water (10.2% w/w). Hot extractive value in pet. ether (0.9% w/w),Â in chloroform (4.6 % w/w), methanol (10.40 % w/w) andÂ in waterÂ (11.2% w/w). In methanolic extract and aqueous extract, tannins and saponins present in a major amount. Other constituents include carbohydrate, glycosides and phenolic compounds were present. Various pharmacognistical parameters evaluated in this study help in identification and standardization of the root of Asparagus racemosus.Keywords:Â Asparagus racemosus Willd, Satavar; Phytochemical investigation, Phytochemistry
2. Venkatesh S, Madhava RB, Suresh B, Swamy MM, Ramesh M. Pharmacognostical identification of Rumex nepallensis Spreng (Polygonanceae)- an adulterant for Indian Rhubarb. Nat Prod Sci. 2004; 10:43-47.
3. Kirtikar KR and Basu BD.(Book) Indian medicinal plants (India), 2nd ed., Vol. 2, India press publisher, Allahabad, India. 1989, 2389.
4. Rastogi Ram P, Malhotra BN. Indian medicinal plants. Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi, 1989; 4:189-192.
5. Satyavati GV, Raina MK, Sharma M. Medicinal Plants of India. Indian council of Medical Research, New Delhi. 1976, Vol. IV, 123-125.
6. Satyavati GV, Gupta AK. Medicinal Plants of India. Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi. 1987, Vol. II. 1275-1280.
7. Husain A, Virmani OP, Popli SP, Misra LN, Gupta MM,Srivastava GN. Dictionary of Indian Medicinal Plants. Lucknow, India, CIMAP, 1992, 546.
8. Goyal RK, Singh J, Lal H. Asparagus racemosusâ€” an update. Ind J Med Sci. 2003; 57:408â€“414.
9. Hussain A, Ahmad MP, Wahab S, Hussain MS, Ali M. A Review on Pharmacological and Phytochemical Profile of Asparagus racemosus Willd. Pharmacologyonline. 2011; 3:1353-1364.
10. Wallis TE. Text book of Pharmacognosy, CBS Publisher and Distributors, 2001, 68-78.
11. Indian Pharmacopoeia, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, Controller of Publication, 1985; 310.
12. Harbone JB. Phytochemical Method, Chapman Hall, 1988, 117-119.
13. Mohammed A. Text Book of Pharmacognosy, CBS Publishers and Distributors, 1994; 81, 116, 372, 447.
14. Agrawal OP. Advanced practical organic chemistry, Goel Publishing House, 2000, 43-59.
15. Divakar MC. Plant Drug Evaluation, CD Remedies Publication, 2002; 49-52, 84-89.
16. Chang C, Yang M, Wen H, Chern J. Estimation of total flavonoid content in propolis by two complementary colorimetric methods. J Food Drug Anal. 2002; 10:178-182.
17. Singleton V L, Orthofer R, Lamuela-Raventos R M. Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of Folinâ€“Ciocalteau reagent. Meth Enzymol. 1999; 299:152â€“178.
18. Joshi J, Sukh Dev. Chemistry of Ayurvedic crude drugs: part VIII: Shatavari-2: Structure elucidation of bioactive Shatavarin-I and other glycosides. Ind J Chem. 1988; 27B:12-16.
19. Dinakaran SK, Banji D, Godala P, Harani A. Pharmacognostical evaluation study on Crotalaria juncea Linn. American-Eurasian J Sci Res. 2011; 6(3):139-145.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (SeeÂ The Effect of Open Access).